Discontinuation of Infliximab Therapy in Patients with Crohn's Disease

Increased mucosal and T-cell expression of 4-1BB and PD-1 are modulated by anti-TNFα treatment in Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

Pro-inflammatory T-cell responses dominate in Crohn's disease (CD). This may result from a dysbalanced expression of co-stimulatory and inhibitory T-cell receptors. The present study investigated if a dysbalanced co-stimulatory and inhibitory T-cell receptor expression are present in CD and can be rebalanced by anti-TNFα treatment.

METHODS

Mucosal biopsies from 27 patients with active CD receiving anti-TNF treatment were examined for the mRNA levels of the co-stimulatory 4-1BB and inhibitory PD-1 T-cell receptor. Levels of mRNA were compared between inflamed and noninflamed tissue, and before and after treatment. Peripheral T cells from 12 healthy controls (HC) and 11 active CD patients were evaluated for their expression of 4-1BB and PD-1 by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The 4-1BB mRNA levels in inflamed mucosa were upregulated (> 2-fold) compared with uninflamed mucosa (p < 0.05). Anti-TNFα treatment reduced the 4-1BB and PD-1 mRNA levels in the inflamed gut tissue (p < 0.05). In in vitro activated T cells, the percentage of both 4-1BB and PD-1 positive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells increased more than 1.5 fold compared with HC (p < 0.05). The 4-1BB/PD-1 ratio on activated peripheral T cells was significantly reduced in CD after anti-TNF therapy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A dysbalanced mucosal proinflammatory co-stimulatory T cell receptor expression was present in active CD and modified by anti-TNFα treatment. However, anti-TNFα treatment did not normalize the expression of 4-1BB or PD-1 on peripheral T cells although a modest increased immunoregulatory capacity could be demonstrated.

Long-Term Outcomes Following Withdrawal of Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients in Remission: The Exit Long-Term Study of GETECCU

BACKGROUND

The EXIT trial found no difference in sustained remission at 12 months between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in remission who withdrew anti-TNF therapy [withdrawal arm (WA)] and those who maintained treatment [maintenance arm (MA)].

AIMS

To compare the long-term risk of relapse between these groups and assess the response to anti-TNF resumption.

METHODS

This was a follow-up extension of the EXIT trial. We analysed long-term outcomes of patients in sustained clinical remission from the start of EXIT.

RESULTS

We included 125 patients (63 in MA and 62 in WA). Median follow-up was 12 months for MA and 26 months for WA. The cumulative incidence of relapse (95% CI) was 35% (23%-48%) in MA and 47% (34%-60%) in WA; p = 0.3. In MA, relapses occurred in 8% of patients by 12 months and 47% by 24 months. In WA, relapses occurred in 16% by 12 months and 39% by 24 months. The incidence rate of relapse per patient-year was 22% in MA and 19% in WA. Baseline faecal calprotectin > 250 μg/g was the only variable associated with a higher risk of relapse. Of the 29 patients who relapsed in WA, 26 (90%) resumed anti-TNF therapy; of these, 69% regained clinical remission.

CONCLUSION

In this extended analysis of patients included in the EXIT trial, withdrawing anti-TNF therapy in patients with IBD in remission was not associated with a higher long-term relapse risk.

Biologics in the management of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: When and what to choose

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, with rising global incidence and prevalence. Over the past two decades, biologics have added to the therapeutic armamentarium and revolutionized the approach to treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The available biologics include monoclonal antibodies which target inflammatory cytokines (anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha, anti-interleukin 12/23) or recruitment of leucocytes to the gastrointestinal tract (anti-alpha4beta7 integrin) and small molecules (Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine 1-phosphate-inhibitors) which modify the proinflammatory signaling. Considering their potential disease-modifying ability, recent pediatric guidelines from the West have advocated upfront use of biologics in appropriate clinical scenarios as a top-down approach rather than the conventional step-up approach. Although real-world studies are available regarding the clinical efficacy of biologics in PIBD, there is paucity of long-term outcome and safety data in children. Also, little information is available about the best approach in the newly industrialized - developing countries where PIBD is rising but at the same time, infections are prevalent and resources are limited. In this review, we summarize the efficacy and safety profile of biologics and small molecule drugs and discuss the challenges in the management of PIBD, especially in the developing world, and future directions.

Progressing advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease: Current status including dual biologic therapy and discontinuation of biologics

INTRODUCTION

Advanced therapies (ADT) that encompass biological agents and small molecules have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), broadening the spectrum of available treatment options. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve satisfactory responses, necessitating surgical intervention. Treatment objectives have evolved beyond clinical remission, reduction of inflammation, and mucosal healing, shifting focus toward enhancing the quality of life, acknowledging the profound impact of IBD on physical and mental well-being.

AREA COVERED

This comprehensive review describes the current landscape of ADT for IBD, including dual biologic therapy (DBT), which involves the combination of two biologics or a single biologic with a small-molecule compound, as well as considerations surrounding the discontinuation of biologics.

EXPERT OPINION

ADT is the standard treatment for moderate to severe IBD, while DBT appears promising for specific subsets of patients, including those with refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. However, these approaches may increase the risk of adverse effects, including malignancy. To optimize individualized treatment strategies in patients with refractory IBD, further trials are needed to refine ADT's predictive value, establish DBT's safety and indications, define biologic discontinuation criteria, and evaluate emerging biomarkers, artificial intelligence, and bowel ultrasound in patient management.

Withdrawal of antitumour necrosis factor in inflammatory bowel disease patients in remission: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial of GETECCU

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Primary objectives: to compare the rates of sustained clinical remission at 12 months in patients treated with antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and immunomodulators who withdraw anti-TNF treatment versus those who maintain it.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

to evaluate the effect of anti-TNF withdrawal on relapse-free time, endoscopic and radiological activity, safety, quality of life and work productivity; and to identify predictive factors for relapse.

DESIGN

Prospective, quadruple-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease in clinical remission for >6 months and absence of severe endoscopic (and radiological in Crohn's disease) lesions were randomised to maintain anti-TNF treatment (maintenance arm (MA)) or to withdraw it (withdrawal arm (WA)). All patients maintained immunomodulators. Patients were followed-up until month 12 or up to clinical relapse.

RESULTS

One-hundred forty patients were randomised: 70 were allocated to the MA and 70 to the WA. The proportion of patients with sustained clinical remission at 12 months was similar in the MA and WA: 59/70 (84%), 95% CI=74% to 92% versus 53/70 (76%), 95% CI=64% to 85%. The proportion of patients with significant endoscopic lesions at the end of follow-up was 8.5% in the MA and 19% in the WA (p=0.1); a higher proportion of patients had faecal calprotectin >250 µg/g at the end of follow-up in the WA (p=0.01). The same percentage of patients in both groups had at least one adverse event (69%). The proportion of patients with serious adverse events was also similar in both groups (4% in MA vs 7% in WA).

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF withdrawal in selected patients with IBD in clinical, endoscopic and radiological remission has no impact on sustained clinical remission at 1 year although objective markers of activity were higher in patients who withdrew treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2015-001410-10 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02994836.

Comprehensive care of ulcerative colitis: new treatment strategies

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition of the colon driven by aberrant immune activation. Although advanced medical therapies form the cornerstone of ulcerative colitis management, unmet needs include failure to induce and sustain remission in a substantial proportion of patients and in managing acute severe ulcerative colitis. We review new treatment strategies that might improve patient outcomes in the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed database, including studies published from inception to October 2024, selected for their relevance. Recognizing current limitations, this article reviews strategies to improve treatment outcomes in ulcerative colitis using advanced therapies. These approaches include early treatment initiation, dose optimization, positioning newer agents as first-line therapies, combination therapy, targeting novel therapeutic endpoints, and the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis.

EXPERT OPINION

The strategies discussed may contribute to establishing new standards of care aimed at achieving long-term remission and enhancing patient outcomes. Personalized therapy, which tailors treatment based on individual disease characteristics and risk factors, is anticipated to become a critical aspect of delivering more effective care in the future.

A Treat-to-Target Approach in IBD: Contemporary Real-World Perspectives from an International Survey

Background/Objectives: The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) varies due to differences in healthcare systems, treatment costs, access to diagnostics, and diverse clinical practices between specialists. Despite the frequent advocacy of a treat-to-target (T2T) approach, there is insufficient clarity on how clinicians implement T2T in real-world settings. We aim to conduct a large, global survey among IBD experts to identify current practices in management. Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using a 16-item survey divided into two sections-for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD)-and distributed to practicing IBD clinicians. Results: A total of 261 respondents from 88 countries participated in the survey, with the majority (253/261) being physicians and eight being IBD nurse specialists. Despite global guidance, only a quarter of the respondents routinely perform an endoscopy to assess the response after starting an advanced therapy (28.4% in UC vs. 23.5% in CD). Moreover, despite an increasing academic focus on intestinal ultrasound (IUS), 171 (66%) of respondents in UC and 132 (51%) in CD reported that they do not routinely undertake IUS to guide treatment decisions. Faecal calprotectin for monitoring treatment response was routinely used by 87% (90% in UC and 84% in CD) of the respondents. Forty-five percent reported use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) both proactively and reactively and 35% reported only using TDM reactively. Conclusions: Our study shows considerable variation in IBD management across different countries and interpretation of the T2T approach. This highlights the need for standardised and pragmatic guidelines to help improve outcomes for patients with IBD globally.

Review Article: Green Management of IBD-New Paradigms for an Eco-Friendly Approach

BACKGROUND

The worldwide prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing, with its potential evolution as a global disease and a consequent increase in its burden on healthcare systems. These estimates do not factor in the 'real' price of IBD, which, beyond curbing career aspirations, instilling social stigma, and impairing the quality of life in patients, could also significantly affect the environment.

AIM

To highlight potential areas for intervention and develop management strategies aimed at minimising environmental impacts in the field of IBD over time.

METHODS

Various aspects of IBD care (organisation of IBD centres, diagnostics and therapeutics) are examined from an environmental sustainability perspective.

RESULTS

Each stage, from the patient's means of transport to the hospital to the physician's diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, contribute to CO2 and waste production. Strategies to contain the environmental impact are feasible. Some are easy to implement, such as ensuring the appropriateness of the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for patients; others need to be implemented in synergy with healthcare providers' policies and pharmaceutical companies.

CONCLUSIONS

With an inevitable increase in the number of patient visits, endoscopies, laboratory testing, and long-term therapeutic strategies for IBD, the clinical community should be aware of environmental concerns and investigate possible strategies to reduce the environmental impact of IBD care.

Interpreting modern randomized controlled trials of medical therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment options for the medical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have expanded substantially over the past decade. Multiple classes of advanced therapies, including both monoclonal antibodies and novel oral small molecules, are now available for the treatment of moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, highlighted by the approvals of the first IL23p19 antagonists, selective Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators. These advances have been accompanied by the identification of novel targets and the rapid growth in both the number and size of IBD clinical trials. Over a dozen landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been completed in the past 5 years, including the first head-to-head biologic trials, the first combination biologic studies, and multiple phase III registrational trials of novel compounds with new co-primary and composite end points that will change the treatment landscape for years to come. Importantly, the methodology of RCTs in IBD has evolved substantially, with new trial designs, evaluation of unique patient populations, and different types of efficacy and safety end points being key innovations. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of how modern RCTs of IBD medical therapies have evolved and the implications for their appraisal that will help guide the application of these data to clinical practice.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomised placebo-controlled trials for the induction of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remission involve potential harms to those receiving placebo. Whether these harms are also apparent with placebo during maintenance of remission trials in IBD is unclear. We aimed to examine the potential harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched several medical literature databases including MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to May 31, 2024), Embase and Embase Classic (Jan 1, 1947, to May 31, 2024), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 31, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission in adults with IBD reporting data on adverse events over a period of 20 weeks or more. There were no language restrictions or prespecified exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of IBD activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events, reporting relative risks (RRs) for placebo versus active drug with 95% CIs for each outcomes. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542624).

FINDINGS

Our search identified 10 826 citations, of which 45 trials including 16 562 patients (10 319 [62·3%] receiving active drug and 6243 [37·7%] placebo) were eligible. The risks of any treatment-emergent adverse event (7297/9546 [76·4%] patients on active drug vs 4415/5850 [75·5%] on placebo; RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·99-1·04; I2 =47%), serious infection (260/10 242 [2·5%] vs 155/6149 [2·5%]; 0·97, 0·79-1·19; I2 =0%), or venous thromboembolic event (12/4729 [0·3%] vs 9/2691 [0·3%]; 0·72, 0·31-1·66; I2 =0%) were not significantly lower with active drug than placebo. The risks of any infection (3208/8038 [39·9%] vs 1713/4809 [35·6%]; 1·14, 1·05-1·23; I2 =60%) or any drug-related adverse event (1094/2997 [36·5%] vs 609/1950 [31·2%]; 1·24, 1·02-1·50; I2 =75%) were higher with active drug than placebo. However, the risks of any worsening of IBD activity (1038/8090 [12·8%] vs 1181/5191 [22·8%]; 0·58, 0·52-0·64; I2 =40%), any withdrawal due to adverse events (610/10 282 [5·9%] vs 561/6207 [9·0%]; 0·71, 0·60-0·84; I2 =43%), any serious adverse events (1066/10 292 [10·4%] vs 742/6198 [12·0%]; 0·85, 0·77-0·94; I2 =17%), or any serious worsening of IBD activity (101/5707 [1·8%] vs 143/3640 [3·9%]; 0·55, 0·42-0·71; I2 =0%) were lower with active drug than placebo. 21 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains.

INTERPRETATION

In maintenance of remission trials in IBD, placebo was associated with some clinically significant potential harms. Patients should be counselled about these before participating in clinical trials and consideration given to alternative designs to test novel drugs in IBD.

FUNDING

None.

Phytochemical Compounds as Promising Therapeutics for Intestinal Fibrosis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Critical Review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Intestinal fibrosis, a prominent consequence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), presents considerable difficulty owing to the absence of licensed antifibrotic therapies. This review assesses the therapeutic potential of phytochemicals as alternate methods for controlling intestinal fibrosis. Phytochemicals, bioactive molecules originating from plants, exhibit potential antifibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant activities, targeting pathways associated with inflammation and fibrosis. Compounds such as Asperuloside, Berberine, and olive phenols have demonstrated potential in preclinical models by regulating critical signaling pathways, including TGF-β/Smad and NFκB, which are integral to advancing fibrosis.

RESULTS

The main findings suggest that these phytochemicals significantly reduce fibrotic markers, collagen deposition, and inflammation in various experimental models of IBD. These phytochemicals may function as supplementary medicines to standard treatments, perhaps enhancing patient outcomes while mitigating the adverse effects of prolonged immunosuppressive usage. Nonetheless, additional clinical trials are necessary to validate their safety, effectiveness, and bioavailability in human subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, investigating phytochemicals may lead to crucial advances in the formulation of innovative treatment approaches for fibrosis associated with IBD, offering a promising avenue for future therapeutic development.

Interrupting inflammatory bowel disease therapy: why, who, when and how to consider medication holidays

INTRODUCTION

Medication holidays in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) offer a potential means to balance disease management, costs, and quality of life. This concept is increasingly relevant in light of the chronic nature of IBD, the cumulative side effects associated with long-term pharmacotherapy, and the evolving treatment landscape that now includes a large armamentarium of effective induction, maintenance, and rescue therapies paired with disease monitoring tools that enable early intervention.

AREAS COVERED

This review critically examines the rationale, implementation, and risks of medication holidays in IBD. Recent evidence is reviewed to help guide the risks of relapse involved with cessation of therapy. The selection criteria for patients, the necessary monitoring protocols, and strategies for managing potential relapses are outlined.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the potential benefits, medication holidays in IBD involve significant risks and require careful patient selection and active management. Current research highlights a need for improved predictive models and a deeper understanding of patient-specific outcomes and consequences. The future of medication holidays will depend heavily on advancements in noninvasive monitoring technologies and more personalized approaches to therapy. Ultimately, establishing clearer guidelines for safely conducting medication holidays will be crucial in integrating this strategy into routine clinical practice.

De-escalating therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Results from an observational study in clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Combination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM) and an anti-TNF is commonly recommended in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. However, little is known about relapse rates after therapeutic de-escalation. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of relapse in a cohort of UC and CD patients with long-standing clinical remission after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to identify predictive factors for relapse.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with UC or CD on combination therapy and clinical remission for at least 6 months. IMM or anti-TNF was stopped upon physician decision. Primary objective was to evaluate the relapse rates after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to analyze predictors of relapse.

RESULTS

The study included 88 patients, 48 patients (54.5%) discontinued IMM and 40 (45.5%) anti-TNF. During follow-up, relapse rates were 16.7% and 52.5% in the IMM discontinuation group and anti-TNF discontinuation group, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that anti-TNF discontinuation (HR=3.01; 95% CI=1.22-7.43) and ileal CD location (HR=2.36; 95% CI=1.02-5.47) were predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor (HR=0.32; 95% CI=0.11-0.90). Reintroduction of anti-TNF upon relapse was effective and safe.

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF discontinuation led to significantly higher relapse rates compared to IMM discontinuation in UC and CD patients on combination therapy. Anti-TNF discontinuation and ileal CD location were identified as predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor. Retreatment after anti-TNF discontinuation was effective and safe.

Infliximab for maintenance of medically-induced remission in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Infliximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralises tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) which is present in high levels in the blood serum, mucosa and stool of patients with Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of infliximab for maintaining remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

SEARCH METHODS

On 31 August, 2021 and 23 June, 2023, we searched CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which infliximab was compared to placebo or another active comparator for maintenance, remission, or response in patients with Crohn's disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Pairs of review authors independently selected studies and conducted data extraction and risk of bias assessment. We expressed outcomes as risk ratios and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. Our primary outcome was clinical relapse. Secondary outcomes were loss of clinical response, endoscopic relapse, and withdrawal due to serious and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine RCTs with 1257 participants were included. They were conducted between 1999 and 2022; seven RCTs included biologically-naive patients, and the remaining two included a mix of naive/not naive patients. Three studies included patients in clinical remission, five included patients with a mix of activity scores, and one study included biologic responders with active disease at baseline. All studies allowed some form of concomitant medication during their duration. One study exclusively included patients with fistulating disease. The age of the participants ranged from 18 to 69 years old. All but one single-centre RCT were multicentre RCTs. Four studies were funded by pharmaceutical companies, two had a mix of commercial and public funding, and two had public funding. Infliximab is probably superior to placebo in preventing clinical relapse in patients who have mixed levels of clinical disease activity at baseline, and are not naive to biologics (56% vs 75%, RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.84, NNTB = 5, moderate-certainty evidence). We cannot draw any conclusions on loss of clinical response (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.96), withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.19), or serious adverse events (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.00) because the evidence is very low certainty. Infliximab combined with purine analogues is probably superior to purine analogues for clinical relapse (12% vs 59%, RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.42, NNTB = 2, moderate-certainty evidence), for patients in remission, and who are not naive to biologics. We cannot draw any conclusions on withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.49), and serious adverse events (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.64) because the evidence is very low certainty. We cannot draw any conclusions about the effects of infliximab on serious adverse events compared to purine analogues (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.68) for a population in remission at baseline because the evidence is very low certainty. There was no evidence available for the outcomes of clinical relapse, loss of clinical response, and withdrawal due to adverse events. Infliximab may be equivalent to biosimilar for clinical relapse (47% vs 40% RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.69), and it may be slightly less effective in averting loss of clinical response (49% vs 32%, RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.23, low-certainty evidence), for a population with mixed/low disease activity at baseline. Infliximab may be less effective than biosimilar in averting withdrawals due to adverse events (27% vs 0%, RR 20.73, 95% CI 2.86 to 150.33, low-certainty evidence). Infliximab may be equivalent to biosimilar for serious adverse events (10% vs 10%, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.50, low-certainty evidence). We cannot draw any conclusions on the effects of subcutaneous biosimilar compared with intravenous biosimilar on clinical relapse (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.57), loss of clinical response (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.25), and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.97) for an active disease population with clinical response at baseline because the evidence is of very low certainty. We cannot draw any conclusions on the effects of infliximab compared to adalimumab on loss of clinical response (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.59), withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.72), serious adverse events (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.54) for an active disease population with clinical response at baseline because the evidence is of very low certainty. There was no evidence available for the outcome of clinical relapse.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab is probably more effective in preventing clinical relapse than placebo (moderate-certainty evidence). Infliximab in combination with purine analogues is probably more effective in preventing clinical and endoscopic relapse than purine analogues alone (moderate-certainty evidence). No conclusions can be drawn regarding prevention of loss of clinical response, occurrence of withdrawals due to adverse events, or total adverse events due to very low-certainty evidence for both of these comparisons. There may be little or no difference in prevention of clinical relapse, withdrawal due to adverse events or total adverse events between infliximab and a biosimilar (low-certainty evidence). Infliximab may lead to more loss of clinical response than a biosimilar (low-certainty evidence). We were unable to draw meaningful conclusions about other comparisons and outcomes related to missing data or very low-certainty evidence due to serious concerns about imprecision and risk of bias. Further research should focus on comparisons with other active therapies for maintaining remission, as well as ensuring adequate power calculations and reporting of methods.

Biological therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: cyclical rather than lifelong treatment?

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment was revolutionised with the arrival of biological therapy two decades ago. There are now multiple biologics and increasingly novel small molecules licensed for the treatment of IBD. Treatment guidelines highlight the need for effective control of inflammation and early escalation to advanced therapies to avoid long-term complications. Consequently, a large proportion of patients with IBD receive advanced therapies for a long time. Despite their beneficial risk-benefit profile, these treatments are not without risk of side effects, are costly to healthcare providers and pose a burden to the patient. It is, therefore, paramount to examine in which circumstances a temporary cessation of therapy can be attempted without undue clinical risk. Some patients may benefit from cyclical rather than continuous treatment. This review examines the risk of relapse after discontinuation of advanced therapies, how to identify patients at the lowest risk of relapse and the chance of recapturing response when flaring after discontinuation.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease: A practical approach

The global burden of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is estimated at 4.9 million and the global prevalence exceeds 0.3%. Multiple newer therapeutic agents have broadened the options for the therapy of IBD in the last three decades. Thiopurines, however, have retained their place as maintenance therapy in IBD, especially in resource-constrained setting. But thiopurines have narrow therapeutic range, often needing discontinuation due to side effects or lack of efficacy. Biologic agents revolutionized the treatment of IBD, but the efficacy is lost in 50% of patient after one year. These outcomes are often due to inadequate drug concentrations that may lead to the development of antibodies as well as pharmacodynamic failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was proposed to reduce loss of response and to optimize the therapy in patients on thiopurine and biologic therapy. TDM is based on exposure-response relationship, suggesting a positive correlation between elevated serum anti-TNF concentrations and favorable therapeutic outcomes. TDM has multiple facets. This article discusses the benefits, evidence and limitations of TDM. The practical use of TDM in clinical practice is highlighted. Newer developments in the field and their relevance in practice are discussed.

Withdrawal of Immunomodulators or TNF Antagonists in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in Remission on Combination Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Withdrawal of immunomodulators (IMMs) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) in remission on combination therapy is attractive. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of (1) IMM, or (2) TNF antagonist withdrawal in patients with IBD in sustained remission on combination therapy.

METHODS

Through a systematic review till March 31, 2023, we identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of IMM or TNF antagonist withdrawal vs continued combination therapy, in patients with IBD in sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission for >6 months on combination therapy. Primary outcome was risk of relapse and serious adverse events at 12 months. We conducted meta-analysis to calculate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to appraise certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

We identified 8 RCTs with 733 patients (77% with Crohn's disease, 91% on infliximab-based combination therapy). On meta-analysis of 5 RCTs, there was no difference in the risk of relapse between patients with IMM withdrawal (continued TNF antagonist monotherapy) vs continued combination therapy (16.8% vs 14.9%; RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.75-1.76) without heterogeneity (low certainty of evidence). TNF antagonist withdrawal (continued IMM monotherapy) was associated with 2.4-times higher risk of relapse compared with continuing combination therapy (31.5% vs 11.2%; RR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.38-4.01), with minimal heterogeneity (low certainty of evidence). There was no difference in the risk of serious adverse events with IMM or TNF antagonist withdrawal vs continued combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IBD in sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission for >6 months on combination therapy, de-escalation with TNF antagonist withdrawal, but not IMM withdrawal, was associated with an increased risk of relapse.

Serum Immune Profiling in Paediatric Crohn's Disease Demonstrates Stronger Immune Modulation With First-Line Infliximab Than Conventional Therapy and Pre-Treatment Profiles Predict Clinical Response to Both Treatments

BACKGROUND

Despite its efficacy, rational guidance for starting/stopping first-line biologic treatment in individual paediatric Crohn's disease [CD] patients is needed. We assessed how serum immune profiles before and after first-line infliximab [FL-IFX] or conventional [CONV] induction therapy associate with disease remission at week 52.

METHODS

Pre- [n = 86], and 10-14-week post-treatment [n = 84] sera were collected from patients with moderate-to-severe paediatric CD in the TISKids trial, randomized to FL-IFX [n = 48; five 5-mg/kg infusions over 22 weeks] or CONV [n = 43; exclusive enteral nutrition or oral prednisolone]; both groups received azathioprine maintenance. The relative concentrations of 92 inflammatory proteins were determined with Olink Proteomics; fold changes [FC] with |log2FC| > 0.5 after false discovery rate adjustment were considered significant.

RESULTS

FL-IFX modulated a larger number of inflammatory proteins and induced stronger suppression than CONV; 18/30 proteins modulated by FL-IFX were not regulated by CONV. Hierarchical clustering based on IFX-modulated proteins at baseline revealed two clusters of patients: CD-hi patients had significantly higher concentrations of 23/30 IFX-modulated proteins [including oncostatin-M, TNFSF14, HGF and TGF-α], and higher clinical disease activity, C-reactive protein and blood neutrophils at baseline than CD-lo patients. Only 24% of CD-hi FL-IFX-treated patients maintained remission without escalation at week 52 vs 58% of CD-lo FL-IFX-treated patients. Similarly, 6% of CD-hi CONV-treated patients achieved remission vs 20% of CONV-treated CD-lo patients. Clustering based on immune profiles post-induction therapy did not relate to remission at week 52.

CONCLUSION

FL-IFX leads to stronger reductions and modulates more immune proteins than CONV. Stratification on pre-treatment profiles of IFX-modulated proteins directly relates to maintenance of remission without treatment escalation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02517684.

Exit strategies in inflammatory bowel disease: Looking beyond anti-tumor necrosis factors

The long-term management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is still a matter of debate, and no clear guidelines have been issued. In clinical practice, gastroenterologists often have to deal with patients in prolonged remission after immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies. When planning an exit strategy for drug withdrawal, the risk of disease relapse must be balanced against the risk of drug-related adverse events and healthcare costs. Furthermore, there is still a dearth of data on the withdrawal of novel biologics, such as the anti-α4β7 integrin antibody (vedolizumab) and anti-IL12/23 antibody (ustekinumab), as well as the small molecule tofacitinib. Models for estimating the risk of disease relapse and the efficacy of retreatment should be evaluated according to the patient's age and IBD phenotype. These models should guide clinicians in programming a temporary drug withdrawal after discussing realistic outcomes with the patient. This would shift the paradigm from an exit strategy to a holiday strategy.

Use of biologics for the management of Crohn's disease: IG-IBD clinical guidelines based on the GRADE methodology

A cure for Crohn's disease (CD), a chronic inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract of unknown etiology, is not available, so patients require lifelong management to keep inflammation under control. The therapeutic armamentarium has expanded with approval of several biological drugs, including infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab - monoclonal antibodies that target different inflammatory pathways - and darvadstrocel, a suspension of expanded human allogeneic, adipose-derived, mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of refractory complex perianal fistula. Notwithstanding existing practice guidelines on medical therapy for CD, the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease felt the need to issue new guidelines focused on the use of biologics for managing the intestinal manifestations of CD and based on the GRADE methodology. This document presents recommendations regarding six clinical settings, from the induction to the maintenance of clinical remission, and from optimization and de-escalation of treatments to dealing with perianal CD and post-operative recurrence. The 19 evidence-based statements are supported by information on the quality of the evidence, agreement rate among panel members, and panel comments mainly based on evidence from real world studies.

De-escalation of Therapy in Patients with Quiescent Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic disease of unknown origin that requires long-term treatment. The optical duration of maintenance treatment once remission has been achieved remains unclear. When discussing a de-escalation strategy, not only the likelihood of relapse but also, the outcome of retreatment for relapse after de-escalation should be considered. Previous evidence has demonstrated controversial results for risk factors for relapse after de-escalation due to the various definitions of remission and relapse. In fact, endoscopic or histologic remission has been suggested as a treatment target; however, it might not always be indicative of a successful drug withdrawal. For better risk stratification of relapse after de-escalation, it may be necessary to evaluate both the current and previous treatments. Following de-escalation, biomarkers should be closely monitored. In addition to the risk of relapse, a comprehensive understanding of the overall outcome, such as the long-term safety, patient quality of life, and impact on healthcare costs, is necessary. Therefore, a shared decision-making with patients on a case-by-case basis is imperative.

Withdrawal of infliximab or concomitant immunosuppressant therapy in patients with Crohn's disease on combination therapy (SPARE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy is a standard management strategy for patients with Crohn's disease. Concerns regarding the implications of long-term combination therapy provided the rationale for a formal clinical trial of treatment de-escalation. Our aim was to compare the relapse rate and the time spent in remission over 2 years between patients continuing combination therapy and those stopping infliximab or immunosuppressant therapy.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was performed in 64 hospitals in seven countries in Europe and Australia. Adult patients with Crohn's disease in steroid-free clinical remission for more than 6 months, on combination therapy of infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy for at least 8 months were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either continue combination therapy (combination group), discontinue infliximab (infliximab withdrawal group), or discontinue immunosuppressant therapy (immunosuppressant withdrawal group). Randomisation was stratified according to disease duration before start of first anti-TNF treatment (≤2 or >2 years), failure of immunosuppressant therapy before start of infliximab, and presence of ulcers at baseline endoscopy. The patient number and group of each stratum were assigned by a central online randomisation website. Treatment was optimised or resumed in case of relapse in all groups. Participants, those assessing outcomes, and those analysing the data were not masked to group assignment. The coprimary endpoints were the relapse rate (superiority analysis) and time in remission over 2 years (non-inferiority analysis, non-inferiority margin 35 days). Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02177071, and with EU Clinical Trials Register, EUDRACT 2014-002311-41. The trial was completed in April, 2021.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 2, 2015, and April 24, 2019, 254 patients were screened. Of these, 211 were randomised and 207 were included in the final analysis (n=67 in the combination group, n=71 in the infliximab withdrawal group, and n=69 in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). 39 patients had a relapse (eight [12%] of 67 in the combination group, 25 [35%] of 71 in the infliximab withdrawal group, six [9%] of 69 in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). 2-year relapse rates were 14% (95% CI 4-23) in the combination group, 36% (24-47) in the infliximab withdrawal group, and 10% (2-18) in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group (hazard ratio [HR] 3·45 [95% CI 1·56-7·69], p=0·003, for infliximab withdrawal vs combination, and 4·76 [1·92-11·11], p=0·0004, for infliximab withdrawal vs immunosuppressant withdrawal). Of 28 patients who had a relapse and were retreated or optimised according to protocol, remission was achieved in 25 patients (one of two in the combination group, 22 of 23 in the infliximab withdrawal group, and two of three in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). The mean time spent in remission over 2 years was 698 days (95% CI 668-727) in the combination group, 684 days (651-717) in the infliximab withdrawal group, and 706 days (682-730) in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group. The difference in restricted mean survival time in remission was -14 days (95% CI -56 to 27) between the infliximab withdrawal group and the combination group and -22 days (-62 to 16) between the infliximab withdrawal group and the immunosuppressant withdrawal group. The 95% CIs contained the non-inferiority threshold (-35 days). We recorded 31 serious adverse events, in 20 patients, with no difference in frequency between groups. The most frequent serious adverse events were infections (four in the combination group, two in the infliximab withdrawal group, and one in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group) and Crohn's disease exacerbation (three in the combination group, four in the infliximab withdrawal group, and one in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). No death nor malignancy was recorded.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with Crohn's disease in sustained steroid-free remission under combination therapy with infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy, withdrawal of infliximab should only be considered after careful assessment of risks and benefits for each patient, whereas withdrawal of immunosuppressant therapy could generally represent a preferable strategy when considering treatment de-escalation.

FUNDING

European Union's Horizon 2020.

Increased monocyte abundance as a marker for relapse after discontinuation of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease with deep remission

Monocytes are involved in the upstream inflammatory process in the immune reaction in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with IBD who discontinued biologics have been found to relapse, even after checking for deep remission. This study investigated whether monocytes could act as a predictor of relapse in patients who experienced relapse after the discontinuation of biologics. To this end, pediatric patients (<19 years old, n = 727) diagnosed with IBD from January 2003 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical features, monocytes, and disease activity at the time of discontinuing biologics were evaluated by dividing patients into a relapsed group and a non-relapsed group after discontinuing biologics. The percentage of monocytes (8.65% vs. 6.42%, P < 0.001), the absolute monocyte count (614.79 cells/μL vs. 381.70 cells/μL, P < 0.001), and the monocyte/polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) ratio (0.18 vs. 0.11, P < 0.001) at the time of discontinuation were significantly higher in patients who experienced relapse. As a result of multivariate analysis, the monocyte percentage (odds ratio: 2.012, P < 0.001) and monocyte/PMN ratio (odds ratio: 4.320E+14, P = 0.002) were evaluated as risk factors for relapse. Diagnostic capability was confirmed using area under operating characteristic curve (0.782) of the monocyte percentage for assessing the relapse within 6 months with cutoff value of 8.15% (P < 0.001). The findings presented in this study indicate that the patients with high monocyte counts experienced relapse after the discontinuation of biologics. A monocyte percentage of over 8.15% in the blood at the time of discontinuation was found to be associated with a high probability of relapse within 6 months, even in deep remission.

Biologic Treatment Withdrawal: Two Sides of a Coin

Biologic Treatment Withdrawal: Two Sides of a CoinThe advent of monoclonal antibody (biologic) therapies ushered in a wave of highly effective yet relatively safe treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases; their use predicated on assertively controlling intestinal inflammation to reduce disease-related complications has accelerated their adoption in clinical practice.1-3 However, despite the overall advantages of biologic therapies, patients often express hesitation initiating them. The concern is for fear of adverse effects (particularly, infections and malignancy), inconvenience, cost, and the psychologic barrier of having to receive an intravenous or injectable drug "for the rest of my life."

To Stop or Not to Stop? Approaches to Randomized Discontinuation Trials

In health care, it is often clear when to start a treatment but not as obvious when to stop it. This uncertainty has particular relevance, for example, in the context of polypharmacy or management of a chronic disease. Both situations usually carry side effects resulting from pharmacointeractions or continued long-term use of medication, and they also impose a financial burden on patients and health care systems. In this issue of NEJM Evidence, Buhl et al.1 evaluate the discontinuation of infliximab therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.

The Ethics of Research on Treatment Discontinuation

Discussions of the ethics of research with human participants frequently focus on early-phase studies that investigate the clinical properties of novel interventions,1 randomized controlled trials that investigate the relative diagnostic, prophylactic, or therapeutic merits of promising new interventions,2 or pragmatic research on existing practices.3 There has also been significant discussion of ethical issues in trials that employ a "washout period," in which participants discontinue one treatment before being exposed to another.4.