Therapeutic use of type F botulinum toxin

Clinical duration of action of different botulinum toxin types in humans

The Botulinum NeuroToxin (BoNT) comprises several serotypes with distinct properties, mechanisms of action, sensitivity and duration of effect in different species. The serotype A (BoNT/A) is the prevalent neurotoxin applied in human's disease. In this paper we present an overview of the current knowledge regarding the duration of effect and the neuromuscular sprouting of different BoNT serotypes in humans. Then, we report the original results of a study in healthy subjects treated with BoNT/A, B, C and F using different neurophysiological techniques. Twelve healthy volunteers (7 men, 5 women) are treated with BoNT/A, B, C and F or placebo in Abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle of the hand. Before and after injections, an extensive neurophysiological study is performed with the CMAP amplitude variation, Multi-Motor Unit Action Potentials (MUAPs) analysis, the Turns/Amplitude ratio of interference pattern (IP) and determination of jitter and Fiber Density (FD) at single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG), at week 2 (w2), 4 (w4), 6 (w6) and 8 (w8). A maximal neuromuscular block is obtained at w2 for all the serotypes. Afterwards, the CMAP trend appear similar for BoNT/A, B, and C while, BoNT/F shows a faster recover. Multi-MUAPs analysis and IP detect mild changes at w2 for all serotypes, except for BoNT/F that shows a greater change since w4. SFEMG have minimal changes in FD while, Jitter increase at w2 with a slower decrease over the time for all BoNTs. In conclusion, BoNT/F has earlier sprouting and complete recovery at w8. Other serotypes present a slower and similar profile. The EMG appear useful to study the functional recovery in humans, and these results should provide new evidence for assessing different serotypes. These findings improve our knowledge regarding the methods to evaluate duration of effects and dose equivalents in different serotypes, that in the future could change the clinicians strategy for disease-tailored BoNT therapies.

Novel Native and Engineered Botulinum Neurotoxins

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs), produced by Clostridia and other bacteria, are the most potent toxins known. Their cleavage of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor activating protein receptor (SNARE) proteins in neurons prevents the release of neurotransmitters, thus resulting in the muscle paralysis that is characteristic of botulism. This mechanism of action has been exploited for a variety of therapeutic and cosmetic applications of BoNTs. This chapter provides an overview of the native BoNTs, including the classical serotypes and their clinical use, mosaic BoNTs, and novel BoNTs that have been recently identified in clostridial and non-clostridial strains. In addition, the modular structure of native BoNTs, which are composed of a light chain and a heavy chain, is amenable to a multitude of novel fusions and mutations using molecular biology techniques. These novel recombinant BoNTs have been used or are being developed to further characterize the biology of toxins, to assist in vaccine production, to serve as delivery vehicles to neurons, and to be utilized as novel therapeutics for both neuronal and non-neuronal cells.

The Expanding Therapeutic Utility of Botulinum Neurotoxins

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is a major therapeutic agent that is licensed in neurological indications, such as dystonia and spasticity. The BoNT family, which is produced in nature by clostridial bacteria, comprises several pharmacologically distinct proteins with distinct properties. In this review, we present an overview of the current therapeutic landscape and explore the diversity of BoNT proteins as future therapeutics. In recent years, novel indications have emerged in the fields of pain, migraine, overactive bladder, osteoarthritis, and wound healing. The study of biological effects distal to the injection site could provide future opportunities for disease-tailored BoNT therapies. However, there are some challenges in the pharmaceutical development of BoNTs, such as liquid and slow-release BoNT formulations; and, transdermal, transurothelial, and transepithelial delivery. Innovative approaches in the areas of formulation and delivery, together with highly sensitive analytical tools, will be key for the success of next generation BoNT clinical products.

AbobotulinumtoxinA: A 25-Year History

During the late 1960s and early 1970s, Alan Scott showed that intramuscular injections of botulinum toxin (BoNT) corrected nonaccommodative strabismus without resorting to surgery. The UK doctors who trained with Scott soon realized the significant potential offered by BoNT type A as a therapeutic option for several difficult-to-treat diseases. This led to a collaboration between these pioneering clinicians and the Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research at Porton Down, United Kingdom, and, in turn, to the development and commercialization of abobotulinumtoxinA as Dysport (Dystonia/Porton Down; Ipsen Biopharm Ltd., Wrexham, UK). Dysport was approved in Europe for the treatment of specific dystonias in December 1990 and now has marketing authorizations in 75 countries. Since then, the use of BoNT in therapeutic and aesthetic indications has grown year-on-year, and continues to expand well beyond Scott's initial aim. For example, ongoing trials are assessing potential new indications for BoNT-A, including acne and psoriasis. Furthermore, a growing number of other BoNT products, often termed "biosimilars," together with innovative formulations of well-established BoNT types, are likely to reach the market over the next few years. This review focuses on the history of Dysport to mark the 25th anniversary of its first launch in the United Kingdom.

A clinical evaluation of botulinum toxin-A injections in the temporomandibular disorder treatment

Background

This study clinically evaluated the effect of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) in the temporomandibular disorder (TMD) treatment using Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD).

Methods

A total of 21 TMD patients were recruited to be treated with BTX-A injections on the bilateral masseter and temporalis muscles and were followed up by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon highly experienced in the TMD treatment. For each patient, diagnostic data gathering were conducted according to the RDC/TMD. Characteristic pain intensity, disability points, chronic pain grade, depression index, and grade of nonspecific physical symptoms were evaluated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied for statistical analysis.

Results

The results showed that more than half of the participants (85.7 %) had parafunctional oral habits such as bruxism or clenching. In comparison between pre- and post-treatment results, graded pain score, characteristic pain intensity, disability points, chronic pain grade, and grade of nonspecific physical symptoms showed statistically significant differences after the BTX-A injection therapy (p < 0.05). Most patients experienced collective decrease in clinical manifestations of TMD including pain relief and improved masticatory functions after the treatment.

Conclusions

Within the limitation of our study, BTX-A injections in masticatory musculatures of TMD patients could be considered as a useful option for controlling complex TMD and helping its associated symptoms.

Therapeutic use of botulinum toxin in migraine: mechanisms of action

Migraine pain represents sensations arising from the activation of trigeminal afferents, which innervate the meningeal vasculature and project to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC). Pain secondary to meningeal input is referred to extracranial regions innervated by somatic afferents that project to homologous regions in the TNC. Such viscerosomatic convergence accounts for referral of migraine pain arising from meningeal afferents to particular extracranial dermatomes. Botulinum toxins (BoNTs) delivered into extracranial dermatomes are effective in and approved for treating chronic migraine pain. Aside from their well-described effect upon motor endplates, BoNTs are also taken up in local afferent nerve terminals where they cleave soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins, and prevent local terminal release. However, a local extracranial effect of BoNT cannot account for allthe effects of BoNT upon migraine. We now know that peripherally delivered BoNTs are taken up in sensory afferents and transported to cleave SNARE proteins in the ganglion and TNC, prevent evoked afferent release and downstream activation. Such effects upon somatic input (as from the face) likewise would not alone account for block of input from converging meningeal afferents. This current work suggests that BoNTs may undergo transcytosis to cleave SNAREs in second-order neurons or in adjacent afferent terminals. Finally, while SNAREs mediate exocytotic release, they are also involved in transport of channels and receptors involved in facilitated pain states. The role of such post-synaptic effects of BoNT action in migraine remains to be determined.

Central nervous system toxicity after botulinum neurotoxin injection

Since Its first description of botulism toxicity in 1820s, specific formulations of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) have been introduced with different clinical benefits. However, there is increasing number of adverse events reported to Food and Drug Administration. This report presents the case of 62-year-old woman with Parkinson’s disease who received BoNT injections to treat painful spasticity in her hands. She developed severe generalized dystonia shortly after BoNT injections.

Botulinum toxins: mechanisms of action, antinociception and clinical applications

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is a potent neurotoxin that is produced by the gram-positive, spore-forming, anaerobic bacterium, Clostridum botulinum. There are 7 known immunologically distinct serotypes of BoNT: types A, B, C1, D, E, F, and G. Clostridum neurotoxins are produced as a single inactive polypeptide chain of 150kDa, which is cleaved by tissue proteinases into an active di-chain molecule: a heavy chain (H) of ∼100 kDa and a light chain (L) of ∼50 kDa held together by a single disulfide bond. Each serotype demonstrates its own varied mechanisms of action and duration of effect. The heavy chain of each BoNT serotype binds to its specific neuronal ecto-acceptor, whereby, membrane translocation and endocytosis by intracellular synaptic vesicles occurs. The light chain acts to cleave SNAP-25, which inhibits synaptic exocytosis, and therefore, disables neural transmission. The action of BoNT to block the release of acetylcholine botulinum toxin at the neuromuscular junction is best understood, however, most experts acknowledge that this effect alone appears inadequate to explain the entirety of the neurotoxin's apparent analgesic activity. Consequently, scientific and clinical evidence has emerged that suggests multiple antinociceptive mechanisms for botulinum toxins in a variety of painful disorders, including: chronic musculoskeletal, neurological, pelvic, perineal, osteoarticular, and some headache conditions.

Differences in neuromuscular junctions of laryngeal and limb muscles in rats

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Laryngeal muscles are specialized for fine control of voice, speech, and swallowing, and may differ from limb muscles in many aspects. Because muscles and their controlling motor neurons communicate via neuromuscular junctions (NMJs), we hypothesized that NMJs in laryngeal muscles have specialized characteristics different from limb muscles.

STUDY DESIGN

In vivo study.

METHODS

Single muscle fibers from 12 Sprague-Dawley rats (six male, six female) were used to analyze the postsynaptic side of NMJs from laryngeal thyroarytenoid (TA), cricothyroid (CT), posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA), limb soleus (SOL), and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles. NMJs were labeled with rhodamine-conjugated α-bungarotoxin. With confocal microscopy, we counted cluster fragments and measured the NMJ area, both absolute and normalized (corrected by muscle fiber diameter), for at least 10 single fibers from each muscle of each animal. Differences between genders were also compared.

RESULTS

Cluster fragments of postsynaptic NMJs were more numerous in PCA and TA compared to CT, SOL, and EDL muscles (P < .01) in both male and female rats. NMJ cluster fragments were more numerous in female than in male rats only in the TA muscle (P < .01). The absolute area covered by the NMJs showed SOL > EDL > PCA > CT > TA (P < .01); however, with normalization the SOL = EDL = PCA > CT = TA.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences found in NMJ surface and organization between laryngeal and limb muscle fibers may relate to specialized laryngeal muscle functions. Differences in NMJs between male and female rats were found only in the TA muscle, suggesting an underlying mechanism for some gender-specific laryngeal disorders related to abnormal TA muscle activity.

Presynaptic neurotoxins with enzymatic activities

Toxins that alter neurotransmitter release from nerve terminals are of considerable scientific and clinical importance. Many advances were recently made in the understanding of their molecular mechanisms of action and use in human therapy. Here, we focus on presynaptic neurotoxins, which are very potent inhibitors of the neurotransmitter release because they are endowed with specific enzymatic activities: (1) clostridial neurotoxins with a metallo-proteolytic activity and (2) snake presynaptic neurotoxins with a phospholipase A2 activity.

Botulinum Toxin (Botox) to Enhance Facial Macroesthetics: A Literature Review

Dental implants have emerged as a predictable treatment option for partial edentulism. Their ability to preserve bone and soft tissue yields highly esthetic results in the long term. Increasingly, patients are demanding not only enhancements to their dental (micro) esthetics but also to their overall facial (macro) esthetics. Dynamic wrinkles (caused by hyperfunctional muscles) in the perioral, glabellar, and forehead regions can cause a patient's expressions to be misinterpreted as angry, anxious, fearful, or fatigued. An emerging treatment option to address these issues is the use of a paralyzing material such as botulinum toxin A (Botox) to decrease the appearance of the wrinkles, which yields a more esthetic and youthful facial appearance. Botox is a deadly poison that is produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum and causes muscle paralysis by inhibiting acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. When used in areas of hyperfunctional muscles, a transient partial paralysis occurs that diminishes the appearances of wrinkles, Therefore, wrinkles not attributable to hyperfunctional muscles (eg, wrinkles caused by aging, gravity, photodamage, trauma, and scarring) will not be amenable to treatment with the toxin. As a result, proper case selection is essential. A thorough understanding of the indications, techniques, dosages, and complications and their management is imperative to achieve a satisfactory result. This article will review the pathogenesis of facial wrinkles as well as the history, techniques, clinical controversies, and other important considerations for successful treatment of facial wrinkles with Botox.

Clinical use of non-A botulinum toxins: botulinum toxin type C and botulinum toxin type F

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) serotype A is commonly used in the treatment of focal dystonia, but some patients are primarily or become secondarily resistant to it. Consequently, other serotypes have to be used when immuno-resistance is proven. In the literature, patients with focal dystonia have been treated with BoNT serotype F with clinical benefit but with short lasting effects. Recently, BoNT serotype C has been used with positive clinical outcome. An update on the clinical use of BoNT serotype F and BoNT serotype C is provided.

The therapeutic use of botulinum toxin

Since Alan Scott's research, botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been used in several diseases or conditions characterised by muscular overactivity. BoNT acts on either neuromuscular or autonomic cholinergic junctions. Seven different serotypes are known, with antigenic specificity and different therapeutic profiles. BoNT is made up of a heavy chain, involved in binding and membrane translocation, and a light chain, involved in blocking neuroexcytosis. Each serotype shares a specific acceptor on the presynaptic membrane of a cholinergic junction. The available BoNT preparations differ in toxicity, purity and stability. Injection of the neurotoxin produces several modifications at a neuromuscular junction. Axonal sprouting, muscular fibre atrophy, and new end-plates are the most evident histological events after BoNT treatment. They appear to be reversible in untreated muscles. Diffusion can occur at first by haematogeneous or local BoNT spread. Several factors, such as dose, volume, site of injection, muscle size, and muscular fascia, can influence the amount of diffusion and possible side-effects. After prolonged BoNT treatment patients can become unresponsive. Antibodies directed against BoNT have been observed with ELISA or mouse bioassay. Different serotypes have been used to treat non-responder patients. Novel toxins with lower immunogenicity and prolonged clinical efficacy are required for more effective treatment.

Complications with the use of botulinum toxin

This article discusses complications with the use of botulinum toxin. The following topics are explored: conditions caused by muscle spasms, resistance to botulinum toxin, cosmetic use of botulinum toxin, complications in treating hyperhidrosis, treatment of migraine headaches, and informed consent.

Botulinum toxin therapy in pain management

BTs seem to be a useful treatment in refractory MPS and headache. Presumably BTs work by breaking the spasm or pain cycle giving the patient a "window of opportunity" for traditional conservative measures to have a greater beneficial impact, but several studies suggest that a direct antinociceptive effect distinct from any reduction in muscle spasm may be at play. The major benefit of BTs compared with standard therapies is duration of response. We do not advocate that BTs be used as a first line treatment for MPS or headache. However, in refractory cases where nothing else has worked, it may offer a chance for improvement or cure not otherwise available. For now, it remains an off label, but increasingly accepted, approach in-patients with refractory myofascial pain and headache, who despite multidisciplinary approaches, continue to suffer.

Different types of botulinum toxin in humans

In humans, botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) serotype A (BoNT/A) is a useful therapeutic tool, but different BoNT serotypes may be useful when a specific immune resistance related to BoNT/A is proved. BoNT serotype F (BoNT/F) was injected into human muscles but its effects are shorter compared to BoNT/A, whereas BoNT serotype B (BoNT/B) is effective in humans only if injected at very high doses. BoNT serotype C (BoNT/C) has a general profile of action similar to BoNT/A. Nevertheless, a comparison between these different BoNTs in human has not yet been reported. To establish the general profile of these different BoNTs in humans and the spread in near and untreated muscles we conducted an electrophysiological evaluation in 12 healthy volunteers by injecting BoNT/A (BOTOX 15MU), BoNT/B (NeuroBloc 1500MU), BoNT/F (15MU), BoNT/C (15MU) and a saline solution (placebo) in the abductor digiti minimi muscle (ADM) in a double-blind manner. The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude variation, before and at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after the injections, was evaluated in the ADM, the fourth dorsal interosseus, the first dorsal interosseus and the abductor pollicis brevis APB. We detected an earlier recovery for BoNT/F when compared to the other BoNTs. No significant differences in the local or distant BoNT spread was observed among the different serotypes. We conclude that in humans, BoNT/B and BoNT/C have a general profile similar to BoNT/A and as such these serotypes could be alternative therapies to BoNT/A. BoNT/F might be useful when only a short duration of neuromuscular blockade is required.

Contraindications and complications with the use of botulinum toxin

Cosmetic use of BTX has skyrocketed in recent years, especially since the approval of BTX-A for treatment of glabellar lines. Complications and adverse reactions can easily arise, particularly for the novice injector. This paper provides insights from an experienced physician on how to avoid these complications, and how to treat them when and if they occur. The main cosmetic uses for BTX are analyzed for possible complications and adverse events. Injection techniques are discussed. Comparisons between BTX-A and BTX-B are given to point out the need for different injection techniques based on the product being used. Treatment recommendations for the Glabella, Brow, Crow's Feet, Upper Lip Wrinkling/Lines, Depressor Anguli Oris, Nasolabial Folds, Mentalis, Neck and Hyperhidrosis are discussed, as well as systemic complications. It is important for the injecting physician to be familiar with these potential complications, even though the use of BTX has been safe and generally well tolerated, because it will lead to even greater success with the use of BTX.

Botulinum toxins in neurological disease

Botulinum toxins are among the most potent neurotoxins known to humans. In the past 25 years, botulinum toxin has emerged as both a potential weapon of bioterrorism and as a powerful therapeutic agent, with growing applications in neurological and non-neurological disease. Botulinum toxin is unique in its ability to target peripheral cholinergic neurons, preventing the release of acetylcholine through the enzymatic cleavage of proteins involved in membrane fusion, without prominent central nervous system effects. There are seven serotypes of the toxin, each with a specific activity at the molecular level. Currently, serotypes A (in two preparations) and B are available for clinical use, and have been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of dystonia, spasticity, and other disorders in which muscle overactivity gives rise to symptoms. This review focuses on the pharmacology, electrophysiology, immunology, and application of botulinum toxin in selected neurological disorders.

Therapeutic use of botulinum toxins: background and history

The seven botulinum neurotoxin serotypes share less than 50% sequence homology and are immunologically distinct. The neurotoxins inhibit release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine from the axon terminals of motor neurons, preganglionic sympathetic and parasympathetic neurons, and postganglionic parasympathetic nerves by a multi-step mechanism that differs slightly, but significantly, for each serotype. The inhibition is long lasting but temporary. The resulting muscle paralysis has provided the basis for therapeutic use of botulinum toxin types A and B in a variety of focal dystonias. The safety of the botulinum toxins, when administered focally, has permitted their widespread use in a number of other painful conditions.

Comparison of neuromuscular blockade and recovery with botulinum toxins A and F

Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin A is used to treat focal dystonias. Because immunoresistance has been documented in some patients, other molecular forms of the toxin have been evaluated clinically. The present investigation compared the time course and extent of neuromuscular blockade and recovery of botulinum toxin types A and F using an electromyographic monitoring system implanted in the rat hindlimb. For a given dose, the degree and duration of blockade was more complete with type A toxin. Delayed onset of recovery in animals that received high doses of type A toxin allowed time for denervative changes to prevent a full return to baseline, as confirmed histologically. Conversely, animals receiving type F toxin fully recovered within 30 days at all dose levels. The rapid recovery with type F toxin suggested that neuromuscular transmission was restored via the original terminals rather than through functional collateral sprouting. The reversible nature of blockade with this molecular species puts in question its future clinical utility.

Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX) for treatment of migraine

An open-label study and 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have provided supporting evidence of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) as an effective, well-tolerated treatment for migraine. Observed durations of benefit were consistent with known properties of BTX-A. Findings suggest that response may vary by features of preinjection headaches, such as migraine frequency. The precise mechanism by which BTX-A provides pain relief is hypothesized to be related not only to acetylcholine inhibition but also to a blocking action on the parasympathetic nervous system. Additional studies that control factors likely to be related to response may lead to better understanding of the BTX-A effect on migraine and an optimal treatment protocol.

Complications and adverse reactions with the use of botulinum toxin

Botulinum toxins are the causative agents of the severe food-borne illness botulism. With lethal doses approximating 10(-9) g/kg body weight, these neurotoxins represent some of the most toxic naturally occurring substances. Regardless, botulinum toxin is considered a safe therapy for inappropriate muscle spasms with adverse effects being typically self-limited. This article deals with some of the complications that have occurred with these treatments. The greatest concern with the use of BOTOX is probably the formation of blocking antibodies leading to nonresponse of subsequent treatment. Prevalence of resistance is less than 5%. Most complications associated with its aesthetic use are few and anecdotal. Nevertheless, the common problems and pitfalls associated with aesthetic treatment of the various areas of the face and neck with botulinum toxin are discussed. Also included are recommendations as to how to avoid these very undesirable, yet common, problems.

Cervical dystonia pathophysiology and treatment options

Dystonia is a syndrome of sustained involuntary muscle contractions, frequently causing twisting and repetitive movements or abnormal posturing. Cervical dystonia (CD) is a form of dystonia that involves neck muscles. However, CD is not the only cause of neck rotation. Torticollis may be caused by orthopaedic, musculofibrotic, infectious and other neurological conditions that affect the anatomy of the neck, and structural causes. It is estimated that there are between 60,000 and 90,000 patients with CD in the US. The majority of the patients present with a combination of neck rotation (rotatory torticollis or rotatocollis), flexion (anterocollis), extension (retrocollis), head tilt (laterocollis) or a lateral or sagittal shift. Neck posturing may be either tonic, clonic or tremulous, and may result in permanent and fixed contractures. Sensory tricks ('geste antagonistique') often temporarily ameliorate dystonic movements and postures. Commonly used sensory tricks by patients with CD include touching the chin, back of the head or top of the head. Patients with CD are classified according to aetiology into two groups: primary CD (idiopathic--may be genetic or sporadic) or secondary CD (symptomatic). Patients with primary CD have no evidence by history, physical examination or laboratory studies (except primary dystonia gene) of any secondary cause for the dystonic symptoms. CD is a part of either generalised or focal dystonic syndrome which may have a genetic basis, with an identifiable genetic association. Secondary or symptomatic CD may be caused by central or peripheral trauma, exposure to dopamine receptor antagonists (tardive), neurodegenerative disease, and other conditions associated with abnormal functioning of the basal ganglia. In the majority of patients with CD, the aetiology is not identifiable and the disorder is often classified as primary. Unless the aetiological investigation reveals a specific therapeutic intervention, therapy for CD is symptomatic. It includes supportive therapy and counselling, physical therapy, pharmacotherapy, chemodenervation [botulinum toxin (BTX), phenol, alcohol], and central and peripheral surgical therapy. The most widely used and accepted therapy for CD is local intramuscular injections of BTX-type A. Currently, both BTX type A and type B are commercially available, and type F has undergone testing. Pharmacotherapy, including anticholinergics, dopaminergic depleting and blocking agents, and other muscle relaxants can be used alone or in combination with other therapeutic interventions. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with CD in whom other forms of treatment have failed.

Botulinum neurotoxins: from paralysis to recovery of functional neuromuscular transmission

The neuromuscular junction is one of the most accessible mammalian synapses which offers a useful model to study long-term synaptic modifications occurring throughout life. It is also the natural target of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) causing a selective blockade of the regulated exocytosis of acetylcholine thereby triggering a profound albeit transitory muscular paralysis. The scope of this review is to describe the principal steps implicated in botulinum toxin intoxication from the early events leading to a paralysis to the cellular response implementing an impressive synaptic remodelling culminating in the functional recovery of neuromuscular transmission. BoNT/A treatment promotes extensive sprouting emanating from intoxicated motor nerve terminals and the distal portion of motor axons. The current view is that sprouts have the ability to form functional synapses as they display a number of key proteins required for exocytosis: SNAP-25, VAMP/synaptobrevin, syntaxin-I, synaptotagmin-II, synaptophysin, and voltage-activated Na+, Ca2+ and Ca2+-activated K+ channels. Exo-endocytosis was demonstrated (using the styryl dye FM1-43) to occur only in the sprouts in vivo, at the time of functional recovery emphasising the direct role of nerve terminal outgrowth in implementing the restoration of functional neurotransmitter release (at a time when nerve stimulation again elicited muscle contraction). Interestingly, sprouts are only transitory since a second distinct phase of the rehabilitation process occurs with a return of synaptic activity to the original nerve terminals. This is accompanied by the elimination of the dispensable sprouts. The growth or elimination of these nerve processes appears to be strongly correlated with the level of synaptic activity at the parent terminal. The BoNT/A-induced extension and later removal of "functional" sprouts indicate their fundamental importance in the rehabilitation of paralysed endplates, a finding with ramifications for the vital process of nerve regeneration.

Complications and adverse reactions with the use of botulinum toxin

Botulinum toxins are the causative agents of the severe food-borne illness botulism. With lethal doses approximating 10(-9) g/kg body weight, these neurotoxins represent some of the most toxic naturally occurring substances. Regardless, botulinum toxin is considered a safe therapy for inappropriate muscle spasms with adverse effects being typically self-limited. This article deals with some of the complications that have occurred with these treatments. The greatest concern with the use of BOTOX is probably the formation of blocking antibodies leading to nonresponse of subsequent treatment. Prevalence of resistance is less than 5%. Most complications associated with its aesthetic use are few and anecdotal. Nevertheless, the common problems and pitfalls associated with aesthetic treatment of the various areas of the face and neck with botulinum toxin are discussed. Also included are recommendations as to how to avoid these very undesirable, yet common, problems.

Tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins: turning bad guys into good by research

The neuroparalytic syndromes of tetanus and botulism are caused by neurotoxins produced by bacteria of the genus Clostridium. They are 150 kDa proteins consisting of three-domains, endowed with different functions: neurospecific binding, membrane translocation and specific proteolysis of three key components of the neuroexocytosis apparatus. After binding to the presynaptic membrane of motoneurons, tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) is internalized and transported retroaxonally to the spinal cord, where it blocks neurotransmitter release from spinal inhibitory interneurons. In contrast, the seven botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) act at the periphery and inhibit acetylcholine release from peripheral cholinergic nerve terminals. TeNT and BoNT-B, -D, -F and -G cleave specifically at single but different peptide bonds, VAMP/synaptobrevin, a membrane protein of small synaptic vesicles. BoNT types -A, -C and -E cleave SNAP-25 at different sites within the COOH-terminus, whereas BoNT-C also cleaves syntaxin. BoNTs are increasingly used in medicine for the treatment of human diseases characterized by hyperfunction of cholinergic terminals.

Neurotoxins affecting neuroexocytosis

Nerve terminals are specific sites of action of a very large number of toxins produced by many different organisms. The mechanism of action of three groups of presynaptic neurotoxins that interfere directly with the process of neurotransmitter release is reviewed, whereas presynaptic neurotoxins acting on ion channels are not dealt with here. These neurotoxins can be grouped in three large families: 1) the clostridial neurotoxins that act inside nerves and block neurotransmitter release via their metalloproteolytic activity directed specifically on SNARE proteins; 2) the snake presynaptic neurotoxins with phospholipase A(2) activity, whose site of action is still undefined and which induce the release of acethylcholine followed by impairment of synaptic functions; and 3) the excitatory latrotoxin-like neurotoxins that induce a massive release of neurotransmitter at peripheral and central synapses. Their modes of binding, sites of action, and biochemical activities are discussed in relation to the symptoms of the diseases they cause. The use of these toxins in cell biology and neuroscience is considered as well as the therapeutic utilization of the botulinum neurotoxins in human diseases characterized by hyperfunction of cholinergic terminals.

The effects of tetanus toxin on the orbicularis oculi muscle

PURPOSE

Tetanus toxin can cause localized neuromuscular weakness, but it also can produce systemic tetany. The action of tetanus toxin on the orbicularis muscle has not been studied in animals immunized to prevent systemic tetany. Our objective was to determine whether tetanus toxin could be used to treat orbicularis oculi muscle spasms.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical, electrophysiologic, and histopathologic effects of tetanus toxin injected into the orbicularis oculi muscle of rabbits with passive immunity to tetanus toxin. In six rabbits, the orbicularis oculi function in both eyes was assessed clinically, and the baseline orbicularis oculi muscle action potential was measured physiologically with electromyography (EMG). The rabbits then were immunized against tetanus toxin with tetanus immunoglobulin for immediate and definitive immunity. Tetanus toxin was injected into the left orbicularis oculi muscles, leaving the right eyes as controls. Ten days later, the rabbits were again assessed by clinical examination and with EMGs on both the injected side and the noninjected side. The animals were killed at 14 days, and the orbicularis muscle was removed from both sides. The injected and control tissues were examined microscopically for signs of neuromuscular denervation.

RESULTS

All six rabbits showed weakness in eye closure on the side injected with tetanus toxin. In addition, four rabbits developed complete ear ptosis on the tetanus toxin injected side because of spread of the toxin to adjacent ear muscles. EMGs showed both a denervation of the orbicularis oculi muscle and a poor blink potential on the side injected with tetanus toxin. Histopathologic studies of the orbicularis oculi muscle injected with tetanus toxin showed angulation of both slow and fast types of muscle fibers compatible with neuromuscular denervation.

CONCLUSIONS

Tetanus toxin can cause localized orbicularis oculi weakness, as documented clinically, physiologically, and microscopically, without producing systemic tetany in immunized rabbits. Tetanus toxin may have a potential application in the treatment of blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm.

Botulinum toxin in motor disorders

Advances in the clinical use of botulinum neurotoxins continue. Of interest to the neurologist is the advanced practice in the treatment of focal dystonia and the new developments on other dyskinesias and on autonomic control of smooth muscle motility. New toxin serotypes are now being tested; their availability will improve clinical practice and will possibly lead to combined treatments. Indications in spasticity and in juvenile cerebral palsy are now under scrutiny. The combination of focal chemodenervation with specific rehabilitation procedures enables new development in this field.

Tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins: mechanism of action and therapeutic uses

The clostridial neurotoxins responsible for tetanus and botulism are proteins consisting of three domains endowed with different functions: neurospecific binding, membrane translocation and proteolysis for specific components of the neuroexocytosis apparatus. Tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) binds to the presynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction, is internalized and transported retroaxonally to the spinal cord. The spastic paralysis induced by the toxin is due to the blockade of neurotransmitter release from spinal inhibitory interneurons. In contrast, the seven serotypes of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) act at the periphery by inducing a flaccid paralysis due to the inhibition of acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction. TeNT and BoNT serotypes B, D, F and G cleave specifically at single but different peptide bonds, of the vesicle associated membrane protein (VAMP) synaptobrevin, a membrane protein of small synaptic vesicles (SSVs). BoNT types A, C and E cleave SNAP-25 at different sites located within the carboxyl-terminus, while BoNT type C additionally cleaves syntaxin. The remarkable specificity of BoNTs is exploited in the treatment of human diseases characterized by a hyperfunction of cholinergic terminals.

Further studies using higher doses of botulinum toxin type F for torticollis resistant to botulinum toxin type A

OBJECTIVE

A previous study of botulinum toxin type F (BTX-F) treatment for torticollis had shown a dose of 520 MU to be effective, but for a much shorter duration than is usual with botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). The objective was to assess the effect of a higher dose of BTX-F.

METHODS

Four of the previously treated patients, plus an additional patient, were treated with a higher dose of 780 MU BTX-F. All were secondary nonresponders to BTX-A due to neutralising antibodies. A test injection of 40 MU BTX-F was also given into the extensor digitorum brevis muscle (EDB), to examine the time course of the biological effect of the toxin electrophysiologically. Patients were followed up at two, four, eight, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

All patients reported subjective improvement lasting from seven to 11 (mean 8.6) weeks accompanied by a significant reduction in mean clinical severity scores at two weeks. Four patients had pain which was substantially reduced. The electrophysiological studies confirmed biological sensitivity to the toxin in all patients, showing a significant change beginning at two weeks and returning to baseline at 12 weeks. The time course of this effect paralleled roughly that of the clinical response. The four patients who had previously received 520 MU BTX-F reported that the response was better and longer in duration with 780 MU. Dysphagia was more common than reported with the lower dose.

CONCLUSION

Better results are possible with higher doses of BTX-F but the duration of benefit is still shorter than with BTX-A, seemingly due to a shorter duration of neuromuscular junction blockade.

Variability of the immunologic and clinical response in dystonic patients immunoresistant to botulinum toxin injections

Immunoresistance (Ab+) to botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has been a serious concern since the introduction of BTX-A in the treatment of dystonia and other disorders associated with abnormal muscle contractions. We studied seven patients who developed Ab+ and later reverted to antibody-negative (Ab-) status. These seven patients, six women (mean age, 56 years; range, 41-80 years), with an average duration of dystonia for all patients of 197 months (range, 84-360 months), received a total mean cumulative dose of 1659 units (U) (range, 810-1975 U), with an average dose of 207 U per visit. All of these patients became unresponsive to BTX-A treatment and became Ab+ as determined by mouse bioassay. Their response to BTX-A after they reverted to Ab- was analyzed. The average latency between the initial BTX-A treatment and development of Ab+ was 27 months (range, 1543 months). The average duration between the detection of Ab+ status and subsequent reversal to Ab- status was 30 months (range, 10-78 months). Six of these Ab- patients were reinjected with BTX-A, and all six benefited from repeat injections comparable with their earlier response. Three patients lost their clinical response to subsequent injections and were found to be again Ab+. Two of the five patients who became immunoresistant to BTX-A received botulinum toxin type F (BTX-F) injections and one patient received a single session of BTX-B with improvement in their symptoms. In conclusion, this unique group of patients who were Ab+ and became Ab- responded favorably to repeat BTX-A injections, but some lost the benefit with subsequent injections. These observations suggest that the anamnestic immunologic response to BTX-A can wane, but can be reactivated by repeat BTX-A treatments. The presence of antibodies did not interfere with the response to BTX-F or BTX-B injections, thus confirming the antigenic specificity of various BTX serotypes.

Botulinum neurotoxin serotype C: a novel effective botulinum toxin therapy in human

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) serotype A is commonly used in the treatment of focal dystonia. Nevertheless, some patients are or become resistant to this serotype. Consequently, other different serotypes have to be used. A comparison of the neuromuscular blockade induced by BoNT type A and C in the extensor digitorum brevis muscles of voluntary subjects was studied, by evaluating the amplitude variation over the time (until 90 days) of the compound muscular action potential elicited by supramaximal electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve at the ankle. A very similar effect and temporal profile, was observed for each serotype. On this basis, two patients with idiopathic facial hemispasm and one with blepharospasm were treated with BoNT serotype C with very beneficial long lasting effects.

Botulinum neurotoxins: mechanism of action and therapeutic applications

Recent studies have led to the discovery of the molecular lesions in motor neurons caused by botulinum neurotoxins. These neurotoxins are metalloproteinases that enter the cytosol and very specifically cleave protein components of the neuroexocytosis apparatus. Consequently, acetylcholine cannot be released and the muscle is paralysed. For this reason, botulinum neurotoxins are increasingly being used to treat a variety of conditions where a functional paralysis of neuromuscular junctions is useful as therapy.

Botulinum toxin F in the treatment of torticollis clinically resistant to botulinum toxin A

Two reports have shown a Japanese preparation of botulinum toxin type F (BTX-F) to be an effective alternative for patients with torticollis who develop clinical resistance to botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). A group of patients with torticollis, comprising five secondary non-responders and one primary non-responder, were treated with a preparation of BTX-F produced in the UK (Speywood Pharmaceuticals). A low dose of BTX-F (220 mouse units (MU) in total) was given into clinically affected neck muscles, followed six weeks later by an injection of a total of 520 MU. Antibodies to BTX-A (mouse protection assay) were present in all secondary non-responders but not in the primary non-responder. No patients developed atrophy after injection of Dysport BTX-A (40 MU) into the left extensor digitorum brevis muscle whereas pronounced atrophy occurred in all patients after injection of 40 MU of BTX-F into the right extensor digitorum brevis muscle. Three patients improved subjectively after treatment with 220 MU BTX-F and five (all secondary non-responders) after the subsequent dose of 520 MU (two considerably), with reduced Tsui scores, but group scores were only significantly changed after the higher dose. The primary non-responder remained unchanged after both doses of BTX-F. One patient reported mild dysphagia with 520 MU BTX-F. Mean duration of improvement with 520 MU BTX-F was five (range 4-6)weeks. Thus BTX-F provides benefit for BTX-A non-responders with few side effects but for a shorter period than BTX-A, possibly due to relative underdosing. As with BTX-A, biological sensitivity to BTX-F does not necessarily predict a clinical response.

Development of resistance to botulinum toxin type A in patients with torticollis

Between 1984 and 1992, 559 patients with torticollis were treated with botulinum toxin type A (btx) injections. Twenty-four of these 559 patients (4.3%) had serological evidence of antibodies to btx by mouse neutralization assay. Some of the 559 patients had only one or two injection series, whereas others were lost to follow-up, so that the actual prevalence of serologically detectable antibodies may be higher than 4%. In addition, some patients who improved after btx injections lost benefit and stopped developing muscle atrophy from adequate doses of btx, without serological evidence of antibodies. To evaluate the risk factors for btx resistance (loss of benefit and muscle atrophy after injections with or without serological evidence of antibodies), we reviewed the records of a cohort of torticollis patients injected over 2-45 months (mean, 23 months) beginning in 1988. Eight of 76 patients (10.5%) developed btx resistance. Compared to nonresistant patients from the same cohort, these eight patients received more frequent injections, had more "booster injections" 2-3 weeks after an initial injection, and received higher doses of btx per treatment. In order to minimize the risk of developing btx resistance, therefore, we recommend that physicians wait as long as possible (at least 1 month) between btx injections, avoid booster injections, and use the smallest possible doses.

The medical management of masseteric hypertrophy with botulinum toxin type A

We describe the successful outpatient medical treatment of a patient with bilateral masseteric hypertrophy using botulinum toxin type A in a double-blind placebo controlled study. No significant side-effects occurred, and benefit has so far lasted for 6 months.

Use of botulinum toxin type F injections to treat torticollis in patients with immunity to botulinum toxin type A

Fifteen patients with torticollis who had been treated with repeated injections of botulinum toxin type A (botox A) developed antibodies to the toxin. This resulted in loss of benefit in the 13 patients who had improved with botox A injections and failure to develop muscle atrophy after injection in all 15 patients. Patients were then injected with botulinum toxin type F (botox F) in the same muscles that had been injected with botox A. Ten of the 15 improved after botox F injections, including 9 of the 12 patients who had improved with type A toxin. Six of 9 patients with pain had improvement in pain after botox F injections. Patients reported similar improvement with type F and type A toxins, but duration of benefit was approximately 3 months with type A and approximately 1 month with type F. Botox F is an effective treatment for torticollis in patients who are immune to botox A. The usefulness of type F toxin, however, is limited by short duration of benefit.

Stabilization of botulinum toxin type A during lyophilization

Botulinum toxin for medical use is diluted to very low concentrations (nanograms per milliliter); when it is preserved by lyophilization, considerable loss of activity can occur. In the present study, conditions that gave > 90% recovery of the toxicity after lyophilization of solutions containing 20 to 1,000 mouse 50% lethal doses per ml were found. Toxicity was recovered upon drying 0.1 ml of toxin solution when the pH was maintained below 7 and bovine or human serum albumins were used as stabilizers. Various other substances tested with albumin, including glucose, sucrose, trehalose, mannitol, glycine, and cellibiose, did not increase recovery on drying.