Aesthetic and anatomic considerations for nasal reconstruction

Crescentic flap for the reconstruction of the nose after skin cancer resection

PURPOSE

Non-melanoma skin cancers are the most frequent skin tumours; in 25.5% of cases, they are reported to affect the nasal area. For an excellent surgical outcome, first of all the radical excision of the lesion is important, with appropriate margins of healthy skin in order to avoid recurrences. Moreover is important to achieve a good aesthetical result, avoiding distortion of the aesthetic units and preserving their functions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have applied the modified crescentic flap, described by Smadja in 2007, to 24 nasal skin defects left by oncologic surgery. It consists of the crescent-shaped resection of Burow's triangle all around the alar groove that allows the advancement of the flap to the tip of the nose, hiding the scar in the alar groove.

RESULTS

The outcome and the long-term follow-up were completely satisfactory both for patients and for surgeons.

CONCLUSION

For skin defects localized in the midline or paramedian line of the dorsum of the nose, the crescentic flap seems to be a good solution to obtain the better aesthetic result with respect to both anatomy and function of the nasal area, sparing the patient a second intervention or an overly invasive procedure.

Salient Points in Reconstruction of Nasal Skin after Tumor Ablation with Local Flaps

Objective:

A variety of nasal skin reconstruction methods are available to meet the esthetic patient's needs. In this article, we review some of modifications of these procedures and share our experience in reconstruction of different parts of the nasal skin following skin tumor ablation.

Patients and Methods:

From January 2010 to January 2014, 171 patients underwent nasal skin reconstruction after excising cancerous lesions of the involved nasal skin. The patient's history, pre- and post-operation photographs, and the surgery data were collected and assessed. Demographic data related to the type of cancer, defect size and location, type of reconstruction were collected.

Results:

A variety of local flaps were used based on location and defect features. Nearly all flaps healed primarily without postsurgical significant complications.

Conclusion:

According to the results and the outcomes of the operations, we concluded that a certain flaps are more effective than others in nasal skin reconstruction. Local flap reconstruction of the nose has good esthetic result with low complication rate.

Reconstruction of nasal skin cancer defects with local flaps

Reconstruction of nasal defects must preserve the integrity of complex facial functions and expressions, as well as facial symmetry and a pleasing aesthetic outcome. The reconstructive modality of choice will depend largely on the location, size, and depth of the surgical defect. Individualized therapy is the best course, and numerous flaps have been designed to provide coverage of a variety of nasal-specific defects. We describe our experience in the aesthetic reconstruction of nasal skin defects following oncological surgery. The use of different local flaps for nasal skin cancer defects is reported in 286 patients. Complications in this series were one partial flap dehiscence that healed by secondary intention, two forehead flaps, and one bilobed flap with minimal rim necrosis that resulted in an irregular scar requiring revision. Aesthetic results were deemed satisfactory by all patients and the operating surgeons. The color and texture matches were aesthetically good, and the nasal contour was distinct in all patients. All scars were inconspicuous and symmetrical. No patient had tenting or a flat nose.

Aesthetic considerations in nasal reconstruction and the role of modified nasal subunits

In 1985, Burget and Menick's landmark article on the nasal subunit principle popularized the technique of reconstructing the specific topographic subunits that they identified as the dorsum, tip, and columella and the paired alae, sidewalls, and soft triangles. In patients with more than 50 percent of subunit loss, Burget and Menick proposed removing the remaining portion of the subunit and reconstructing the entire subunit with a skin graft or flap. They further supported the placement of incisions for local flaps along borders of aesthetic subunits to maximize scar camouflage. Although the concept of nasal subunits is important in planning the reconstruction, other aesthetic considerations, such as skin texture, color, contour, and actinic damage, are also crucial in achieving an optimal result. Often, focusing on these aspects with the goal of nasal symmetry in mind leads to the violation of the subunit principle but provides a pleasing result of both the defect and the donor site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate when and how the modification of the nasal subunit principle is used to achieve coverage of nasal skin defects. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nasal reconstruction after skin cancer ablation surgery by one surgeon at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 1987 to 2000 was performed. During this 13-year period, 219 patients underwent 245 nasal reconstructions. Seventy-four patients with 76 reconstructions (31 percent) had procedures that violated the classic nasal subunit principle. Eight of these 74 patients (11 percent) had complications, and eight (11 percent) had 10 revisions performed. The aesthetic and functional results were graded as excellent, good, and fair. The results for the 74 patients who underwent modification of the subunit were excellent in 85 percent, good in 13 percent, and fair in 2 percent. Case reports were selected to illustrate situations in which the nasal subunit was altered.