Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

Summary of the 2024 Update of the European Association of Urology Guidelines on Neurourology

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Most patients with neurourological disorders require lifelong medical care. The European Association of Urology (EAU) regularly updates guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of these patients. The objective of this review is to provide a summary of the 2024 updated EAU guidelines on neurourology.

METHODS

A structured literature review covering the timeframe 2021-2023 was conducted for the guideline update. A level of evidence and a strength rating were assigned for each recommendation on the basis of the literature data.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Neurological conditions significantly affect urinary, sexual, and bowel function, and lifelong management is required for neurourological patients to maintain their quality of life and prevent urinary tract deterioration. Early diagnosis and effective treatment are key, and comprehensive clinical assessments, including urodynamics, are crucial. Management should be customised to individual needs and should involve a multidisciplinary approach and address sexuality and fertility. Lifelong monitoring and follow-up highlight the importance of continuous care for neurourological patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The 2024 EAU guidelines on neurourology provide an up-to-date overview of available evidence on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for neurourological patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Neurological disorders very frequently affect the lower urinary tract and sexual and bowel function and patients need lifelong management. We summarise the updated European Association of Urology guidelines on neurourology to provide patients and caregivers with the latest insights for optimal health care support.

Outcomes of sequential third-line therapies in patients with refractory overactive bladder

INTRODUCTION

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) and onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) injection are third-line therapies for overactive bladder (OAB). Although the efficacy of each third-line treatment has been well established in clinical trials, there is far less information about performing one third-line therapy after the other. Our aim is thus to investigate the outcomes of post-SNM BoNTA and post-BoNTA SNM as "second" third-line treatments.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all OAB patients who had both SNM and BoNTA between 2013 and 2022. The primary endpoint was the response rates (>50% improvements) of the second third-line treatments. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of the patients who achieved total dry, the duration of treatments of patients who had significant responses, and risk factors that are associated with treatment response or duration of treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients had two third-line therapies. There were 104 patients who had post-SNM BoNTA and 68 patients who had post-BoNTA SNM. In the post-SNM BoNTA group, 62.5% (65/104) had significant responses after BoNTA treatment. In the post-BoNTA SNM group, 61.8% (44/68) had significant responses after SNM treatment. The proportions of patients who became dry were 21.2% and 23.5%, respectively. In the post-SNM BoNTA group, spinal pathology is associated with a lower probability of a significant response (48.9% vs. 73.7%, p-value = 0.0105).

CONCLUSIONS

BoNTA or SNM remains a viable option for refractory OAB after patients fail from one another. Spinal pathology is associated with a poorer response of post-SNM BoNTA.

Detrusor Sphincter Dyssynergia

Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) is defined as a detrusor contraction concurrent with an involuntary contraction of the urethral and/or periurethral striated muscles typically occurring in a patient with a spinal cord lesion above the sacral cord. Consequently, high urethral closure pressures during the detrusor contraction leads to high intravesical voiding pressure and large postvoid residuals, which can lead to significant complications in up to 50% of patients if DSD is not treated and followed-up regularly. DSD treatment options are centered around symptomatic management rather that addressing the underlying causative mechanisms.

[Neurogenic, non-obstructive urinary retention: diagnosis and treatment]

Neurogenic, non-obstructive urinary retention has a varied aetiology. The condition can be caused by central-nervous diseases as well as by disorders of the peripheral nervous system. The formation of residual urine may lead to considerable problems that can have a significant impact on a patient's everyday life. A treatment appropriate for the lower urinary tract dysfunction and suited to the patient's situation in life is only possible if a differentiated diagnostic evaluation has been performed. Both conservative and surgical therapeutic strategies are available, while drug treatment approaches are less relevant. Neuromodulative procedures are particularly suitable for causal treatment of the dysfunction. For patients requiring artificial bladder voiding, intermittent self-catheterization is generally preferable to using an indwelling catheter.

[Invasive neurostimulation in neuro-urology: state of the art]

Modulation or stimulation of the nerves supplying the lower urinary tract is a possible treatment option for dysfunction of the lower urinary tract, pelvic floor and rectum if conservative or minimally invasive treatment approaches fail. This overview shows the possibilities and limitations of sacral neuromodulation, sacral deafferentation with sacral anterior root stimulation and conus deafferentation.Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a procedure for the treatment of refractory pelvic floor dysfunction of various origins (idiopathic, neurogenic or post-operative), such as overactive bladder, non-obstructive retention and faecal incontinence. A particular advantage of SNM is the possibility of prior test stimulation with a high prognostic value. The procedure is minimally invasive, reversible and associated with relatively low morbidity rates.Following the introduction of MRI-compatible SNM systems, there has been renewed interest in the treatment of neurogenic bladder dysfunction. A recent meta-analysis reports similar success rates as in the idiopathic patient population.Sacral deafferentation with implantation of a sacral anterior root stimulator (SARS/SDAF) is an excellent therapeutic option for patients with spinal cord injury, which can significantly improve the quality of life of those affected and, in addition to treating neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, can also have a positive effect on neurogenic bowel dysfunction, neurogenic sexual dysfunction or autonomic dysreflexia. If conservative or minimally invasive treatment fails, it is crucial for the success of this procedure to consider SDAF/SARS at an early stage in order to avoid irreversible organic damage.Conus deafferentation (KDAF) is a less invasive surgical treatment option for patients with spinal cord injury for whom sacral deafferentation would be indicated but who would not benefit from the simultaneous implantation of a sacral anterior root stimulator. In principle, these patients also have the option of being subsequently treated with an extradural implant and thus utilising the advantages of anterior root stimulation. Indications for KDAF are autonomic dysreflexia, therapy-refractory detrusor overactivity, recurrent urinary tract infections, urinary incontinence and spasticity triggered by detrusor overactivity. With KDAF, we have a safe and efficient procedure with great potential for improving the spectrum of paraplegiological and neuro-urological treatment.

Feasibility of Sacral Neuromodulation in Patients With Underlying Neurologic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction and Fecal Incontinence

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in patients with underlying neurologic conditions and compare outcomes to non-neurogenic patients.

METHODS

Between 2017-2022 patients undergoing 2-staged implantation of InterStim II were included in a single-center retrospective study. Patients were allocated into two groups: underlying neurologic conditions (group 1) or non-neurogenic (group 2). Efficacy and safety were evaluated by comparing patients' bladder/bowel logs pre- and post-operative. Patients' demographics, indications, preimplantation urodynamic study variables, surgery duration, number of postop visits, and time to revision/removal procedures were compared and included in the data analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients (64.2% female) with a mean age of 63.23 ± 14.15years were included in the study - 16/67(23.9%) patients assigned to group 1. There is no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the indication for the treatment. The most common indication was nonobstructing urinary retention (NOUR) in both study groups. The common neurologic pathologies were multiple sclerosis, disc disease, and spinal stenosis. Overall and subgroup (based on an indication for SNM implantation) analyses showed no significant difference in patients' demographics, the surgery duration, or the chances for clinical success with a similar follow-up period. During the follow-up, the device was removed in 4 (25.0%) and 10 (19.6%) of the patients in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P = .912). There was no significant difference between the groups in the time till InterStim II removal (P = .905). All NOUR patients with clinical success in group 1 had an improvement of at least 75% from the baseline compared to 69% of patients in group 2 (P = .42). Univariate analysis in NOUR patients demonstrated that maximal cystometric capacity below 430 mL and the presence of detrusor contraction at voiding were statistically significant predictors of successful SNM. Overall, at the end of the follow-up period, 8 (50.0%) and 29 (56.9%) patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, were defined as clinical success (P = .775).

Neuro-Urology and Biobanking: An Integrated Approach for Advancing Research and Improving Patient Care

Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying neuro-urological disorders is crucial for the development of targeted therapeutic interventions. Through the establishment of comprehensive biobanks, researchers can collect and store various biological specimens, including urine, blood, tissue, and DNA samples, to study these mechanisms. In the context of neuro-urology, biobanking facilitates the identification of genetic variations, epigenetic modifications, and gene expression patterns associated with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. These conditions often present as symptoms of neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, and many others. Biobanking of tissue specimens from such patients is essential to understand why these diseases cause the respective symptoms and what can be done to alleviate them. The utilization of high-throughput technologies, such as next-generation sequencing and gene expression profiling, enables researchers to explore the molecular landscape of these conditions in an unprecedented manner. The development of specific and reliable biomarkers resulting from these efforts may help in early detection, accurate diagnosis, and effective monitoring of neuro-urological conditions, leading to improved patient care and management. Furthermore, these biomarkers could potentially facilitate the monitoring of novel therapies currently under investigation in neuro-urological clinical trials. This comprehensive review explores the synergistic integration of neuro-urology and biobanking, with particular emphasis on the translation of biobanking approaches in molecular research in neuro-urology. We discuss the advantages of biobanking in neuro-urological studies, the types of specimens collected and their applications in translational research. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of standardization and quality assurance when collecting samples and discuss challenges that may compromise sample quality and impose limitations on their subsequent utilization. Finally, we give recommendations for sampling in multicenter studies, examine sustainability issues associated with biobanking, and provide future directions for this dynamic field.

Development of a Sham Protocol to Investigate Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Randomised, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trials

Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) is a promising treatment for neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms. However, the evidence is limited due to a general lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and, also, inconsistency in the sham and blinding conditions. In the context of much-needed RCTs, we aimed to develop a suitable sham-control protocol for a clinical setting to maintain blinding but avoid meaningful stimulation of the tibial nerve. Three potential electrode positions (lateral malleolus/5th metatarsal/plantar calcaneus) and two electrode sizes (diameter: 2.5 cm/3.2 cm) were tested to determine which combination provided the optimal sham configuration for a TTNS approach, based on a visible motor response. Sixteen healthy volunteers underwent sensory and motor assessments for each sham configuration. Eight out of them came back for an extra TTNS visit. Sensory thresholds were present for all sham configurations, with linear regression models revealing a significant effect regarding electrode position (highest at plantar calcaneus) but not size. In addition, motor thresholds varied with the position-lowest for the 5th metatarsal. Only using this position and 3.2 cm electrodes attained a 100% response rate. Compared to TTNS, sensory and motor thresholds were generally higher for the sham configurations; meanwhile, perceived pain was only higher at the lateral malleolus. In conclusion, using the 5th metatarsal position and 3.2 cm electrodes proved to be the most suitable sham configuration. Implemented as a four-electrode setup with standardized procedures, this appears to be a suitable RCT protocol for maintaining blinding and controlling for nonspecific TTNS effects in a clinical setting.