CT-Koronarangiographie bei Patienten mit Vorhofflimmern

[Evaluation of 320-row area detector computed tomography (ADCT) coronary angiography for patients with atrial fibrillation]

The aim of this study was to evaluate 320-row area detector CT (ADCT) for patients with atrial fibrillation (Af) based on simulated exposure using electrocardiogram RR intervals and comparison with the findings of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) using 64-row multi slice CT (MSCT). The probability of including RR intervals of 900 ms or more was calculated when the acquisition time was varied from 1 to 4 beats. Overall, 51 patients with Af who underwent CCTA were examined. The exposure time for CCTA, the total dose length product (DLP) for the examination, and the image quality (scored 0 to 3: poor to excellent) were compared between ADCT and MSCT. The probability of including RR intervals of 900 ms or more was highly significantly increased at 3 beats of acquisition time. The exposure time using ADCT was reduced by 75% compared with MSCT (ADCT/MSCT: 2.8/11.3 s), and the total DLP was reduced by 40% (ADCT/MSCT: 1398/2277 mGy·cm). Moreover, ADCT provided diagnosable images in all cases, and the mean image quality score for ADCT was significantly higher than that for MSCT (ADCT/MSCT: 2.8/2.4). Thus, 320-row ADCT at 3 beats of acquisition time can provide CCTA images of acceptable quality for patients with Af.

Gated multidetector computed tomography. A technique to reduce intracranial aneurysm clip and coil artifacts

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Streak artifacts caused by aneurysm clips and coils impede image quality in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The authors propose a technique to minimize these artifacts by gated data reconstruction and shifting the reconstruction window.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Intracranial CT angiograms were acquired in the follow-up of six patients with clipped and coiled intracranial aneurysms, respectively. Images were reconstructed from four consecutive 45 degrees rotated segments with an acquisition time of 52.5 ms/segment. Data acquisition was gated via an external pacemaker cable-connected to the scanner.

RESULTS

Artifact orientation could be rotated by shifting the reconstruction window and interesting vessel segments visualized without disturbing streak artifacts. This allowed to assess the posterior communicating artery origin in two cases and a middle cerebral artery aneurysm remnant in another case, respectively. However, due to a higher noise interesting vessel segments were not adjustable in another three patients.

CONCLUSION

Gated MDCT is a promising technique to reduce the amount and to change the position of artifacts induced by clips or coils.

64-MDCT coronary angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation: influence of heart rate on image quality and efficacy in evaluation of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effects of mean heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality at coronary 64-MDCT angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation and to determine the efficacy of coronary 64-MDCT angiography in the detection of significant (> 50%) coronary artery stenosis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixty patients (37 women, 23 men; mean age, 58.7 years) underwent both coronary 64-MDCT angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Heart rate variability was calculated as the SD from the mean heart rate during scanning. Image quality (good, moderate, or poor) and the presence of significant (> 50%) stenosis at coronary CT angiography were evaluated by two radiologists blinded to the results of conventional coronary angiography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of coronary CT angiography were calculated with conventional angiography as the reference standard. Pearson's correlation analysis and chi-square tests were performed to compare image quality with mean heart rate and heart rate variability in each patient. Differences in detection of coronary artery stenosis between coronary 64-MDCT angiography and conventional coronary angiography were evaluated with McNemar's test, and agreement between techniques was calculated with kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The mean heart rate was 90 +/- 13.1 beats/min with variability of 19.35 +/- 6.95 beats/min. Of 803 segments evaluated, 26 (3%) were considered to have poor image quality. Highly significant correlation was found between mean heart rate and image quality for all segments in each patient (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), for the right coronary artery (r = 0.43, p = 0.001), and for the distal portion of the coronary arteries (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). Heart rate variability also correlated in a highly significant way with image quality in all segments (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), the right coronary artery (r = 0.46, p < 0.001), and the middle (r = 0.44, p = 0.001) and distal (r = 0.41, p = 0.001) portions of the coronary arteries. The best diagnostic image quality was obtained in end systole (200-400 milliseconds). Image quality decreased significantly with a mean heart rate greater than 100 beats/min or with an SD of heart rate greater than 24 beats/min. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value per segment level were 86.4%, 99.3%, 79.2%, and 99.6%. No significant difference was found between coronary 64-MDCT angiography and conventional coronary angiography in detection of significant stenosis. Excellent agreement between techniques was found.

CONCLUSION

Coronary 64-MDCT angiography has diagnostic image quality within a wide range of heart rates and in patients with atrial fibrillation. Reducing average heart rate and heart rate variability in patients with atrial fibrillation is beneficial in improving image quality.

Coronary CT angiography using 64 detector rows: methods and design of the multi-centre trial CORE-64

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses is a promising candidate for widespread clinical application because of its non-invasive nature and high sensitivity and negative predictive value as found in several previous studies using 16 to 64 simultaneous detector rows. A multi-centre study of CT coronary angiography using 16 simultaneous detector rows has shown that 16-slice CT is limited by a high number of nondiagnostic cases and a high false-positive rate. A recent meta-analysis indicated a significant interaction between the size of the study sample and the diagnostic odds ratios suggestive of small study bias, highlighting the importance of evaluating MSCT using 64 simultaneous detector rows in a multi-centre approach with a larger sample size. In this manuscript we detail the objectives and methods of the prospective "CORE-64" trial ("Coronary Evaluation Using Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography Angiography using 64 Detectors"). This multi-centre trial was unique in that it assessed the diagnostic performance of 64-slice CT coronary angiography in nine centres worldwide in comparison to conventional coronary angiography. In conclusion, the multi-centre, multi-institutional and multi-continental trial CORE-64 has great potential to ultimately assess the per-patient diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography using 64 simultaneous detector rows.

Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT in the assessment of coronary artery stenosis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

CT and invasive coronary angiography were performed on 114 patients (mean age, 62 years) referred for known coronary artery disease (n = 26), atypical chest pain (n = 58), and presurgical exclusion of coronary artery disease before abdominal aortic (n = 14) or cardiac valve (n = 16) surgery. The population was divided into two groups depending on median average heart rate (60.0 beats/min) and median heart rate variability (2.7 beats/min) during scanning. Heart rate variability was calculated as SD from the mean heart rate. Two blinded observers using a 4-point scale independently assessed the quality of images of each coronary artery segment and classified each segment as being stenosed (luminal diameter narrowing > 50%) or not. Invasive coronary angiography was used as the reference standard.

RESULTS

In 71 (62.3%) of the patients, 241 significant coronary artery stenoses were identified with invasive coronary angiography. In 11 (9.7%) of the patients, 1.6% (26/1,672) of the segments were not evaluable with CT. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in a patient-based analysis were 97%, 81%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. Image quality was better (p < 0.05) in the low average heart rate group than in the high average heart rate group, but diagnostic accuracy was comparable for the two groups. In contrast, image quality and diagnostic accuracy were significantly better (p < 0.01) among patients in the low heart rate variability group than in the high heart rate variability group.

CONCLUSION

Lower heart rate variability is associated with higher diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiography.

Effectiveness of dual-source CT coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of dual-source CT for significant coronary stenosis (>50% narrowing) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), by using conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent were obtained. Fifteen consecutive patients (nine men, six women; mean age, 58.47 years) were examined. Image quality (good, moderate, or poor) and significant stenosis (>50%) were evaluated by two radiologists blinded to the conventional coronary angiography results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) were calculated. McNemar test was used to search for any significant difference between dual-source CT and conventional coronary angiography in helping detect coronary stenosis. kappa statistics were calculated for intermodality and interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Sixteen segments by reader 1 and 13 segments by reader 2 were considered as poor image quality and rejected for further analysis. All segments with good image quality were correctly diagnosed. The respective overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values were 87%, 98%, 77%, and 99% for reader 1 and 80%, 99%, 80%, and 99% for reader 2. No significant difference between dual-source CT and conventional coronary angiography was found in helping detect significant stenosis. kappa statistics demonstrated good intermodality and excellent interobserver agreement.

CONCLUSION

Dual-source CT technology provides a temporal resolution that allows CT coronary angiography at higher heart rates and even with AF.

Usefulness of noninvasive cardiac imaging using dual-source computed tomography in an unselected population with high prevalence of coronary artery disease

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new dual-source computed tomographic scanner generation with 83-ms temporal resolution in cardiac imaging. Fifty-one unselected consecutive patients (mean age 64 +/- 10 years) scheduled for invasive coronary angiography because of suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) were examined with dual-source computed tomography (DSCT). All coronary segments were analyzed regarding the presence of coronary artery lesions. The findings were compared with invasive coronary angiography. During computed tomographic examination, mean heart rate was 65 +/- 14 beats/min. Thirteen of 51 patients (25%) did not have sinus rhythm. Mean Agatston score equivalent was 779 (median 358, range 0 to 3,898). Prevalence of CAD was 75%. Based on a coronary segment model, sensitivity was 96%, specificity 87%, positive predictive value 61%, and negative predictive value 99% for the detection of significant lesions (> or =50% diameter stenosis). The main reason for false-positive results was an overestimation of mild lesions by DSCT. In conclusion, our initial data indicate that DSCT allows a high accuracy to exclude relevant coronary stenosis in unselected patients with a high prevalence of CAD and a relevant number with heart rhythm irregularities. However, overestimation of stenosis, especially in cases of calcifications, is still a limitation.

Triage of patients with suspected coronary artery disease using multislice computed tomography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Several studies have shown that multislice computed tomography (MSCT) has a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting coronary artery stenoses. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether MSCT can reliably triage patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or no revascularization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 123 patients with suspected CAD who were referred for conventional coronary angiography (CATH) additionally underwent MSCT (16*0.5 mm detector collimation). Therapeutic decisions made on the basis of CATH and MSCT strictly following current guidelines for treatment of CAD were compared with decisions made by a cardiac surgeon and an interventional cardiologist. Only MSCTs with at least adequate image quality in all coronary segments were included in the analysis (94/123).

RESULTS

Decisions made on the basis of MSCT and CATH according to guidelines did not differ significantly (agreement of 88%, 82 of 94, P = .319). The therapeutic decisions made by the interventional cardiologist and the cardiac surgeon based on CATH differed significantly (overall agreement of 79%, 74 of 94 cases, P < .001; cardiologist: 78% PCI and 22% CABG versus surgeon: 38% PCI and 62% CABG), whereas there was 100% agreement regarding decisions for or against invasive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

MSCT shows good agreement with CATH in triaging patients with suspected CAD to CABG, PCI, or no revascularization. The choice of revascularization procedure is significantly more strongly influenced by whether an interventional cardiologist or a cardiac surgeon makes the decision than by the diagnostic test on which the decision is based.