1
|
Seely JM, Domonkos V, Verma R. Auditing Abbreviated Breast MR Imaging: Clinical Considerations and Implications. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:687-701. [PMID: 38777543 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Abbreviated breast MR (AB-MR) imaging is a relatively new breast imaging tool, which maintains diagnostic accuracy while reducing image times compared with full-protocol breast MR (FP-MR) imaging. Breast imaging audits involve calculating individual and organizational metrics, which can be compared with established benchmarks, providing a standard against which performance can be measured. Unlike FP-MR imaging, there are no established benchmarks for AB-MR imaging but studies demonstrate comparable performance for cancer detection rate, positive predictive value 3, sensitivity, and specificity with T2. We review the basics of performing an audit, including strategies to implement if benchmarks are not being met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean M Seely
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.
| | - Victoria Domonkos
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Raman Verma
- Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada. https://twitter.com/RamanVermaMD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Menes TS, Zippel D, Sklair-Levy M, Friedman E, Bernstein-Molho R, Faermann R, Madorsky Feldman D. Clinical breast exam contribution to breast cancer diagnosis in BRCA mutation carriers vs. average to intermediate risk women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024:10.1007/s10549-024-07345-3. [PMID: 38797791 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07345-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The contribution of clinical breast exam (CBE) to breast cancer diagnosis in average risk women undergoing regular screening mammography is minimal. To evaluate the role of CBE in high-risk women, we compared BC diagnosis by CBE in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing regular BC surveillance to average to intermediate risk women undergoing regular breast cancer screening. METHODS A retrospective chart review of all consecutive screening visits of BRCA mutation carriers (January 2012-October 2022) and average to intermediate risk women (November 2016-December 2022) was completed. Women with histologically confirmed BC diagnosis were included. Additional CBE yield for BC diagnosis, defined as the percentage of all BC cases detected by CBE alone, was assessed in both groups. RESULTS Overall, 12,997 CBEs were performed in 1,328 BRCA mutation carriers in whom 134 BCs were diagnosed. In 7,949 average to intermediate risk women who underwent 15,518 CBEs, 87 BCs were diagnosed. CBE contributed to BC diagnosis in 3 (2%) BRCA mutation carriers and 3 (4%) non-carriers. In both groups, over 4,000 CBEs were needed in order to diagnose one cancer. In all 3 BRCA mutation carriers BC was palpated during the surveillance round that did not include MRI. In the average to intermediate risk group, 2 of 3 cancers diagnosed following CBE findings were in a different location from the palpable finding. CONCLUSIONS The contribution of CBE to BC diagnosis is marginal for all women including BRCA mutation carriers. In BRCA mutation carriers, CBE appears redundant during the MRI surveillance round.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tehillah S Menes
- Department of Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
- Tel Aviv School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
| | - Douglas Zippel
- Department of Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Tel Aviv School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Miri Sklair-Levy
- Meirav Center for Women's Health and High-Risk Clinic, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Tel Aviv School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Meirav Center for Women's Health and High-Risk Clinic, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Tel Aviv School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Rinat Bernstein-Molho
- Meirav Center for Women's Health and High-Risk Clinic, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Tel Aviv School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Renata Faermann
- Meirav Center for Women's Health and High-Risk Clinic, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Dana Madorsky Feldman
- Meirav Center for Women's Health and High-Risk Clinic, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alvarenga P, Park JY, Pinto R, Parente D, Lajkosz K, Westergard S, Ghai S, Kim R, Kulkarni S, Au F, Chamadoira J, Freitas V. Decoding the Prevalent High-Risk Breast Cancers: Demographics, Pathological, Imaging Insights, and Long-Term Outcome. Can Assoc Radiol J 2024:8465371241253254. [PMID: 38795027 DOI: 10.1177/08465371241253254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the features and outcomes of breast cancer in high-risk subgroups. Materials and Methods: REB approved an observational study of women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2019. Three radiologists, using the BI-RADS lexicon, blindly reviewed mammogram and MRI screenings without a washout period. Consensus was reached with 2 additional reviewers. Inter-rater agreement was measured by Fleiss Kappa. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square tests for cohort analysis, and Kaplan-Meier for survival rates, with a Cox model for comparative analysis using gene mutation as a reference. Results: The study included 140 high-risk women, finding 155 malignant lesions. Significant age differences noted: chest radiation therapy (median age 44, IQR: 37.0-46.2), gene mutation (median age 49, IQR: 39.8-58.0), and familial risk (median age 51, IQR: 44.5-56.0) (P = .007). Gene mutation carriers had smaller (P = .01), higher-grade tumours (P = .002), and more triple-negative ER- (P = .02), PR- (P = .002), and HER2- (P = .02) cases. MRI outperformed mammography in all subgroups. Substantial to near-perfect inter-rater agreement observed. Over 10 years, no deaths occurred in chest radiation group, with no significant survival difference between gene mutation and familial risk groups, HR = 0.93 (95% CI: 0.27, 3.26), P = .92. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of age and specific tumour characteristics in identifying high-risk breast cancer subgroups. MRI is confirmed as an effective screening tool. Despite the aggressive nature of cancers in gene mutation carriers, early detection is crucial for survival outcomes. These insights, while necessitating further validation with larger studies, advocate for a move toward personalized medical care, strengthening the existing healthcare guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Alvarenga
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ji Yeon Park
- Department of Radiology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Gimhae-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Renata Pinto
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Katherine Lajkosz
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shelley Westergard
- Average and High-Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sandeep Ghai
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raymond Kim
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Sinai Health System, Hospital for Sick Children, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Supriya Kulkarni
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Frederick Au
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Juliana Chamadoira
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vivianne Freitas
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klassen CL, Viers LD, Ghosh K. Following the High-Risk Patient: Breast Cancer Risk-Based Screening. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:3154-3159. [PMID: 38302622 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-14957-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer occurring in women in the USA today, and accounts for more than 40,000 deaths annually (Giaquinto in CA Cancer J Clin 72: 524-541, 2022). While breast cancer survival has improved over the past decades, incidence has increased, and diagnoses are being made at younger ages. This emphasizes the importance of risk evaluation, accurate prediction, and effective mitigation and risk reduction strategies. Enhanced screening can help detect cancers at an earlier stage, thus improving morbidity and mortality. This review addresses the recognition of women at high-risk for BC and monitoring strategies for those at high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine L Klassen
- Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic- Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Lyndsay D Viers
- Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic- Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Karthik Ghosh
- Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic- Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Aribal E, Guldogan N, Seker ME, Yilmaz E, Turk EB. MRI only detected lesions: Can contrast enhanced mammography guided biopsy be an alternative method: Initial clinical findings. Eur J Radiol 2024; 173:111373. [PMID: 38364588 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to analyze our initial findings regarding CEM-guided stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy for MRI-only detected lesions and compare biopsy times by MRI-guided biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective analysis, CEM-guided biopsies of MRI-only detected breast lesions from December 2021 to June 2023were included. Patient demographics, breast density, lesion size, background parenchymal enhancement on CEM, lesion positioning, procedure duration, and number of scout views were documented. Initially, seven patients had CEM imaging before biopsy; for later cases, CEM scout views were used for simultaneous lesion depiction and targeting. RESULTS Two cases were excluded from the initial 28 patients with 29 lesions resulting in a total of 27 lesions in 26 women (mean age:44.96 years). Lesion sizes ranged from 4.5 to 41 mm, with two as masses and the remaining as non-mass enhancements. Histopathological results identified nine malignancies (33.3 %, 9/27), including invasive cancers (55.6 %, 5/9) and DCIS (44.4 %, 4/9). The biopsy PPV rate was 33.3 %. Benign lesions comprised 66.7 %, with 22.2 % high-risk lesions. The biopsy success rate was 93.1 % (27/29), and minor complications occurred in seven cases (25.9 %, 7/27), mainly small hematomas and one vasovagal reaction (3.7 %, 1/27). Median number of scout views required was 2, with no significant differences between cases with or without prior CEM (P = 0.8). Median duration time for biopsy was 14 min, significantly shorter than MRI-guided bx at the same institution (P < 0.001) by 24 min with predominantly upright positioning of the patient (88.9 %) and horizontal approach of the needle (92.6 %). CONCLUSION This study showed that CEM-guided biopsy is a feasible and safe alternative method and a faster solution for MRI-only detected enhancing lesions and can be accurately performed without the need for prior CEM imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erkin Aribal
- Acibadem University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | | | | - Ebru Yilmaz
- Acibadem Altunizade Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ahsan MD, Webster EM, Wolfe IA, McGonigle R, Brewer JT, Chandler IR, Weiss JM, Enriquez A, Cantillo E, Holcomb K, Chapman-Davis E, Blank SV, Sharaf RN, Frey MK. Personalized survivorship care: Routine breast cancer risk assessment in the gynecologic oncology clinic. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 183:47-52. [PMID: 38503141 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gynecologic and breast cancers share several risk factors. Breast cancer risk assessment tools can identify those at elevated risk and allow for enhanced breast surveillance and chemoprevention, however such tools are underutilized. We aim to evaluate the use of routine breast cancer risk assessment in a gynecologic oncology clinic. METHODS A patient-facing web-based tool was used to collect personal and family history and run four validated breast cancer risk assessment models (Tyrer-Cuzick (TC), Gail, BRCAPRO, and Claus) in a gynecologic oncology clinic. We evaluated completion of the tools and identification of patients at elevated risk for breast cancer using the four validated models. RESULTS A total of 99 patients were included in this analysis. The BRCAPRO model had the highest completion rate (84.8%), followed by the TC model (74.7%), Gail model (74.7%), and the Claus model (52.1%). The TC model identified 21.6% of patients completing the model as having ≥20% lifetime risk of breast cancer, compared to 6.8% by the Gail model, and 0% for both the BRCAPRO and Claus models. The Gail model identified 52.5% of patients as having ≥1.67% 5-year risk of breast cancer. Among patients identified as high-risk for breast cancer and eligible for screening, 9/9 (100%) were referred to a high-risk breast clinic. CONCLUSION Among patients that completed the TC breast cancer risk assessment in a gynecologic oncology clinic, approximately 1 in 5 were identified to be at significantly elevated lifetime risk for breast cancer. The gynecologic oncologist's office might offer a convenient and feasible setting to incorporate this risk assessment into routine patient care, as gynecologic oncologists often have long-term patient relationships and participate in survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily M Webster
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Isabel A Wolfe
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Rylee McGonigle
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Jesse T Brewer
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | | | - Jessica M Weiss
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Allan Enriquez
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Evelyn Cantillo
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Kevin Holcomb
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | | | - Stephanie V Blank
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai - 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Ravi N Sharaf
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Melissa K Frey
- Weill Cornell Medicine - 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kapsner LA, Folle L, Hadler D, Eberle J, Balbach EL, Liebert A, Ganslandt T, Wenkel E, Ohlmeyer S, Uder M, Bickelhaupt S. Lesion-conditioning of synthetic MRI-derived subtraction-MIPs of the breast using a latent diffusion model. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6391. [PMID: 38493266 PMCID: PMC10944528 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56853-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this feasibility study is to investigate if latent diffusion models (LDMs) are capable to generate contrast enhanced (CE) MRI-derived subtraction maximum intensity projections (MIPs) of the breast, which are conditioned by lesions. We trained an LDM with n = 2832 CE-MIPs of breast MRI examinations of n = 1966 patients (median age: 50 years) acquired between the years 2015 and 2020. The LDM was subsequently conditioned with n = 756 segmented lesions from n = 407 examinations, indicating their location and BI-RADS scores. By applying the LDM, synthetic images were generated from the segmentations of an independent validation dataset. Lesions, anatomical correctness, and realistic impression of synthetic and real MIP images were further assessed in a multi-rater study with five independent raters, each evaluating n = 204 MIPs (50% real/50% synthetic images). The detection of synthetic MIPs by the raters was akin to random guessing with an AUC of 0.58. Interrater reliability of the lesion assessment was high both for real (Kendall's W = 0.77) and synthetic images (W = 0.85). A higher AUC was observed for the detection of suspicious lesions (BI-RADS ≥ 4) in synthetic MIPs (0.88 vs. 0.77; p = 0.051). Our results show that LDMs can generate lesion-conditioned MRI-derived CE subtraction MIPs of the breast, however, they also indicate that the LDM tended to generate rather typical or 'textbook representations' of lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenz A Kapsner
- Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
- Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Wetterkreuz 15, 91058, Erlangen-Tennenlohe, Germany.
| | - Lukas Folle
- Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Martensstraße 3, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dominique Hadler
- Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jessica Eberle
- Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Eva L Balbach
- Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andrzej Liebert
- Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Ganslandt
- Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Wetterkreuz 15, 91058, Erlangen-Tennenlohe, Germany
| | - Evelyn Wenkel
- Radiologie München, Burgstraße 7, 80331, Munich, Germany
| | - Sabine Ohlmeyer
- Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Uder
- Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Bickelhaupt
- Institute of Radiology, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Maximiliansplatz 3, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pestana C, Cairns A, Fang-Chi H, Lombana G, Howard-McNatt M, Levine EA, Chiba A. Rates of high-risk screening prior to a breast cancer diagnosis in patients under age 40. Am J Surg 2024; 228:218-221. [PMID: 37863802 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND NCCN Guidelines recommend screening young women with an increased breast cancer risk (>20 % lifetime risk). We sought to evaluate our institutional rates of high-risk screening in young breast cancer patients prior to their diagnoses." METHODS A single-institution retrospective review (2013-2018) was performed investigating risk scores (Tyrer-Cuzick model) and characteristics of breast cancer patients (age <40 y) prior to diagnosis. RESULTS 92 breast cancer patients age <40 y were identified (average age 34.5). Only 3.3 % (n = 3) underwent appropriate screening, despite 35.8 % meeting high-risk criteria. Nearly all patients underwent genetic testing (98.9 %) with pathogenic mutations identified in 36.5 %, including 15.3 % with BRCA1/2 mutations. CONCLUSIONS This analysis highlights a significant discrepancy between those meeting criteria for high-risk screening and those who underwent appropriate screening. We identified that this cohort carries significant genetic burden. Future analysis should investigate these findings on a broader scale and strategies to improve screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Pestana
- Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley Cairns
- Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hsu Fang-Chi
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Marissa Howard-McNatt
- Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Edward A Levine
- Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Akiko Chiba
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Udayakumar D, Madhuranthakam AJ, Doğan BE. Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging for Breast Cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2024; 32:135-150. [PMID: 38007276 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among women worldwide, carrying a significant socioeconomic burden. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with 4 major subtypes identified. Each subtype has unique prognostic factors, risks, treatment responses, and survival rates. Advances in targeted therapies have considerably improved the 5-year survival rates for primary breast cancer patients largely due to widespread screening programs that enable early detection and timely treatment. Imaging techniques are indispensable in diagnosing and managing breast cancer. While mammography is the primary screening tool, MRI plays a significant role when mammography results are inconclusive or in patients with dense breast tissue. MRI has become standard in breast cancer imaging, providing detailed anatomic and functional data, including tumor perfusion and cellularity. A key characteristic of breast tumors is angiogenesis, a biological process that promotes tumor development and growth. Increased angiogenesis in tumors generally indicates poor prognosis and increased risk of metastasis. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI measures tumor perfusion and serves as an in vivo metric for angiogenesis. DCE-MRI has become the cornerstone of breast MRI, boasting a high negative-predictive value of 89% to 99%, although its specificity can vary. This review presents a thorough overview of magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion imaging in breast cancer, focusing on the role of DCE-MRI in clinical applications and exploring emerging MR perfusion imaging techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durga Udayakumar
- Department of Radiology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| | - Ananth J Madhuranthakam
- Department of Radiology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Başak E Doğan
- Department of Radiology, Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Metcalfe K, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Kotsopoulos J, Kim R, Moller P, Pal T, Aeilts A, Eisen A, Karlan B, Bordeleau L, Tung N, Olopade O, Zakalik D, Singer CF, Foulkes W, Couch F, Neuhausen SL, Eng C, Sun P, Lubinski J, Narod SA. Risk-reducing mastectomy and breast cancer mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant: an international analysis. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:269-274. [PMID: 38030749 PMCID: PMC10803363 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02503-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) is offered to women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant, however, there are limited data on the impact on breast cancer mortality. METHODS Participants were identified from a registry of women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. We used a pseudo-randomised trial design and matched one woman with a RRM to one woman without a RRM on year of birth, gene, and country. We estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dying of breast cancer in the follow-up period. RESULTS There were 1654 women included; 827 assigned to the RRM arm and 827 assigned to the control arm. After a mean follow-up of 6.3 years, there were 20 incident breast cancers (including 15 occult cancers) and two breast cancer deaths in the RRM arm, and 100 incident breast cancers and 7 breast cancer deaths in the control arm (HR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.05-1.35; p = 0.11). The probability of dying of breast cancer within 15 years after RRM was 0.95%. CONCLUSIONS In women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant, RRM reduces the risk of breast cancer, and the probability of dying of breast cancer is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Metcalfe
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Joanne Kotsopoulos
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raymond Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pal Moller
- The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Department for Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Amber Aeilts
- Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Beth Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Louise Bordeleau
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Cancer Risk and Prevention Program, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olufunmilayo Olopade
- Department of Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dana Zakalik
- Cancer Genetics Program, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - William Foulkes
- McGill Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Fergus Couch
- Division of Experimental Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Charis Eng
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Center for Personalized Genetic Healthcare, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ping Sun
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rahman WT, Gerard S, Grundlehner P, Oudsema R, McLaughlin C, Noroozian M, Neal CH, Helvie M. Outcomes of High-Risk Breast MRI Screening in Women Without Prior History of Breast Cancer: Effectiveness Data from a Tertiary Care Center. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2024; 6:53-63. [PMID: 38142230 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic performance outcomes of a breast MRI screening program in high-risk women without prior history of breast cancer. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 1 405 consecutive screening breast MRI examinations in 681 asymptomatic women with high risk of breast cancer without prior history of breast cancer from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. Outcomes (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false-negative rate [FNR], cancer detection rate [CDR]) and characteristics of cancers were determined based on histopathology or 12-month follow-up. MRI examinations performed, BI-RADS assessments, pathology outcomes, and CDRs were analyzed overall and by age decade. Results in incidence screening round (MRI in last 18 months) and nonincidence round were compared. RESULTS Breast MRI achieved CDR 20/1000, sensitivity 93.3% (28/30), and specificity 83.4% (1 147/1375). Twenty-eight (28/1 405, CDR 20/1000) screen-detected cancers were identified: 18 (64.3%, 18/28) invasive and 10 (35.7%, 10/28) ductal carcinoma in situ. Overall, 92.9% (26/28) of all cancers were stage 0 or 1 and 89.3% (25/28) were node negative. All 14 incidence screening round malignancies were stage 0 or 1 with N0 disease. Median size for invasive carcinoma was 8.0 mm and for ductal carcinoma in situ was 9.0 mm. There were two false-negative exams for an FNR 0.1% (2/1 405). CONCLUSION High-risk screening breast MRI was effective at detecting early breast cancer and associated with favorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Tania Rahman
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Paul Grundlehner
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rebecca Oudsema
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Carol McLaughlin
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mitra Noroozian
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Diagnostic Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Colleen H Neal
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark Helvie
- Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Greenwood HI, Dodelzon K. Screening in Women With BRCA Mutations Revisited. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2024; 6:4-13. [PMID: 38166173 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/04/2024]
Abstract
Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations are at high risk for the development of breast cancer. This article reviews the current evidence for breast cancer screening of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic gene mutations if they have not undergone prophylactic mastectomy. It will review the current evidence-based imaging recommendations for different modalities and ages of screening initiation in screening this patient population at high risk. Special considerations in transgender BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather I Greenwood
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katerina Dodelzon
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Morgan J, MacInnes E, Erskine S, Walters SJ, Cook J, Collins K, Wyld L. Psychosocial outcomes after varying risk management strategies in women at increased familial breast cancer risk: a mixed methods study of patient and partner outcomes. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024; 106:78-91. [PMID: 37458196 PMCID: PMC10757884 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/02/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Female carriers of BRCA1/2 genes have an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer. Options for managing risk include imaging surveillance or risk-reducing surgery (RRS). This mixed methods study aimed to identify factors affecting risk-management decisions and the psychosocial outcomes of these decisions for high-risk women and their partners. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews were performed with women at high breast cancer risk who had faced these choices. Partners were also interviewed. Analysis used a framework approach. A bespoke questionnaire was developed to quantify and explore associations. RESULTS A total of 32 women were interviewed. Of these, 27 had partners of whom 7 (26%) agreed to be interviewed. Four main themes arose: perception of risk and impact of increased risk; risk-management strategy decision-making; impact of risk-management strategy; support needs and partner relationship issues. The questionnaire response rate was 36/157 (23%). Decision satisfaction was high in both surveillance and RRS groups. Relationship changes were common but not universal. Common causes of distress following RRS included adverse body image changes. Both groups experienced generalised and cancer-specific anxiety. Drivers for surgery included having children, deaths of close family from breast cancer and higher levels of cancer anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Levels of psychosocial and decision satisfaction were high for women choosing both RRS and surveillance but, for a minority, risk-reducing measures result in long-term psychosocial morbidity. Efforts to recognise women at increased risk of psychological morbidity may allow targeted support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - E MacInnes
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - S Erskine
- East of England School of General Practice, Norwich, UK
| | | | - J Cook
- Sheffield Childrens NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | - L Wyld
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tollens F, Baltzer PA, Froelich MF, Kaiser CG. Economic evaluation of breast MRI in screening - a systematic review and basic approach to cost-effectiveness analyses. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1292268. [PMID: 38130995 PMCID: PMC10733447 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1292268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Economic evaluations have become an accepted methodology for decision makers to allocate resources in healthcare systems. Particularly in screening, where short-term costs are associated with long-term benefits, and adverse effects of screening intermingle, cost-effectiveness analyses provide a means to estimate the economic value of screening. Purpose To introduce the methodology of economic evaluations and to review the existing evidence on cost-effectiveness of MR-based breast cancer screening. Materials and methods The various concepts and techniques of economic evaluations critical to the interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses are briefly introduced. In a systematic review of the literature, economic evaluations from the years 2000-2022 are reviewed. Results Despite a considerable heterogeneity in the reported input variables, outcome categories and methodological approaches, cost-effectiveness analyses report favorably on the economic value of breast MRI screening for different risk groups, including both short- and long-term costs and outcomes. Conclusion Economic evaluations indicate a strongly favorable economic value of breast MRI screening for women at high risk and for women with dense breast tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Tollens
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Pascal A.T. Baltzer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias F. Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Clemens G. Kaiser
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Coffey K, Mango V. Revisiting Screening in Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2023; 5:635-645. [PMID: 38141237 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbad069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
Women with a family history (FH) of breast cancer and without known genetic susceptibility represent a unique population whose lifetime probability of developing breast cancer varies widely depending on familial factors, breast density, and the risk assessment tool used. Recently updated guidelines from the American College of Radiology recommend supplemental annual screening with contrast-enhanced MRI or contrast-enhanced mammography for women with an FH who are high risk (≥20% lifetime risk) or have dense breasts. To date, most screening studies addressing outcomes in women with FH have largely included those also with confirmed or suspected gene mutations, in whom the lifetime risk is highest, with limited data for women at average to intermediate risk who are not known to be genetically susceptible and may not benefit as much from the same screening approaches. Further research focusing specifically on women with FH as the only breast cancer risk factor is warranted to refine risk assessment and optimize a multimodality personalized screening approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Coffey
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victoria Mango
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Phillips J, Mehta TS, Portnow LH, Fishman MDC, Zhang Z, Pisano ED. Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography with MRI Utilizing an Enriched Reader Study: A Breast Cancer Study (CONTRRAST Trial). Radiology 2023; 309:e230530. [PMID: 37962503 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Background Despite growing interest in using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) for breast cancer screening as an alternative to breast MRI, limited literature is available. Purpose To determine whether CEM is noninferior to breast MRI or abbreviated breast MRI (AB MRI) and superior to two-dimensional mammography in an asymptomatic population simulating those who would present for screening and then undergo diagnostic work-up. Materials and Methods This enriched reader study used CEM and MRI data prospectively collected from asymptomatic individuals at a single institution from December 2014 to March 2020. Case sets were obtained at screening, as part of work-up for a screening-detected finding, or before biopsy of a screening-detected abnormality. All images were anonymized and randomized, and all 12 radiologists interpreted them. For CEM interpretation, readers were first shown low-energy images as a surrogate for digital mammography and asked to give a forced Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System score for up to three abnormalities. The highest score was used as the case score. Readers then reviewed the full CEM examination and scored it similarly. After a minimum 1-month washout, the readers similarly interpreted AB MRI and full MRI examinations. Receiver operating characteristic analysis, powered to test CEM noninferiority to full MRI, was performed. Results The study included 132 case sets (14 negative, 74 benign, and 44 malignant; all female participants; mean age, 54 years ± 12 [SD]). The mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for digital mammography, CEM, AB MRI, and full MRI were 0.79, 0.91, 0.89, and 0.91, respectively. CEM was superior to digital mammography (P < .001). No evidence of a difference in AUC was found between CEM and AB MRI and MRI. Conclusion In an asymptomatic study sample, CEM was noninferior to full MRI and AB MRI and was superior to digital mammography. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03482557 and NCT02275871 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordana Phillips
- From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, TCC 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02215 (J.P.); Department of Radiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (T.S.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.H.P.); Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (J.P., M.D.C.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Mass (Z.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.D.P.)
| | - Tejas S Mehta
- From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, TCC 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02215 (J.P.); Department of Radiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (T.S.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.H.P.); Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (J.P., M.D.C.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Mass (Z.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.D.P.)
| | - Leah H Portnow
- From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, TCC 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02215 (J.P.); Department of Radiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (T.S.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.H.P.); Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (J.P., M.D.C.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Mass (Z.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.D.P.)
| | - Michael D C Fishman
- From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, TCC 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02215 (J.P.); Department of Radiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (T.S.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.H.P.); Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (J.P., M.D.C.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Mass (Z.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.D.P.)
| | - Zheng Zhang
- From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, TCC 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02215 (J.P.); Department of Radiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (T.S.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.H.P.); Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (J.P., M.D.C.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Mass (Z.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.D.P.)
| | - Etta D Pisano
- From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, TCC 4th Floor, Boston, MA 02215 (J.P.); Department of Radiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Mass (T.S.M.); Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (L.H.P.); Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Mass (J.P., M.D.C.F.); Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Mass (Z.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (E.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Knerr S, Guo B, Wernli KJ, Mittendorf KF, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Jarvik GP, Kauffman TL, Keast E, Liles EG, Lynch FL, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Veenstra DL, Zepp JM, Wilfond BS, Devine B, Goddard KAB. Longitudinal adherence to breast cancer surveillance following cancer genetic testing in an integrated health care system. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 201:461-470. [PMID: 37470892 PMCID: PMC10503958 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07007-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Screening with mammography and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important risk management strategy for individuals with inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in genes associated with increased breast cancer risk. We describe longitudinal screening adherence in individuals who underwent cancer genetic testing as part of usual care in a vertically integrated health system. METHODS We determined the proportion time covered (PTC) by annual mammography and breast MRI for individuals with PVs in TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, NF1, CHEK2, and ATM. We determined time covered by biennial mammography beginning at age 50 years for individuals who received negative results, uncertain results, or with PVs in genes without specific breast cancer screening recommendations. RESULTS One hundred and forty individuals had PVs in TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, NF1, CHEK2, or ATM. Among these individuals, average PTC was 48% (range 0-99%) for annual screening mammography and 34% (range 0-100%) for annual breast MRI. Average PTC was highest for individuals with PVs in CHEK2 (N = 14) and lowest for individuals with PVs in TP53 (N = 3). Average PTC for biennial mammography (N = 1,027) was 49% (0-100%). CONCLUSION Longitudinal screening adherence in individuals with PVs in breast cancer associated genes, as measured by the proportion of time covered, is low; adherence to annual breast MRI falls below that of annual mammography. Additional research should examine screening behavior in individuals with PVs in breast cancer associated genes with a goal of developing interventions to improve adherence to recommended risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Knerr
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Boya Guo
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karen J Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Erin Keast
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Frances L Lynch
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | - David L Veenstra
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Beth Devine
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gamble LA, McClelland PH, Teke ME, Samaranayake SG, Juneau P, Famiglietti AL, Blakely AM, Redd B, Davis JL. Defining features of hereditary lobular breast cancer due to CDH1 with magnetic resonance imaging and tumor characteristics. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:77. [PMID: 37758801 PMCID: PMC10533560 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00585-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Women with germline pathogenic variants in CDH1, which encodes E-cadherin protein, are at increased lifetime risk of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). The associated tumor characteristics of hereditary lobular breast carcinoma (HLBC) in this high-risk population are not well-known. A single-center prospective cohort study was conducted to determine the imaging and pathologic features of HLBC compared to population-based ILC using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. One hundred fifty-eight women with CDH1 variants were evaluated, of whom 48 (30%) also had an ILC diagnosis. The median age at CDH1 diagnosis was 45 years [interquartile range, IQR 34-57 years] whereas the median age at diagnosis of CDH1 with concomitant ILC (HLBC) was 53 [IQR 45-62] years. Among women with HLBC, 83% (40/48) were identified with CDH1 mutation after diagnosis of ILC. Among 76 women (48%, 76/158) undergoing surveillance for ILC with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 29% (22/76) had an abnormal MRI result with available biopsy data for comparison. MRI detected ILC in 7 out of 8 biopsy-confirmed cases, corresponding with high sensitivity (88%), specificity (75%), and negative predictive value (98%); however, false-positive and false-discovery rates were elevated also (25% and 68%, respectively). HLBC was most frequently diagnosed at age 40-49 years (44%, 21/48), significantly younger than the common age of diagnosis of ILC in SEER general population data (most frequent age range 60-69 years, 28%; p < 0.001). HLBC tumors were smaller than SEER-documented ILC tumors (median 1.40 vs. 2.00 cm; p = 0.002) and had a higher incidence of background lobular carcinoma in situ (88% vs. 1%; p < 0.001) as well as progesterone receptor positivity (95% vs. 81%, p = 0.032). These findings suggest that HLBC is often detected via conventional screening methods as an early-stage hormone receptor-positive tumor, thus the clinical benefit of intensive screening with MRI may be limited to a subset of women with germline CDH1 variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren A Gamble
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul H McClelland
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Martha E Teke
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sarah G Samaranayake
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Paul Juneau
- Division of Library Services, Office of Research Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Amber L Famiglietti
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrew M Blakely
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bernadette Redd
- Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeremy L Davis
- Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lamb LR, Mercaldo SF, Ghaderi K, Carney A, Lehman CD. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammogram-based Deep Learning and Traditional Breast Cancer Risk Models in Patients Who Underwent Supplemental Screening with MRI. Radiology 2023; 308:e223077. [PMID: 37724967 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.223077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
Background Access to supplemental screening breast MRI is determined using traditional risk models, which are limited by modest predictive accuracy. Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a mammogram-based deep learning (DL) risk assessment model to that of traditional breast cancer risk models in patients who underwent supplemental screening with MRI. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing breast cancer screening MRI from September 2017 to September 2020 at four facilities. Risk was assessed using the Tyrer-Cuzick (TC) and National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) 5-year and lifetime models as well as a DL 5-year model that generated a risk score based on the most recent screening mammogram. A risk score of 1.67% or higher defined increased risk for traditional 5-year models, a risk score of 20% or higher defined high risk for traditional lifetime models, and absolute scores of 2.3 or higher and 6.6 or higher defined increased and high risk, respectively, for the DL model. Model accuracy metrics including cancer detection rate (CDR) and positive predictive values (PPVs) (PPV of abnormal findings at screening [PPV1], PPV of biopsies recommended [PPV2], and PPV of biopsies performed [PPV3]) were compared using logistic regression models. Results This study included 2168 women who underwent 4247 high-risk screening MRI examinations (median age, 54 years [IQR, 48-60 years]). CDR (per 1000 examinations) was higher in patients at high risk according to the DL model (20.6 [95% CI: 11.8, 35.6]) than according to the TC (6.0 [95% CI: 2.9, 12.3]; P < .01) and BCRAT (6.8 [95% CI: 2.9, 15.8]; P = .04) lifetime models. PPV1, PPV2, and PPV3 were higher in patients identified as high risk by the DL model (PPV1, 14.6%; PPV2, 32.4%; PPV3, 36.4%) than those identified as high risk with the TC (PPV1, 5.0%; PPV2, 12.7%; PPV3, 13.5%; P value range, .02-.03) and BCRAT (PPV1, 5.5%; PPV2, 11.1%; PPV3, 12.5%; P value range, .02-.05) lifetime models. Conclusion Patients identified as high risk by a mammogram-based DL risk assessment model showed higher CDR at breast screening MRI than patients identified as high risk with traditional risk models. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bae in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie R Lamb
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696
| | - Sarah F Mercaldo
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696
| | - Kimeya Ghaderi
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696
| | - Andrew Carney
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696
| | - Constance D Lehman
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Lee CS, Destounis SV. Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Updated Recommendations From the ACR. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:902-914. [PMID: 37150275 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Early detection decreases breast cancer death. The ACR recommends annual screening beginning at age 40 for women of average risk and earlier and/or more intensive screening for women at higher-than-average risk. For most women at higher-than-average risk, the supplemental screening method of choice is breast MRI. Women with genetics-based increased risk, those with a calculated lifetime risk of 20% or more, and those exposed to chest radiation at young ages are recommended to undergo MRI surveillance starting at ages 25 to 30 and annual mammography (with a variable starting age between 25 and 40, depending on the type of risk). Mutation carriers can delay mammographic screening until age 40 if annual screening breast MRI is performed as recommended. Women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 or with personal histories of breast cancer and dense breasts should undergo annual supplemental breast MRI. Others with personal histories, and those with atypia at biopsy, should strongly consider MRI screening, especially if other risk factors are present. For women with dense breasts who desire supplemental screening, breast MRI is recommended. For those who qualify for but cannot undergo breast MRI, contrast-enhanced mammography or ultrasound could be considered. All women should undergo risk assessment by age 25, especially Black women and women of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, so that those at higher-than-average risk can be identified and appropriate screening initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debra L Monticciolo
- Division Chief, Breast Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Mary S Newell
- Interim Division Chief, Breast Imaging, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Linda Moy
- Associate Chair for Faculty Mentoring, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York; Editor-in-Chief, Radiology
| | - Cindy S Lee
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Stamatia V Destounis
- Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, Rochester, New York; Chair, ACR Commission on Breast Imaging
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gaur S, Panda A, Fajardo JE, Hamilton J, Jiang Y, Gulani V. Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: A Review of Clinical Applications. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:561-577. [PMID: 37026802 PMCID: PMC10330487 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an approach to quantitative magnetic resonance imaging that allows for efficient simultaneous measurements of multiple tissue properties, which are then used to create accurate and reproducible quantitative maps of these properties. As the technique has gained popularity, the extent of preclinical and clinical applications has vastly increased. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of currently investigated preclinical and clinical applications of MRF, as well as future directions. Topics covered include MRF in neuroimaging, neurovascular, prostate, liver, kidney, breast, abdominal quantitative imaging, cardiac, and musculoskeletal applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Gaur
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ananya Panda
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | | | - Jesse Hamilton
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Yun Jiang
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Vikas Gulani
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wehbe A, Gonte MR, O'Neill SC, Amit‐Yousif A, Purrington K, Manning M, Simon MS. Predictors of nonadherence to breast cancer screening guidelines in a United States urban comprehensive cancer center. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15482-15491. [PMID: 37329206 PMCID: PMC10417068 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify predictors of nonadherence to breast cancer screening guidelines in an urban screening clinic among high- and average-risk women in the United States. METHODS We reviewed records of 6090 women who received ≥2 screening mammograms over 2 years at the Karmanos Cancer Institute to examine how breast cancer risk and breast density were associated with guideline-concordant screening. Incongruent screening was defined as receiving supplemental imaging between screening mammograms for average-risk women, and as not receiving recommended supplemental imaging for high-risk women. We used t-tests and chi-square tests to examine bivariate associations with guideline-congruent screening, and probit regression to regress guideline-congruence unto breast cancer risk, breast density, and their interaction, controlling for age and race. RESULTS Incongruent screening was more likely among high- versus average-risk women (97.7% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.01). Among average-risk women, incongruent screening was more likely among those with dense versus nondense breasts (2.0% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.01). Among high-risk women, incongruent screening was more likely among those with nondense versus dense breasts (99.5% vs. 95.2%, p < 0.01). The significant main effects of density and high-risk on increased incongruent screening were qualified by a density by high-risk interaction, showing a weaker association between risk and incongruent screening among women with dense breasts (simple slope = 3.71, p < 0.01) versus nondense breasts (simple slope = 5.79, p < 0.01). Age and race were not associated with incongruent screening. CONCLUSIONS Lack of adherence to evidence-based screening guidelines has led to underutilization of supplementary imaging for high-risk women and potential overutilization for women with dense breasts without other risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Wehbe
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of OncologyBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
- Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
- Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Madeleine R. Gonte
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Suzanne C. O'Neill
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Cancer CenterGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Alit Amit‐Yousif
- Center for Breast HealthOakland Macomb Obstetrics and GynecologyRochester HillsMichiganUSA
| | - Kristen Purrington
- Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Mark Manning
- Department of PsychologyOakland UniversityRochesterMichiganUSA
- Center for Molecular Medicine and GeneticsWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Michael S. Simon
- Department of OncologyBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
- Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Anaby D, Shavin D, Zimmerman-Moreno G, Nissan N, Friedman E, Sklair-Levy M. 'Earlier than Early' Detection of Breast Cancer in Israeli BRCA Mutation Carriers Applying AI-Based Analysis to Consecutive MRI Scans. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3120. [PMID: 37370730 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Female BRCA1/BRCA2 (=BRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs) carriers are at a substantially higher risk for developing breast cancer (BC) compared with the average risk population. Detection of BC at an early stage significantly improves prognosis. To facilitate early BC detection, a surveillance scheme is offered to BRCA PV carriers from age 25-30 years that includes annual MRI based breast imaging. Indeed, adherence to the recommended scheme has been shown to be associated with earlier disease stages at BC diagnosis, more in-situ pathology, smaller tumors, and less axillary involvement. While MRI is the most sensitive modality for BC detection in BRCA PV carriers, there are a significant number of overlooked or misinterpreted radiological lesions (mostly enhancing foci), leading to a delayed BC diagnosis at a more advanced stage. In this study we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-network, aimed at a more accurate classification of enhancing foci, in MRIs of BRCA PV carriers, thus reducing false-negative interpretations. Retrospectively identified foci in prior MRIs that were either diagnosed as BC or benign/normal in a subsequent MRI were manually segmented and served as input for a convolutional network architecture. The model was successful in classification of 65% of the cancerous foci, most of them triple-negative BC. If validated, applying this scheme routinely may facilitate 'earlier than early' BC diagnosis in BRCA PV carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Anaby
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6910201, Israel
| | - David Shavin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
| | | | - Noam Nissan
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6910201, Israel
| | - Eitan Friedman
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6910201, Israel
- Meirav High Risk Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
| | - Miri Sklair-Levy
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 6910201, Israel
- Meirav High Risk Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nicosia L, Gnocchi G, Gorini I, Venturini M, Fontana F, Pesapane F, Abiuso I, Bozzini AC, Pizzamiglio M, Latronico A, Abbate F, Meneghetti L, Battaglia O, Pellegrino G, Cassano E. History of Mammography: Analysis of Breast Imaging Diagnostic Achievements over the Last Century. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11111596. [PMID: 37297735 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common forms of cancer and a leading cause of mortality in women. Early and correct diagnosis is, therefore, essential to save lives. The development of diagnostic imaging applied to the breast has been impressive in recent years and the most used diagnostic test in the world is mammography, a low-dose X-ray technique used for imaging the breast. In the first half of the 20th century, the diagnosis was in practice only clinical, with consequent diagnostic delay and an unfavorable prognosis in the short term. The rise of organized mammography screening has led to a remarkable reduction in mortality through the early detection of breast malignancies. This historical review aims to offer a complete panorama of the development of mammography and breast imaging during the last century. Through this study, we want to understand the foundations of the pillar of radiology applied to the breast through to the most modern applications such as contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM), artificial intelligence, and radiomics. Understanding the history of the development of diagnostic imaging applied to the breast can help us understand how to better direct our efforts toward an increasingly personalized and effective diagnostic approach. The ultimate goal of imaging applied to the detection of breast malignancies should be to reduce mortality from this type of disease as much as possible. With this paper, we want to provide detailed documentation of the main steps in the evolution of breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast neoplasms; we also want to open up new scenarios where the possible current and future applications of imaging are aimed at being more precise and personalized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Gnocchi
- Postgraduation School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Gorini
- Centre of Research in Osteoarchaeology and Paleopathology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Via J.H. Dunant, 3, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Massimo Venturini
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Federico Fontana
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, 21100 Varese, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Ida Abiuso
- Radiology Department, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy
| | - Anna Carla Bozzini
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Pizzamiglio
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Antuono Latronico
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Abbate
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza Meneghetti
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavia Battaglia
- Postgraduation School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pellegrino
- Postgraduation School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Manley K, Ryan N, Jenner A, Newton C, Hillard T. Counselling of path_ BRCA carriers who are considering risk-reducing oophorectomy. Post Reprod Health 2023; 29:42-52. [PMID: 36757900 DOI: 10.1177/20533691231156640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
path_BRCA 1/2 increases a woman's lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Interventions can be offered which manage cancer risk; annual breast screening from age 30, chemoprevention and, once a woman's family is complete, risk-reducing surgery. The latter is the most effective method of reducing cancer in path_BRCA carriers; salpingo-oophorectomy reduces breast and ovarian cancer, respectively, by up to 50% and 95%. Factors affecting a woman's decision to undergo risk-reducing surgery are complex; dominant factors include risks of surgery, effect on cancer outcomes and menopausal sequelae. Specific information relating to hormone replacement and non-hormonal alternatives are an important consideration for women but, are often overlooked. Informative counselling is required to enable satisfaction with the chosen intervention whilst improving survival outcomes. This review paper outlines the current data pertaining to these decision-making factors and provides a proforma to enable effective counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristyn Manley
- Department of Gynaecology, 1984University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,The Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Women's Health Sciences, 152004University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Neil Ryan
- The Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Women's Health Sciences, 152004University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.,Department of Gynaecology Oncology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
| | - Abigail Jenner
- Department of Gynaecology, 1984University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,Department of Oncology, 1556Royal United Hospitals Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Claire Newton
- Department of Gynaecology, 1984University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,The Academic Women's Health Unit, Translational Women's Health Sciences, 152004University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Timothy Hillard
- Department of Gynaecology, 6655University Hospitals Dorset, Poole, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Spalluto LB, Bonnet K, Sonubi C, Ernst LL, Wahab R, Reid SA, Agrawal P, Gregory K, Davis KM, Lewis JA, Berardi E, Hartsfield C, Selove R, Sanderson M, Schlundt D, Audet CM. Barriers to Implementation of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: The Health Care Team Perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:342-351. [PMID: 36922108 PMCID: PMC10042588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess health care professionals' perceptions of barriers to the utilization of breast cancer risk assessment tools in the public health setting through a series of one-on-one interviews with health care team members. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study consisting of one-on-one semistructured telephone interviews with health care team members in the public health setting in the state of Tennessee between May 2020 and October 2020. An iterative inductive-deductive approach was used for qualitative analysis of interview data, resulting in the development of a conceptual framework to depict influences of provider behavior in the utilization of breast cancer risk assessment. RESULTS A total of 24 interviews were completed, and a framework of influences of provider behavior in the utilization of breast cancer risk assessment was developed. Participants identified barriers to the utilization of breast cancer risk assessment (knowledge and understanding of risk assessment tools, workflow challenges, and availability of personnel); patient-level barriers as perceived by health care team members (psychological, economic, educational, and environmental); and strategies to increase the utilization of breast cancer risk assessment at the provider level (leadership buy-in, training, supportive policies, and incentives) and patient level (improved communication and better understanding of patients' perceived cancer risk and severity of cancer). CONCLUSIONS Understanding barriers to implementation of breast cancer risk assessment and strategies to overcome these barriers as perceived by health care team members offers an opportunity to improve implementation of risk assessment and to identify a racially, geographically, and socioeconomically diverse population of young women at high risk for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy B Spalluto
- Vice Chair of Health Equity, Associate Director of Diversity and Inclusion, Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee; and Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Health Care System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, Tennessee; RSNA Cochair, Health Equity Committee.
| | - Kemberlee Bonnet
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Chiamaka Sonubi
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Laura L Ernst
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Rifat Wahab
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. https://twitter.com/RifatWahab
| | - Sonya A Reid
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Pooja Agrawal
- University of Texas Medical Branch, John Sealy School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas
| | - Kris Gregory
- R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Katie M Davis
- Section Chief, Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jennifer A Lewis
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Co-director clinical lung screening program, Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Health Care System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, Tennessee; and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Rescue Lung Rescue Life Society Board Member
| | - Elizabeth Berardi
- Program Director, Tennessee Breast and Cervical Screening Program, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Crissy Hartsfield
- Clinical Programs Administrator, Division of Family Health and Wellness, Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Rebecca Selove
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, and Director, Center for Prevention Research, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Maureen Sanderson
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, and Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - David Schlundt
- Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Carolyn M Audet
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Associate Director of the Vanderbilt Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research and Associate Director of Research in Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hussein H, Abbas E, Keshavarzi S, Fazelzad R, Bukhanov K, Kulkarni S, Au F, Ghai S, Alabousi A, Freitas V. Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Dense Breasts and Negative Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2023; 306:e221785. [PMID: 36719288 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Background The best supplemental breast cancer screening modality in women at average risk or intermediate risk for breast cancer with dense breast and negative mammogram remains to be determined. Purpose To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes of the most common available supplemental screening modalities in women at average risk or intermediate risk for breast cancer in patients with dense breasts and mammography with negative findings. Materials and Methods A comprehensive search was conducted until March 12, 2020, in Medline, Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations; Embase Classic and Embase; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, for Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Observational Studies. Incremental cancer detection rate (CDR); positive predictive value of recall (PPV1); positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3); and interval CDRs of supplemental imaging modalities, digital breast tomosynthesis, handheld US, automated breast US, and MRI in non-high-risk patients with dense breasts and mammography negative for cancer were reviewed. Data metrics and risk of bias were assessed. Random-effects meta-analysis and two-sided metaregression analyses comparing each imaging modality metrics were performed (PROSPERO; CRD42018080402). Results Twenty-two studies reporting 261 233 screened patients were included. Of 132 166 screened patients with dense breast and mammography negative for cancer who met inclusion criteria, a total of 541 cancers missed at mammography were detected with these supplemental modalities. Metaregression models showed that MRI was superior to other supplemental modalities in CDR (incremental CDR, 1.52 per 1000 screenings; 95% CI: 0.74, 2.33; P < .001), including invasive CDR (invasive CDR, 1.31 per 1000 screenings; 95% CI: 0.57, 2.06; P < .001), and in situ disease (rate of ductal carcinoma in situ, 1.91 per 1000 screenings; 95% CI: 0.10, 3.72; P < .04). No differences in PPV1 and PPV3 were identified. The limited number of studies prevented assessment of interval cancer metrics. Excluding MRI, no statistically significant difference in any metrics were identified among the remaining imaging modalities. Conclusion The pooled data showed that MRI was the best supplemental imaging modality in women at average risk or intermediate risk for breast cancer with dense breasts and mammography negative for cancer. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Hooley and Butler in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba Hussein
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| | - Engy Abbas
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| | - Sareh Keshavarzi
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| | - Rouhi Fazelzad
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| | - Karina Bukhanov
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| | - Supriya Kulkarni
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| | - Frederick Au
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| | - Sandeep Ghai
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| | - Abdullah Alabousi
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| | - Vivianne Freitas
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging-Breast Division, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (H.H., E.A., K.B., S. Kulkarni, F.A., S.G., V.F.); Department of Radiology, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom (H.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (S. Keshavarzi); Department of Library and Information Services, University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (R.F.); and Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Canada (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wong FL, Lee JM, Leisenring WM, Neglia JP, Howell RM, Smith SA, Oeffinger KC, Moskowitz CS, Henderson TO, Mertens A, Nathan PC, Yasui Y, Landier W, Armstrong GT, Robison LL, Bhatia S. Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Children's Oncology Group Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Chest-Irradiated Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1046-1058. [PMID: 36265088 PMCID: PMC9928841 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the Children's Oncology Group Guideline recommendation for breast cancer (BC) screening using mammography (MAM) and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in female chest-irradiated childhood Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), increasingly replacing MAM in practice, was also examined. METHODS Life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), BC mortality, health care costs, and false-positive screen frequencies of undergoing annual MAM, DBT, MRI, MAM + MRI, and DBT + MRI from age 25 to 74 years were estimated by microsimulation. BC risks and non-BC mortality were estimated from female 5-year survivors of HL in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study and the US population. Test performance of MAM and MRI was synthesized from HL studies, and that of DBT from the general population. Costs (2017 US dollars [USD]) and utility weights were obtained from the medical literature. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. RESULTS With 100% screening adherence, annual BC screening extended LYs by 0.34-0.46 years over no screening. If the willingness-to-pay threshold to gain a quality-adjusted LY was ICER < $100,000 USD, annual MAM at age 25-74 years was the only cost-effective strategy. When nonadherence was taken into consideration, only annual MAM at age 30-74 years (ICER = $56,972 USD) was cost-effective. Supplementing annual MAM with MRI costing $545 USD was not cost-effective under either adherence condition. If MRI costs were reduced to $300 USD, adding MRI to annual MAM at age 30-74 years could become more cost-effective, particularly in the reduced adherence condition (ICER = $133,682 USD). CONCLUSION Annual BC screening using MAM at age 30-74 years is effective and cost-effective in female chest-irradiated HL survivors. Although annual adjunct MRI is not cost-effective at $545 USD cost, it could become cost-effective as MRI cost is reduced, a plausible scenario with the emergent use of abbreviated MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janie M. Lee
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | - Susan A. Smith
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Ann Mertens
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Paul C. Nathan
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | | | - Smita Bhatia
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shao Z, Yu J, Cheng Y, Ma W, Liu P, Lu H. MR imaging phenotypes and features associated with pathogenic mutation to predict recurrence or metastasis in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:97. [PMID: 36707770 PMCID: PMC9883861 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10555-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Distant metastasis remains the main cause of death in breast cancer. Breast cancer risk is strongly influenced by pathogenic mutation.This study was designed to develop a multiple-feature model using clinicopathological and imaging characteristics adding pathogenic mutations associated signs to predict recurrence or metastasis in breast cancers in high familial risk women. METHODS Genetic testing for breast-related gene mutations was performed in 54 patients with breast cancers. Breast MRI findings were retrospectively evaluated in 64 tumors of the 54 patients. The relationship between pathogenic mutation, clinicopathological and radiologic features was examined. The disease recurrence or metastasis were estimated. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors of pathogenic mutation and disease recurrence or metastasis. Based on significant factors from the regression models, a multivariate logistic regression was adopted to establish two models for predicting disease recurrence or metastasis in breast cancer using R software. RESULTS Of the 64 tumors in 54 patients, 17 tumors had pathogenic mutations and 47 tumors had no pathogenic mutations. The clinicopathogenic and imaging features associated with pathogenic mutation included six signs: biologic features (p = 0.000), nuclear grade (p = 0.045), breast density (p = 0.005), MRI lesion type (p = 0.000), internal enhancement pattern (p = 0.004), and spiculated margin (p = 0.049). Necrosis within the tumors was the only feature associated with increased disease recurrence or metastasis (p = 0.006). The developed modelIincluding clinico-pathologic and imaging factors showed good discrimination in predicting disease recurrence or metastasis. Comprehensive model II, which included parts of modelIand pathogenic mutations significantly associated signs, showed significantly more sensitivity and specificity for predicting disease recurrence or metastasis compared to Model I. CONCLUSIONS The incorporation of pathogenic mutations associated imaging and clinicopathological parameters significantly improved the sensitivity and specificity in predicting disease recurrence or metastasis. The constructed multi-feature fusion model may guide the implementation of prophylactic treatment for breast cancers at high familial risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenzhen Shao
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Jinpu Yu
- Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Core, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Yanan Cheng
- Cancer Molecular Diagnostics Core, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Wenjuan Ma
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Peifang Liu
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Breast Imaging, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Laws A, Katlin F, Hans M, Graichen M, Kantor O, Minami C, Bychkovsky BL, Pace LE, Scheib R, Garber JE, King TA. Screening MRI Does Not Increase Cancer Detection or Result in an Earlier Stage at Diagnosis for Patients with High-Risk Breast Lesions: A Propensity Score Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:68-77. [PMID: 36171529 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12568-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines recommend consideration of screening MRI for patients with high-risk breast lesions (HRLs), acknowledging limited data for this moderate-risk population. METHODS This study identified patients with atypical ductal/lobular hyperplasia (ADH/ALH), lobular carcinoma in situ, (LCIS) or both evaluated at our high-risk clinic. Patients were categorized as having received screening mammography (MMG) alone vs. MMG and breast MRI (MMG+MRI). Inverse probability weighting based on propensity scores (PS) representing likelihood of MRI use was applied to Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses to determine cancer detection and biopsy rates by screening group. RESULTS Among 908 eligible patients, 699 (77%) patients with available follow-up data were analyzed (542 with ADH/ALH and 157 with LCIS). Of the 699 patients, 540 (77%) received MMG alone, and 159 (23%) received MMG + MRI. The median follow-up period was 25 months, during which a median of two MRIs were performed. After PS-weighting, the characteristics of each screening group were well-balanced with respect to age, race, body mass index (BMI), menopausal status, breast density, family history, HRL type, and chemoprevention use. The 4 year breast cancer detection rate was 3.6% with both MMG alone and MMG+MRI (p = 0.89). The breast biopsy rates were significantly higher with MMG+MRI (30.5% vs12.6%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.67; p < 0.001). All breast cancers were clinically node-negative and pathologic stage 0 or 1. Among five cancers in the MMG+MRI group, two were MRI-detected, two were MMG-detected, and one was detected on clinical exam. CONCLUSIONS Screening MRI did not improve cancer detection, and cancer characteristics were favorable whether screened with MMG alone or MMG + MRI. These findings question the benefit of MRI for patients with HRL, although longer-term follow-up study is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Laws
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fisher Katlin
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marybeth Hans
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary Graichen
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Kantor
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christina Minami
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brittany L Bychkovsky
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lydia E Pace
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Women's Health, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rochelle Scheib
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judy E Garber
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. .,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kim H, Ko EY, Kim KE, Kim MK, Choi JS, Ko ES, Han BK. Assessment of Enhancement Kinetics Improves the Specificity of Abbreviated Breast MRI: Performance in an Enriched Cohort. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 13:diagnostics13010136. [PMID: 36611428 PMCID: PMC9818206 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the added value of kinetic information for breast lesion evaluation on abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 207 breast lesions with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories 3, 4, or 5 on AB-MRI in 198 consecutive patients who had breast MRI for screening after breast cancer surgery between January 2017 and December 2019. All lesions were pathologically confirmed or stable on follow-up images for 2 years or more. Kinetic information of the lesions regarding the degree and rate of enhancement on the first post-contrast-enhanced image and the enhancement curve type from two post-contrast-enhanced images were analyzed on a commercially available computer-assisted diagnosis system. The diagnostic performances of AB-MRI with morphological analysis alone and with the addition of kinetic information were compared using the McNemar test. Results: Of 207 lesions, 59 (28.5%) were malignant and 148 (71.5%) were benign. The addition of an enhancement degree of ≥90% to the morphological analysis significantly increased the specificity of AB-MRI (29.7% vs. 52.7%, p < 0.001) without significantly reducing the sensitivity (94.9% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.083) compared to morphological analysis alone. Unnecessary biopsy could have been avoided in 34 benign lesions, although three malignant lesions could have been missed. For detecting invasive cancer, adding an enhancement degree ≥107% to the morphological analysis significantly increased the specificity (26.5% vs. 57.6%, p < 0.001) without significantly decreasing the sensitivity (94.6% vs. 86.5%, p = 0.083). Conclusion: Adding the degree of enhancement on the first post-contrast-enhanced image to the morphological analysis resulted in higher AB-MRI specificity without compromising its sensitivity.
Collapse
|
32
|
Corines MJ, Coffey K, Dou E, Lobaugh S, Zheng J, Hwang S, Feigin K. Bone Lesions Detected on Breast MRI: Clinical Outcomes and Features Associated with Metastatic Breast Cancer. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:600-611. [PMID: 37744182 PMCID: PMC10516530 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Objective To determine prevalence and frequency of malignancy among bone lesions detected on breast MRI and to identify clinical and imaging features associated with bone metastases from breast cancer (BC), as bone lesions are suboptimally evaluated on breast imaging protocols and can present a diagnostic challenge. Methods This IRB-approved retrospective review of breast MRIs performed from June 2009 to June 2018 identified patients with bone lesions. Demographic, clinical, and MRI features were reviewed. Clinical outcome of bone lesions was determined based on pathology and/or additional diagnostic imaging. All benign lesions had ≥ 2 years of imaging follow-up. Statistics were computed with Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results Among all patients with breast MRI, 1.2% (340/29 461) had bone lesions. Of these, 224 were confirmed benign or metastatic BC by pathology or imaging follow-up, with 70.1% (157/224) be- nign and 29.9% (67/224) metastatic. Bone metastases were associated with BC history (P < 0.001), with metastases occurring in 58.2% (53/91) of patients with current BC, 17.9% (14/78) patients with prior BC, and 0.0% (0/55) without BC. Bone metastases were associated with invasive and ad- vanced stage BC and, on MRI, with location in sternum, ribs, or clavicles, larger size, multiplicity, andT1 hypointensity (all P < 0.01 in tests of overall association). Conclusion Of clinically confirmed breast MRI-detected bone lesions, 30% were bone metastases; all were detected in patients with current or prior BC. Metastases were associated with advanced stage, invasive carcinoma, larger lesion size, multiplicity, low T1 signal, and non-spine location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina J. Corines
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristen Coffey
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eda Dou
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imagery, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Lobaugh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Junting Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sinchun Hwang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Feigin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mighton C, Shickh S, Aguda V, Krishnapillai S, Adi-Wauran E, Bombard Y. From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening. Front Genet 2022; 13:893832. [PMID: 36353115 PMCID: PMC9637971 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.893832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic medicine is expanding from a focus on diagnosis at the patient level to prevention at the population level given the ongoing under-ascertainment of high-risk and actionable genetic conditions using current strategies, particularly hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch Syndrome (LS) and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The availability of large-scale next-generation sequencing strategies and preventive options for these conditions makes it increasingly feasible to screen pre-symptomatic individuals through public health-based approaches, rather than restricting testing to high-risk groups. This raises anew, and with urgency, questions about the limits of screening as well as the moral authority and capacity to screen for genetic conditions at a population level. We aimed to answer some of these critical questions by using the WHO Wilson and Jungner criteria to guide a synthesis of current evidence on population genomic screening for HBOC, LS, and FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Mighton
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Salma Shickh
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vernie Aguda
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Suvetha Krishnapillai
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ella Adi-Wauran
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kim MY, Suh YJ, An YY. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection among Women with a History of Breast Cancer. Acad Radiol 2022; 29:1458-1465. [PMID: 35033452 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic performance of abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in women with a personal history (PH) of breast cancer as a postoperative screening tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 471 patients who completed both DBT and AB-MRI examinations were included in this study (median age, 54.5 years). The detected cancer characteristics were analyzed. The cancer detection rate (CDR), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS Eleven malignancies were diagnosed, and most of the detected cancers were stage I (7 of 11, 63.6%). Eight were invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), and 3 were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Of the 11 recurrences, 6 malignancies were detected by DBT, and 11 were detected by AB-MRI. AB-MRI detected all 8 IDC and 3 DCIS lesions, and DBT detected 6 of 8 IDC lesions. The CDRs for DBT and AB-MRI screenings were 12.7 and 23.4 per 1,000 women, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of DBT versus AB-MRI were 54.6% versus 100%, 97.6% versus 96.5%, 35.3% versus 40.7%, 98.9% versus 100%, and 96.6% versus 96.6%, respectively. AB-MRI showed a higher AUC value (0.983) than DBT (0.761) (p = 0.0049). CONCLUSION AB-MRI showed an improved CDR, especially for invasive cancer. The diagnostic performance of AB-MRI was superior to that of DBT with high sensitivity and PPV without sacrificing specificity in women with a PH of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Young Kim
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Jin Suh
- Division of Breast and Thyroid Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeong Yi An
- Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 93 Jungbu-daero, Paldal-gu, Seoul, Suwon 16247, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
What Is the Best Imaging Modality for Breast Cancer Detection in Women with a Personal History? Acad Radiol 2022; 29:1466-1468. [PMID: 35595630 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
36
|
Lee J, Kang BJ, Park GE, Kim SH. The Usefulness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the Detection of Local Recurrence after Mastectomy with Reconstructive Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12092203. [PMID: 36140604 PMCID: PMC9497711 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of local recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate reconstructive surgery for breast cancer. Two hundred and eighty-six NSM or SSM procedures and immediate reconstruction cases between August 2015 and February 2020 were reviewed. The detectability rates of for local recurrence using MRI and ultrasound were assessed, and the characteristics of recurrent and primary cancers were evaluated. The patients with multifocal or multicentric primary cancer and a dense parenchymal pattern showed a higher recurrence rate (p < 0.001). A total of 22 cases showed recurrence, and due to multifocal recurrence, a total of 27 recurrent lesions were identified in the reconstructed breast, of which 12 were symptomatic and 15 were asymptomatic (p < 0.001). With the exception of skin recurrence (n = 6), MRI showed a significantly higher detectability rate (95.2%, 20 of 21) than ultrasound (38.1%, 8 of 21) for the recurrence of cancer in the reconstructed breast (p < 0.001), especially for small-sized (<1 cm) asymptomatic lesions. In addition, the mean recurrence interval of MRI-detected asymptomatic lesions was 21.7 months (SD ± 17.7), which was significantly longer than that of symptomatic recurrence. In conclusion, postoperative MRI can be useful for identifying small-sized (<1 cm) asymptomatic recurrence lesions in reconstructed breast tissue after NSM or SSM, which can be implemented within two years of surgery.
Collapse
|
37
|
Armani M, Carton M, Tardivon A. Lésions mammaires ACR 3 en IRM chez des femmes à très haut risque de cancer du sein : analyse rétrospective sur trois ans. IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.femme.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
38
|
Saule C, Menu-Hespel S, Carton M, Malhaire C, Cherel P, Reyal F, Le Mentec M, Guillot E, Donnadieu A, Callet N, Frank S, Coussy F, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Mouret-Fourme E. Prevalent versus incident breast cancers: benefits of clinical and radiological monitoring in women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1060-1066. [PMID: 35217802 PMCID: PMC9436925 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01049-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Women with pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants have a higher risk of breast cancer than in the general population. International guidelines recommend specific clinical and radiological breast follow-up. This specific breast screening program has already been shown to be of clinical benefit, but no information is available concerning the use of prognostic factors or specific survival to guide follow-up decisions. We evaluated "high-risk" screening in a retrospective single-center study of 520 women carrying pathogenic germline variants of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene treated for breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2016. We compared two groups of women: the incidental breast cancer group (IBCG) were followed before breast cancer diagnosis (N = 103), whereas the prevalent breast cancer group (PBCG) (N = 417) had no specific follow-up for high risk before breast cancer diagnosis. Breast cancers were diagnosed at an earlier stage in the IBCG than in the PBCG: T0 in 64% versus 19% of tumors, (p < 0.00001), and N0 in 90% vs. 75% (p < 0.00001), respectively. Treatment differed significantly between the 2 groups: less neoadjuvant chemotherapy (7.1% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.00001), adjuvant chemotherapy (47.7% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.004) and more mastectomies (60% vs. 42% p < 0.0001) in the IBCG vs PBCG groups respectively. Overall and breast cancer-specific mortality were similar between the two groups. However, the patients in the IBCG had a significantly longer metastasis-free survival than those in the PBCG, at three years (96.9% [95% CI 93.5-100] vs. 92.30% [95% CI 89.8-94.9]; p = 0.02), suggesting a possible long-term survival advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Saule
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| | | | - Matthieu Carton
- Institut Curie, Department of Biometry, DRCI, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Caroline Malhaire
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Imaging, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, INSERM, LITO Laboratory, 91401, Orsay, France
| | - Pascal Cherel
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Imaging, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Fabien Reyal
- Institut Curie, Department of Surgery, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Residual Tumour & Response to Treatment Laboratory (RT2Lab), INSERM, U 932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Marine Le Mentec
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne Donnadieu
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Nasrine Callet
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Sophie Frank
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Florence Coussy
- Institut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, INSERM U830, Paris, France
- Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Eby PR, Ghate S, Hooley R. The Benefits of Early Detection: Evidence From Modern International Mammography Service Screening Programs. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:346-356. [PMID: 38416986 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Research from randomized controlled trials initiated up to 60 years ago consistently confirms that regular screening with mammography significantly reduces breast cancer mortality. Despite this success, there is ongoing debate regarding the efficacy of screening, which is confounded by technologic advances and concerns about cost, overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and equitable care of diverse patient populations. More recent screening research, designed to quell the debates, derives data from variable study designs, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. This article reviews observational population-based screening research that has followed the early initial long-term randomized controlled trials that are no longer practical or ethical to perform. The advantages and disadvantages of observational data and study design are outlined, including the three subtypes of population-based observational studies: cohort/case-control, trend, and incidence-based mortality/staging. The most recent research, typically performed in countries that administer screening mammography to women through centralized health service programs and directly track patient-specific outcomes and detection data, is summarized. These data are essential to understand and inform construction of effective new databases that facilitate continuous assessment of optimal screening techniques in the current era of rapidly developing medical technology, combined with a focus on health care that is both personal and equitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter R Eby
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sujata Ghate
- Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Regina Hooley
- Yale New Haven Hospital, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gibson AL, Watkins JE, Agrawal A, Tyminski MM, DeBenedectis CM. Shedding Light on T2 Bright Masses on Breast MRI: Benign and Malignant Causes. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:430-440. [PMID: 38416977 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
While T2 hyperintense masses on breast MRI are often benign, there are several malignant etiologies that can also be T2 hyperintense. Delineation between benign and malignant entities is important for the accurate interpretation of breast MRI. Common benign T2 hyperintense masses include cysts, fibroadenomas, and lymph nodes. Malignant processes that are T2 hyperintense include metastatic lymph nodes, mucinous breast carcinomas, papillary breast carcinomas, and breast cancers with central necrosis. Evaluation of the morphology and enhancement pattern of a T2 hyperintense mass can help to differentiate a benign process from a malignant one. This educational review will present both benign and malignant causes of T2 hyperintense masses on breast MRI and review common imaging findings and pertinent imaging characteristics that can be used to help accurately identify benign entities while also recognizing suspicious lesions that require additional evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Averi L Gibson
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Radiology, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Jade E Watkins
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Radiology, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Anushree Agrawal
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Radiology, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Monique M Tyminski
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Radiology, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Karavas E, Ece B, Aydın S. Type 2 dynamic curves: A diagnostic dilemma. World J Radiol 2022; 14:229-237. [PMID: 36160627 PMCID: PMC9350610 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i7.229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with multiparametric dynamic contrast plays a critical role in the assessment of breast lesions. Dynamic curves are a critical parameter in determining the benign or malignant nature of lesions. Dynamic curves of type 1 are known to represent benign masses, while dynamic curves of type 3 are known to identify malignant masses. Type 2 dynamic curves have a sensitivity of 42.6% and specificity of 75% for malignancy detection.
AIM To investigate the pathological diagnosis of lesions with type 2 dynamic curves.
METHODS We evaluated breast MRI examinations performed between 2020 and 2021 retrospectively and included lesions with type 2 dynamic curves. We included 38 lesions from 33 patients. The lesions were evaluated for their pathological diagnosis and morphological characteristics.
RESULTS Twenty-six lesions were malignant, while twelve were benign. The most frequently encountered benign lesion (7/12, 58.3%) was sclerosing adenosis, while the most frequently encountered malignant diagnosis was invasive ductal cancer. The presence of a type 2 dynamic curve had a sensitivity of 40.2% and specificity of 73.4% for predicting malignancy. By combining type 2 curves and morphological features, the sensitivity and specificity were increased.
CONCLUSION The high rates of malignancy detected histopathologically among patients with type 2 dynamic curves in our study are remarkable. Type 2 dynamic curves can be detected in benign breast masses, especially in sclerosing adenosis cases. Considering morphological features can increase the diagnostic accuracy in cases with type 2 dynamic curves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erdal Karavas
- Department of Radiology, Erzincan University, Erzincan 24142, Turkey
| | - Bunyamin Ece
- Department of Radiology, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu 37150, Turkey
| | - Sonay Aydın
- Department of Radiology, Erzincan University, Erzincan 24142, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Besser AH, Fang LK, Tong MW, Sjaastad Andreassen MM, Ojeda-Fournier H, Conlin CC, Loubrie S, Seibert TM, Hahn ME, Kuperman JM, Wallace AM, Dale AM, Rodríguez-Soto AE, Rakow-Penner RA. Tri-Compartmental Restriction Spectrum Imaging Breast Model Distinguishes Malignant Lesions from Benign Lesions and Healthy Tissue on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133200. [PMID: 35804972 PMCID: PMC9264763 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) offers a potential adjunct to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to discriminate benign from malignant breast lesions by yielding quantitative information about tissue microstructure. Multi-component modeling of the DW-MRI signal over an extended b-value range (up to 3000 s/mm2) theoretically isolates the slowly diffusing (restricted) water component in tissues. Previously, a three-component restriction spectrum imaging (RSI) model demonstrated the ability to distinguish malignant lesions from healthy breast tissue. We further evaluated the utility of this three-component model to differentiate malignant from benign lesions and healthy tissue in 12 patients with known malignancy and synchronous pathology-proven benign lesions. The signal contributions from three distinct diffusion compartments were measured to generate parametric maps corresponding to diffusivity on a voxel-wise basis. The three-component model discriminated malignant from benign and healthy tissue, particularly using the restricted diffusion C1 compartment and product of the restricted and intermediate diffusion compartments (C1 and C2). However, benign lesions and healthy tissue did not significantly differ in diffusion characteristics. Quantitative discrimination of these three tissue types (malignant, benign, and healthy) in non-pre-defined lesions may enhance the clinical utility of DW-MRI in reducing excessive biopsies and aiding in surveillance and surgical evaluation without repeated exposure to gadolinium contrast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra H. Besser
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
| | - Lauren K. Fang
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
| | - Michelle W. Tong
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
| | - Maren M. Sjaastad Andreassen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, 7491 Trondheim, Norway;
| | - Haydee Ojeda-Fournier
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
| | - Christopher C. Conlin
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
| | - Stéphane Loubrie
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
| | - Tyler M. Seibert
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Michael E. Hahn
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
| | - Joshua M. Kuperman
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
| | - Anne M. Wallace
- Department of Surgery, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA;
| | - Anders M. Dale
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
- Department of Neuroscience, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Ana E. Rodríguez-Soto
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
| | - Rebecca A. Rakow-Penner
- Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; (A.H.B.); (L.K.F.); (M.W.T.); (H.O.-F.); (C.C.C.); (S.L.); (T.M.S.); (M.E.H.); (J.M.K.); (A.M.D.); (A.E.R.-S.)
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nguyen DL, Myers KS, Oluyemi E, Mullen LA, Panigrahi B, Rossi J, Ambinder EB. BI-RADS 3 Assessment on MRI: A Lesion-Based Review for Breast Radiologists. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:460-473. [DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Unlike mammography and US, limited data exist to establish well-defined criteria for MRI findings that have a ≤2% likelihood of malignancy. Therefore, determining which findings are appropriate for a BI-RADS 3 assessment on MRI remains challenging and variable among breast radiologists. Emerging data suggest that BI-RADS 3 should be limited to baseline MRI examinations (or examinations with less than two years of prior comparisons) performed for high-risk screening and only used for masses with all of the typical morphological and kinetic features suggestive of a fibroadenoma or dominant enhancing T2 hypointense foci that is distinct from background parenchymal enhancement and without suspicious kinetics. This article presents an updated discussion of BI-RADS 3 assessment (probably benign) for breast MRI using current evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek L Nguyen
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science , Baltimore, MD , USA
| | - Kelly S Myers
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science , Baltimore, MD , USA
| | - Eniola Oluyemi
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science , Baltimore, MD , USA
| | - Lisa A Mullen
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science , Baltimore, MD , USA
| | - Babita Panigrahi
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science , Baltimore, MD , USA
| | - Joanna Rossi
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science , Baltimore, MD , USA
| | - Emily B Ambinder
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science , Baltimore, MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hollingsworth AB, Li FY, Morse AN. Lifetime risks for breast cancer are age-discriminatory when used for high-risk screening with MRI. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 78:102122. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
45
|
Ahmad R, Ahmed B, Ahmed B. Effectiveness of MRI in screening women for breast cancer: a systematic review. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt-2021-0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence techniques for the diagnosis of disease continue to develop with rapid pace. This review article systematically determines incremental accuracy and other parameters of current methods, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value with regard to breast MRI as a screening tool for women under 50 years. Articles were included from the databases of health technology assessment agencies from 2000 to 2019, using various medical subject heading terms. A total of 23 eligible studies were included incorporating a total of 11,688 patients out of which two were multicentered, four were accuracy studies, seven were prospective studies and four were retrospective studies. MRI screening showed an adequate detection of invasive cancers, premalignant lesions and pre-invasive cancers, suggesting that MRI is a powerful surveillance tool to detect cancer in high-risk populations. These findings have indicated that MRI has particular sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of breast cancer. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42020158372.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rani Ahmad
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Basem Ahmed
- Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bassam Ahmed
- Faculity of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tesch ME, Partridge AH. Treatment of Breast Cancer in Young Adults. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-12. [PMID: 35580291 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_360970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Although breast cancer is rare and understudied in adults age 40 and younger, recent epidemiologic data show an increasing incidence of breast cancer among young women in the United States and ongoing inferior long-term outcomes. Given breast cancers arising at a young age are more likely to present at advanced stages and to have aggressive biology, multimodal treatments are often indicated. Elevated local recurrence risks and greater propensity for germline cancer predisposition mutations can impact local therapy choices. Recently, escalated systemic therapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer incorporating immunotherapy, de-escalated anti-HER2 therapy, and emerging targeted agents, including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARP inhibitors, for early-stage disease may be employed in younger and older patients alike, with some special considerations. Prognostic genomic signatures can spare low-risk young women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy, but management of intermediate-risk patients remains controversial. Ovarian function suppression and extended endocrine therapy are improving outcomes in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, but treatment adherence is a particular problem for young patients. Young women may also face greater challenges in long-term survivorship, including impaired fertility, difficulties in psychosocial adjustment, and other treatment-related comorbidities. Consideration of these age-specific issues through dedicated multidisciplinary strategies is necessary for optimal care of young women with breast cancer.
Collapse
|
47
|
Freitas V, Li X, Amitai Y, Au F, Kulkarni S, Ghai S, Mulligan AM, Bromley M, Siepmann T. Contralateral Breast Screening with Preoperative MRI: Long-Term Outcomes for Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. Radiology 2022; 304:297-307. [PMID: 35471109 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.212361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background The diagnostic value of screening the contralateral breast with MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer is poorly understood. Purpose To assess the impact of MRI for screening the contralateral breast on long-term outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and to determine whether subgroups with unfavorable prognoses would benefit from MRI in terms of survival. Materials and Methods Data on consecutive patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer seen from January 2008 to December 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, previous breast cancer, distant metastasis, absence of contralateral mammography at diagnosis, and no planned surgical treatment were excluded. Groups that did and did not undergo preoperative MRI were compared. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method for propensity score-matched groups to estimate cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). A marginal Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate association of MRI and clinicopathologic variables with OS. Results Of 1846 patients, 1199 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up time was 10 years (range, 0-14 years). The 2:1 matched sample comprised 705 patients (470 in the MRI group and 235 in the no-MRI group); median ages at surgery were 59 years (range, 31-87 years) and 64 years (range, 37-92 years), respectively. MRI depicted contralateral synchronous disease more frequently (27 of 470 patients [5.7%] vs five of 235 patients [2.1%]; P = .047) and was associated with a higher OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.51; 95% CI: 1.25, 5.06; P = .01). No differences were observed between groups in metachronous disease rate (MRI group: 21 of 470 patients [4.5%]; no-MRI group: 10 of 235 patients [4.3%]; P > .99) or CSS (HR, 1.34; 95% CI: 0.56, 3.21; P = .51). MRI benefit was greater in patients with larger tumor sizes (>2 cm) (HR, 2.58; 95% CI: 1.11, 5.99; P = .03) and histologic grade III tumors (HR, 2.94; 95% CI: 1.18, 7.32; P = .02). Conclusion Routine MRI screening of the contralateral breast after first diagnosis of breast cancer improved overall survival; the most pronounced benefit was found in patients with larger primary tumor size and primary tumors of histologic grade III. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Taourel in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivianne Freitas
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.F., F.A., S.K., S.G.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (X.L.); Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.A.); Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, Toronto, Canada (A.M.M.); Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru (M.B.); and Department of Neurology, Dresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav, Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (T.S.)
| | - Xuan Li
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.F., F.A., S.K., S.G.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (X.L.); Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.A.); Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, Toronto, Canada (A.M.M.); Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru (M.B.); and Department of Neurology, Dresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav, Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (T.S.)
| | - Yoav Amitai
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.F., F.A., S.K., S.G.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (X.L.); Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.A.); Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, Toronto, Canada (A.M.M.); Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru (M.B.); and Department of Neurology, Dresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav, Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (T.S.)
| | - Frederick Au
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.F., F.A., S.K., S.G.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (X.L.); Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.A.); Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, Toronto, Canada (A.M.M.); Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru (M.B.); and Department of Neurology, Dresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav, Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (T.S.)
| | - Supriya Kulkarni
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.F., F.A., S.K., S.G.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (X.L.); Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.A.); Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, Toronto, Canada (A.M.M.); Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru (M.B.); and Department of Neurology, Dresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav, Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (T.S.)
| | - Sandeep Ghai
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.F., F.A., S.K., S.G.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (X.L.); Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.A.); Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, Toronto, Canada (A.M.M.); Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru (M.B.); and Department of Neurology, Dresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav, Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (T.S.)
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.F., F.A., S.K., S.G.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (X.L.); Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.A.); Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, Toronto, Canada (A.M.M.); Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru (M.B.); and Department of Neurology, Dresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav, Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (T.S.)
| | - Miluska Bromley
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.F., F.A., S.K., S.G.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (X.L.); Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.A.); Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, Toronto, Canada (A.M.M.); Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru (M.B.); and Department of Neurology, Dresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav, Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (T.S.)
| | - Timo Siepmann
- From the Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2M9 (V.F., F.A., S.K., S.G.); Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada (X.L.); Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel (Y.A.); Laboratory Medicine Program, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital Site, Toronto, Canada (A.M.M.); Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru (M.B.); and Department of Neurology, Dresden Neurovascular Center, University Hospital Carl Gustav, Carus Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany (T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wang X, Chang MD, Lee MC, Niell BL. The Breast Cancer Screening and Timing of Breast MRI—Experience in a Genetic High-Risk Screening Clinic in a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:2119-2131. [PMID: 35323371 PMCID: PMC8947675 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
For women with genetic risk of breast cancer, the addition of screening breast MRI to mammography has become a standard. The order and interval of annual imaging can be variable among providers. To evaluate the clinical implications related to the timing, we conducted a chart review on a cohort of women (N = 276) with high-risk (BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, PTEN and TP53) and moderate high-risk (ATM and CHEK2) predisposition to breast cancer in a 48-month follow up. The estimated MRI detection rate in the entire group is 1.75% (18 per 1000 MRI tests). For the high-risk group, the estimated rate is 2.98% (30 per 1000 MRI tests). Many women discovered their genetic risk at an age much older (average age of the high-risk group was 48 years) than the age recommended to initiate enhanced screening (age 20 to 25 years). In total, 4 of the 11 primary breast cancers detected were identified by screening MRI within the first month after initial visit, which were not detected by previous mammography, suggesting the benefit of initiating MRI immediately after the discovery of genetic risk. Breast screening findings for women with Lynch syndrome and neurofibromatosis type 1 were also included in this report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Wang
- GeneHome, Department of Individualized Cancer Management, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
- Correspondence:
| | - Maxine D. Chang
- GeneHome, Department of Individualized Cancer Management, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| | - Marie Catherine Lee
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| | - Bethany L. Niell
- Division of Breast Imaging, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Personalized Screening and Prevention Based on Genetic Risk of Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00443-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
50
|
Maimone S, Morozov AP, Li Z, Craver EC, Elder EA, McLaughlin SA. Additional Workups Recommended During Preoperative Breast MRI: Methods to Gain Efficiency and Limit Confusion. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3839-3848. [PMID: 35258769 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11476-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative breast MRI is indicated for staging but can lead to complex imaging workups. This study reviewed imaging recommendations made on preoperative MRI exams, to simplify management approaches for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. METHODS This retrospective single-institution review was restricted to women with breast cancer who underwent staging MRI. Additional breast lesions, separate from index tumors, recommended for additional workup or surveillance were assessed to see which were detected and which characteristics predicted success in detection. Univariate mixed-effects logistic modeling predicted the likelihood of finding lesions using MRI-directed ultrasound (US), with odds ratios reported. Tests were two-sided, with a p value lower than 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS In this study, 534 (39.6%) patients had recommendations for additional workup after preoperative MRI. MRI detected additional malignancy in 178 patients (33.3%). Half of the 66 patients who refused an additional workup and opted for mastectomy had additional malignancies at mastectomy. MRI-directed US was 14 times more likely to detect masses than nonmass enhancement (NME) (p < 0.001). NME was detected on US in only 16% of cases, with one third of subsequent biopsy results considered discordant. Probably benign assessments were given to 35 patients, with 23% not returning for follow-up evaluation and 7% returning at least 6 months later than recommended. CONCLUSION Use of preoperative breast MRI has increased. Although it can add value, institutions should establish indications and expectations to prevent unnecessary workups. Limiting MRI-directed US to masses, avoiding probably benign assessments, and consulting with patients after MRI but prior to workups can prevent unnecessary exams and confusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santo Maimone
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| | - Andrey P Morozov
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Zhuo Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Emily C Craver
- Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Erin A Elder
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|