[The role of S100B-protein in neonatology, pediatric intensive care, and pediatrics]

The role of EEG recordings in children undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Neurological dysfunction may occur after corrective cardiac surgery using cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) with or without circulatory arrest. Different neurophysiological monitoring systems have been employed to detect neurological complications and possible brain injury in infants and children during and after cardiac surgery. The value of Elecetroencephalogram (EEG) in infants and children at risk for neurological sequelae has not been systematically studied.

METHODS

Sequential performance of two EEGs before and after cardiac surgery at a tertiary University Hospital to screen for possible brain injury after cardiac surgery in neonates and children undergoing CPB surgery. In addition, a complete neurological examination and assessment by a physiotherapist was performed.

RESULTS

Over a 4-year period, in 313 patients (age: 54.2 ± 55.7 months; normal initial EEG) after cardiac surgery CPB (duration of surgery: 146.0 ± 58.9 min; aortic cross clamp time: 34.1 ± 19.1 min), a 19-channel EEG recording was performed 2.4 ± 1.8 days prior to and 11.6 ± 5.3 days after cardiac surgery. An abnormal EEG was detected in only 8 of 313 patients (2.5%; focal slowing: 1, generalised slowing: 5, epiletiform discharges: 2) after cardiac surgery, while the EEG was normal in the remaining 305 patients (97.5%). In 1 patient, an intra-cerebral pathology was seen on MRI (ischemic); in 5 patients, follow-up EEGs were performed, which revealed normalized findings. None of the 8 patients demonstrated new focal neurological deficits on physical examination, but 33 (9.7%) children demonstrated minor abnormalities (e.g., subtle motor asymmetry, increase in muscle tone, etc.), which were unrelated to abnormal EEG findings.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the used protocol, pathological EEG findings were very infrequent in our study cohort. The routine and indiscriminative recording of EEGs in children before and after corrective or palliative cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease using CPB is not recommended. Further intra-operative neuromonitoring methods with immediate intervention should be evaluated.

Diagnostic approach to children with minor traumatic brain injury

STUDY PURPOSE

To analyse the management of minor traumatic brain injury (MTBI) in paediatric hospitals in Germany.

METHODS

An electronic survey was sent to 72 children hospitals.

RESULTS

All participating (45/72; 62.5 %) hospitals had facilities to perform an electroencephalogram (EEG), 98 % cranial ultrasonography, 94 % MRI studies, and 87 % a CT scan. The initial Glasgow Coma Scale, the clinical presentation/neurological deficits, the intensity of the trauma and external/visible injuries were most important for initial assessment. The main reason for in-patient monitoring was initial clinical neurologic presentation (44 %). X-ray scans were used routinely in only 2.2 %, cMRI scans in 6.7 % and cCT scans in 13.3 %; approximately one third employed ultrasonography. In 22.2 % was an EEG part of the routine diagnostic work-up. Inpatient monitoring for 24-48 h was done in 80 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with MTBI are often monitored clinically without resorting to potentially harmful and expensive diagnostic procedures (cCT scans).

Electroencephalogram in children with minor traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is one of the most frequent causes for hospitalisation in childhood. Because of different guidelines in the management the diagnostic approach varies substantially. Apart from neuroimaging studies (CT, MRI, sonography) an electroencephalogram (EEG) is often performed without any evidence-based data supporting its use.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 150 children with MTBI (age 0-16 years), who were admitted to the Children's Hospital of the University of Saarland from January 2006 to December 2007.

RESULTS

Mean age was 4.3 (SD 3.6) years: 55.3% were boys. The most common mechanisms of injury were: Minor fall <1 m of height (60%) and fall >1.5 m of height (10%). The most common symptoms were: one or more episodes of vomiting (60%), somnolence (26.7%) and headache (12.7%). On 118 patients an EEG was performed; 106 (89.8%) were normal, 11 (9.3%) pathological and 1 (0.9%) invalid because of artefacts. The pathological EEGs showed focal findings with localised slowing in nine cases, spike-wave complexes in one case and general slowing in one case. Of the 11 patients with pathological EEG, two had a CT scan, two a MRI and two had cranial sonography; all the neuro-imaging was normal. None of the children required neurosurgical intervention, had a negative outcome or showed persistent symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The routine performance of an EEG after MTBI in children is not indicated because in most of the cases it is unrevealing, and may lead to unnecessary diagnostic procedures. Instead, children with MTBI should be closely monitored for possible clinical complications and neurological deterioration.

Diagnostic value of S100B and neuron-specific enolase in mild pediatric traumatic brain injury

OBJECT

During recent years, several biomarkers have been introduced for use in the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary objective of this investigation was to determine if S100B (or S100 calcium-binding protein B) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) serum concentrations can effectively be used to discriminate between symptomatic and asymptomatic children with minor head trauma.

METHODS

The authors conducted a prospective clinical study that involved patients age 6 months to 15 years who had sustained minor head trauma. Children with concomitant extracranial injuries were excluded. Blood samples were obtained within 6 hours of injury to measure S100B and NSE levels in serum. The authors defined 2 diagnostic groups: a mild TBI group (patients with Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] scores of 13-15) in whom there were clinical signs of concussion (short loss of consciousness, amnesia, nausea, vomiting, somnolence, headache, dizziness, or impaired vision) and a head contusion group (patients with a GCS score of 15) in whom symptoms were absent. Both S100B and NSE concentrations were compared between the 2 groups. Secondary end points were defined as follows: correlation of S100B/NSE and a) the presence of scalp lacerations, b) GCS score, c) age, and d) correlation between S100B and NSE.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-eight patients were enrolled (53 in the contusion group, 95 in the mild TBI group). After adjusting for differences in age and time of injury to blood sample withdrawal, there was no significant difference in S100B or NSE between patients in the 2 groups. Scalp lacerations and GCS score had no affect on posttraumatic S100B or NSE concentrations. The correlation between S100B and NSE was significant. Both markers showed a significant negative correlation with age.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors demonstrated that S100B and NSE do not discriminate between symptomatic and asymptomatic children with minor head injury. There seem to be limitations in marker sensitivity when investigating pediatric patients with mild TBI.