Intraoperative Flüssigkeitstherapie bei Pankreasresektionen - Die Sicht des Chirurgen

Correlation between Intraoperative Fluid Administration and Outcomes of Pancreatoduodenectomy

Background

Intraoperative fluid (IOF) administration plays an important role during major abdominal surgery although increased fluid intake can adversely influence postoperative outcomes. However, the effect of the IOF rate on the outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is unclear.

Methods

151 patients, who underwent PD at Binzhou Medical University Hospital between January 2010 and May 2017, were categorized into three groups according to IOF rates (ml/kg/hr): restricted (<10, n = 47), standard (10–15, n = 76), and liberal (>15, n = 28).

Results

The overall postoperative morbidity was 56.95%. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was 11.26%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.28% with the most common cause being grade C POPF and secondary intra-abdominal infections. The patients in the liberal group had significantly higher incidences of POPF (25%) and respiratory complications (21.43%). The other outcome parameters such as recovery of bowel function, hospital stay, and postoperative daily drainage were similar among the groups. Multivariable analysis confirmed the IOF rate to be most strongly associated with POPF (odds ratio: 5.195, confidence interval: 1.142–23.823, P = 0.023) and respiratory complications (odds ratio: 7.302, confidence interval: 0.676–58.231, P = 0.025).

Conclusions

The IOF rate significantly affects the incidence of POPF and respiratory complications after PD. Careful patient-oriented fluid therapy may help to prevent these complications.

Clinical Implications of Intraoperative Fluid Therapy in Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested that intraoperative fluid overload is associated with a worse outcome after major abdominal surgery. However, evidence in the field of pancreatic surgery is still not consistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether intraoperative fluid management could affect the outcome of a major pancreatic resection.

METHODS

Prospective analysis of 350 major pancreatic resections performed in 2016 at the Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery-The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust. Patients were dichotomized according to intraoperative fluid volume administration (near-zero vs. liberal fluid balance) and matched using propensity score. Intraoperative fluid administration was then correlated to the postoperative outcome.

RESULTS

Liberal fluid balance was associated with an increased rate of Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIB both after pancreaticoduodenectomy (60.3 vs. 30.2%, p < 0.01) and distal pancreatectomy (50 vs. 27.1%, p = 0.03). In case of pancreaticoduodenectomy, liberal fluid balance was also associated with an increased rate of pancreatic fistula (33.3 vs. 19.9%, p = 0.05), but when considering patients with soft remnants, an increase rate of pancreatic fistula (52.8 vs. 23%, p = 0.03) was indeed associated with the near-zero fluid balance.

CONCLUSION

Considering all pancreatic resections, a liberal fluid balance is associated with an increased rate of postoperative morbidity. However, in the case of PD with a soft pancreas, an NZF balance could lead to pancreatic stump ischemia and anastomotic failure. Intraoperative fluid management should be managed according to patient's pancreas-specific risk factors.

Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy are associated with higher amounts of intra- and postoperative fluid therapy: A single center retrospective cohort study

Background

Perioperative mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy has decreased significantly in high-volume centers, but morbidity remains high. Restrictive perioperative fluid management may contribute to reduced complication rates after various surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between the amount of fluid administered and postoperative complications. We hypothesized that higher amounts of intra- and total fluid is associated with greater postoperative morbidity.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively examined data of 553 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at University of Freiburg Medical Center between 2001 and 2013. Data on intra - and postoperative fluid administration (until postoperative day 5) were obtained from anesthesiological and surgical records. Data on complications were retrieved from our institutional pancreatic database.

Results

The median values for intra- and total fluid administered were 6000 ml (range 400–15,000 ml) and 13,600 ml (range 5000–57,700 ml), respectively. The overall in-hospital mortality was 1.9% (no correlation with fluid administration). Patients who received more than 6000 ml intraoperative fluid had more wound infections (P = 0.049), intra-abdominal abscesses (P = 0.020) and postoperative interventions (P = 0.007). In patients who received more than 14000 ml fluid until postoperative day 5 all evaluated types of postoperative complications (infectious, fistula, delayed gastric emptying, bleeding) and re-interventions occurred significantly more frequently than in patients who received less than 14,000 ml (P < 0.05–0.001).

Conclusions

Higher amounts of fluids may contribute to postoperative complications. More studies are needed to adequately assess the use of intra/postop fluid therapy.

•

High amounts of perioperative fluid may impair surgical outcome of pancreatic resection.

•

>6000 ml intraoperative fluid was associated with more infectious complications.

•

>14 000 ml total fluid by postoperative day 5 was linked with many complications.

•

Complications included infections, fistulas, delayed gastric emptying and bleeding.

•

Prospective randomized controlled trials should investigate postoperative fluid therapy.

Intraoperative fluid management and complications following pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

Considerable debate exists as to appropriate perioperative fluid management. Data from several studies suggest that the amount of fluid administered perioperatively influences surgical outcome. Pancreatic resection is a major procedure in which complications are common. We examined 1,030 sequential patients who had undergone pancreatic resection at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. We documented the prevalence and nature of their complications, and then correlated complications to intraoperative fluid administration.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 1,030 pancreatic resections performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between May 2004 and December 2009 from our pancreatic database. Intraoperative administration of colloid and crystalloid was obtained from anesthesia records, and complication data from our institutional database.

RESULTS

The overall in-hospital mortality was 1.7%. Operative mortality was due predominantly to intraabdominal infection. Sixty percent of the mortality resulted from intraabdominal complications related to the procedure. We did not demonstrate a clinically significant relationship between intraoperative fluid administration and complications, although minor statistical significance was suggested.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective review of intraoperative fluid administration we were not able to demonstrate a clinically significant association between postoperative complications and intraoperative crystalloid and colloid fluid administration. A randomized controlled trial has been initiated to address this question.

[The role of intensive care medicine in early postoperative complications. Is surgical expertise in danger?]

Intensive care medicine is the backbone of surgery. We describe a profile of parameters which has to be repeatedly evaluated to allow early detection of postoperative complications. Complex surgical diseases are analyzed to underscore that only a surgeon experienced in intensive care medicine is able to interpret abnormalities in correlation with the intra-operative findings resulting in appropriate decisions with respect to diagnostic measures and reintervention. An increasing lack of motivation compromises the necessary training of young surgeons. Work hour limits already prolong education in the operative core competence thus making residents decline a necessary extension of ICU training beyond the compulsory 6 months. Identification of young surgeons with intensive care medicine is further hampered by the establishment of interdisciplinary operative ICUs excluding surgeons from the leadership. Our current survey of 38 university departments of general and gastro-intestinal surgery in Germany shows that a cooperative ICU steering structure of anesthesiologists and surgeons exists in only 19%. The imminent deficit of training in surgical intensive care medicine can only be counteracted by equal leadership structures.