On-call treatment of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage

Haematological risk factors predicting clinical success in transarterial embolisation for acute gastrointestinal bleeding

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate clinical outcomes in transarterial embolisation (TAE) for acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and determine risk factors for 30-day reintervention for rebleeding and mortality.

METHODS

TAE cases were retrospectively reviewed between March 2010 and September 2020 at our tertiary centre. Technical success (angiographic haemostasis following embolisation) was measured. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify risk factors for clinical success (absence of 30-day reintervention or mortality) following embolisation for active GIB or empirical embolisation for suspected bleeding.

RESULTS

TAE was conducted in 139 patients (92 (66.2%) male; median age:73, range: 20-95 years) for acute upper GIB (n = 88) and lower GIB (n = 51). TAE was technically successful in 85/90 (94.4%) and clinically successful in 99/139 (71.2%); with 12 (8.6%) reintervention cases for rebleeding (median interval 2 days) and 31 (22.3%) cases of mortality (median interval 6 days). Reintervention for rebleeding was associated with haemoglobin drop > 40 g l^-1 from baseline based on univariate analysis (p = 0.047). 30-day mortality was associated with pre-intervention platelet count < 150×10⁹ l^-1 (p < 0.001, OR 7.35, 95% CI 3.05-17.71) and INR > 1.4 (p < 0.001, OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.03-11.09) on multivariate logistic regression analysis. No associations were found for patient age, gender, antiplatelet/anticoagulation prior to TAE, or when comparing upper and lower GIB with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

TAE had excellent technical success for GIB with relatively high (1-in-5) 30-day mortality. INR > 1.4 and platelet count < 150×10⁹ l^-1 were individually associated with TAE 30-day mortality, and pre-TAE > 40 g l^-1 haemoglobin decline with rebleeding requiring reintervention.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Recognition and timely reversal of haematological risk factors may improve TAE periprocedural clinical outcomes.

A case report of endovascular management of delayed upper gastrointestinal bleeding after open esophagectomy for a benign esophageal stricture

INTRODUCTION

Delayed upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a rare complication of esophagectomy and can be difficult to manage.

PRESENTATION

A 76-year-old female represented 17 days post open esophagectomy with an unstable upper GI bleed. When control could not be achieved endoscopically, she was transferred to the Radiology Department where a triphasic CT angiogram confirmed active contrast extravasation into the gastric tube. She proceeded to the Interventional Radiology suite where a thoracic angiogram revealed an active arterial bleed from a branch of the thyrocervical trunk. The bleeding vessel was successfully embolised with coils and haemostasis was achieved.

DISCUSSION

Management options for upper GI bleeding post esophagectomy include medical, endoscopic and endovascular approaches.

CONCLUSION

Our case represents a rare example of delayed bleeding into a gastric conduit post open esophagectomy for a benign stricture. The case reinforces.

Special considerations in the management of lower GI bleed by interventional radiology

Despite the rapid development of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities and techniques to manage LGIB patients from interventional radiology's standpoint, a successful localization of the bleeding site that leads to an effective embolotherapy remains a significant technical challenge. The interventional radiologist's decisions when managing patients with LGIB may significantly impact the clinical outcomes; therefore, management should be made based on careful and thorough considerations of factors such as etiology, locations, patient's comorbidities, and potential post-procedure complications, among others. The purpose of this paper is to review the management of LGIB by interventional radiology, focusing on a few challenging and common clinical situations that require special consideration by interventional radiologists.

Endoscopic and angiographic management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding: Review of the published literature

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding is common and occurs often in elderly patients. In rare cases it is associated with hemorrhagic shock. A large number of such bleedings, which are often caused by colon diverticula, subside spontaneously. Alternatively they can be treated by endoscopic procedures successfully. Given the aging population of our society, the rising incidence of lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding and new anticoagulant therapies, some of the bleedings tend to be severe. Colonoscopy is the established standard procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. However, a small number of patients experience re-bleeding or shock; their bleeding does not resolve spontaneously and cannot be treated successfully by endoscopic procedures. In such patients, interventional radiology is very useful for the detection of bleeding and the achievement of hemostasis. Against this background we performed a literature search using PubMed to identify all relevant studies focused on the endoscopic and radiological management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding and present recent conclusions on the subject.

Role of interventional radiology in the management of acute gastrointestinal bleeding

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) can lead to significant morbidity and mortality without appropriate treatment. There are numerous causes of acute GIB including but not limited to infection, vascular anomalies, inflammatory diseases, trauma, and malignancy. The diagnostic and therapeutic approach of GIB depends on its location, severity, and etiology. The role of interventional radiology becomes vital in patients whose GIB remains resistant to medical and endoscopic treatment. Radiology offers diagnostic imaging studies and endovascular therapeutic interventions that can be performed promptly and effectively with successful outcomes. Computed tomography angiography and nuclear scintigraphy can localize the source of bleeding and provide essential information for the interventional radiologist to guide therapeutic management with endovascular angiography and transcatheter embolization. This review article provides insight into the essential role of Interventional Radiology in the management of acute GIB.

Liquid Embolization with Onyx in a Technically Challenging Case of Acute Upper GI Bleeding

Conventional embolization such as coiling of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding may be rendered impossible or unsuitable due to anatomical and technical factors. Liquid (Onyx) embolization in such situations may prove valuable and life saving, though literature on the subject, particularly of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to duodenal ulcer, is sparse. We present a technically challenging case of acutely rebleeding duodenal ulcer embolized successfully using ethylene polyvinyl alcohol polymer (Onyx).

Radiation risks in interventional radiology

The number, diversity and complexity of interventional radiological examinations have all increased markedly in recent years, and it is widely recognized that some of these procedures carry greater risks than many other radiological procedures. This Commentary uses a meeting on "Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology" held at the British Institute of Radiology on 28 March 2007 as a template to discuss recent progress in this area, some current problems and plans for the future.