Mifepristone Pretreatment for the Medical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss

Inducing labor after fetal demise: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol combination versus misoprostol alone

INTRODUCTION

Intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD), one of the most tragic outcomes of pregnancy, affects approximately 1% of pregnancies. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of mifepristone combined with misoprostol versus misoprostol alone in inducing labor in women with IUFD.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of scientific databases from their inception up to July 29, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the Efficacy and Safety of mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone in women with IUFD were included. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB). All analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.4. To determine the quality of evidence, we used the GRADE tool.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The analysis revealed a significant reduction in the induction delivery interval with the combination treatment, with a total mean difference of - 7.86 h (MD = - 7.86, 95% CI: - 9.98 to - 5.73, p < 0.00001), favoring mifepristone plus misoprostol. There was a significant reduction in the number of misoprostol doses needed (MD = - 1.38, 95% CI: - 1.82 to - 0.94, p < 0.00001) and in the total misoprostol dose (MD = - 60.51, 95% CI: - 106.98 to - 14.04, p = 0.01), favoring the use of mifepristone plus misoprostol. The quality of evidence ranged from low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides compelling evidence that the combination therapy of mifepristone and misoprostol results in a significant reduction in the induction delivery interval and total dosage of misoprostol required for successful labor induction compared to misoprostol administered alone. Further high-quality research is essential to confirm these results.

Changes in local access to mifepristone dispensed by community pharmacies for medication abortion in Ontario: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Although mifepristone for medication abortion has been available in Canada since a regulatory change in 2017, leading to its rapid uptake, the effects of this availability on regional access to abortion are unknown. We sought to examine how community pharmacy dispensation of mifepristone affected distribution of abortion services over time in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

We used linked health administrative data to identify a cohort of all medication and procedural abortions provided in Ontario from 2017 to 2022, defined by outpatient mifepristone dispensations and abortion billing, diagnostic, and procedure codes. We evaluated changes over time in the annual proportion of community pharmacies that dispensed mifepristone and the availability and distribution of medication and procedural abortion services across geographic regions, defined by postal code forward sortation areas.

RESULTS

In 2017, 2% of Ontario pharmacies filled 1 or more prescriptions for mifepristone, which increased to 20% in 2022. In 2017, few regions contained a mifepristone-dispensing pharmacy (19%) or procedural abortion service (18%). By 2022, most regions had local access to a mifepristone-dispensing pharmacy (77%), with geographically distributed abortion services across Ontario. Although only 37% of abortion service users lived in a region with either a mifepristone-dispensing pharmacy or procedural provider in 2017, this increased to 91% by 2022.

INTERPRETATION

Access to medication abortion across Ontario increased substantially within 5 years of mifepristone's availability as a normally prescribed and dispensed medication. This regulatory approach appears successful for achieving widespread access to local abortion services.

Acceptability of Mifepristone and Misoprostol and Patients' Experience With the Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic at a Community Hospital in Canada

OBJECTIVES

Early pregnancy loss (EPL) is a common complication of pregnancy. Research has demonstrated the efficacy of mifepristone pre-treatment followed by misoprostol for the induction of an EPL. North York General Hospital (NYGH) provides an all-in-one Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic (EPAC) to streamline the care of women with an EPL.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective single cohort qualitative survey to understand patients' satisfaction with mifepristone and misoprostol and their experience with EPAC at NYGH. We recruited 191 patients with a confirmed EPL. They were given mifepristone and misoprostol. We administered the validated modified version of the Short Form-36 Health Survey Revised quality of life scales questionnaire to study the following outcomes: (1) acceptability of mifepristone and misoprostol: cramping, bleeding, duration of treatment, and recommendation to others; (2) effect on social activities; and (3) participants' overall satisfaction with the EPAC at NYGH.

RESULTS

We found that 96% of our participants responded completely to our questionnaire. For cramping, 24% reported definitely acceptable, whereas 8% definitely unacceptable. For bleeding, 26% reported definitely acceptable, whereas 4.8% definitely unacceptable. For duration of treatment, 27% reported definitely acceptable and 2.7% definitely unacceptable. Finally, for recommendation to others, 41% reported definitely acceptable and 2.1% definitely unacceptable. The rating for NYGH's EPAC was high, with 68% of participants rating it as excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the acceptability of the medical management at our EPAC for an EPL is high with the mifepristone and misoprostol protocol. This study encourages this treatment and the establishment of similar centres.

Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Medication management for early pregnancy loss

Early pregnancy loss (EPL) occurs in 15% to 20% of clinically recognized pregnancies. We recommend that patients experiencing EPL have equal access to all treatment options, including expectant, medication, and procedural management, when urgent treatment is not necessary (GRADE 1A). We recommend a patient-centered approach that uses shared decision-making to diagnose EPL through ultrasonography, serial quantitative hCG measurements, or symptoms (GRADE 1C). We suggest a shared decision-making approach for continuing expectant management of EPL up to 8 weeks after diagnosis in the absence of medical complications or symptoms requiring urgent intervention (GRADE 2C). We suggest against Rh testing and Rh-immunoglobulin administration before 12 weeks of gestation for patients undergoing medication management of EPL (GRADE 2B). We recommend a combined regimen of mifepristone with misoprostol for medication management of EPL (GRADE 1A), using mifepristone 200 mg orally followed 7 to 48 hours later by misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally or buccally (GRADE 2A). When used without mifepristone, we recommend misoprostol in two or more doses of 600 to 800 mcg sublingually or vaginally at intervals of at least 3 hours (GRADE 1B). We suggest ibuprofen 800 mg orally for pain control during medication management of EPL (GRADE 2A). Clinicians should offer all patients, but not require, in-person confirmation of completed EPL (GRADE 2B). We recommend against using endometrial thickness alone as a criterion for recommending additional intervention after medication management of EPL (GRADE 1B). We recommend institutions and clinicians make thorough efforts to obtain and maintain access to mifepristone in clinical settings where patients receive EPL care (GRADE 1C).

Off-label use of drugs in pregnancy: A critical review of guidelines, current practices, and a clinical perspective

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this narrative review was twofold: to delineate the usage patterns of the main off-label drugs during pregnancy (i.e., misoprostol, nifedipine, and corticosteroids) and to offer a medical examiner's perspective on the use of these medications.

METHODS

An extensive review of the literature was performed to assess the off-label use of corticosteroids, nifedipine, and misoprostol in pregnancy.

RESULTS

Overall, 503 records about the use of off-label medicines during pregnancy were identified. After the exclusion of papers published in languages other than English and experimental studies in animals, 340 studies were considered eligible. Studies with medicines other than corticosteroids, misoprostol, and nifedipine were removed, leaving a total of 240 articles. From the remaining records, 24 reports were not retrieved. The research strategy allowed the final identification of 76 references.

CONCLUSION

Off-label drug use in obstetrics has transitioned from being an exception to a routine, scientifically validated practice. While its application is justified by clinical outcomes and international protocols, healthcare providers must navigate a strict framework of ethical and legal responsibility.

Misoprostol administration mimicking a febrile transfusion reaction

BACKGROUND

Misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue, is widely used in obstetrics for its uterotonic properties. It is known to cause thermogenic side effects, a fact well-recognized in obstetrics but less familiar in transfusion medicine.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were collected through chart review, including temperature recordings, serologic findings, and blood culture results.

RESULTS

This case report describes a postpartum temperature spike to 39.2°C in a G1P0 female who received a red cell transfusion shortly after administration of misoprostol. Serologic workup for transfusion reaction showed no abnormalities, and blood cultures of both the patient and donor were negative for growth. Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reaction (FNHTR) remained in the differential, however, the fever was attributed to misoprostol's thermogenic effect rather than a transfusion reaction.

DISCUSSION

Increased awareness of misoprostol's thermogenic effects in transfusion medicine may improve differential diagnosis, reduce unnecessary testing, and enhance patient satisfaction by avoiding unwarranted concerns regarding transfusion reactions.

[Clinical aspects of the preparation, performance, and follow-up of a first trimester abortion]

In January 2023, the "S2k guideline on abortion in the first trimester" of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies ("Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften e. V.", AWMF) was published, which was commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Health ("Bundesministerium für Gesundheit", BMG). The guideline deals with surgical and medical abortion after counseling, with criminological or medical indication in the first 14 weeks of pregnancy, based to the last menstrual period. In this review article, based on this guideline, the procedures for medical and surgical abortion are compared as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Clinical and practical aspects of preparation and implementation, complication management, and immediate aftercare for abortion are presented.

Mifepristone as a non-emergency contraceptive among women of reproductive age: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mifepristone is a selective progesterone receptor modulator with decades of data demonstrating its potential as a highly effective emergency as well as non-emergency contraceptive. Despite considerable evidence pointing to the potential effectiveness of mifepristone as a non-emergency contraceptive, no systematic review has been conducted to synthesise the available evidence. This systematic review aims to synthesise the current evidence on the use of mifepristone as a non-emergency contraceptive to prevent pregnancy among cisgender girls and women of reproductive age.

METHODS

We developed an electronic search strategy in collaboration with the research librarian. We will search five databases (Ovid Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane-Central Trials and Global Health) from inception and identify additional studies using several grey literature search strategies. All databases will be searched from inception, and we planned to complete the search by 30 June 2024. An Ovid Medline search strategy conducted on 24 May 2024 is provided as an example. We will include all studies that involve cisgender girls and/or women of reproductive age (defined as 54 years or younger), which assessed mifepristone as a non-emergency contraceptive to prevent pregnancy. The primary outcome is contraceptive effectiveness. Two independent reviewers will screen studies for eligibility through title, abstract, and full-text review. We will extract data with Covidence software using a Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC)-adapted data-extraction tool and will assess risk of bias using the EPOC risk of bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. If sufficient data are available, we will conduct a meta-analysis using fixed and/or random effect models. However, if we are unable to conduct a meta-analysis, we will present the results narratively using the synthesis without meta-analysis guidelines and the EPOC table recommended for presenting findings without meta-analysis. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used to assess the quality of the evidence. We will report this review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review is focused on secondary data and does not require any ethical approval. We aim to publish the review in a peer-reviewed scientific journal to promote knowledge transfer and present results using other knowledge translation mediums.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024554720.

Haematometra arising from multiple abortions: a comprehensive case report

Haematometra, a rare and delayed complication, can emerge following medical termination of pregnancy, also known as 'postabortal post-caesarean syndrome' or 'redo syndrome'. Treatment requires the immediate evacuation of both liquid and clotted blood for quick resolution, followed by administration of an oxytocic agent to ensure complete recovery. This current report describes a female patient in her mid-30s who presented with colicky lower abdominal pain following a medically-induced abortion at 10 weeks. The case underscores the critical need for vigilance in detecting haematometra after abortion or caesarean delivery. Prompt recognition through symptoms and ultrasound, followed by immediate treatment, is essential to prevent severe complications such as infertility and ensure ongoing reproductive health.

Randomized Trial of Very Early Medication Abortion

BACKGROUND

Medication abortion, with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, is highly effective and safe. However, there is insufficient evidence on efficacy and safety at very early gestations before a pregnancy can be visualized with ultrasonography.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial involving women requesting medication abortion at up to 42 days of gestation with an unconfirmed intrauterine pregnancy on ultrasound examination (visualized as an empty cavity or a sac-like structure without a yolk sac or embryonic pole). Participants were randomly assigned to either immediate start of abortion (early-start group) or standard-care treatment delayed until intrauterine pregnancy was confirmed (standard group). The primary outcome was complete abortion. The noninferiority margin was set at 3.0 percentage points for the absolute between-group difference.

RESULTS

In total, 1504 women were included at 26 sites in nine countries and were randomly assigned to the early-start group (754 participants) or the standard group (750 participants). In an intention-to-treat analysis, a complete abortion occurred in 676 of 710 participants (95.2%) in the early-start group and in 656 of 688 (95.3%) in the standard group; the absolute between-group difference was -0.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -2.4 to 2.1). Ectopic pregnancies occurred in 10 of 741 participants (1.3%) in the early-start group and in 6 of 724 (0.8%) in the standard group, with one rupture before diagnosis (early-start group). Serious adverse events occurred in 12 of 737 participants (1.6%) in the early-start group and in 5 of 718 (0.7%) in the standard group (P = 0.10); the majority were uncomplicated hospitalizations for treatment of ectopic pregnancy or incomplete abortion.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication abortion before confirmed intrauterine pregnancy was noninferior to standard, delayed treatment with respect to complete abortion. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; VEMA EudraCT number, 2018-003675-35; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03989869.).

Telemedicine Follow-up After Medication Management of Early Pregnancy Loss

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of a new protocol for telemedicine follow-up after medication management of early pregnancy loss. Study Design: The study was designed to assess the feasibility of planned telemedicine follow-up after medication management of early pregnancy loss. We compared these follow-up rates with those after planned in-person follow-up of medication management of early pregnancy loss and planned telemedicine follow-up after medication abortion. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including patients initiating medication management of early pregnancy loss <13w0d gestation and medication abortion ≤10w0d with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol between April 1, 2020, and March 28, 2021. As part of a new clinical protocol, patients could opt for telemedicine follow-up one week after treatment and a home urine pregnancy test 4 weeks after treatment. Our primary outcome was completed follow-up as per clinical protocol. We also examined outcomes related to complications across telemedicine and in-person follow-up groups. Results: Of patients reviewed, 181 were eligible for inclusion; 75 had medication management of early pregnancy loss, and 106 had medication abortion. Thirty-six out of 75 patients elected for telemedicine follow-up after early pregnancy loss. Of patients scheduled for telemedicine follow-up, 29/36 (81%, 95% CI: 64-92) with early pregnancy loss and 64/69 (93%, 95% CI: 84-98) undergoing medication abortion completed follow-up as per protocol (p = 0.06). Completed follow-up was also similar among patients undergoing medication management of early pregnancy loss who planned for in-person follow-up (p = 0.135). Complications were rare and did not differ across early pregnancy loss and medication abortion groups. Conclusions: Telemedicine follow-up is a feasible alternative to in-person assessment after medication management of early pregnancy loss.

Efficacy and Safety of Mifepristone and Misoprostol Compared to Misoprostol Alone for the Resolution of Miscarriage and Intrauterine Fetal Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol together (intervention) compared to misoprostol alone (comparator) for the resolution of miscarriage and intrauterine fetal death.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology through July 2024 that evaluated the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and misoprostol together compared to misoprostol alone for the resolution of miscarriage and intrauterine fetal death through July 2024.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Primary endpoints were overall delivery success, 24-hour delivery success, and incidence of safety outcomes. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant, and heterogeneity was reported as the I2 value.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Overall delivery success was higher in the intervention group (0.73 [CI 0.64-0.82], P < 0.01). Twenty-four-hour delivery rate was higher (1.54 [CI 1.32-1.77], P = 0.06), and a shorter time to delivery interval (9.22-18.78 vs 15.47-37.1 hours) was observed in the intervention group. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were more frequent in the intervention group (0.04 [CI -0.03 to 0.12], P < 0.01).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Mifepristone and misoprostol together demonstrated higher delivery success rates and comparable safety outcomes to misoprostol alone, demonstrating the potential of improving patient care and positively impacting the time to successful delivery for patients at the bedside.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mifepristone and misoprostol together for the resolution of miscarriage and intrauterine fetal death is warranted over the use of misoprostol alone.

Association of different types of abortions with neonatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancy

Background

Abortion is an important issue that concerns all women. It holds great significance to investigate the correlation between various types of abortion histories and the neonatal outcomes of subsequent pregnancies.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included pregnant women who gave birth to singleton live-born in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital from 2016 to 2020 (n = 75 773). Women with a history of abortion, including spontaneous abortion (SAB) and induced abortion (IA), were included in the exposed group, and the remaining were included in the unexposed group. The main outcomes were birthweight and preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association of maternal abortion history with birthweight and risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancy.

Results

Women who have experienced SAB history had an increased risk of delivering very low birth weight (VLBW) and preterm birth children, with (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.15-2.32; OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.07-1.79). However, women with a history of IA were at greater risk of macrosomia (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.06-1.27). We also observed that the likelihood of delivering a VLBW baby was heightened by the number of SAB occurrences (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.54-1.38; OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.01-3.36, OR = 5.71, 95% CI = 3.21-10.15).

Conclusions

Our study indicates that pregnant women with a history of SAB are at an increased risk of delivering VLBW infants and experiencing preterm labour. The risk is positively associated with the number of SABs. Conversely, women with a history of IA are more likely to deliver macrosomic infants.

Spatial Disparities in Mifepristone Use for Early Miscarriage and Induced Abortion Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists Practicing in Massachusetts

Background

About 25% of pregnancies end in early miscarriage or abortion annually in the United States. While mifepristone is part of the most effective medication regimen for miscarriage and abortion, regulatory burdens and legal restrictions limit its provision in obstetric-gynecological practice. The extent of geographic disparities in mifepristone use is unknown.

Objectives

We sought to ascertain whether regional "deserts" for mifepristone-based miscarriage and abortion care exist in Massachusetts using geographic regions specified by the Commonwealth's Executive Office of Health and Human Services.

Methods

We fielded a cross-sectional survey of obstetrician-gynecologists practicing in Massachusetts. We weighted survey data to account for differential nonresponse by provider sex, region, and years in independent practice.

Results

Among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice with region data (n = 148), 51.0% reported using mifepristone for miscarriage and 43.5% for abortion. Significant differences in reported use were observed across regions (p < 0.001 for both indications). Barriers to using mifepristone for miscarriage management also varied across regions. Respondents outside of Boston and Western Massachusetts were more likely to report gaps in knowledge about regulations and prescribing and had less prior experience using mifepristone. In a multivariable model adjusting for provider sex and practice type, obstetrician-gynecologists outside of Boston had significantly lower odds of using mifepristone for miscarriage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.14, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.08-0.25) and abortion (aOR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.26-0.82), compared to Boston-based obstetrician-gynecologists.

Conclusion

Mifepristone provision varies significantly by Massachusetts region. This may lead to spatial disparities in reproductive health outcomes.

Outcomes After Early Pregnancy Loss Management With Mifepristone Plus Misoprostol vs Misoprostol Alone

Importance

Medication management of early pregnancy loss (EPL), or miscarriage, typically involves the administration of misoprostol with or without pretreatment with mifepristone. Combination treatment with mifepristone plus misoprostol is more effective than misoprostol alone but is underutilized in the US.

Objective

To describe differences in clinical outcomes after EPL management with mifepristone plus misoprostol vs misoprostol alone using commercial claims data.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study used national insurance claims data from the IBM MarketScan Research Database. Participants included pregnant people (aged 15-49 years) with private insurance who presented with an initial EPL diagnosis between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022.

Exposures

The primary exposure was the medication used to manage EPL (ie, mifepristone plus misoprostol or misoprostol alone). Other exposures of interest included demographic characteristics and location of service.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was subsequent procedural management (eg, uterine aspiration) after EPL diagnosis and medication management. Other outcomes of interest included return visits, hospitalizations, and complications occurring in the subsequent 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were used, and a multivariable logistic regression model was created to examine factors associated with subsequent procedural management.

Results

This study included 31 977 patients (mean [SD] age, 32.7 [5.6] years) with claims for EPL who received medication management. Of these patients, 3.0% received mifepristone plus misoprostol and 97.0% received misoprostol alone. Patients who received misoprostol with pretreatment with mifepristone were less likely to have subsequent uterine aspiration (10.5% vs 14.0%; P = .002), and they were also less likely to have subsequent emergency department (ED) visits for EPL (3.5% vs 7.9%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, use of mifepristone plus misoprostol was associated with decreased odds of subsequent procedural management (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.57-0.87]).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this study suggest that mifepristone is underutilized for the medication management of EPL, but its use is associated with a lower need for subsequent uterine aspiration and a decrease in the number of subsequent visits to an ED. Increasing access to mifepristone for EPL management may decrease health care utilization and expenditures.

Management of early pregnancy loss by reproductive endocrinologists: does access to mifepristone matter?

Objective

To describe patterns and variations in the medical and procedural management of early pregnancy loss (EPL) among reproductive endocrinology and infertility specialists, with attention to mifepristone use.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

Online survey.

Patients

Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility members.

Intervention

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure

Preferred management for EPL.

Results

Of 101 completed surveys (response rate: 12.2%), 70.3% of respondents reported diagnosing EPL at least once per week. Half (50.5%) of respondents preferred medical management compared with 27.7% who preferred procedural management and 21.8% who preferred expectant management. Approximately one-quarter (26.7%) of respondents offer mifepristone for medical management of EPL. The most common reason cited for not prescribing mifepristone was a lack of access to the medication. Mifepristone prescribers were more likely to work in a hospital or university setting than private practice. Increasing years in practice was also associated with mifepristone use. The use of mifepristone for EPL did not vary by the respondent's age, gender, prior abortion training, or practice region.

Conclusion

The most effective method of medical management uses both mifepristone and misoprostol. However, nearly three-quarters of reproductive endocrinology and infertility physicians do not offer mifepristone, which may be linked to access issues.

The Success of Mifepristone and Misoprostol in the Management of Early Pregnancy Loss at a Community Hospital: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

This prospective single-arm study was conducted to understand the expulsion rate of the gestational sac in the management of early pregnancy loss (EPL).

METHODS

We recruited 441 participants; 188 met the eligibility criteria. Participants were 18 years of age and older who experienced a confirmed EPL (<12 weeks gestational age) defined by an intrauterine pregnancy with a non-viable embryonic or anembryonic gestational sac with no fetal heart activity. Participants were given 200 mg of mifepristone pre-treatment orally followed by 2 doses of misoprostol 800 μg vaginally after 24 and 48 hours. Participants were seen in follow-up on day 14 to confirm the absence of a gestational sac, classified as treatment success. For failed treatment (defined by retained gestational sac), we offered expectant management or a third dose of misoprostol and/or dilatation and curettage. We followed all participants for 30 days. We collected data on overtreatment for retained products of conception and hospital admissions for adverse events.

RESULTS

Overall, 181 participants followed the protocol and 169 (93.3%) participants had a complete expulsion of the gestational sac by the second visit (day 14). Twelve (6.6%) failed the treatment and 1 had an adverse event of heavy vaginal bleeding requiring dilatation and curettage. Despite the expulsion of the gestational sac, 29 cases (17.1%) at subsequent follow-up were diagnosed as retained products of conception based on ultrasound assessment of thickened endometrium.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with mifepristone followed by 2 doses of misoprostol with a 14-day follow-up resulted in a high expulsion rate and is a safe management option for EPL.

Abortion Stigma as a Barrier to Mifepristone Use among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Alabama for Early Pregnancy Loss

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our study was to identify and characterize barriers to mifepristone use among obstetrician-gynecologists (OB-GYNs) for early pregnancy loss in a southern US state.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, we conducted semistructured interviews with 19 OB-GYNs in Alabama who manage early pregnancy loss. The interviews explored participants' knowledge of and experience with mifepristone use for miscarriage management and abortion, along with barriers to and facilitators of clinical mifepristone use. The interviews were coded by multiple study staff using inductive and deductive thematic coding.

RESULTS

Nearly all of the interviewees identified abortion-related stigma as a barrier to mifepristone use. Interviewees often attributed stigma to a lack of knowledge about the clinical use of mifepristone for early pregnancy loss. The stigmatization of mifepristone due to its association with abortion was related to religious and political objections. Many interviewees also described stigma associated with misoprostol use. Although providers believed that mifepristone use for abortion would not be accepted in their practice, most believed that mifepristone could be used successfully for miscarriage management after practice-wide education on its use.

CONCLUSIONS

Mifepristone is strongly associated with abortion stigma among OB-GYNs in Alabama, which is a barrier to its use for miscarriage management. Interventions to decrease abortion stigma and associated stigma surrounding mifepristone are needed to optimize early pregnancy loss care.

Medical management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol in emergency departments compared to a Complex Family Planning office: Implementation of a COVID-19 institutional policy change

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the implementation of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical management of early pregnancy loss (EPL) in emergency departments (EDs) by comparing efficacy, complication, and follow-up rates for patients treated in EDs to the Complex Family Planning (CFP) outpatient office.

STUDY DESIGN

In COVID-19's first wave, we expanded medical management of EPL to our EDs. This retrospective study evaluated 72 patients receiving mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021, comparing treatment success, safety outcomes, and follow-up rates by location.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (46%) patients received care in the ED and 39 (54%) at CFP. Treatment success was lower in EDs (23, 70%) compared to CFP (34, 87%), but after adjusting for insurance status and pregnancy type (miscarriage, uncertain viability, unknown location), this was not significant: adjusted odds ratio 0.48 (95% CI 0.13-1.81). More ED patients underwent emergent interventions (3 vs 0) including two emergent uterine aspirations, one uterine artery embolization, and two blood transfusions. Two cases were attributed to misdiagnosis (cesarean scar and cervical ectopic pregnancies interpreted as incomplete miscarriages) and one to guideline nonadherence. No complications occurred in the CFP group. Follow-up rates were over 80% in both groups. More ED patients engaged in telehealth follow-up (67% vs 18%, p ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this small sample, we observed a trend toward less successful treatment in the ED compared to the CFP office. Both correctly making uncommon diagnoses and adhering to new guidelines presented implementation challenges.

IMPLICATIONS

Implementing mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL in our EDs achieved lower rates of pregnancy resolution compared to outpatient management. Complex uncommon diagnoses and implementing new care pathways in EDs may have contributed to complications and highlighted opportunities for improvement. Additional studies are needed to further quantify safety outcomes for EPL management in EDs.

Medical treatment for early pregnancy loss following in vitro fertilization compared to spontaneous pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Misoprostol is a well-studied medical treatment for early pregnancy loss (EPL), with success rates ranging between 70 and 90%. However, treatment failure is associated with major patient discomfort, including the need for surgical intervention to evacuate the uterus. It was previously reported that medical treatment was especially successful among women who conceived after in vitro fertilization (IVF). We aimed to study if there is a difference in rates of medical treatment failures for EPL between pregnancies conceived by IVF and spontaneous pregnancies.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included all women who underwent medical treatment for EPL at our institute between 07/2015 and 12/2020. Treatment outcome was compared between IVF and spontaneous pregnancies. Treatment failure was defined as a need for surgical intervention, namely, dilation & curettage (D&C) and/or hysteroscopy, due to retained products of conception, which was defined as a gestational sac or endometrial thickness greater than 15 mm in a TVS scan.

RESULTS

Overall, 775 patients were included, of which 195 (169/775 = 25.1%) ultimately required surgical intervention. There was no difference between the study groups in the rate of treatment failure. However, among IVF pregnancies, the rate of emergency D&C was lower (3.6% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.001), compared to spontaneous group.

CONCLUSION

In cases of medical treatment for EPL, IVF pregnancies had no differences in rates of treatment failure compared to spontaneous pregnancies. That being said, IVF pregnancies have lower chances to undergo emergency D&C, compared to spontaneous pregnancies.

Pregnancy Outcomes After Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Uterine Leiomyomas Compared With Myomectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and myomectomy.

METHODS

The ULTRA (Uterine Leiomyoma Treatment With Radiofrequency Ablation) study is an ongoing multicenter prospective cohort study with longitudinal follow-up up to 5 years comparing outcomes of radiofrequency ablation with myomectomy in premenopausal women older than age 21 years with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. Participants were queried every 6 months after surgery to assess the incidence of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 539 women enrolled in ULTRA, a total of 37 participants (mean age at first pregnancy 35.0±4.7 years) conceived 43 times as of March 2023 (22 radiofrequency ablation, 21 myomectomy). The average length of follow-up time after all procedures was 2.5±1.0 years. The baseline miscarriage rate in the study population was 33.3%. In participants who underwent radiofrequency ablation, 9 of 22 pregnancies (40.9%, 95% CI, 20.3-61.5%) ended in first-trimester miscarriage, 11 resulted in live births (50.0%, 95% CI, 29.1-70.9%), one resulted fetal death at 30 weeks of gestation, and one resulted in uterine rupture during miscarriage treatment with misoprostol 10 weeks after radiofrequency ablation. Among the live births in the radiofrequency ablation group, 45.5% were by vaginal delivery. In the myomectomy group, 9 of 21 pregnancies (42.9%, 95% CI, 21.7-64.0%) ended in first-trimester miscarriage and 12 resulted in live births (57.1%, 95% CI, 36.0-78.3%). There were no significant differences in the likelihood of live birth or miscarriage between the study groups.

CONCLUSION

Full-term pregnancy and vaginal delivery are achievable after radiofrequency ablation of leiomyomas. However, in this interim analysis, the miscarriage rate in both radiofrequency ablation and myomectomy groups was higher than expected for women in this age group. Long-term data collection in the ongoing ULTRA study aims to further understand pregnancy outcomes after radiofrequency ablation compared with myomectomy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT0210094.

Retrospective cohort study comparing success of medical management of early pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived with and without medical assistance

OBJECTIVE

To compare the success rates of medical management using a combined mifepristone and misoprostol protocol in cases of early pregnancy loss (EPL) between women who conceived without medical assistance and those who conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF), after fresh or frozen embryo transfer, and evaluate for the predictive factors of success, time to first passage of tissue, and time to complete resolution of pregnancy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Women who presented with EPL below 13 weeks of gestation between June 2013 and July 2021 who were managed medically with mifepristone 200 mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally were included in the study.

INTERVENTION(S)

Medical management with mifepristone and misoprostol; conception without medical assistance vs. post-IVF, after fresh or frozen embryo transfer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We evaluated overall success and performed subgroup analysis according to the mode of conception and compared fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfers for IVF pregnancies. In all groups, we also calculated success according to gestational age and compared the time to first passage of tissue. The potential predictive factors of treatment success were analyzed. The side effects and complications of treatment were recorded.

RESULT(S)

A total of 930 women were included in the study, 99 (11%) of whom achieved pregnancy after IVF. The overall success of medical treatment was 89% with no statistically significant difference according to the mode of conception (89% vs. 89%) or type of transfer (fresh 89% vs. frozen 89%). Only lower gestational age by sonography was independently predictive of treatment success, showing a negative regression coefficient of β = -0.333 and an odds ratio of 0.717. The mean time to first passage of tissue was 5.0 ± 2.1 hours. Altogether, 666 women (72%) showed pregnancy resolution on the day of medication administration, an additional 110 women at 1-week follow-up, and a further 74 women after ≥4 weeks on ultrasound.

CONCLUSION(S)

Medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol is a highly successful treatment option that results in completed abortion in a timely fashion in both pregnancies conceived without medical assistance and those conceived after IVF.

Clinical factors associated with subsequent surgical intervention in women undergoing early medical termination of viable or non-viable pregnancies

Introduction

Mifepristone-misoprostol treatment for medical abortion and miscarriage are safe and effective. This study aimed to assess clinical factors associated with subsequent surgical intervention after medical termination of early viable or non-viable pregnancy.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study included women who underwent medical abortion at Taipei Medical University between January 2010 and December 2019. A total of 1,561 subjects, with 1,080 viable and 481 non-viable pregnancies, who were treated with oral mifepristone 600 mg followed by misoprostol 600 mg 48 h later were included. Data of all pregnancies and medical termination of pregnancy were evaluated using regression analysis. The main outcome was successful termination of pregnancy.

Results

The success rate of medical abortion was comparable in women with viable and non-viable (92.13% vs. 92.93%) pregnancies. Besides retained tissue, more existing pregnancies with ultrasonographic findings were found in the non-viable pregnancy group than in the viable pregnancy group (29.4% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.011). Multivariate analysis showed that previous delivery was an independent risk factor for failed medical abortion among all included cases. In women with viable pregnancy, longer gestational age [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.483, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.224-1.797, p < 0.001] and previous Cesarean delivery (aOR: 2.177, 95% CI: 1.167-40.62, p = 0.014) were independent risk factors for failed medical abortion. Number of Cesarean deliveries (aOR: 1.448, 95% CI: 1.029-2.039, p = 0.034) was an independent risk factor for failed medication abortion in women with non-viable pregnancies.

Conclusion

This is the first cohort study to identify risk factors for subsequent surgical intervention in women with viable or non-viable pregnancies who had undergone early medically induced abortions. The success rate of medical abortion is comparable in women with viable and non-viable pregnancies. Previous delivery is an independent risk factor for failed medical abortion. Clinical follow-up may be necessary for women who are at risk of subsequent surgical intervention.

Nanoparticles Partially Restore Bacterial Susceptibility to Antibiotics

The growing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics is one of the main public health problems nowadays. The influence of silver nanoparticle (AgNP) pretreatment of 220 cows with mastitis on the susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteria to 31 antibiotics was studied. The obtained results were compared with the previous results for Escherichia coli, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, and Staphylococcus aureus. For all four bacteria, an increase in susceptibility (9.5-21.2%) to 31 antibiotics after cow treatment with AgNPs was revealed, while after first-line antibiotic drug treatment as expected, the susceptibility decreased (11.3-27.3%). These effects were explained by (1) the increase in the contribution of isolates with efflux effect after antibiotic treatments and its decrease after AgNP treatment and (2) the changes in bacteria adhesion and anti-lysozyme activity after these treatments. The effect of the increasing antibacterial activity of antibiotics after AgNP treatment was the most pronounced in the case of E. coli and was minimal in the case of S. epidermidis. With AgNP treatment, the time of recovery decreased by 26.8-48.4% compared to the time of recovery after treatment with the first-line antibiotic drugs. The AgNP treatment allows for achieving the partial restoration of the activity of antibiotics.

hCG trends after mifepristone and misoprostol for undesired pregnancy of unknown location

OBJECTIVES

To describe human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trends for patients with a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) presenting for medication abortion by management strategy and outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included patients presenting for medication abortion with a PUL at ≤42 days gestation managed with either (1) immediate mifepristone with serial hCG follow-up (same-day-start) or (2) hCG testing every 48 to 72 hours ± ultrasonography to confirm pregnancy location followed by treatment (delay-for-diagnosis). The primary outcome was percent hCG change over time between presentation and diagnosis, summarized using a multivariate regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 55 same-day-start patients, none were treated for ectopic. The eight who eventually required suction curettage had median hCG percent changes (interquartile range) on days 3, 4, and 5 of +57% (-14 to 127; n = 2), +292% (226-353; n = 4), and +392% (n = 1), while the 41 successful medication abortions had declines of -64% (n = 1), -65% (-75 to -27; n = 17), and -77% (-85 to -68; n = 13). Of the 380 delay-for-diagnosis patients, the 30 ectopic pregnancies had day 3, 4, and 5 changes of +38% (-17 to 56; n = 14), +50% (17-71; n = 7), and +115% (87-177; n = 4). None of the ectopic pregnancies declined ≥50% by days 3 to 5. The hCG trend for ectopic pregnancies differed from successful medication abortions (p < 0.01), but not medication abortions with retained intrauterine pregnancies (p = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum hCG trends can help differentiate ectopic pregnancy from successful medication abortion, but cannot distinguish between ectopic and retained intrauterine pregnancy.

IMPLICATIONS

Serial serum hCG testing is effective for confirming successful medication abortion and identifying patients requiring further follow-up among patients undergoing medication abortion for an undesired PUL.

Mifepristone Use Among Obstetrician-Gynecologists in Massachusetts: Prevalence and Predictors of Use

OBJECTIVES

We estimated the prevalence of mifepristone use for evidence-based indications among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice in Massachusetts and explored the demographic and practice-related factors associated with use.

METHODS

We used data from a cross-sectional survey administered to Massachusetts obstetrician-gynecologists identified from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. We measured the prevalence of mifepristone use for four clinical scenarios: early pregnancy loss, medication abortion, cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation procedures, and cervical preparation before induction of labor. Multivariate regression was used to calculate the odds of mifepristone use for these scenarios based on practice type, years in practice, physician sex, and history of medication abortion training.

RESULTS

A total of 198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate = 29.0%); this analysis was limited to 158 respondents who were not in residency or fellowship. Overall, 46.0% used mifepristone for early pregnancy loss and 38.6% for medication abortion. Fewer used mifepristone for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation (26.0%) or before induction of labor (26.4%). Respondents in academic practice settings, with more years in practice, of female sex, and with sufficient medication abortion training were significantly more likely to use mifepristone for one or more evidence-based clinical indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficient medication abortion training during residency significantly predicts whether obstetrician-gynecologists use mifepristone in practice. The U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade will allow state-level abortion bans and restrictions to be in effect, which will reduce exposure to abortion training during residency. Increasing training in and utilization of mifepristone are critical for equitable access to reproductive health services. Further interventions may need to be developed to increase mifepristone use in nonacademic practice settings.

Comparing letrozole and mifepristone pre-treatment in medical management of first trimester missed miscarriage: a prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether letrozole pre-treatment is non-inferior to mifepristone pre-treatment, followed by misoprostol, for complete evacuation in the medical treatment of first-trimester missed miscarriage.

DESIGN

Prospective open-label non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

A university-affiliated hospital.

POPULATION

We recruited 294 women diagnosed with first-trimester missed miscarriage who opted for medical treatment.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to: (i) the mifepristone group, who received 200 mg mifepristone orally followed 24-48 h later by 800 μg misoprostol vaginally; or (ii) the letrozole group, who received 10 mg letrozole orally once-a-day for 3 days, followed by 800 μg misoprostol vaginally on the third (i.e. last) day of letrozole administration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the rate of complete evacuation without surgical intervention at 42 days post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included induction-to-expulsion interval, adverse effects, women's satisfaction, number of doses of misoprostol required, duration of vaginal bleeding, pain score on the day of misoprostol administration and other adverse events.

RESULTS

The complete evacuation rates were 97.8% (95% CI 95.1%-100%) and 97.2% (95% CI 94.4%-99.9%) in the letrozole and mifepristone groups, respectively (p ≤ 0.001 for non-inferiority). The mean induction-to-tissue expulsion interval in the letrozole group was longer compared with the mifepristone group (15.4 vs 9.0 h) (p = 0.03). The letrozole group had less heavy post-treatment bleeding and an earlier return of menses. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of doses of misoprostol required, the duration of vaginal bleeding, the pain score on the day of misoprostol administration and the rate of other adverse events between the two groups. The majority of the women (91.2% and 93.9% in the letrozole and mifepristone groups, respectively) were satisfied with their treatment option.

CONCLUSIONS

Letrozole is non-inferior to mifepristone as a pre-treatment, followed by misoprostol, for the medical treatment of first-trimester missed miscarriage.

Mifepristone implementation in primary care: Clinician and staff insights from a pilot learning collaborative

OBJECTIVES

The ExPAND Mifepristone (ExPAND) learning collaborative aims to support primary care providers in overcoming logistical barriers to mifepristone provision. This qualitative study describes clinician and staff perspectives on the impact of ExPAND in two federally qualified health center networks (FQHCs).

STUDY DESIGN

Researchers conducted semi-structured qualitative interview with a purposive sample of clinicians, staff, and leadership from two Illinois FQHCs. We analyzed transcripts in batches using modified grounded theory to identify themes regarding the reception of ExPAND and barriers to and facilitators of mifepristone implementation.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 13) expressed strong support for providing mifepristone for miscarriage management at their clinics. Most also personally supported mifepristone for abortion care. Many participants felt that ExPAND reflected their clinics' values, as it strengthens the primary care relationship, emphasizes patient-centered care, and addresses disparities in access. Barriers to implementation included fear that providing abortion care would jeopardize FQHC funding and logistical hurdles due to the coronavirus disease pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants felt that mifepristone provision in primary care was an important service, and that ExPAND helped achieve that goal. Future clinics participating in ExPAND would benefit from education about how FQHCs can provide mifepristone for abortion care while complying with federal funding restrictions.

IMPLICATIONS

Learning collaboratives like ExPAND can prepare primary care clinics to provide mifepristone. Participants describe a clear benefit of mifepristone integration to their patients, and they report mifepristone integration aligns with clinic values.

Pharmacists' experiences dispensing misoprostol and readiness to dispense mifepristone

BACKGROUND

Mifepristone, followed by misoprostol, is commonly used for medication abortion and early miscarriage care. Since mifepristone's approval in 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed restrictions on where and how it could be dispensed, including applying a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy in 2011. In December 2021, the FDA removed the in-person dispensing requirement and, in January 2023, began allowing certified pharmacies to dispense the drug directly to patients.

OBJECTIVES

To explore pharmacist knowledge about misoprostol and mifepristone, experience dispensing misoprostol, as well as comfort and readiness to dispense mifepristone should federal regulations allow.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth interviews with 21 U.S.-based pharmacists and pharmacy trainees between June and December of 2021, a time when few pharmacists were allowed to dispense mifepristone.

RESULTS

Participants reported varied knowledge about medications for miscarriage and abortion but described themselves as generally knowledgeable about medications and reported strategies for learning about new medications. Most said they would feel ready to dispense mifepristone, and many described dispensing misoprostol without difficulty. Potential challenges specific to mifepristone dispensing included employer hesitation and colleague refusals. To assure successful dispensing, participants recommended basic training and fact sheets; relationships with prescribers for follow-up; and policies for prescription transfers in the event of refusal.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that nearly all participants would feel ready to dispense mifepristone with some basic training. Pharmacists self-report having the skills and resources to learn about new medications quickly. Our findings support the FDA's rule change allowing pharmacist dispensing of mifepristone and suggest that most challenges would stem from individual or institutional refusals.

Combination of Mifepristone and Misoprostol for First-Trimester Medical Abortion: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Importance

Several medications have been used to achieve medical abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. The most commonly used is the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol; however, different doses and routes of administration have been proposed.

Objective

The aim of this study was to summarize published data on the effectiveness, adverse effects, and acceptability of the various combinations of mifepristone and misoprostol in medical abortion protocols in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Evidence Acquisition

This was a comprehensive review, synthesizing the findings of the literature on the current use of mifepristone and misoprostol for first-trimester abortion.

Results

The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol seems to be more effective than misoprostol alone. Regarding the dosages and routes, mifepristone is administered orally, and the optimal dose is 200 mg. The route of administration of misoprostol varies; the sublingual and buccal routes are more effective; however, the vaginal route (800 μg) is associated with fewer adverse effects. Finally, the acceptability rates did not differ significantly.

Conclusions

Different schemes for first-trimester medical abortion have been described so far. Future research needs to focus on identifying the method that offers the best trade-off between efficacy and safety in first-trimester medical abortion.

Medical management of first trimester miscarriage: a quality improvement initiative

INTRODUCTION

Medical management of first trimester pregnancy loss is a safe option that is well tolerated and affords women more autonomy in relation to their care. Recent trials provide robust evidence that mifepristone pretreatment is the optimal approach for women with missed miscarriage who desire medical management.

METHODS

Following a change in medical management of first trimester miscarriage in our unit, we conducted a retrospective audit over a 3-month period of all women who had elected medical management as their primary treatment option. We compared the results with a previous audit that had been undertaken prior to the change in practice.

RESULTS

The implementation of mifepristone resulted in an increased effectiveness of primary medical treatment for first trimester miscarriage from 53.8% to 85.2% (p=<0.001).

DISCUSSION

The results of our study support the introduction of mifepristone into routine clinical practice for medical management of first trimester pregnancy loss across all maternity units.

Medication Abortion: A Comprehensive Review

This chapter provides an overview of evidence-based guidelines for medication abortion in the first trimester. We discuss regimens, both FDA-approved and other clinical-based protocols, and will briefly discuss novel self-managed abortion techniques taking place outside the formal health care system. Overview of patient counseling and pain management are presented with care to include guidance on "no touch" regimens that have proven both feasible and effective. We hope that this comprehensive review helps the health care community make strides to increase access to abortion in a time when reproductive health care is continuously restricted.

Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Misoprostol in the Treatment of Incomplete Miscarriage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

 To assess the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of misoprostol in the treatment of incomplete miscarriage.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials databases (clinicaltrials.gov) were searched for the relevant articles, and search strategies were developed using a combination of thematic Medical Subject Headings terms and text words. The last search was conducted on July 4, 2022. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION OF STUDIES

 Randomized clinical trials with patients of gestational age up to 6/7 weeks with a diagnosis of incomplete abortion and who were managed with at least 1 of the 3 types of treatment studied were included. A total of 8,087 studies were screened.

DATA COLLECTION

 Data were synthesized using the statistical package Review Manager V.5.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom). For dichotomous outcomes, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were derived for each study. Heterogeneity between the trial results was evaluated using the standard test, I2 statistic.

DATA SYNTHESIS

 When comparing misoprostol with medical vacuum aspiration (MVA), the rate of complete abortion was higher in the MVA group (OR = 0.16; 95%CI = 0.07-0.36). Hemorrhage or heavy bleeding was more common in the misoprostol group (OR = 3.00; 95%CI = 1.96-4.59), but pain after treatment was more common in patients treated with MVA (OR = 0.65; 95%CI = 0.52-0.80). No statistically significant differences were observed in the general acceptability of the treatments.

CONCLUSION

 Misoprostol has been determined as a safe option with good acceptance by patients.

Management of early pregnancy loss among obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts and barriers to mifepristone use

OBJECTIVES

To measure the prevalence of early pregnancy loss management types among obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts, and delineate barriers, facilitators, demographic and practice-related factors associated with mifepristone use for early pregnancy loss.

STUDY DESIGN

We surveyed a census of obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts. Descriptive statistics measured the prevalence of offering expectant, misoprostol-alone, mifepristone and misoprostol, dilation and curettage in the office and operating room, and multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated barriers and facilitators to mifepristone use. Data were weighted to account for nonresponders.

RESULTS

198 obstetrician-gynecologists responded to the survey (response rate=29%). Participants most commonly offered expectant management (98%), dilation and curettage in the operating room (94%), and misoprostol-only medication management (80%). Fewer offered mifepristone-misoprostol (51%) or dilation and curettage in an office setting (45%). Those in private practice or other practice types had lower odds of offering mifepristone-misoprostol than those in academic practice (private practice: aOR 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.19, 0.61]). Female physicians had higher odds of offering mifepristone-misoprostol (aOR 1.97, 95% CI [1.11, 3.49]). Obstetrician-gynecologists who included medication abortion in their practice had much higher odds of using mifepristone for early pregnancy loss (aOR 25.06, 95% CI [14.52, 43.24]). The Food and Drug Administration Risk and Evaluation Management Strategies Program was a primary barrier among those not using mifepristone (54%).

CONCLUSIONS

Many obstetrician-gynecologists do not offer mifepristone-based regimens for early pregnancy loss, which are more efficacious than misoprostol-only regimens. The Food and Drug Administration Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Program is a major barrier to mifepristone use.

IMPLICATIONS

Half of obstetrician-gynecologists in Massachusetts do not use mifepristone for early pregnancy loss management. Major barriers include lack of experience with mifepristone and the Food and Drug Administration Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies Program regulations. Removing medically unnecessary regulations and increasing education on mifepristone via access to abortion care experts may increase uptake of this practice.

Early pregnancy loss medical management in clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to review clinical practice outcomes of early pregnancy loss (EPL) medical management using mifepristone and misoprostol outside of a clinical trial setting.

STUDY DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed a deidentified database of patients who received mifepristone-misoprostol for EPL from May 2018 to May 2021 at our academic center-based clinic, which was a study site for a multicenter mifepristone-misoprostol EPL trial completed in March 2018. All patients received mifepristone 200 mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg vaginally or buccally, with clinic follow-up typically scheduled within 1 week. The primary outcome was successful medical management, defined as management without the need for aspiration, and the secondary outcomes included additional interventions and indications, follow-up ultrasonography findings, and adverse events requiring treatment.

RESULTS

We treated 90 patients with a median ultrasound-measured gestational size of 49 (range 30-80) days and median time from mifepristone to misoprostol of 24 (range 8-66) hours. Follow-up was completed in clinic by 80 (88.9%), completed remotely by five (5.6%), and not completed by five (5.6%) patients. Overall, 76 (95% CI 82.9%-96.0%) of 85 patients (89.4%) with follow-up were successfully managed without uterine aspiration. Eighty patients had initial follow-up ultrasonography interpreted as gestational sac expulsion; seven (8.8%) of these ultimately underwent aspiration, including one patient who had a previously undiagnosed cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Two patients had significant safety outcomes: one pelvic infection and one blood transfusion during aspiration in the patient with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Outside of a clinical trial setting, medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol remains effective and safe.

IMPLICATIONS

Medical management of EPL with mifepristone and misoprostol is effective and safe outside of a clinical trial setting. A standardized protocol based on the best available clinical trial evidence can be used in clinical practice for the medical management of EPL.

The role of mifepristone on first trimester miscarriage treatment - A double-blind randomized controlled trial - MiFirsT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of combined mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in outpatient medical treatment of first trimester miscarriage. Additionally, the study intends to compare the rate of complications, adverse effects, and treatment acceptability between groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial including women with diagnosis of missed first trimester miscarriage up to 9 weeks of gestation.

RESULTS

Between April 2019 and November 2021, 216 women diagnosed with first trimester miscarriage up to 9 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to mifepristone group or to misoprostol-alone group. Data from 105 women in mifepristone group and 103 women in misoprostol-alone group were analyzed, with no differences in baseline characteristics. The median time between medications (oral mifepristone/placebo and vaginal misoprostol) was nearly 43 h in both groups (p = 0.906). The median time to first follow-up was 2.6 weeks (IQR 1.0) in mifepristone group and 2.4 weeks (IQR 1.0) in misoprostol-alone group (p = 0.855). The overall success rate of medical treatment was significantly higher in the mifepristone-group comparing to misoprostol-alone group (94.3% vs. 82.5%, RR 1.14, 95% CI, 1.03-1.26; p = 0.008). Accordingly, the rate of surgical treatment was significantly lower in the mifepristone-group (5.7% vs.14.6%, RR 0.39, 95% CI, 0.16-0.97; p = 0.034). The composite complication rate was similar and lower than 4% in both groups. No case of complicated pelvic infection, hemodynamic instability or inpatient supportive treatment was reported. There were no significant differences in the rates of adverse events, median score for vaginal bleeding intensity or analgesics use. Despite the same median value, the score of abdominal pain intensity was significantly higher in the mifepristone-group (p = 0.011). In both groups, more than 65% of the women classified the treatment as "good" and 92% would recommend it to a friend on the same clinical situation.

CONCLUSION

The mifepristone plus vaginal misoprostol combined treatment for medical resolution of first trimester miscarriage resulted in significant higher success rate and lower rate of surgical uterine evacuation comparing to misoprostol-alone treatment, with no relevant differences in adverse events or treatment acceptability.

Failure Rate of Medical Treatment for Miscarriage Correlated with the Difference between Gestational Age According to Last Menstrual Period and Gestational Size Calculated via Ultrasound

Objective: To study whether the interval between gestational age calculated using the last menstrual period (GA-LMP) and gestational age calculated via ultrasound (GA-US) is correlated with the success rate of medical treatment in cases of miscarriages. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a gynecology unit in a tertiary medical center. Women who underwent medical treatment with Misoprostol for miscarriage at the Edith Wolfson Medical Center between 07/2015 and 12/2020 were included. Incomplete or septic miscarriages, multiple pregnancies, patients with irregular periods, and cases of missing data were excluded. Failure of medical treatment was defined as the need for surgical intervention due to a retained gestational sac, severe bleeding or retained products of conception. The cohort study was divided into two groups: patients with successful treatment and patients for whom surgical intervention was eventually needed. We performed both a univariate and multivariate analysis in order to identify whether a correlation between GA-LMP and GA-US interval is indeed a factor in the success rate of a medical abortion. Results: Overall, 778 patients were included in the study. From this cohort 582 (74.9%) had undergone a successful medical treatment, while 196 (25.1%) required surgical intervention due to the failure of medical treatment, as defined above. The GA-LMP to GA-US interval (in weeks) was 2.6 ± 1.4 in the success group, while the GA in the failure group was 3.1 ± 1.6 (p < 0.001). After performing a multivariant regression analysis, we were able to show that the GA-LMP to GA-US interval was found to be independently correlated with an increase in the treatment failure rate (aOR = 1.24, CI 95% (1.01-1.51), p = 0.03). Conclusions: In cases of miscarriage, longer GA-LMP to GA-US interval has been shown to be an independently correlated factor to lower success rate of the medical treatment option.

Vaginal Bleeding Before 20 Weeks Gestation

Conditions that often present with vaginal bleeding before 20 weeks are common and can cause morbidity and mortality. Clinically stable patients can choose their management options. Clinically unstable patients require urgent procedural management: uterine aspiration, dilation and evacuation, or surgical removal of an ectopic pregnancy. Septic abortion requires prompt procedural management, intravenous antibiotics, and intravenous fluids. Available data on prognosis with expectant management of pre-viable rupture of membranes in the United States are poor for mothers and fetuses.

Mifepristone use for early pregnancy loss: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators among OB/GYNS in Massachusetts, USA

CONTEXT

Early pregnancy loss (EPL) affects 1 million patients in the United States (US) annually, but integration of mifepristone into EPL care may be complicated by regulatory barriers, practice-related factors, and abortion stigma.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews among obstetrician-gynecologists in independent practice in Massachusetts, US on mifepristone use for EPL. We recruited participants via professional networks and purposively sampled for mifepristone use, practice type, time in practice, and geographic location within Massachusetts until we reached thematic saturation. We analyzed interviews using inductive and deductive coding under a thematic analysis framework to identify facilitators of and barriers to mifepristone use.

RESULTS

We interviewed 19 obstetrician-gynecologists; 12 had used mifepristone for EPL and 7 had not. Participants were in private practice (n = 12), academic practice (n = 6), or worked at a federally qualified health center (n = 1). Seven had fellowship training, including four in complex family planning. The most common facilitators of mifepristone use for EPL were access to the expertise or protocols of local-regional experts, leadership from a "champion," prior experience with abortion care, and hospital capacity constraints during the COVID-19 pandemic. The most common barriers were related to the Mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program imposed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Additionally, mifepristone's affiliation with abortion was a barrier to its use in EPL for some obstetrician-gynecologists.

CONCLUSION

The FDA Mifepristone REMS Program presents substantial barriers to obstetrician-gynecologists incorporating mifepristone into their EPL care.

Trends in the Use of Mifepristone for Medical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss From 2016 to 2020

This study assesses the use of mifepristone plus misoprostol for miscarriage management among commercially insured adults in the US.

The association between abortion restrictions and patient-centered care for early pregnancy loss at US obstetrics-gynecology residency programs

BACKGROUND

Early pregnancy loss is a common medical problem, and the recommended treatments overlap with those used for induced abortions. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends the incorporation of clinical and patient factors when applying conservative published imaging guidelines to determine the timing of intervention for early pregnancy loss. However, in places where abortion is heavily regulated, clinicians who manage early pregnancy loss may cautiously rely on the strictest criteria to differentiate between early pregnancy loss and a potentially viable pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also notes that specific treatment modalities that are frequently used to induce abortion, including the use of mifepristone in medical therapy and surgical aspiration in an office setting, are cost-effective and beneficial for patients with early pregnancy loss.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine how US-based obstetrics and gynecology residency training institutions adhere to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations for early pregnancy loss management, including the timing and types of interventions, and to evaluate the relationship with institutional and state abortion restrictions.

STUDY DESIGN

From November 2021 to January 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional study of all 296 US-based obstetrics and gynecology residency programs by emailing them and requesting that a faculty member complete a survey about early pregnancy loss practices at their institution. We asked about location of diagnosis, use of imaging guidelines before offering intervention, treatment options available at their institution, and program and personal characteristics. We used chi-square tests and logistic regressions to compare the availability of early pregnancy loss care based on institutional indication-based abortion restrictions and state legislative hostility to abortion care.

RESULTS

Of the 149 programs that responded (50.3% response rate), 74 (49.7%) reported that they did not offer any intervention for suspected early pregnancy loss unless rigid imaging criteria were met, whereas the remaining 75 (50.3%) programs reported that they incorporated imaging guidelines with other factors. In an unadjusted analysis, programs were less likely to incorporate other factors with imaging criteria if they were in a state with legislative policies that were hostile toward abortion (33% vs 79%; P<.001) or if the institution restricted abortion by indication (27% vs 88%; P<.001). Mifepristone was used less often in programs located in hostile states (32% vs 75%; P<.001) or in institutions with abortion restrictions (25% vs 86%; P<.001). Similarly, office-based suction aspiration use was lower in hostile states (48% vs 68%; P=.014) and in institutions with restrictions (40% vs 81%; P<.001). After controlling for program characteristics, including state policies and affiliation with family planning training programs or religious entities, institutional abortion restrictions were the only significant predictor of rigid reliance on imaging guidelines (odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-47.9).

CONCLUSION

In training institutions that restrict access to induced abortion based on indication for care, residency programs are less likely to holistically incorporate clinical evidence and patient priorities in determining when to intervene in early pregnancy loss as recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Programs in restrictive institutional and state environments are also less likely to offer the full range of early pregnancy loss treatment options. With state abortion bans proliferating nationwide, evidence-based education and patient-centered care for early pregnancy loss may also be hindered.

BPDE exposure promotes trophoblast cell pyroptosis and induces miscarriage by up-regulating lnc-HZ14/ZBP1/NLRP3 axis

Environmental Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) and its ultimate metabolite BPDE (benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide) are typical persistent organic pollutants and endocrine disrupting chemicals. BaP/BPDE exposure might cause human trophoblast cell dysfunctions and induce miscarriage. However, the underlying mechanisms remain largely elusive. In this study, we found that BPDE exposure induced human trophoblast cell pyroptosis by up-regulating NLRP3/Caspase1/GSDMD pathway. We also identified that lnc-HZ14 was highly expressed in BPDE-exposed trophoblast cells and in recurrent miscarriage (RM) vs healthy control (HC) villous tissues. Lnc-HZ14 promoted trophoblast cell pyroptosis by promoting IRF1-mediated ZBP1 transcription, increasing METTL3-mediated m6A methylation on NLRP3 mRNA and its stability, and also enhancing ZBP1/NLRP3 protein interactions. Knockdown of lnc-HZ14/ZBP1/NLRP3 axis could efficiently alleviate BPDE-induced trophoblast cell pyroptosis. Higher level of pyroptosis, as indicated by the up-regulation of lnc-HZ14/ZBP1/NLRP3 axis, was found in RM vs HC villous tissues. In BaP-exposed mouse model, BaP exposure induced placental tissue pyroptosis and miscarriage by up-regulating murine Zbp1/Nlrp3 axis, and knockdown of Nlrp3 could efficiently reduce placenta pyroptosis and alleviate BaP-induced mouse miscarriage. Serum IL-1β protein level might act as a promising indicator to predict the risk of miscarriage. These findings provided new insights into BaP/BPDE-induced trophoblast cell pyroptosis and miscarriage and might be helpful for further assessment of the toxicological effects of BaP/BPDE on the female reproduction.