Untersuchungen zum Einfluß von Glycopyrrolat und Atropin auf das Verhalten der Herzfrequenz und den pH-Wert des Magensaftes während Mikrolaryngoskopien

Preoperative glycopyrrolate: oral, intramuscular, or intravenous administration

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of oral, intramuscular (i.m.) and intravenous (i.v. glycopyrrolate on oral and gastric secretions, and to assess how these routes of administration change intubating conditions.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING

University hospital operating room.

PATIENTS

37 ASA status I and II general anesthesia patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive glycopyrrolate or placebo just before surgery by three routes: oral, i.m., and i.v.. Glycopyrrolate was received once by one route and placebo by the other two routes. A placebo group received three placebos and no glycopyrrolate.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mouth conditions and intubating conditions were qualitatively assessed by the patient and the intubating anesthesiologist. No difference between groups was noted. Oral and gastric volumes were measured and showed significantly less gastric volume for the i.v. group as compared with the other groups. Oral secretions were reduced in both the i.v. and i.m. groups when compared with placebo or glycopyrrolate administered orally.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative glycopyrrolate is significantly more effective at reducing oral and gastric secretions if administered intravenously immediately before induction.

Glycopyrrolate vs. atropine during anaesthesia for laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy

As glycopyrrolate has been reported superior to atropine with respect to reduction of salivation, stability of cardiac rate and rhythm, and recovery, a comparison of these properties of the two drugs and placebo was made in 45 patients undergoing direct laryngoscopy and 45 patients undergoing bronchoscopy, in most cases followed by mediastinoscopy. When given i.m. 30 min before anesthesia (midazolam, alfentanil, thiopentone, and suxamethonium), the two test drugs were found to be equally potent regarding the antisialogogic effect. The same increase in heart rate after the test drugs was seen before induction, and during anaesthesia heart rate rose to the same level in the placebo group as the test groups. During anaesthesia, blood pressure was lowest in the atropine group. No differences could be demonstrated with respect to cardiac arrhythmias, possibly due to the small size of the material. The present study gives no reason for preferring either drug, and only the efficacy of both test drugs in controlling airway secretions provides an argument for using any anticholinergic drug when laryngoscopy or bronchoscopy is performed under the conditions of the present study.