[Postoperative autologous transfusion from blood drainage after total hip joint arthroplasty--how much value is really there?]

Does single use of an autologous transfusion system in TKA reduce the need for allogenic blood?: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Mechanical autotransfusion systems for washed shed blood (WSB) were introduced to reduce the need for postoperative allogenic blood transfusions (ABTs). Although some authors have postulated decreased requirements for ABT by using autologous retransfusion devices, other trials, mostly evaluating retransfusion devices for unwashed shed blood (USB), verified a small or no benefit in reducing the need for postoperative ABT. Because of these contradictory findings it is still unclear whether autologous retransfusion systems for WSB can reduce transfusion requirements.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore asked whether one such autologous transfusion system for WSB can reduce the requirements for postoperative ABT.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, we enrolled 151 patients undergoing TKA. In Group A (n=76 patients), the autotransfusion system was used for a total of 6 hours (intraoperatively and postoperatively) and the WSB was retransfused after processing. In Control Group B (n=75 patients), a regular drain without suction was used. We used signs of anemia and/or a hemoglobin value less than 8 g/dL as indications for transfusion. If necessary, we administered one or two units of allogenic blood.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (33%) in Group A, who received an average of 283 mL (range, 160-406 mL) of salvaged blood, needed a mean of 2.1 units of allogenic blood, compared with 23 patients (33%) in Control Group B who needed a mean of 2.1 units of allogenic blood.

CONCLUSIONS

We found the use of an autotransfusion system did not reduce the rate of postoperative ABTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Foreign blood saving measures in orthopedic surgery]

Major transfusion-free orthopaedic surgery can be performed successfully. This requires advanced planning, good routines and close collaborative team efforts. Since most blood saving techniques reduce blood usage by just 1-2 units, a series of integrated preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative blood saving approaches is required. These include preoperative autologous donation, erythropoietic support, acute normovolemic hemodilution, intraoperative autotransfusion, individualized assessment of anemia tolerance, meticulous surgical techniques and the use of pharmacologic agents for limiting blood loss. For various reasons, we do not recommend the transfusion of wound drainage. This article describes the various methods for bloodless medical care.

Efficacy and economics of postoperative blood salvage in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) regularly receive allogenic blood transfusions. The infusion of allogenic blood exposes the recipient to significant risks including the transmission of infection, anaphylactic and haemolytic reactions. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of introducing a system to retransfuse salvaged drainage blood in patients undergoing primary THR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed records of 109 consecutive patients who underwent THR following the introduction of the ABTrans autologous retransfusion system at our institution in January 2000. For comparison, we reviewed the medical records of 109 patients who underwent the same procedure immediately before the introduction of the retransfusion system.

RESULTS

Overall, 9% of patients treated with blood salvage and 30% treated without blood salvage required allogenic blood transfusions. Patients treated with the salvage system had significantly smaller haemoglobin drops in the peri-operative period (difference 0.56 g/dl; P = 0.001). The overall cost of using the retransfusion system was similar to that of routine vacuum drainage when the savings of reduced allogenic blood transfusion were taken into account.

CONCLUSIONS

The retransfusion of postoperative drainage blood is a simple, effective and safe way of providing autologous blood for patients undergoing primary THR.