[Bolus-triggered spiral CT: a new program-monitored procedure for optimal contrast]

Optimized enhancement in helical CT: experiences with a real-time bolus tracking system in 628 patients

AIMS

Ultrafast detector technology enables bolus-triggered application of contrast media. In a prospective study we investigated the benefit of this new method with the intention of optimizing enhancement during examination of the chest and abdomen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, we examined 548 patients under standardized conditions. All examinations were performed on a Somatom Plus 4 Power CT system (Siemens Corp., Forchheim, Germany) using the CARE-Bolus software. This produces repetitive low-dose test images (e.g. for the lung: 140 kV, 43 mA, TI 0.5 s) and measures the Hounsfield attenuation in a pre-selected region of interest. After exceeding a defined threshold, a diagnostic spiral CT examination was begun automatically. The data obtained from 321 abdominal CT and 179 lung CT examinations were correlated with different parameters such as age, weight and height of the patients and parameters of vascular access. In a group of 80 patients, the injection of contrast medium was stopped after reaching a pre-defined threshold of an increase of 100 HU over the baseline. Then, we assessed the maximal enhancement of liver, pulmonal artery trunk and aortic arch.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between bolus geometry and age, body surface or weight. In helical CT of the abdomen the threshold was reached after a mean trigger time of 27 s (range 13-67 s) and only 65 ml (range 41-105 ml) of contrast medium were administered. In helical CT of the lung the threshold was reached after 21 s (range 12-48 s) and the mean amount of administered contrast medium was 48 ml (range 38-71 ml).

CONCLUSION

Bolus triggering allows optimized enhancement of the organs and reduces the dose of contrast material required compared with standard administration.

Spiral CT angiography of the abdominal aorta. Comparison of iodixanol and ioversol

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Enhancement characteristics of a nonionic, dimeric, isotonic contrast medium (iodixanol [Visipaque]) were compared with a nonionic, monomeric contrast medium (ioversol [Optiray]) of the same iodine concentration in spiral computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the abdominal aorta.

METHODS

Spiral CTA was performed in 78 patients referred for suspected renal artery stenosis (n = 35) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 43). A test bolus was used to time the scan delay, and all patients were injected with 150 ml contrast medium (320 mgI/ml) of either iodixanol (n = 40) or ioversol (n = 38). Contrast enhancement was measured in the aorta, renal arteries, and renal parenchyma.

RESULTS

All mean aortic enhancement was slightly higher with iodixanol than ioversol, measured at three different levels (celiac trunk 315 Hounsfield units [HU] versus 300 HU, renal arteries 325 HU versus 312 HU, aortic bifurcation 276 HU versus 266 HU). However, none of them were statistically significant (e.g., P = 0.26 at the celiac trunk level). Similar results were observed in renal artery and parenchyma enhancements.

CONCLUSIONS

Iodixanol and ioversol had similar enhancement characteristics in the early arterial phase. Both substances were well tolerated and seem to be well suited for spiral CTA.