[Advance directives in the prehospital setting -- emergency physicians' attitudes]

[Medicolegal aspects in emergency medical care : Analysis of the frequency of advance health care directives and the influence on decision making in emergency medicine]

BACKGROUND

Medical decisions in an emergency medical services (EMS) situation are always extremely time- critical and sensitive, potentially leading to medicolegal consequences. Advance health care directives (AHCDs) are crucial components in the patients' participative decision making. When a patient refuses resuscitation, and/or other life-extending treatments, emergency physicians face possible ethical, medical, and medicolegal conflicts.

METHODS

As part of the RIMANO II Study [Risk Management Präklinische (prehospital) Notfallmedizin (emergency medicine)], all 18 "emergency physician bases" of the Berlin Fire Department were polled regarding the influence of AHCDs in regard to emergency medical decision making. The assessment was based on anonymous questionnaires. Furthermore, emergency medical suggestions for improvement of AHCDs were gathered. Descriptive statistics and qualitative methods were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 112 responses from emergency physicians could be incorporated into the study. Anesthesiologists represented the largest group (n = 55, 49 %), followed by internists (n = 40, 36 %). The median length of experience in EMS was 7 years [interquartile range (IQR) 4-14 years]. Patients' "do not resuscitate" orders were obeyed in 78/112 cases (70 %, 95 % CI 69-78 %). In 49/112 cases (44 %, 95 % CI 34-53 %), the request to not be hospitalized was granted. The length of EMS experience, type of medical specialty, the number of EMS cases and ways in which AHCDs were handled were all contributing factors to the various emergency medical interventions.

CONCLUSION

AHCDs appear to have an influence in the emergency medical decision process. However, it is presently unclear as to what a standardized and universally comprehensible AHCD should look like, in order to provide a framework that is both acceptable and necessary in a prehospital emergency medicine environment, ensuring medicolegal certainty for the parties involved.

[Advance directives in prehospital emergency treatment : prospective questionnaire-based analysis]

BACKGROUND

The handling of advance directives (AD) in prehospital emergency treatment in Germany is characterized by instability. In the project "Advance directives in preclinical emergency medical aid" ("Patientenverfügungen in der präklinischen Notfallmedizin") the frequency and quality of ADs in emergency situations was investigated.

AIM

The aim of this study was to fill the gaps in research and to collate data on how consideration of the self-determination of patients in emergency situations can be optimized.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Over a period of 12 months from December 2007 to December 2008 a questionnaire was included in the emergency documentation of the medical emergency service in Aachen. Emergency patients were asked by emergency physicians to provide an AD and the quantitative as well as qualitative features of these ADs were examined. Furthermore, the study recorded what kinds of problems occurred with ADs in emergency situations and what measures were needed to correct this deficiency. The reactions of patients were documented on a numeral rating scale with a score of 1 reflecting a negative and 10 reflecting a positive reaction. In the 12-month period emergency doctors recorded 1,321 missions and after application of the exclusion criteria (e.g. missing signature, incomplete documentation and late delivery) 1,047 documented questionnaires were available for the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 127 out of 1,047 emergency patients provided an AD, 44 had a durable power of attorney and 27 had appointed a legal representative for healthcare. Of the emergency patients 20 had a legal attendant and 43 out of the 127 ADs could be presented to the emergency team during the emergency mission. The emergency team often encountered difficulties regarding the handling of the ADs due to the time factor and unclear wording. The latter included the following problems: misleading formulation (19.1 %), difficulty with the complexity (14.9 %) and contradicting information (4 %). Only 29 (61.7 %) of the durable powers of attorney were signed and legally binding. From the view of the emergency physicians the following information was lacking but would be helpful in emergency situations: emergency plan, hierarchy of those given power of attorney, knowledge of risks regarding ADs and medication requirements.

CONCLUSION

The results show that for an AD to apply in an emergency situation certain standards are necessary that assure the practicability, especially if a patient does not wish to be resuscitated. Most difficulties with ADs occurred with imprecise formulation, text length and inconsistency of statements. The following instructions were usually missing: hierarchy of those given power of attorney and specification on medication, information about the scope of the ADs, statement about resuscitation, extent and limitations of the desired treatment, especially with patients certified as terminally ill and instructions on who should decide about medical treatment in a conflict situation. A so-called emergency instruction which gives on a single page the patient's statement on resuscitation would have been very helpful in individual cases. The results suggest that patients may need more information and education about AD to guarantee patients rights and self-determination.

Paramedics experiences and expectations concerning advance directives: a prospective, questionnaire-based, bi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Advance directives and palliative crisis cards are means by which palliative care patients can exert their autonomy in end-of-life decisions.

AIM

To examine paramedics' attitudes towards advance directives and end-of-life care.

DESIGN

Questionnaire-based investigation using a self-administered survey instrument.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Paramedics of two cities (Hamburg and Goettingen, Germany) were included. Participants were questioned as to (1) their attitudes about advance directives, (2) their clinical experiences in connection with end-of-life situations (e.g. resuscitation), (3) their suggestions in regard to advance directives, 'Do not attempt resuscitation' orders and palliative crisis cards.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were returned by 728 paramedics (response rate: 81%). The majority of paramedics (71%) had dealt with advance directives and end-of-life decisions in emergency situations. Most participants (84%) found that cardiopulmonary resuscitation in end-of-life patients is not useful and 75% stated that they would withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the case of legal possibility. Participants also mentioned that more extensive discussion of legal aspects concerning advance directives should be included in paramedic training curricula. They suggested that palliative crisis cards should be integrated into end-of-life care.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision making in prehospital end-of-life care is a challenge for all paramedics. The present investigation demonstrates that a dialogue bridging emergency medical and palliative care issues is necessary. The paramedics indicated that improved guidelines on end-of-life decisions and the termination of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in palliative care patients may be essential. Participants do not feel adequately trained in end-of-life care and the content of advance directives. Other recent studies have also demonstrated that there is a need for training curricula in end-of-life care for paramedics.

[Save life--allow death. Collation of emergency missions for terminally ill patients]

BACKGROUND

Emergency missions can also be necessary for patients in the terminal phase of a progressive incurable disease. The emergency physician, accustomed to acting under strict procedures and whose training focuses on the restoration and stabilization of acutely threatened vital functions, can face severe difficulties when treating incurably ill patients in the terminal phase. This study investigates the number of such cases, patient symptoms and the events occurring during life-threatening emergencies of terminally ill patients.

METHOD

All cases of emergency events involving terminally ill patients were analyzed prospectively. In addition to the standardized protocol (following DIVI/Mind 2) an enquiry sheet was used, which contained an 8-item checklist specifically for terminally ill patients, to be filled out by the responding physician.

RESULTS

The total number of patients in the terminal phase identified by the emergency physician was 55 (0.72% of total cases) and of these patients 30 (55%) were tumor patients. The most frequent complaint observed was dyspnea (30 patients, 55%), followed by relatives of the patients experiencing the stress of caring for a terminally ill person (19 patients, 35%). The leading symptom of 6 patients (11%) was pain. Only 17 cases (30.9%) required transport of the patient to hospital for further treatment.

CONCLUSION

Every emergency physician can be confronted with an emergency involving a patient with a progressive incurable disease. The condition of each patient must be assessed for each medical decision. Not only medical, but also psychosocial, ethical and legal aspects have to be considered.

[Palliative care and end-of-life patients in emergency situations. Recommendations on optimization of out-patient care]

BACKGROUND

At the end of life acute exacerbations of medical symptoms (e.g. dyspnea) in palliative care patients often result in emergency medical services being alerted. The goals of this study were to discuss cooperation between emergency medical and palliative care structures to optimize the quality of care in emergencies involving palliative care patients.

METHODS

For data collection an open discussion of the main topics by experts in palliative and emergency medical care was employed. Main outcome measures and recommendations included responses regarding current practices related to expert opinions and international literature sources.

RESULTS

As the essential points of consensus the following recommendations for optimization of care were named: (1) integration of palliative care in the emergency medicine curricula for pre-hospital emergency physicians and paramedics, (2) development of outpatient palliative care, (3) integration of palliative care teams into emergency medical structures, (4) cooperation between palliative and emergency medical care, (5) integration of crisis intervention into outpatient palliative emergency medical care, (6) provision of emergency plans and emergency medical boxes, (7) provision of palliative crisis cards and do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) orders, (8) psychosocial aspects concerning palliative emergencies and (9) definition of palliative patients and their special situation by the physician responsible for prior treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital emergency physicians are confronted with emergencies in palliative care patients every day. In the treatment of these emergencies there are potentially serious conflicts due to the different therapeutic concepts of palliative medical care and emergency medical services. This study demonstrates that there is a need for regulated criteria for the therapy of palliative patients and patients at the end of life in emergency situations. Overall, more clinical investigations concerning end-of-life care and unresponsive palliative care patients in emergency medical situations are necessary.

[Emergency medical treatment of palliative care patients at the end of life: regulatory emergency medical care framework--a case control investigation of medical intervention and advance directives]

BACKGROUND

The treatment of out-of-hospital palliative emergency care situations during cardiac arrest is a special situation. The prehospital emergency physician (EP) and the paramedic must be informed about the medical, legal, and ethical specifics of these situations, but this knowledge is not integrated within emergency medical curricula at all. We present a case study to discuss such legal and ethical specifics.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed six emergency cases with palliative care patients in the final stages of their illnesses. On the basis of these case studies, we present six different emergency cases with different regulatory frameworks for each EP and paramedic. In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, data were collected pseudonymously.

RESULTS

The six case studies show therapeutic concepts concerning the emergency medical care of palliative care patients during cardiac arrest. The differences are apparent in the treatment given by EPs and by paramedics (such as whether to start or stop resuscitation). EPs and paramedics differ in their therapeutic approach to these specific situations (e.g. paramedics more often start resuscitation during cardiac arrest even though patients would refuse this according to their advance directives). These differences may be important for the patient and his or her caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Every EP and paramedic may be involved in the care of palliative care patients who are at the end of their lives. EPs and paramedics do not always adapt their treatment to the will or supposed will of the patient (especially in accordance with the new German law concerning advance directives). The reasons for this usually concern legal uncertainties. Therefore, EPs and paramedics should know that different legal meanings could be important in emergency medical care therapy of palliative care patients. A written "do not resuscitate" order as an advance directive must be evaluated as a desired therapeutic limitation.

[Emergency outpatient palliative care in acute situations by paramedics]

BACKGROUND

In recent years outpatient palliative care, even for patients in an advanced state of their disease, has gained importance. Therefore, also paramedics are more often confronted with palliative emergencies, advance directives, and ethical end-of-life issues. Presently in emergency medicine there is undoubtedly a lack of education on palliative medicine and ethical questions for paramedics.

METHODS

In a period of six months we questioned 250 paramedics from two German regions (Göttingen and Braunschweig) about their experiences in palliative medicine, palliative emergencies and about their knowledge of advance directives. For these key questions we drew up a specific questionnaire.

RESULTS

The response rate in the set period of time amounted to 64.8% (n = 162). Most of the interviewed paramedics (91.4%, n = 148) had been confronted with palliative emergency situations on duty. 47.6% felt uncertain about the correct psychosocial care of the patients. 84% of the paramedics were insecure concerning their knowledge about advance directives. 72.8% had already taken care of patients with advance directives. These advance directives had influenced their therapy decision in 42.8%.

CONCLUSION

The emergency treatment of palliative patients can present a particular challenge to paramedics. Most of the interviewed paramedics felt insecure both about the social care and the assessment of legal issues in dealing with advance directives and decisions at the end of life. Therefore emergency medical training apparently needs to be improved in these fields. Further information and training are necessary to guarantee adequate patient-oriented care of palliative patients und their relatives also in emergency situations.

Quality of out-of-hospital palliative emergency care depends on the expertise of the emergency medical team--a prospective multi-centre analysis

BACKGROUND

The number of palliative care patients who live at home and have non-curable life-threatening diseases is increasing. This is largely a result of modern palliative care techniques (e.g. specialised out-of-hospital palliative medical care services), changes in healthcare policy and the availability of home care services. Accordingly, pre-hospital emergency physicians today are more likely to be involved in out-of-hospital emergency treatment of palliative care patients with advanced disease.

METHODS

In a prospective multi-centre study, we analysed all palliative emergency care calls during a 24-month period across four emergency services in Germany. Participating pre-hospital emergency physicians were rated according to their expertise in emergency and palliative care as follows--group 1: pre-hospital emergency physicians with high experience in emergency and palliative medical care, group 2: pre-hospital emergency physicians with high experience in emergency medical care but less experience in palliative medical care and group 3: pre-hospital emergency physicians with low experience in palliative and emergency medical care.

RESULTS

During the period of interest, the centres received 361 emergency calls requiring a response to palliative care patients (2.8% of all 12,996 emergency calls). Ten percent of all patients were treated by group 1; 42% were treated by group 2 and 47% were treated by group 3. There was a statistically significant difference in the treatment of palliative care patients (e.g. transfer to hospital, symptom control, end-of-life decision) as a result of the level of expertise of the investigated pre-hospital emergency physicians (p< 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In Germany, out-of-hospital emergency medical treatment of palliative care patients depends on the expertise in palliative medical care of the pre-hospital emergency physicians who respond to the call. In our investigation, best out-of-hospital palliative medical care was given by pre-hospital emergency physicians who had significant expertise in palliative and emergency medical care. Our results suggest that it may be necessary to take the core principles of palliative care into consideration when conducting out-of-hospital emergency medical treatment of palliative care patients.