S3-Guidelines Colorectal Cancer 2004

Clinical outcome after total neoadjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-12) versus intensified neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) a comparison between two multicenter randomized phase II/III trials

BACKGROUND

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) can enhance local tumor regression, but its survival benefits compared to intensified chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) remain unclear.

METHODS

This is a secondary comparison between 607 patients treated with intensified 5-FU/Oxaliplatin neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial, and 306 patients treated with TNT within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 phase II trial. Comparison between clinical-pathological characteristics, surgical quality, and post-surgical complications were analyzed using the Pearson's Chi-squared or Mann-Whitney U test. Oncological outcome was examined with log-rank, Gray's test, and multivariate cox regression. In addition, further subgroup analyses and propensity score matching were performed to optimize the balance of baseline covariates.

FINDINGS

Patients treated with CRT followed by consolidation CT had a significantly higher rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) compared to patients treated within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial (25.3 % vs 17.3 %, P = 0.04). Post-surgical complications were less common in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial. After a median follow-up of 46 months, clinical outcome did not differ significantly in the overall cohort, in any subgroup or after propensity score matching. In multivariate analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial and treatments arms of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial (vs arm A: HR 0.92 [95 % CI 0.62-1.37], P = 0.69; vs arm B: HR 1.06 [95 % CI 0.72-1.58], P = 0.76).

INTERPRETATION

Notwithstanding the limitations of intertrial comparison, TNT did not improve long term oncological outcome in our study compared to the intensified neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT treatment in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial. Improved response rates after TNT offers an attractive option to explore organ preservation in selective patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) cross-signaling via non-corresponding receptors indicates bypassed signaling in colorectal cancer

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling, besides other growth factor-mediated signaling pathways like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), seems to play a crucial role in tumor development and progression. We have recently provided evidence for upregulation of PDGF expression in UICC stage I-IV primary colorectal cancer (CRC) and demonstrated PDGF-mediated induction of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in CRC cell lines. The present study sought to follow up on our previous findings and explore the alternative receptor cross-binding potential of PDGF in CRC. Our analysis of primary human colon tumor samples demonstrated upregulation of the PDGFRβ, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 genes in UICC stage I-III tumors. Immunohistological analysis revealed co-expression of PDGF and its putative cross-binding partners, VEGFR2 and EGFR. We then analyzed several CRC cell lines for PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2 protein expression and found these receptors to be variably expressed amongst the investigated cell lines. Interestingly, whereas Caco-2 and SW480 cells showed expression of all analyzed receptors, HT29 cells expressed only VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. However, stimulation of HT29 cells with PDGF resulted in upregulation of VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 expression despite the absence of PDGFR expression and mimicked the effect of VEGF stimulation. Moreover, PDGF recovered HT29 cell proliferation under simultaneous treatment with a VEGFR or EGFR inhibitor. Our results provide some of the first evidence for PDGF cross-signaling through alternative receptors in colorectal cancer and support anti-PDGF therapy as a combination strategy alongside VEGF and EGF targeting even in tumors lacking PDGFR expression.

Endoscopic resection: when is EMR/ESD sufficient?

Endoscopic treatment of malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract can be treated curatively if the risk for lymph node metastasis is lower than 1%. In the lower gi-tract (colon and rectum) the low risk criteria for this situation are well-defined (G1/G2, LO, invasion depth ≤1000μm). However, en-bloc R0-resection is also mandatory. Benign lesions such as lateral spreading tumors (granular-type) can be also treated with piecemeal EMR, however, recurrence rate is up to 30%. All other cases, regardless of size, such as non-granular type lesions or mixed type lesions should be treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection. The definitive histopathology of the resected specimen allows further decision (e.g., surgery if invasion depth of tumor is >1000μm).

[Individualization of guidelines. Approach for rectal cancer in UICC stages II and III]

BACKGROUND

The German guidelines for the therapy of rectal carcinoma in Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stages II and III raise questions of overtherapy. This is why we have individualized the therapy in suitable isolated cases (localization in the upper third of the rectum and wider safety margins in cases of small T3).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All 131 patients with rectal cancer stages II and III, who were operated on within a time period of 4 years were retrospectively included in the study. In 30 favorable cases no radiotherapy was given and in 15 of these no chemotherapy. After an average of 57 months follow-up the course of the disease could be clarified in 95 % of the patients.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate in the whole group was 81.5 % with a local recurrence rate of 8 %. Of the patients with no additional therapy (or only adjuvant chemotherapy), 30 had a 5-year survival rate of 100 % (86.7 %) and a local recurrence rate of 6.7 % (6.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study it could be shown that an individualization of guidelines in special cases does not lead to a higher mortality rate or to a higher rate of local recurrence. The study highlights that chemotherapy and radiotherapy with all the negative consequences could be avoided for several patients.

[Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer]

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy has become established treatment for rectal cancer. It is indicated when primary R0 resection is not an option, in cases of higher risk of locoregional relapse following surgical treatment alone, and when initially impossible conservation of the anal sphincter becomes possible in conjunction with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. The indication for radiochemotherapy in the upper third of the rectum is still controversial. Reevaluation of the tumor situation following neoadjuvant treatment is necessary before decisions on operative strategy. Modern imaging techniques are limited in this respect, as they hardly allow differentiation between living tumor tissue and lesions. In case of doubt clarity is possible only through surgical exploration, taking R1 resection into account. Overall the recognition of lymph node metastasis is not a sufficient indicator of local relapse. The frequency of postoperative complications following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is independent of the operative method. The effect of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy on long-term survival and formation of distant metastases is still not clarified. Current studies seek clarification through the use of new chemotherapies and modified treatment regimes. Further, the correct time interval between the end of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and the following surgical therapy has yet to be determined. This applies also to the management of patients following complete remission.

Multivisceral resection for colon carcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of curative surgery for colon carcinoma is the complete resection of the neoplasm. In locally advanced colon carcinomas with adhesion to neighboring organs, standard surgical procedures often turn into multivisceral resections. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of multivisceral resection in primary colon carcinomas and factors influencing its success.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data for 174 patients from the Erlangen Registry for Colorectal Carcinomas who underwent multivisceral resection for colon carcinoma from 1978 through 2002 were analyzed. Multivisceral resection was defined as the excision or resection of at least one further organ in addition to the carcinoma-affected colon. Postoperative complications, locoregional tumor recurrence, distant metastases, and cancer-related survival were evaluated after a five-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Multivisceral resection most commonly involved parts of the small intestine (31.6%), urinary bladder (27.0%), and the abdominal wall (15.5%). R0 resection (no residual tumor) was achieved in 93.1%. Overall, postoperative complications occurred in 25.8%, and the postoperative mortality rate was 6.9%. For patients with R0 resection, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of five-year cancer-related survival was 80.7%; no patient with R1 or R2 resection survived for 5 years. The five-year rate of locoregional tumor recurrence was 6.5%, and the five-year rate of distant metastases was 24.2%. The presence of lymphatic metastases was a significant prognostic factor for locoregional tumor recurrence, distant metastases, and cancer-related survival.

CONCLUSION

The high percentage of R0 resections achieved through multivisceral resection justifies this procedure for locally advanced colon carcinomas and highlights the importance of experienced, well-trained surgeons to decrease the incidence of locoregional recurrence.

Exactitude of relative survival compared with cause-specific survival and competing risk estimations based on a clinical database of patients with colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Relative survival estimates are widely used by cancer registries. They provide survival rates adjusted for causes of death other than cancer. They have rarely been used in clinical settings. When compared with cause-specific survival rates or competing risks analysis, their applicability is hardly known. This study compares these three outcome measures on the basis of a well-documented clinical database of patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We selected a consecutive series of 1,791 histopathologically completely resected colorectal cancer patients without neoadjuvant therapy from a prospective database from 1981 through 2006. Median follow-up was 4.7 (range, 0-23) years with only 3.1% patients lost. Cause-specific and relative survival are reported as failure rates as is the cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks.

RESULTS

The analysis comprised 1,081 patients with colon cancer and 710 patients with rectal cancer. Stage distribution was as follows: Stage I, 480 patients; Stage II, 785 patients; Stage III, 472 patients; and Stage IV, 54 patients. The "cause-specific" failure rate, the "relative" failure rate, and the cumulative incidence in the presence of competing risks at five years (95% CI) for all patients were 21.1 (range, 19.0-23.4) %, 22.5 (range, 19.6-25.2) %, and 19.0 (range, 17.0-20.9) %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Because we could demonstrate almost identical failure rates, we consider relative survival to be a powerful tool in clinical settings in which a comprehensive follow-up is not possible. It is especially useful as a reference parameter for clinical audit.

Effect of total mesorectal excision on the outcome of rectal cancer after standardized postoperative radiochemotherapy: do randomized studies translate into clinical routine?

PURPOSE

To compare local control, disease-free survival and overall survival after postoperative radiochemotherapy with or without total mesorectal excision (TME) in a retrospective analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1993 and 2002, 103 patients with UICC stage II and III rectal cancer were treated by surgery and postoperative chemoradiation. Group B (n = 50; 1993-1998) were operated before TME era without using TME and group A (n = 53; 1998-2002) with TME; both groups received identical radiochemotherapy to a total dose of 50.4 Gy (median) and two courses of continuous 5-fluorouracil infusion.

RESULTS

Patients in group A (TME) showed a significant improvement in 5-year disease-free survival (71.1%; 46.8%) and freedom from distant metastases (76.3%; 46.9%) and a marked improvement of local control (85.2%; 62.5%). Acute and late toxicity were significantly less frequent in group A.

CONCLUSION

Radiochemotherapy cannot compensate an insufficient surgical procedure. These data confirm that TME is the standard. High outcome quality can be achieved in daily practice compared to results of randomized studies without patient selection.

Cdc2 as prognostic marker in stage UICC II colon carcinomas

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdc2) controls the G2-M checkpoint and, therefore, the entrance of cells into mitosis. It might play a crucial role during tumour progression in colon carcinomas (CCA). Thus, the prognostic value of cdc2 expression and connected markers relevant for proliferation and apoptosis has to be evaluated.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Punch biopsies from the tumour centre and the invasion front of 0.6mm diameter from 392 CCA stage UICC II-IV were integrated in 14 recipient paraffin blocks. After immunohistochemical staining for cdc2, p53, caspase 3 and ki-67, a present (+) and absent (-) scoring was performed in the tissue arrays. The logrank test was used to compare distant metastasis and cancer-related survival. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was done to identify independent prognostic factors for parameters with significant influence on cancer-related survival (CRS) and distant metastasis (DM).

RESULTS

The pT-category (p=0.007), nodal status (p<0.001), extramural venous infiltration (p<0.001) and lymphatic vessel invasion (p=0.003) were identified as independent histological parameters for CRS. Univariate analysis relating to stage UICC II-IV CCA showed caspase 3 in the tumour centre (p=0.047) to be a prognostic marker for CRS. In stage UICC II cdc2 (p=0.041) and caspase 3 in the invasion front (p=0.026) could be identified as independent prognostic factors for CRS and DM by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cdc2 and caspase 3 could be identified as independent prognostic markers in stage UICC II CCA. They might be of value to select patients who should receive adjuvant treatment.

Indications and techniques for lower intestinal endoscopy

The search for inflammatory and neoplastic lesions are the main indications for colonoscopy. A high rate of detection of polyps has become a quality criterion that depends on skilled handling of the colonoscope, on expertise and concentration during the examination, on excellent bowel preparation, and on a high standard of technical equipment. The diagnostic benefits outweigh the risk of bleeding, perforation and infection in almost all situations. Contraindications are signs of perforated intestine or imminent perforation due to deep ulcerations, necroses, or fulminant colitis. The patient's comorbidity must be considered to assess the physical stress of bowel preparation, colonoscopy and sedation. Informed consent is necessary and must be documented in all cases. It is advisable to explain planned therapeutic manoeuvres before the examination, since all non-invasive polyps must be removed completely. Total colonoscopy is possible in 95-99% of cases, but technical efforts are under way to solve the problem of looping and fixed colon angulations. Optimising optical imaging is another main focus of industrial development. The combination of narrow-band imaging, zoom magnification, and high-definition processor technology is currently the most promising tool for identifying small and flat lesions in the colon.

Combined Chemotherapy with Mitomycin C, Folinic Acid, and 5-Fluorouracil (MiFoFU) as Salvage Treatment for Patients with Liver Metastases from Breast Cancer - a Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the activity and tolerability of a combined chemotherapy with mitomycin C, folinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil (MiFoFU) in patients with hepatic metastases from breast cancer, and in particular in patients with impaired liver function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied the charts of 44 patients who were treated with a MiFoFU combination therapy because of progressive metastatic breast cancer. Predominant site of metastases was the liver. Primary endpoints were response and time to progression (TTP); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and tolerability. RESULTS: Median age prior to treatment was 59 years. A median of 6 treatment cycles were administered per patient. Clinical benefit rate amounted to 64%. A mean TTP of 9 months and a mean OS of 14 months were found. Main clinical signs of nonhematological toxicity were stomatitis, nausea, and diarrhea. Grade III/IV hematotoxicity was seen in only 9 patients. 16 patients showed clinical signs of liver dysfunction. A clinical benefit could be achieved in 8 of these patients. CONCLUSION: MiFoFU combination chemotherapy is a well-tolerated treatment alternative in the palliative therapy of patients with liver metastases from breast cancer. Particularly in patients with hepatic dysfunction, this regimen seems to represent a helpful treatment option.

[Medicinal prevention of gastrointestinal tumors: aspirin, Helicobacter and more?]

Despite the huge number of drugs on the market and recent advances in pharmacotherapy, only a few substances are available for the prevention of gastrointestinal tumors--most of which are not approved for this indication or not validated in appropriately designed randomized trials. General recommendations include lifestyle modifications such as avoidance of smoking, only moderate consumption of alcohol, regular physical exercise and a nutrition rich in fresh fruits and vegetables with limited meat. A global eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori would be desirable to prevent gastric carcinoma, but this does not seem feasible from the socio-economic point of view. Therefore, at least patients at high risk should be screened and this pathogen eradicated, preferentially in their youth. Hepatitis B vaccination of newborns to prevent the development of hepatocellular carcinoma has already been established in Germany; a specific antiviral therapy should be offered to all patients with hepatitis B or C infections, taking into consideration the risks associated with this treatment. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to prevent gastrointestinal malignancies cannot generally be recommended and should be restricted to patients at high risk and to clinical studies. However, the appropriate substance, dose and duration of NSAID therapy are still being debated.

Activity and tolerability of a combined palliative chemotherapy with mitomycin C, folinate, and 5-Fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer after intensive pretreatment: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of a combined chemotherapy containing mitomycin, folinate, and 5-fluorouracil (MiFoFU) in patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer and reduced performance status, ie, elderly patients or heavily pretreated patients.

METHODS

We studied the charts of 76 patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer who received MiFoFU chemotherapy at our institution between 1997 and 2003. Primary end points were response and time-to-progression (TTP); secondary end points were overall survival (OAS) and tolerability.

RESULTS

Median age was 57 years. Seventeen patients had > or =2 palliative cytostatic treatments before; 19 patients were older 65 years. Patients received a median of 6 cycles. Clinical benefit rate was 58%. After MiFoFU, median TTP and OAS were 8 months and 14 months, respectively. Main nonhematologic toxicity was stomatitis (grade I/II, 21%) and diarrhea (grade I/II, 37%). Grade III/IV hematotoxicity was seen in 18 patients (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

A combined MiFoFU chemotherapy is a well-tolerated treatment option in the palliative therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer. In particular, the favorable efficacy/toxicity ratio in intensively pretreated or elderly patients makes this combination a reasonable alternative within these settings.