Differences in infantile growth patterns in Turner syndrome girls with and without spontaneous puberty

Normalization of puberty and adult height in girls with Turner syndrome: results of the Swedish Growth Hormone trials initiating transition into adulthood

Objective

To study the impact of GH dose and age at GH start in girls with Turner syndrome (TS), aiming for normal height and age at pubertal onset (PO) and at adult height (AH). However, age at diagnosis will limit treatment possibilities.

Methods

National multicenter investigator-initiated studies (TNR 87-052-01 and TNR 88-072) in girls with TS, age 3-16 years at GH start during year 1987-1998, with AH in 2003-2011. Of the 144 prepubertal girls with TS, 132 girls were followed to AH (intention to treat), while 43 girls reduced dose or stopped treatment prematurely, making n=89 for Per Protocol population. Age at GH start was 3-9 years (young; n=79) or 9-16 years (old; n=53). Treatment given were recombinant human (rh)GH (Genotropin^® Kabi Peptide Hormones, Sweden) 33 or 67 µg/kg/day, oral ethinyl-estradiol (2/3) or transdermal 17β-estradiol (1/3), and, after age 11 years, mostly oxandrolone. Gain in height_SDS, AH_SDS, and age at PO and at AH were evaluated.

Results

At GH start, height_SDS was -2.8 (versus non-TS girls) for all subgroups and mean age for young was 5.7 years and that of old was 11.6 years. There was a clear dose-response in both young and old TS girls; the mean difference was (95%CI) 0.66 (-0.91 to -0.26) and 0.57 (-1.0 to -0.13), respectively. The prepubertal gain_SDS (1.3-2.1) was partly lost during puberty (-0.4 to -2.1). Age/height_SDS at PO ranged from 13 years/-0.42 for GH_67young to 15.2 years/-1.47 for GH_33old. At AH, GH_67old group became tallest (17.2 years; 159.9 cm; -1.27 SDS; total gain_SDS, 1.55) compared to GH_67young group being least delayed (16.1 years; 157.1 cm; -1.73 SDS; total, 1.08). The shortest was the GH_33young group (17.3 years; 153.7 cm: -2.28 SDS; total gain_SDS, 0.53), and the most delayed was the GH_33old group, (18.5 years; 156.5 cm; -1.82 SDS; total gain_SDS, 0.98).

Conclusion

For both young and old TS girls, there was a GH-dose growth response, and for the young, there was less delayed age at PO and at AH. All four groups reached an AH within normal range, despite partly losing the prepubertal gain during puberty. Depending on age at diagnosis, low age at start with higher GH dose resulted in greater prepubertal height gain, permitting estrogen to start earlier at normal age and attaining normal AH at normal age, favoring physiological treatment and possibly also bone health, hearing, uterine growth and fertility, psychosocial wellbeing during adolescence, and the transition to adulthood.

Hypothesis: exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals may interfere with timing of puberty

A recent decline in onset of puberty - especially among girls - has been observed, first in the US in the mid-1990s and now also in Europe. The development of breast tissue in girls occurs at a much younger age and the incidence of precocious puberty (PP) is increasing. Genetic factors and increasing prevalence of adiposity may contribute, but environmental factors are also likely to be involved. In particular, the widespread presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) is suspected to contribute to the trend of earlier pubertal onset. The factors regulating the physiological onset of normal puberty are poorly understood. This hampers investigation of the possible role of environmental influences. There are many types of EDCs. One chemical may have more than one mode of action and the effects may depend on dose and duration of the exposure, as well as the developmental stage of the exposed individual. There may also be a wide range of genetic susceptibility to EDCs. Human exposure scenarios are complex and our knowledge about effects of mixtures of EDCs is limited. Importantly, the consequences of an exposure may not be apparent at the actual time of exposure, but may manifest later in life. Most known EDCs have oestrogenic and/or anti-androgenic actions and only few have androgenic or anti-oestrogenic effects. Thus, it appears plausible that they interfere with normal onset of puberty. The age at menarche has only declined by a few months whereas the age at breast development has declined by 1 year; thus, the time span from initiation of breast development to menarche has increased. This may indicate an oestrogen-like effect without concomitant central activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. The effects may differ between boys and girls, as there are sex differences in age at onset of puberty, hormonal profiles and prevalence of precocius puberty.