[Effectiveness of zotepine in therapy-refractory psychoses. An open, multicenter study in eight psychiatric clinics]

Treatment of schizophrenia with catatonic symptoms: A narrative review

Catatonia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome consisting of psychomotor abnormalities caused by a broad range of disorders affecting brain function. While the nosological status of catatonia is no longer restricted to a subtype of schizophrenia in standardized diagnostic systems, the character, course, and clinical significance of catatonia in people with schizophrenia remain unclear. Evidence suggests that catatonia could be a nonspecific state-related phenomenon, a fundamental core symptom dimension of schizophrenia, or a subcortical variant of schizophrenia. Either way, the validity of catatonia in schizophrenia is clinically significant only insofar as it predicts prognosis and response to treatment. Most contemporary clinical trials of antipsychotics have targeted schizophrenia as an overly broad unitary psychosis neglecting any differential response defined by phenomenology or course. However, early naturalistic studies showed that catatonia predicted poor response to first-generation antipsychotics in chronic schizophrenia and case reports cautioned against the risk of triggering neuroleptic malignant syndrome. More recent studies suggest that second-generation antipsychotics, particularly clozapine, may be effective in schizophrenia with catatonic symptoms, while small randomized controlled trials have found that the short-term response to ECT may be faster and more significant. Based on available data, conclusions are limited as to whether antipsychotics are as effective and safe in acute and chronic schizophrenia with catatonic symptoms compared to other treatments and compared to schizophrenia without catatonia. Further studies of the pathophysiology, phenomenology, course and predictive value of catatonia in schizophrenia are worthwhile.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, part 1: update 2012 on the acute treatment of schizophrenia and the management of treatment resistance

These updated guidelines are based on a first edition of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia published in 2005. For this 2012 revision, all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of schizophrenia were reviewed systematically to allow for an evidence-based update. These guidelines provide evidence-based practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful and these guidelines are intended to be used by all physicians diagnosing and treating people suffering from schizophrenia. Based on the first version of these guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE/PUBMED database and the Cochrane Library, in addition to data extraction from national treatment guidelines, has been performed for this update. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F; Bandelow et al. 2008b, World J Biol Psychiatry 9:242). This first part of the updated guidelines covers the general descriptions of antipsychotics and their side effects, the biological treatment of acute schizophrenia and the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Zotepine for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Zotepine is a relatively new antipsychotic often used for the treatment of people with schizophrenia. It is claimed to be particularly effective for negative symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of zotepine compared with placebo, typical and other atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia and related psychoses.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For the 2006 update we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register of trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials comparing zotepine with other treatments for people with schizophrenia or other psychoses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently inspected citations and abstracts, ordered papers, re-inspected these and assessed their quality. For homogenous dichotomous data we calculated the relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/H) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD). We inspected all data for heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

The review currently includes 11 studies with 966 participants. Most outcomes were short term (4-12 weeks). We found no data for outcomes such as relapse, time in hospital, satisfaction with care and day-to-day functioning. Compared with placebo, mental state ratings favoured zotepine (n=106, 1 RCT, RR No 20% decrease in BPRS 0.44 CI 0.3 to 0.7, NNT 3 CI 2 to 6) using the last observation carried forward method. For the comparison with typical drugs, limited data suggest that zotepine may be as effective as these older medications. Mental state measures of 'no clinically important improvement' favour zotepine when compared with other active drugs (n=356, 4 RCTs, RR 0.77 CI 0.7 to 0.9, NNT 7 CI 4 to 22). About one third of people in both the zotepine and control groups left the studies before trial completion. Zotepine may result in less movement disorder adverse effects than typical antipsychotic drugs. Trials have not highlighted clear differences between zotepine and other atypical drugs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Zotepine may be a valuable addition to the class of atypical antipsychotic drugs. However, more data from existing studies is urgently needed to increase confidence in the findings of this review. In addition to this, new data from well planned, conducted and reported long term pragmatic randomised trials are needed. Otherwise clinical use of zotepine will be based upon speculation of short explanatory trials for everyday practice.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, Part 1: acute treatment of schizophrenia

These guide lines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBO). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This first part of the guidelines covers disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of schizophrenia, as well as the management of the acute phase treatment. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

[Atypical antipsychotics in therapy refractory schizophrenia]

Many studies have shown that treatment resistance is a substantial problem in schizophrenic patients, with 20-30% of patients responding only partially and about 7% showing no response to antipsychotic treatment. Clozapine has been consistently shown to be effective in this subgroup of schizophrenic patients. It is still the drug of choice, despite the restricted indication and the need for a careful evaluation of side effects. Recently, several double-blind studies of newer atypical antipsychotics have been conducted in therapy-resistant patients. Three studies compared risperidone with clozapine, one study zotepine with clozapine and two others olanzapine with dozapine. One study compared the efficacy of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone with one another and with haloperidol. In these studies, dozapine showed increasing superiority the more restrictive the criteria for therapy-resistance chosen. Olanzapine was found to be as effective as clozapine and was better tolerated. However, the results of studies comparing different atypical anti-psychotics have to be interpreted carefully because of their limited number as well as methodological problems. Case studies also indicate the efficacy of combining different atypical antipsychotics, but no systematic research on this issue has been done so far.

Zotepine for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Typical antipsychotic drugs are widely used as first line treatment for people with schizophrenia. The atypical class of antipsychotic drugs, however, is making important inroads into this approach and zotepine is one such compound. It is a dopamine antagonist and claimed to be to be particularly effective for negative symptoms

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of zotepine compared with placebo, typical and other atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia and related psychoses.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1980-1999), CINAHL (1982-1999), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 1999), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (January 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), Dialog Corporation Datastar service (1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), and PsycLIT (1974-1999) were undertaken. References of all identified studies were searched for further trials. Knoll Pharmaceuticals and authors of trials were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised clinical trials that compared zotepine to other treatments for people with schizophrenia or other psychoses were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Citations and, where possible, abstracts were independently inspected by reviewers, papers ordered, re-inspected and quality assessed. Data were independently extracted. Data were excluded if loss to follow up was greater than 50%. For homogeneous dichotomous data the relative risk (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) and numbers needed to harm (NNH), were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, weighted mean differences were calculated (WMD). All data were inspected for heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

All outcomes were short term (4-12 weeks). Limited data suggest that zotepine is an antipsychotic, at least as effective as typical drugs. Mental state measures of 'no clinically important improvement' favour zotepine when compared to other active drugs (n=356, RR 0.8 CI 0.7-0.9, NNT 7 CI 4-22). About one third of people in both zotepine and control groups left the studies before trial completion. Zotepine may result in less movement disorder adverse effects than typical antipsychotic drugs. Trials have not highlighted clear differences between zotepine and other atypical drugs.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Zotepine may be a valuable addition to the increasing ranks of atypical antipsychotic drugs. More data from already existing studies is urgently needed to increase the confidence in the findings of this review. New data from well planned, conducted and reported long term pragmatic randomised trials are necessary. Otherwise clinical use of zotepine will be based on speculation on the meaning of the findings of short explanatory trials for everyday practice.

Drug treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia

The traditional antipsychotics are generally poorly effective or ineffective against the negative symptoms of schizophrenia and are also associated with extensive side effects which can themselves cause or exacerbate secondary negative symptomatology. As well as having a low propensity to cause extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), the currently available, putative, atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, sertindole, and olanzapine), developmental antipsychotics (zotepine, quetiapine and ziprasidone) and low doses of certain traditional antipsychotics, such as amisulpride and fluphenazine, have been reported to ameliorate negative symptoms in comparison with placebo or standard antipsychotics such as fluphenazine, haloperidol or perphenazine. To date, few trials have specifically examined primary negative symptomatology and it has been suggested that the improvements observed with these drugs may be related to decreases in positive symptoms and/or reduced sedation or extrapyramidal side effects. Although atypicality has been ascribed to 5-HT2/D2 antagonism, the exact pharmacological mechanism(s) underlying the efficacy of the atypical antipsychotics have not been elucidated. Many of these drugs bind to multiple other receptors and/or inhibit neurotransmitter uptake and it seems probable that some of these other pharmacological properties may also contribute to their clinical features.