Ulceration after esophageal and gastric variceal sclerotherapy--influence of sucralfate and other factors on healing

Long-term outcomes of prophylactic endoscopic histoacryl injection for gastric varices with a high risk of bleeding

PURPOSE

Endoscopic histoacryl injection (EHI) is reported to be an effective treatment modality for bleeding gastric varices (GVs) but controversial as a prophylactic treatment for non-bleeding GVs because efficacy and safety have yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and long-term outcomes of prophylactic EHI for non-bleeding GVs with a high risk of bleeding.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients (23 males/10 females, mean age 56.6 years old) with a high risk of gastric variceal bleeding (large tumorous (27), red color sign (14) or rapidly growing in size (1)) underwent EHI. According to the grade of GVs, 25 patients belonged to F3, seven to F2, and one to F1. In terms of the locations of GVs, four patients belonged to type IGV1, 21 to type GOV2, and eight to type GOV1.

RESULTS

Obliteration of GVs was achieved in all of the treated patients. Twenty-three patients required one session and ten needed more than two sessions to obliterate their GVs. A mean volume of histoacryl used per session was 2.0 ml. Complications related to the procedure included immediate bleeding in two patients and bacteremia in one patient. The mean duration of follow-up was 12.2 months and eradication of GVs was achieved in 21 (95%) of 22 patients who were followed-up more than 3 months. Index GVs recurred in three of 21 patients (14%) and re-bleeding in index GVs after EHI occurred in two of 26 patients (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic EHI can be a promising procedure for eradication of non-bleeding GVs in case with a high risk of bleeding.

Effect of sucralfate granules in suspension on endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy induced ulcer: analysis of the factors determining ulcer healing

Oesophageal ulcers commonly occur after endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy and usually cause complications and a delay in further sclerotherapy. The aims of this study are to investigate the effect of sucralfate granules in suspension on the treatment of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy induced ulcer and analyse the factors determining the ulcer healing. Fifty-two patients with oesophageal variceal bleeding received elective endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy. After endoscopically proved oesophageal ulcers, they were randomized to receive either sucralfate granules in suspension (n = 22) or antacid (n = 23). Follow-up endoscopy was performed weekly. Ulcer healing rates were compared between the groups using the log-rank test. Forty-one ulcers receiving sucralfate and 48 ulcers receiving antacid treatment were evaluated. The clinical characteristics of the ulcers were similar in both groups. The ulcers in patients receiving sucralfate healed faster than those receiving antacid (P<0.02). On analysis of factors affecting ulcer healing, ulcers smaller than 1 cm2 (n = 59) appeared to heal faster than those larger than 1 cm2 (n = 30; P= 0.059) and shallow ulcers (n = 46) healed faster than deep ulcers (n = 43; P<0.001). On multifactorial analysis, ulcer depth was the only factor determining ulcer healing. The ulcer healing effects of sucralfate became more prominent when the ulcer was larger than 1.0cm2 (1.7+/-0.6 weeks vs 2.3+/-0.6 weeks, P= 0.011) and deep (1.7+/-0.7 weeks vs 2.5+/-1.0 weeks, P= 0.013) when compared with those receiving antacid. Sucralfate granules in suspension speed the healing of endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy induced ulcer, especially deep and large ulcers.

Long-term follow-up of gastric variceal sclerotherapy: an eleven-year experience

BACKGROUND

Bleeding from gastric varices is often a serious medical emergency. The role of endoscopy in the management of gastric variceal bleeding is still controversial. The types of gastric varices and their respective management strategies have not been identified.

METHODS

Gastric varices were observed in 209 patients with portal hypertension. Seventy-one patients (with cirrhosis 33, noncirrhotic 38) underwent gastric variceal sclerotherapy, 53 of these (75%) for gastric variceal bleeding. By use of a previously described classification, gastric varices were divided into gastroesophageal varices, type 1 (GOV1) and type 2 (GOV2), and isolated gastric varices, type 1 (IGV 1). Gastric variceal sclerotherapy was done every week using a combination technique of paravariceal and intravariceal injections with absolute alcohol.

RESULTS

Emergency gastric variceal sclerotherapy arrested acute bleeding in 12 (66.7%) of 18 patients. Variceal obliteration was achieved in 43 of the 60 (71.6%) patients who underwent repeated elective sclerotherapy. Variceal obliteration was higher in patients with GOV1 (94.4%) than in those with GOV2 (70.4%) and IGV1 (41%). Rebleeding after elective gastric variceal sclerotherapy was seen in 5.5%, 19%, and 53%, respectively, in the three types of gastric varices. Gastric variceal recurrence was not seen during a mean follow-up of 24.2 +/- 22.9 months. Seventeen (24%) patients died, nearly equally from rebleeding and liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Sclerotherapy can effectively arrest acute gastric variceal bleeding and achieve gastric variceal obliteration, (2) it is more effective in patients with gastroesophageal varices, and (3) alternative therapies need to be evaluated for patients with IGV1.

Epidermal growth factor attenuates the sclerotherapy-induced biomechanical properties of the oesophagus. An experimental study in minipigs

BACKGROUND

The effect of epidermal growth factor (EGF) on the biomechanical properties of the oesophagus subjected to sclerotherapy was studied in Goettingen minipigs by means of impedance planimetry.

METHODS

Seventeen animals underwent three sessions of weekly endoscopic sclerotherapy. During these 3 weeks and for the subsequent 2 weeks they were treated with either EGF or placebo. After another 3 weeks an impedance planimetric study was done. Ten healthy non-sclerosed pigs were studied as controls. Impedance planimetry was performed by stepwise pressure-induced balloon inflation for analysis of oesophageal cross-sectional area 5 and 10 cm above the gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ).

RESULTS

Systemic treatment with EGF (total daily dose of 30 micrograms/kg/day, administered subcutaneously) for 3 to 7 days per week combined with a weekly paravenous injection of 20-40 micrograms/kg attenuated the oesophageal damage caused by sclerotherapy, implying less pronounced narrowing 5 cm above and less dilation 10 cm above the GEJ.

CONCLUSION

These observations suggest a potential therapeutic role for EGF in attenuating sclerotherapy-induced oesophageal injury.

Systemic treatment with recombinant human epidermal growth factor accelerates healing of sclerotherapy-induced esophageal ulcers and prevents esophageal stricture formations in pigs

Human epidermal growth factor (EGF), a small polypeptide (6 kDa) with mitogenic properties, has been implicated in the protection of gastrointestinal mucosal integrity. The efficacy of EGF in the prevention and healing of sclerotherapy-induced esophageal lesions was investigated in 24 minipigs with surgically induced portal hypertension. In addition, the effect of EGF on intragastric acidity and pharmacokinetics was investigated as possible means to explain its protective mechanism of action. The animals underwent three weekly sessions of sclerotherapy with polidocanol 2% and were concomitantly and for an additional three weeks treated with either placebo or EGF administered paravenously in the esophagus and/or subcutaneously. The subcutaneous treatment with EGF significantly (P < 0.05) reduced esophageal stricture and scar formations associated with sclerotherapy. Gastric pH values were significantly (P < 0.01) elevated only in animals receiving subcutaneous injections of EGF. Furthermore, the subcutaneous administration of EGF was associated with unexpected prolonged plasma concentration of the peptide. These results suggest a possible clinical value of EGF as an adjunctive treatment with the sclerotherapy.

Biomechanical properties of the oesophagus damaged by endoscopic sclerotherapy. An impedance planimetric study in minipigs

BACKGROUND

The aims of the present study were to evaluate, by means of impedance plainmetry, regional differences in biomechanical properties in the normal oesophagus and the oesophagus damaged by sclerotherapy.

METHODS

Four minipigs underwent a weekly session of sclerotherapy for 4 weeks. Impedance planimetry was performed before the first session of sclerotherapy and 1 week after the last session of sclerotherapy. Investigations were performed by stepwise pressure-induced balloon distensions with concomitant measurements of pressure and luminal cross-sectional area (CSA) in the oesophagus 5 and 10 cm above the gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ).

RESULTS

The normal oesophagus had significantly larger CSAs 5 cm than 10 cm above the GEJ (P < 0.05). Endoscopic sclerotherapy entailed an inversion (P < 0.05) of the normal oesophageal configuration, with narrowing 5 cm above the GEJ (P < 0.05) and increased CSAs 10 cm above the GEJ (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional differences in CSA occur in the normal oesophagus, and sclerotherapy produces profound changes in the oesophageal configuration.

Recombinant human epidermal growth factor prevents sclerotherapy-induced esophageal ulcer and stricture formations in pigs

Human epidermal growth factor (EGF), a naturally occurring protein, has been implicated in the protection of gastrointestinal mucosal integrity. The efficacy of EGF in the prevention of sclerotherapy-induced esophageal lesions was investigated in 18 minipigs with surgically induced portal hypertension. The animals underwent five weekly sessions of sclerotherapy with polidocanol 2% and were concomitantly treated with either placebo or EGF administered either paravenously or subcutaneously. EGF significantly (P < 0.05) reduced esophageal ulcerations, stricture formations, and mucosal histological damage associated with sclerotherapy. The drug was well-tolerated with no overt toxicity. These results suggest a potentially important clinical value of EGF as an adjunctive treatment with the sclerotherapy.

A prospective randomized study to evaluate propranolol in patients undergoing long-term endoscopic sclerotherapy

A prospective randomized double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of propranolol in patients with portal hypertension undergoing long-term endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) for recurrent variceal bleeding. Consecutive patients with portal hypertension (Child's class A or B) due to cirrhosis (n = 72), non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (n = 29) and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (n = 13) attending the liver clinic of a tertiary care center were included in the study. All patients had had at least one documented episode of variceal bleed in the previous 4 weeks. Fifty-eight patients received propranolol and 56 received placebo in addition to weekly EST. Rebleeding occurred in 12 (21%) patients in the placebo group and 10 (17%) patients in the propranolol group during a mean follow-up period of 24.4 +/- 10.4 months in the former and 23.8 +/- 9.2 months in the latter group (P > 0.1). The number of episodes of rebleeding (14 in the placebo and 12 in the propranolol group) were also similar (P > 0.1). The median bleeding-free period was more than 40 months in both treatment groups (P > 0.1). The mean transfusion requirements and the number of hospital admissions for rebleeding were also similar in the two treatment groups (P > 0.1). Complete obliteration of varices was achieved in 44 (78.9%) patients in the placebo group and 43 (75.5%) patients in the propranolol group (P > 0.1). Recurrence of new varices was seen in two patients in the placebo and in three of those in the propranolol group. Seven patients in the placebo group and five in the propranolol group died (P > 0.1). Complications related to EST were similar in the two treatment groups but additional adverse effects were observed in the propranolol group. The cumulative incidence of rebleeding in the placebo group was 12.7 and in the propranolol group it was 11.2 per 100 patient years of follow-up. It is concluded that the addition of propranolol in patients with portal hypertension and fair hepatic function on long-term EST does not confer any additional benefit.

Management of gastric varices

Gastric varices (GV) are a common (20%) accompaniment of portal hypertension; they are more often seen in those patients who bleed than in those who do not (27% versus 4%, p < 0.01). They can develop in both segmental and generalized portal hypertension. Depending on their location and relation with oesophageal varices, GVs can be classified as gastrooesophageal varices (GOV) and isolated gastric varices (IGV); each of these can be further subdivided as follows: GOV1 (extension of oesophageal varices along lesser curve) and GOV2 (extension of oesophageal varices towards fundus); and IGV1 (varices in the fundus) and IGV2 (isolated varices anywhere in the stomach). The common presentation of GVs is variceal bleeding and encephalopathy. In comparison with oesophageal varices, GVs bleed significantly less often (64% versus 25%, p < 0.01) but more severely (2.9 +/- 0.3 versus 4.8 +/- 0.6 transfusion units, p < 0.01). Patients with GOV2 and IGV1 bleed more often than patients with other types of GVs. Sclerotherapy for oesophageal varices can significantly influence the natural history of GVs. GOV1, or lesser curve varices, disappear in the majority of cases (59%) after obliteration of oesophageal varices. In those with persisting GOV1, the incidence of bleeding and mortality is high and these patients require gastric variceal sclerotherapy (GVS). During oesophageal variceal sclerotherapy, bleeding can occasionally be induced from GVs. After obliteration of oesophageal varices, recurrence as GVs (secondary GVs) can occur in about 9% of patients. Emergency GVS is quite effective in controlling acute bleeding from GVs, more so than balloon tamponade. Potent sclerosants like tetradecyl sulphate and alcohol and a glue, bucrylate, have been quite effective. Elective GVS can achieve obliteration of GVs in nearly 70% of patients. Rebleeding and ulceration are common complications of GVS; probably related to incomplete obliteration and mucosal injury respectively. Splenectomy is quite effective in treating GVs due to segmental protal hypertension. For GV bleeding due to generalized portal hypertension, a shunt operation is often effective. TIPS procedure appear to be a very promising therapy for GV bleeding. Liver transplantation may be a superior alternative to sclerotherapy and shunt surgery for gastric varices.

Esophageal strictures following endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy. Antecedents, clinical profile, and management

We have evaluated 169 patients with portal hypertension receiving endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy in order to assess the predisposing factors, clinical profile, and treatment response of sclerotherapy-induced esophageal strictures. Of the 129 patients included in the final analysis, 20 (15.5%) developed persistent esophageal stricture. No significant difference was found with respect to age, nature of sclerosant (absolute alcohol, ethanolamine oleate, or sodium tetradecyl sulfate), etiology of portal hypertension, Child's class, initial variceal score, or intensity of sclerotherapy schedule between the patients who developed strictures and those who did not. However, female sex (P less than 0.01) and persistent esophageal ulceration (P less than 0.05) did predispose to stricture formation. Sclerotherapy-induced strictures presented with a variable grade of dysphagia, were always solitary, and were localized to the lower end of esophagus. Most of these could be dilated rapidly using Eder-Puestow metal olives (3.15 +/- 0.80 dilatation sessions per patient). Stricture formation did interrupt an effective sclerotherapy program but only temporarily, and successful variceal obliteration could be obtained after stricture dilatation.

Long term management of oesophageal varices

Effective control of variceal rebleeding (secondary prophylaxis) or prevention of the initial bleeding (primary prophylaxis) are the main objectives of the treatment of portal hypertension. Endoscopic sclerotherapy is the treatment of choice for secondary prophylaxis, since it significantly decreases rebleeding and, to some extent, mortality. A combination of propranolol and sclerotherapy may be of benefit by decreasing postsclerotherapy rebleeding. Endoscopic variceal band ligation and transjugular intrahepatic shunt are emerging as useful alternative techniques. Devascularisation and preferably selective shunts should be reserved for use as salvage of sclerotherapy failures. Liver transplantation, if feasible, could become the ultimate therapy by controlling variceal bleeding and improving hepatic function. Pharmacotherapy, while not very successful for secondary prophylaxis, has shown promise for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Nonselective beta-blockers significantly decrease the rebleeding rates but are associated with only marginal survival benefits. beta-Blockers alone cannot decrease the hepatic venous pressure gradient adequately (to less than 12mm Hg). Combination with nitrates and other drugs may prove beneficial and requires clinical evaluation. Endoscopic sclerotherapy and surgery have little role in primary prevention of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis but need evaluation in noncirrhotic patients.

A comparison of sucralfate with placebo in the treatment of esophageal ulcers following therapeutic endoscopic sclerotherapy of esophageal varices--a prospective controlled randomized trial

In 1984 Roark published the first report of a sucralfate treatment of esophageal ulcers after sclerotherapy. Because this was an uncontrolled trial we planned a prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study with 60 patients. After therapeutic paravariceal injection-sclerotherapy of esophageal varices, patients were randomly treated with sucralfate suspension or placebo. Time of treatment was limited to a maximum of 3 weeks and the dosage of sucralfate was 1 g q.i.d. (Ulcogant-Suspension). Healing was assessed by endoscopy at weekly intervals. Fifty-three patients (25 sucralfate, 28 placebo) were evaluable according to the protocol. No patient left the study because of side effects. At the start of the trial, the patients in the sucralfate group showed a larger ulcer area than the placebo group. There was a tendency to faster healing in the sucralfate group, especially in patients with deeper ulcerations. However, there was no significant difference in global healing between both treatment groups after 3 weeks. Sucralfate suspension may be of value in accelerating the healing process in esophageal ulcers after sclerotherapy, especially in patients with deep ulcers. These results should be confirmed in further trials, in which patients should be stratified with respect to their ulcer volume and severity of liver disease.

Endoscopic sclerotherapy in the treatment of gastric varices

Of 309 patients with portal hypertension, gastric varices were found in 48 (16 per cent). While the majority (88 per cent) of the patients had gastric varices in association with oesophageal varices, 6 (12 per cent) patients had 'isolated' gastric varices. Gastric varices were seen significantly (P less than 0.01) more often with grade 4 than with grade 3 varices. In 11 (28 per cent) of the 40 patients who completed sclerotherapy for oesophageal varices, gastric varices disappeared concurrently on eradication of oesophageal varices or during the following 6 months. Of the initial five patients with gastric varices who received direct intravariceal injections, four rebled; this technique was therefore replaced by combination (paravariceal + intravariceal) gastric variceal sclerotherapy. Emergency combination sclerotherapy successfully controlled bleeding from gastric varices in six of the eight treated patients. Thirty-two patients entered a programme of elective combination gastric variceal sclerotherapy. Variceal obliteration was achieved in 12 cases (38 per cent) and reduction in size was noted in another 7 patients (22 per cent) after a minimum of four courses. There were 11 (23 per cent) deaths, 8 due to uncontrolled bleeding from gastric varices and 3 due to hepatic coma. The other complications of gastric variceal sclerotherapy were minor and included retrosternal pain, fever and dysphagia. It is concluded that gastric varices often coexist with large oesophageal varices. If they persist for 6 months after eradication of oesophageal varices, a combination of paravariceal and intravariceal sclerotherapy should be attempted for their obliteration.