Hazard of combining allopurinol and thiopurine

Pharmacological targeting of allergen-specific T lymphocytes

Allergic disorders are the result of a complex pathophysiology, involving major cellular lineages and a multitude of humoral factors of the innate and adaptive immune system, and have the tendency to involve multiple organs. Consequently, even standard pharmacological treatment of allergies is rarely specific but usually targets more than one pathway/cellular system at a time. Accordingly, many of the classic anti-allergic drugs have a critical impact also on T helper cells, which are pivotal not only during the sensitization but also the maintenance phase of allergic diseases. Recent years have seen a dramatic increase of novel drugs with the potency to interfere, more or less specifically, with T lymphocyte function, which might, possibly together with classic anti-allergic drugs, help harnessing one of the central cellular players in allergic responses. A major theme in the years to come will be a thoughtful combination of previously established with recently developed treatment modalities.

A guide to clinically relevant drug interactions in oncology

This paper presents an overview of new information on clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, particular focuses on negative drug interactions in oncology. We have generated a concise table of drug-drug interactions that provides a synopsis of the clinical outcome of the interaction along with a recommendation for management. We have also generated other tables that describe specific interactions with methotrexate and dosing guidelines for cytotoxic drugs in the presence of renal or hepatic dysfunction. Since warfarin is one of the non-anticancer drugs that is commonly used in cancer patients for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism, its interactions with other anticancer drugs that have been reported in literatures were also reviewed in this paper. In general, drug interactions observed in cancer patients may be categorized into pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmaceutic interactions. Pharmacokinetic interactions involve one drug altering the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of another drug. Interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic profile of many anticancer agents often complicates the predictability of the antitumor response and toxicities. Among four pharmacokinetic characteristics, drug interactions involving hepatic metabolism is probably the most common and important mechanism responsible for oncologic drug interactions. For example, several anticancer drugs including taxanes, vinca alkaloids, and irinotecan are known to be metabolized by cytochrome CYP3A4. Enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants have been shown to significantly decrease the plasma levels of these anticancer drugs, thereby compromising the anti-tumor effects. N ephrotoxicity or changes in hepatic function caused by some anticancer drugs (e.g., cisplatin, asparaginase) may also have an impact on the pharmacokinetics of the interacting agents. Pharmacodynamic interactions may occur when two or more drugs acting at a common receptor-binding site impact on the pharmacologic action of the object drug, without influencing the pharmacokinetics of each interacting agent. In clinical setting, a decrease of antitumor efficacy was observed in breast cell lines when gemcitabine or vinorelbine were used in combination with paclitaxel. On the other hand, a decreased incidence of thrombocytopenia was seen in patients receiving combination of carboplatin and palcitaxel compared to those receiving carboplatin alone. The third type of drug-drug interaction is known as pharmaceutic interaction. When one drug may alter the physical or chemical compatibility of another drug that utlimately leads to a change in appearance of the solution or a decrease of effectiveness of the drug due to drug inactivation or degradation.

Immunosuppressive Medications

Immunosuppressive agents are commonly used in the nephrologist's practice in the treatment of autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases and transplantation, and they are investigational in the treatment of AKI and ESRD. Drug development has been rapid over the past decades as mechanisms of the immune response have been better defined both by serendipity (the discovery of agents with immunosuppressive activity that led to greater understanding of the immune response) and through mechanistic study (the study of immune deficiencies and autoimmune diseases and the critical pathways or mutations that contribute to disease). Toxicities of early immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide, stimulated intense investigation for agents with more specificity and less harmful effects. Because the mechanisms of the immune response were better delineated over the past 30 years, this specialty is now bestowed with a multitude of therapeutic options that have reduced rejection rates and improved graft survival in kidney transplantation, provided alternatives to cytotoxic therapy in immune-mediated diseases, and opened new opportunities for intervention in diseases both common (AKI) and rare (atypical hemolytic syndrome). Rather than summarizing clinical indications and clinical trials for all currently available immunosuppressive medications, the purpose of this review is to place these agents into mechanistic context together with a brief discussion of unique features of development and use that are of interest to the nephrologist.

Update on immununosuppressive therapies for dogs and cats

Treatment of immune-mediated disease in dogs and cats continues to evolve as new therapies are introduced or adapted from human medicine. Glucocorticoids remain the first-line therapy for many of the immune-mediated or inflammatory diseases of cats and dogs. The focus of this article is to provide an update on some of the common immunosuppressive therapies used in small animal veterinary medicine. The goals of therapy are to induce disease remission through the inhibition of inflammation and the modulation of lymphocyte function.

Review article: the benefits of pharmacogenetics for improving thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Thiopurines represent an effective and widely prescribed therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Concerns about toxicity, mainly resulting from a wide inter-individual variability in thiopurine metabolism, restrict their use. Optimal thiopurine dosing is challenging for preventing adverse drug reactions and improving clinical response.

AIM

To review efficacy and toxicity of thiopurines in IBD. To provide pharmacogenetic-based therapeutic recommendations.

METHODS

We conducted a query on PubMed database using 'inflammatory bowel disease', 'thiopurine', 'azathioprine', '6-mercaptopurine', 'TPMT', 'pharmacogenetics', 'TDM', and selected relevant articles, especially clinical studies.

RESULTS

Thiopurine metabolism - key enzyme: thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) - modulates clinical response, as it results in production of the pharmacologically active and toxic metabolites, the thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN). Adjusting dosage according to TPMT status and/or metabolite blood levels is recommended for optimising thiopurine therapy (e.g. improving response rate up to 30% or decreasing haematological adverse events of 25%). Other enzymes or transporters of interest, as inosine triphosphatase (ITPase), glutathione S-transferase (GST), xanthine oxidase (XO), aldehyde oxidase (AOX), methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and ATP-binding cassette sub-family C member 4 (ABCC4) are reviewed and discussed for clinical relevance.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the literature data, we provide a therapeutic algorithm for thiopurines therapy with starting dose recommendations depending on TPMT status and thereafter dose adjustments according to five metabolite profiles identified with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This algorithm allows a dosage individualisation to optimise the management of patients under thiopurine. Furthermore, identification of new pharmacogenetic biomarkers is promising for ensuring maximal therapeutic response to thiopurines with a minimisation of the risk for adverse events.

Azathioprine-related myelosuppression in a patient homozygous for TPMT*3A

BACKGROUND

A 50-year-old man who had received a simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant 9 years earlier developed pancytopenia 3 weeks after starting azathioprine therapy to treat worsening proteinuria suspected to be caused by sirolimus.

INVESTIGATIONS

Laboratory tests, including complete blood counts, measurement of serum levels of vitamin B(12) and folate, liver function tests, virological assays, and thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping.

DIAGNOSIS

Severe myelosuppression as a consequence of azathioprine therapy in a patient homozygous for the TPMT*3A allele.

MANAGEMENT

Discontinuation of azathioprine, treatment with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, red blood cell transfusions, filgrastim (a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor analogue) and folic acid.

Combination of thiopurines and allopurinol: adverse events and clinical benefit in IBD

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Allopurinol has been presented as a safe and effective adjunct to thiopurine therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to determine the rate of infectious complications and clinical successes with a combination of thiopurine/allopurinol in IBD, and to identify which variables predict 6-thioguanine, 6-methylmercaptopurine, and white blood cell levels. Additionally we aimed to identify which variables predict complications.

METHODS

A retrospective database search identified patients with inflammatory bowel disease on both thiopurines and allopurinol. Regression modeling was used to identify which variables predicted metabolite levels, white blood cell levels, and complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven subjects were found, with 20 treated intentionally and 7 inadvertently after a concurrent gout diagnosis. Thirteen of 20 patients had a major clinical improvement and 7 of 16 stopped steroids. Five infectious complications occurred. These included 2 cases of shingles, and one each of PCP, EBV, and viral meningitis. Significant predictors of metabolite levels included the dose of thiopurine and allopurinol, age, and BMI. Low white blood cell count levels were associated with increased doses, high BMI, and older age. Despite having only 5 events, there was a difference in absolute lymphocyte count between patients with and without infection (median 200 per mm³ vs 850 per mm³ respectively, p=0.0503).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive allopurinol therapy in shunting patients produced major clinical improvement in 48% of patients. However, a surprising number of opportunistic infections have occurred. Low absolute lymphocyte count may be a previously unrecognized indicator of risk of opportunistic infections.

Clinically Significant Drug–Drug Interactions Between Oral Anticancer Agents and Nonanticancer Agents: Profiling and Comparison of Two Drug Compendia

Background:

Use of oral anticancer agents is gaining wide acceptance in the treatment of cancer. However, patients receiving oral therapy are at high risk for drug–drug interactions (DDIs).

Objective:

To create a drug profile for each clinically significant DDI involving selected oral anticancer agents and evaluate the agreement between 2 commonly used DDI compendia: Drug Interaction Facts (DIF) 2008 and Micromedex DRUGDEX.

Methods:

DDI profiles were developed based on primary and tertiary literature reviews. DIF 2008 and Micromedex DRUGDEX were compared to assess the consistency of listings, severity, and scientific evidence ratings of DDIs involving the oral anticancer agents that were selected. The Spearman correlation test was used to assess the correlation of the severity ratings between the 2 compendia.

Results:

A total of 184 DDIs were identified. A DDI profile was created for 40 of these that met the predetermined criteria for clinically significant interactions. The comparative assessment showed inconsistency in DDI listings (15.2% of those identified were listed in DIF only and 46.7% were listed in Micromedex only), severity ratings (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.49), and scientific evidence ratings (disagreement 25.8%).

Conclusions:

The discrepancies in DDI listing and rating systems between the compendia evaluated here reflect the need for more studies to standardize the definitions and classifications of DDIs.

Clinical pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of thiopurines

The thiopurine drugs-azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), and thioguanine-are widely used to treat malignancies, rheumatic diseases, dermatologic conditions, inflammatory bowel disease, and solid organ transplant rejection. However, thiopurine drugs have a relatively narrow therapeutic index and are capable of causing life-threatening toxicity, most often myelosuppression. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT; EC 2.1.1.67), an enzyme that catalyzes S-methylation of these drugs, exhibits a genetic polymorphism in 10% of Caucasians, with 1/300 individuals having complete deficiency. Patients with intermediate or deficient TPMT activity are at risk for excessive toxicity after receiving standard doses of thiopurine medications. This report reviews the recent advances in the knowledge of the mechanism of action as well as the molecular basis and interethnic variations of TPMT and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPase; EC 3.6.1.19), another enzyme implicated in thiopurine toxicity. In addition, an update on pharmacokinetics, metabolism, drug-drug interactions, safety, and tolerability of thiopurine drugs is provided.

Use of allopurinol with low-dose 6-mercaptopurine in inflammatory bowel disease to achieve optimal active metabolite levels: a review of four cases and the literature

BACKGROUND

At least one-third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease do not respond or are intolerant to therapy with 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP). A subgroup fails to attain optimal levels of 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) and instead shunts to 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotide (6-MMPN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted, and four patients are described who had been previously unable to achieve optimal 6-TGN metabolite levels until allopurinol was added to their treatment.

RESULTS

All four patients achieved optimal 6-TGN levels and undetectable 6-MMPN with a mean 6-MP dose of 0.49 mg/kg. Three achieved steroid-free clinical remission. Two of those three patients had normalization of liver enzymes; one patient had baseline normal liver enzymes despite an initial 6-MMPN level of 27,369 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells. Two patients experienced reversible leukopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination allopurinol and low-dose 6-MP is an effective means to achieve optimal metabolite levels and steroid-free clinical remission in previously refractory patients. Caution is advised.

The therapeutic use of azathioprine in renal transplantation

This review discusses the pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, clinical use, toxicities, drug interactions, and possible approaches for therapeutic monitoring of azathioprine (AZA). The drug has been used extensively in posttransplant immunosuppressive protocols. Its therapeutic use is hampered by the development of toxicities, however, especially leukopenia, which is a common criterion for dosage adjustment. Azathioprine is rapidly converted in the liver and erythrocytes to 6-mercaptopurine (6MP), which is eventually metabolized to inactive 6-thiouric acid (6TU). The terminal half-lives of AZA and 6MP are 50 and 74 minutes, respectively. While renal dysfunction does not alter the disposition of AZA, hepatic insufficiency attenuates the pharmacologic activity. Immunosuppression depends on the formation of active intracellular thiopurine ribonucleotides, although AZA itself may block antigen recognition. Individualization of AZA regimens by determining tissue concentrations of thioguanine nucleotides, and plasma concentrations of AZA, 6MP, or 6TU may improve the risk:benefit ratio.