[Diagnosis of instability of the upper cervical spine by functional computed tomography]

Left-right axial rotation within C1–2 after implant removal

Object

Surgical treatment of atlantoaxial injuries may be performed by a variety of surgical procedures, with each of these having its own specific advantages and disadvantages. To preserve the range of motion within the atlantoaxial joint after surgical treatment, posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation according to the method of Goel and Harms could be beneficial. This technique is not considered to fix the joint permanently if the screws are removed. However, this must not necessarily be true, especially if one notices that cervical joints have a tendency for rapid fusion after surgery.

The objective of this study was to analyze left-right axial rotation following implant removal, with the following research questions addressed: 1) is there a relevant rotational left-right mobility in C1–2; 2) is there a difference in mobility depending on sex; 3) is there a correlation of mobility to age; 4) is there a correlation of mobility to the “implant-in-body time”; and 5) is neck pain improved by this method of surgical treatment?

Methods

This is a retrospective study in 10 patients who had received atlantoaxial fixation according to the Harms method following atlantoaxial injury. These patients had undergone implant removal after a mean time of 128 days, followed by functional atlantoaxial CT in left-right rotation. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software package; significance was assumed for p < 0.05.

Results

The following findings are reported. 1) Left-right axial rotation within the atlantoaxial joint was measured to be 17° (mean value) following implant removal. 2) There was no significant difference between men (20°) and women (14.8°) (p = 0.595). 3) Left-right axial rotation negatively correlated to the age of the patient (r = −0.646, p = 0.043). 4) “Implant-in-body time” did not influence left-right axial rotation (r = 0.04, p = 0.907) if the implants are removed within 90–180 days after surgery. 5) Neck pain as assessed by the patients themselves on the visual analog scale was 7.9 ± 1.1 preoperatively and 3.6 ± 1.2 (mean ± SD) after implant removal (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

The authors conclude that removal of the implants 3–6 months after posterior atlantoaxial fixation according to the method of Goel and Harms is beneficial for obtaining some axial rotation within the atlantoaxial joint. The range of motion preserved depends on the age of the patient.

Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination

STUDY DESIGN

Experimental examination in vivo.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the precision of the ultrasound-based Coordinate Measuring System (CMS 50; Zebris Medizintechnik GmbH, D-88316, Isny, Germany) and then to establish a reference range for the active range of motion of the cervical spine in normal test subjects grouped according to age and sex.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many different devices such as inclinometers, goniometers, potentiometers, computer-aided devices, and radiographic procedures have been developed to examine the range of motion of the cervical spine. All of them have more or less inherent limitations.

METHODS

To assess the precision of this examination method, preliminary experiments were performed including intraobserver retest and two-observer repeatability, intraindividual variability, a daily profile, and a comparison between active and passive motions. In the subsequent main experiment 157 persons (86 women and 71 men) were examined during active motion. The sex groups were further subdivided into age groups of 10 years each. A comparison of weight and athletic activity was also performed.

RESULTS

The range of motion decreased with increasing age, increasing body weight, and decreasing athletic activity. The rotation in the upper cervical spine increases with age to compensate for the reduced range of motion in the lower levels. Women showed significantly better mobility than men of the same age, only above the age of 70.

CONCLUSIONS

The CMS 50 device provides precise reproducible measurements of the active range of motion of the cervical spine in all three planes. Criteria such as age, sex, body weight, and athletic activity influence the range of motion of the cervical spine.