[Acute, traumatic versus chronic cartilage lesions as terms of a medical expert's opinion]

On the Effect of Electroacupuncture in Promoting Healing after High Tibial Osteotomy

Purpose

To explore the clinical effect of electroacupuncture in promoting the healing of the osteotomy area after high tibial osteotomy.

Methods

50 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and control group. The control group got the common postoperative treatment, and the observation group was added electroacupuncture from the 3rd day after the operation on the basis of the control group. The electroacupuncture acupoints were selected SP10, ST34, ST32, EX-LE2, ST40,KI6, KI3, SP6, and ST41, once a day, and 14 days were a course of treatment. And then we contrasted the index of the Lane-Sandhu X-ray score, the skin incision healing time, the swelling subsided time, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Score (WOMAC), and Lysholm in different time.

Results

The Lane-Sandhu X-ray score of the observation group was better than that of the control group at all time points (P < 0.05), and the time to achieve bone healing was about 2 weeks earlier than that of the control group. The skin healing and swelling were the subsided time in the osteotomy area. Both were better than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The VAS score, WOMAC score, and Lysholm score of the two groups were significantly improved compared with preoperatively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The improvement of the observation group's VAS score, WOMAC score, and Lysholm score at 1 week, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after the end of the treatment course was better than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Electroacupuncture can quicken the healing of bone tissue and surrounding soft tissues in the osteotomy area after high tibial osteotomy, and at the same time, it can help the relief of knee joint pain and improve knee joint function.

[What does the clinician expect from the radiologist regarding cartilage-specific imaging?]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Today's advanced MRI imaging allows for a precise diagnosis and thus better treatment planning of cartilage damage. The phrase "depending on intraoperative findings" is therefore slowly becoming a thing of the past. However, this also increases the demand for an exact interpretation of the imaging, from clinicians and patients alike. This article highlights the importance of a radiologist's role in different constellations.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

In the case of acute injuries, it is crucial to recognize osteochondral flakes, cartilage delamination, subchondral bone bruising and fractures as well as concomitant injuries. These findings must be instantly communicated to the practitioner. In the case of chronic cartilage damage, grading the extent and size of the damage is decisive in choosing the appropriate therapy method. Possible causes and accompanying injuries must also be analyzed and, if necessary, addressed. Direct communication with the clinical colleague is also useful in correlating the clinical and radiological findings.

The effects of arthroscopic joint debridement in the knee osteoarthritis: results of a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most common orthopaedic diseases. Therapeutic options for this disease include conservative treatments and arthroscopic debridement and partial or complete replacement. This meta-analysis aimed to collect and analyse the available information on the effects of arthroscopic joint debridement related to the clinical outcomes, the required conversion to replacement and the factors for patient selection.

METHODS

A search for publications was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE medical databases. The primary search resulted in a total of 1,512 citations. The results from 30 papers were included in this study. The extracted dates were listed in a standardised protocol. The statistical evaluation was performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis software (V2 Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA).

RESULTS

No randomised study that compared conservative and arthroscopic treatments for knee osteoarthritis was found. Most studies reported middle-term results after arthroscopic operations. The results of these studies showed excellent or good outcomes in more than 60 % of all patients. These results were correlated with a significant increase in the knee scores from baseline to follow-up; the standardised difference in means was 2.3 (CI 95 % 1.5-3.0, p < 0.001). The required conversion rate to replacement increased as the follow-up interval increased. The rates were as follows: 1 year-6.1 % (CI 95 %, 2.1-16.6 %), 2 years-16.8 % (CI 95 %, 10.2-26.3 %), 3 years-21.7 % (CI 95 %, 15.5-29.1 %) and 4 years-34.1 % (CI 95 %, 22.8-47.6 %). The mean survival time was 42.7 (CI 95 %, 14.5-71.1) months. Numerous factors influenced the outcome, including the radiological stage of the osteoarthritis and individual patient factors (e.g. time of history of osteoarthritis, weight and smoking). The local knee findings, such as axial dysalignment, missing effusion and massive crepitus, were also correlated with patient outcome.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic joint debridement is a potential and sufficient treatment for knee osteoarthritis in a middle-term time interval. This procedure results in an excellent or good outcome in approximately 60 % of patients in approximately 5 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of studies, Level III.