[Percutaneous dilatative tracheostomy as a new method in intensive medicine. Procedure, advantages and risks]

Comparison of EtView™ tracheoscopic ventilation tube and video-assisted fiberoptic bronchoscopy during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) via endotracheal tube (ETT) is the most frequent utilized technique for monitoring of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) procedure while maintaining mechanical ventilation. Endoscopic guidance has increased the safety of this procedure; nevertheless, the use of a bronchoscope via ETT potentially may deteriorate ventilation and lead to hypercarbia and/or hypoxia. EtView tracheoscopic ventilation tube (EtView TVT) is a standard endotracheal tube with a camera and light source embedded at the tip. The objectives of this study are to introduce EtView TVT as a monitoring tool during PDT and to compare it with video assisted FOB via ETT. We hypothesized that using EtView TVT during PDT may obtain similar visualization; also may have advantages regarding better mechanical ventilation conditions when compared with video-assisted FOB via ETT. Patients, 18-75 years of age requiring mechanical ventilation scheduled for PDT were randomly allocated into two groups for airway monitorization to guide PDT procedure either with FOB via ETT (Group FOB, n = 12) or EtView TVT (Group EtView, n = 12). After standard anesthesia protocol, alveolar recruitment maneuver was applied and all patients were mechanically ventilated at pressure-controlled ventilation mode with same pressure levels. The primary outcome variable was the reduction in arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂) values during the procedure. Other respiratory variables and the effectiveness (the visualization and identification of relevant airway structures) of two techniques were the secondary outcome variables. Patients in both groups were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics and initial respiratory variables. Visualization and identification of relevant airway structures in any steps of the PDT procedure were also comparable. The decrease in minute ventilation in Group FOB was higher when compared with Group EtView (51 ± 4 % vs. 12 ± 7.3 %, p < 0.05). The decrease in PaO₂ from initial levels during (34 ± 21 % vs. 5 ± 7 % decrease) and after (26 ± 27 % vs. 2.8 ± 16 % decrease) the procedure was higher in Group FOB when compared with Group EtView (p < 0.05). Considering comparable features in monitorization and advantageous features over mechanical ventilation when compared with video bronchoscopy; EtView TVT would be a good alternative for airway monitorization during PDT especially for patients with poor pulmonary reserve.

Intubating laryngeal mask as a ventilatory device during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND

We use an intubating laryngeal mask (ILM) in preference to an endotracheal tube (ETT) as the ventilatory device during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) to overcome potential problems such as difficult ventilation, accidental extubation, damage of the ETT or of the bronchoscope, and need for additional assistant to secure the airway. We report our experience with this method.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, PDT was performed using the ILM in 86 patients. The insertion of the ILM, the quality of ventilation, and the view of the tracheal puncture site were rated as: 'very good', 'good', 'difficult', and 'not possible with ILM'.

RESULTS

The bronchoscope was not damaged during any case, and all PDTs were performed by two physicians, without the need for an additional assistant. PDTs with ILM were successful in 95% of the patients (n=82). The ratings were 'very good' or 'good' in 80% of cases with regards to ventilation, in 90% for identification of relevant structures and tracheal puncture site, and in 85% for the view inside the trachea during PDT. Tracheal re-intubation was required for inadequate ventilation with ILM in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of this procedure were lack of damage to the bronchoscope, the need for two instead of three persons to perform the PDT, and the excellent view inside the trachea. We recommend the ILM as a standard device for ventilation during bronchoscope-guided PDT.

Experience with two different techniques of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy in 54 neurosurgical patients

We report 54 patients with critical neurosurgical diseases (16 females, 38 males, age 21-84 years, mean 63.2 years) who were treated with bedside percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) because of respiratory insufficiency due to their cerebral disease. Bronchoscopically guided PDT was performed after stabilisation of the acute stage of neurosurgical disease. In 15 cases, Ciaglia's multiple dilation technique was used, and in 39 patients the dilational forceps technique according to Griggs was performed. In 14 cases (five Ciaglia's method, nine Griggs technique), intracranial pressure (ICP) was monitored throughout the procedure. Fifty-two procedures were completed. In two cases, PDT had to be aborted because of inability to puncture the trachea. No death occurred. There was a total complication rate of 16.7%, including the aborted procedures, with 3.7% of the complications classified as severe. No increase in ICP was noted. We conclude that bedside PDT, especially with the Griggs system, is safe and effective if done under bronchoscopic control. With the standard narcotic regimen used in our patients, no increase in ICP occurred.