Bevacizumab intravitreal zur Behandlung okkulter und minimal klassischer choroidaler Neovaskularisation (CNV) bei AMD

Synthetic anti-angiogenic genomic therapeutics for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

In light of the intriguing potential of anti-angiogenic approach in suppressing choroidal neovascularization, we attempted to elaborate synthetic gene delivery systems encapsulating anti-angiogenic plasmid DNA as alternatives of clinical antibody-based therapeutics. Herein, block copolymer of cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lysine-thiol) [RGD-PEG-PLys(thiol)] with multifunctional components was tailored in manufacture of core-shell DNA delivery nanoparticulates. Note that the polycationic PLys segments were electrostatically complexed with anionic plasmid DNA into nanoscaled core, and the tethered biocompatible PEG segments presented as the spatial shell (minimizing non-specific reactions in biological milieu). Furthermore, the aforementioned self-assembly was introduced with redox-responsive disulfide crosslinking due to the thiol coupling. Hence, reversible stabilities, namely stable in extracellular milieu but susceptible to disassemble for liberation of the DNA payloads in intracellular reducing microenvironment, were verified to facilitate transcellular gene transportation. In addition, RGD was installed onto the surface of the proposed self-assemblies with aim of targeted accumulation and internalization into angiogenic endothelial cells given that RGD receptors were specifically overexpressed on their cytomembrane surface. The proposed anti-angiogenic DNA therapeutics were validated to exert efficient expression of anti-angiogenic proteins in endothelial cells and elicit potent inhibition of ocular neovasculature post intravitreous administration. Hence, the present study approved the potential of gene therapy in treatment of choroidal neovascularization. In light of sustainable gene expression properties of DNA therapeutics, our proposed synthetic gene delivery system inspired prosperous potentials in long-term treatment of choroidal neovascularization, which should be emphasized to develop further towards clinical translations.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RANIBIZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION DUE TO UNCOMMON CAUSE: Twelve-Month Results of the MINERVA Study

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Ranibizumab was effective in treating choroidal neovascularization of various etiologies, with a treatment effect of +9.9 letters versus sham at Month 2 and a mean gain of 11.0 letters from baseline to Month 12. The beneficial effects of ranibizumab were observed across all etiology subgroups.

Purpose:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in adult patients with choroidal neovascularization because of an uncommon cause enrolled in the 12-month MINERVA study.

Methods:

In this Phase III, double-masked study, adult (≥18 years) patients (N = 178) were randomized 2:1 to receive either ranibizumab (n = 119) or sham (n = 59) at baseline and, if needed, at Month 1 and open-label individualized ranibizumab from Month 2. Best-corrected visual acuity change from baseline to Month 2 (primary endpoint) and Month 12, treatment exposure, and safety over 12 months were reported. Subgroup analysis was conducted on five predefined choroidal neovascularization etiologies (angioid streak, postinflammatory, central serous chorioretinopathy, idiopathic, and miscellaneous).

Results:

Ranibizumab showed superior efficacy versus sham from baseline to Month 2 (adjusted least-squares mean best-corrected visual acuity: +9.5 vs. −0.4 letters; P < 0.001). At Month 12, the mean best-corrected visual acuity change was +11.0 letters (ranibizumab) and +9.3 letters (sham). Across the 5 subgroups, the treatment effect ranged from +5.0 to +14.6 letters. The mean number of ranibizumab injections was 5.8 (ranibizumab arm) with no new ocular or nonocular adverse events.

Conclusion:

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg resulted in clinically significant treatment effect versus sham at Month 2. Overall, ranibizumab was effective in treating choroidal neovascularization of various etiologies with no new safety findings.

A randomized controlled trial of intralesional bevacizumab injection on primary pterygium: preliminary results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intralesional injection of bevacizumab on primary pterygium treatment.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, each primary pterygium patient was randomized to receive either an intralesional injection of bevacizumab 2 mg (1 mg/0.04 mL) or a combination of topical antihistamine (antazoline HCl 0.05%) and vasoconstrictor (tetrahydrozoline HCl 0.04%) as a control. The main outcome measurements were symptoms and signs (including eye irritation, epiphora, redness, amount of discharge, inflammation and elevation of pterygium, and percentage of corneal pterygium area).

RESULTS

A total of 74 pterygium eyes in 66 patients were randomized and allocated into a treatment group (N = 34) and a control group (N = 40). In the treatment group, there was a statistically significant reduction of symptoms (including irritation, photophobia, epiphora, redness, discharge, and blurred vision) and signs (inflammation and corneal pterygium area) compared with the baseline, up to at least 6 months. Between the treatment and control groups, no significant differences were found for all visits with respect to the (1) symptoms, (2) signs, and (3) percentage of corneal pterygium.

CONCLUSIONS

Intralesional bevacizumab may have a therapeutic effect on symptoms and signs of primary pterygium for at least 6 months (ie, the follow-up period), with no serious ocular or systemic adverse effects.

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) vs. ranibizumab (Lucentis) for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We conducted a systematic review to evaluate whether the existing evidence justifies the intravitreal use of bevacizumab in comparison to ranibizumab in age-related macular degeneration.

RECENT FINDINGS

Compared with photodynamic therapy, bevacizumab shows a relative improvement in visual acuity that is of similar size as in the comparison of ranibizumab with photodynamic therapy (relative improvement from 30 to 35%). However, this finding is based on one randomized controlled trial including less than 50 patients treated with bevacizumab. Also, nothing is known about long-term (>12 months) improvements in visual acuity and optimal treatment intervals for bevacizumab.Regarding safety, the published literature indicates that ocular and systemic adverse effects are less frequent under bevacizumab than ranibizumab treatment. But the validity of this finding is strongly limited by inadequate reporting, an unsystematic evaluation of adverse effects and short follow-up times in studies evaluating bevacizumab.

SUMMARY

Given the lack of controlled data, the widespread off-label use of bevacizumab is not justified in clinical practice. On the other hand, a major challenge in the management of patients who require repeated antivascular endothelial growth factor injections is the high cost of ranibizumab. This dilemma underlines the need for head-to-head studies comparing both vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies, or, at least, well conducted randomized controlled trials evaluating intravitreal bevacizumab.