Inhibitors of factor VIII in hemophilia

The role of previously untreated patient studies in understanding the development of FVIII inhibitors

Development of inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII), the major complication of haemophilia A treatment today, is influenced by multiple factors. Genetic (F8 mutation, family history, ethnicity, polymorphisms in immune modulating genes) and non-genetic (intensive exposure to FVIII, presence of pro-inflammatory signals as might occur with large bleeds, infections, surgery, or other immune stimulants [e.g. vaccines]) risk factors as well as their complex inter-relationships contribute to the inhibitor risk profile of haemophilia patients, particularly in the previously untreated patient (PUP) population. Studies in PUPs have been fundamental to furthering the understanding of FVIII inhibitor development, as well as discovering previously unappreciated risk factors. The multi-factorial nature of inhibitor development makes it difficult to ascertain the contribution of FVIII products in inhibitor development through individual PUP studies. Sufficiently powered studies of large cohorts may overcome these limitations but interpretations should be conducted cautiously. Proper design and implementation of PUP safety studies will become even more important with the introduction of new molecules, such as extended half-life or human cell-line derived FVIII that propose reduced immunogenicity. Despite these difficulties, carefully performed clinical studies in PUPs may provide important insights into the natural history of the immune response to FVIII and may suggest targets for intervention to reduce immunogenicity.

Factor VIII inhibitors in hemophilia A: rationale and latest evidence

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy is the foundation of treatment in hemophilia A and is effective unless a patient develops an alloantibody (inhibitor) against exogenous FVIII. Inhibitor development is currently the most significant treatment complication seen in patients with hemophilia and is associated with considerable morbidity and a decreased quality of life. The development of an inhibitor is the result of a complex interaction between a patient's immune system and genetic and environmental risk factors. The mainstay of treatment is the eradication of the inhibitor through immune tolerance. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding inhibitor risk factors, eradication, and hemostatic bypassing agents.

Factor VIII inhibitors: a 50-year perspective

Inhibitors of factor VIII (FVIII) have been studied for more than 50 years, but diagnostic and therapeutic challenges remain. To describe the features that distinguish alloantibodies from autoantibodies, list predisposing factors, and review methods for tolerance induction and autoantibody suppression. Review of key articles published during the past half-century that have advanced knowledge in this field. Alloantibodies generally bind to the A2 or C2 domains of FVIII and disrupt the formation of the FVIII-FIX complex. They exhibit type 1 reaction kinetics, are saturable by FVIII, and display anamnesis. In contrast, autoantibodies usually bind to the C2 domain of FVIII, interfering with phospholipid and von Willebrand factor binding. They have type-2 kinetics and are poorly neutralized by FVIII. Repeated exposures to FVIII induce tolerance in 70-80% of haemophiliacs with inhibitors, whereas drugs that deplete B-lymphocytes restore self-tolerance to FVIII in a similar percentage of non-haemophiliacs. Future work should focus on improving assays that detect and quantify inhibitors, examining the pathophysiology of inhibitor formation using contemporary immunologic tools, and investigating new treatment modalities. These should include agents to control bleeding with less thrombotic risk, more specific immunomodulating drugs to curtail antibody formation, and, for haemophilia patients, genetic therapies to provide FVIII resistant to or protected from inactivation by inhibitors.