1
|
Sud A, Strang M, Buchman DZ, Spithoff S, Upshur REG, Webster F, Grundy Q. How the Suboxone Education Programme presented as a solution to risks in the Canadian opioid crisis: a critical discourse analysis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059561. [PMID: 35820738 PMCID: PMC9277368 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pharmaceutical industry involvement in medical education, research and clinical practice can lead to conflicts of interest. Within this context, this study examined how the 'Suboxone Education Programme', developed and delivered by a pharmaceutical company as part of a federally regulated risk management program, was presented as a solution to various kinds of risks relating to opioid use in public documents from medical institutions across Canada. SETTING These documents were issued during the Canadian opioid crisis, a time when the involvement of industry in health policy was being widely questioned given industry's role in driving the overprescribing of opioid analgesics and contributing to population-level harms. DESIGN A critical discourse analysis of 69 documents collected between July 2020 and May 2021 referencing the Suboxone Education Program spanning 13 years (2007-2021) from medical, nursing and pharmacy institutions sourced from every Canadian province and territory. Discursive themes were identified through iterative and duplicate analyses using a semistructured data extraction instrument. RESULTS Documents characterised the Programme as addressing iatrogenic risks from overprescribing opioid analgesics, environmental risks from a toxic street drug supply and pharmacological risks relating to the dominant therapeutic alternative of methadone. The programme was identified as being able to address these risks by providing mechanisms to surveil healthcare professionals and to facilitate the prescribing of Suboxone. Medical institutions legitimised the Suboxone Education Programme by lending their regulatory, epidemiological and professional authority. CONCLUSIONS Addressing risk is considered as a central, moral responsibility of contemporary healthcare services. In this case, moral imperatives to address opioid crisis-related risks overrode other ethical concerns regarding conflicts of interest between industry and public welfare. Failing to address these conflicts potentially imperils efforts of mitigating population health harms by propagating an important driving force of the opioid crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhimanyu Sud
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Strang
- Department of Sociology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Z Buchman
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bioethics Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sheryl Spithoff
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ross E G Upshur
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona Webster
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quinn Grundy
- Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Permissive regulation: A critical review of the regulatory history of buprenorphine formulations in Canada. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 105:103749. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
3
|
Sud A, Salamanca-Buentello F, Buchman DZ, Sabioni P, Majid U. Beyond harm-producing versus harm-reducing: A qualitative meta-synthesis of people who use drugs' perspectives of and experiences with the extramedical use and diversion of buprenorphine. J Subst Abuse Treat 2021; 135:108651. [PMID: 34728134 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review synthesizes the literature on the perspectives and experiences of people who use drugs to better understand motivations and behaviors related to the extramedical use and diversion of buprenorphine. Given the particular social construction of buprenorphine against methadone, and the centrality of concerns around extramedical use in delivering opioid agonist therapies, a focus on extramedical buprenorphine use can provide an important lens through which to analyze treatment for opioid use disorder. This review is framed within persistent tensions between potential harm-producing versus harm-reducing effects of extramedical use that have long been described for opioid agonist therapies. METHODS The research team conducted a qualitative meta-synthesis based on a systematic search of eight databases as well as hand searching. The review includes all primary qualitative and mixed-methods studies related to the perspectives and experiences of people who use drugs on extramedical buprenorphine use. The study team carried out three rounds of qualitative coding using NVivo 12, and constructivist grounded theory and the constant comparative method informed the synthesis. RESULTS The review includes twenty-one studies. Findings are organized into the following three themes: 1) the experiences of people who use drugs (PWUD) with extramedical use of buprenorphine and their motivations to engage in it (including the desire to self-medicate and achieve "stability", to manage ongoing use of other opioids, and to "get high"); 2) the relationship between extramedical use and formal medical opioid agonist therapy programs; and 3) the established drug economy of extramedical buprenorphine. CONCLUSIONS The review identified varied and often divergent perspectives and experiences with extramedical buprenorphine use. An examination of the reported "normalizing" effects of extramedical buprenorphine suggests this practice as extending medicalized discipline beyond the clinical environment. Taken together, these findings identify a need to move beyond the tension of harm-reducing versus harm-producing effects toward forms of health care and promotion that focus on the needs, perspectives, and priorities of people who use drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhimanyu Sud
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, 5th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1V7, Canada; Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, Ontario M4M 2B5, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada.
| | - Fabio Salamanca-Buentello
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, Ontario M4M 2B5, Canada
| | - Daniel Z Buchman
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1025 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario M6J 1H1, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada; University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, Suite 754, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Pamela Sabioni
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, Ontario M4M 2B5, Canada
| | - Umair Majid
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barenie RE, Sinha MS, Kesselheim AS. Factors Affecting Buprenorphine Utilization and Spending in Medicaid, 2002-2018. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:182-187. [PMID: 33518024 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Buprenorphine is an essential medication for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), but studies show it has been underused over the last 2 decades. We sought to evaluate utilization of and spending on buprenorphine formulations in Medicaid and to evaluate the impact of key market and regulatory factors affecting availability of different formulations and generic versions. METHODS We first identified all buprenorphine formulations approved by the Food and Drug Administration for OUD using Drugs@FDA. We then used National Drug Codes to identify each drug in the Medicaid State Drug Utilization Data and extracted annual utilization rates and spending between 2002 and 2018 by drug and according to whether a brand-name or generic version was dispensed. We compared these trends to market and regulatory factors that affected competition, which we identified through searching the Federal Register, Westlaw, PubMed, and Google News. RESULTS Brand-name buprenorphine-naloxone sublingual tablet and film formulations (Suboxone) were dispensed 2.7 times more (n = 634 213 140) and reimbursed 4.4 times more (n = $4 440 556 473) than all other formulations combined (n = 237 769 689; $1 018 988 133). We identified numerous market and regulatory factors that contributed to an estimated 9-year delay in generic versions of the tablet formulation and 6-year delay for generic versions of the film formulation. CONCLUSIONS Brand-name buprenorphine formulations have been widely used in Medicaid, leading to substantial costs, in part because generic versions were delayed by multiple years owing to market and regulatory factors. Timely availability of low-cost generics could have helped encourage OUD treatment with buprenorphine during the height of the opioid crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel E Barenie
- Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Michael S Sinha
- Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aaron S Kesselheim
- Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A computational approach for the screening of potential antiviral compounds against SARS-CoV-2 protease: Ionic liquid vs herbal and natural compounds. J Mol Liq 2021; 326:115298. [PMID: 33518856 PMCID: PMC7832122 DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The current scenario across the globe shows unprecedented healthcare and an economic crisis due to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) has declared a pandemic stage worldwide because of the high mortality and morbidity rate caused by novel infection disease. There have been several clinical trials and identification underway to find a treatment of this novel virus. For the treatment of severe infection involves the blocking of the replication of its CoV-2 protein. Hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir has been used on an emergency basis for its treatment. The uncontrolled infection and increasing death rate underline the emergence to develop the antiviral drug. In our study, the blind docking of various classes of compounds including control antiviral drugs (abacavir, acyclovir, quinoline, hydroxyquinoline), antimicrobial drugs (levofloxacin, amoxicillin, cloxacin, ofloxacin), natural compounds (lycorine, saikosaponins, myricetin, amentaflavone), herbal compounds (silymarin, palmatine, curcumin, eugenin) available in Indian Ayurveda was done. Besides, we have also performed the blind docking of various ionic liquids (ILs) such as pyrrolidinium, piperidinium, pyridinium, imidazolium based ILs against CoV-2 protease as they have recently emerged as a potential antimicrobial agent. Further, the pharmacokinetic properties and cytotoxicity of the compounds were determined computationally. The docking results showed successful binding to the active site or near a crucial site. The present computational approach was found helpful to predict the best possible inhibitor of protease and may result in an effective therapeutic agent against COVID-19.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nagar S, Kesselheim AS. Promoting Competition in Drug Pricing: A Review of Recent Congressional Legislation. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2021; 49:683-687. [PMID: 35006061 DOI: 10.1017/jme.2021.93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Brand-name prescription drug manufacturers use various strategies to extend their market exclusivity periods by delaying generic or biosimilar competition. Recent Congressional legislation has targeted four such tactics. We analyze these proposals and assess their likely effect on competition in the U.S. drug market.
Collapse
|
7
|
DeRonne BM, Wong KR, Schultz E, Jones E, Krebs EE. Implementation of a pharmacist care manager model to expand availability of medications for opioid use disorder. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2020; 78:354-359. [DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The rise in opioid prescribing, often for chronic pain management, resulted in an increased prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) throughout the United States, including within the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. The veteran population has been especially vulnerable to opioid-related harms, but rates of prescribing medications for OUD have been low. Use of care manager models for OUD have increased access to treatment. In this article we provide an overview of a clinical pharmacist care manager (CPCM) model for medications for OUD treatment implemented within the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Summary
A CPCM model for medications for OUD was identified as a care model that would address patient and facility barriers to effective OUD treatment. Pharmacists were integral in program development and implementation and served as the main care providers. An interim evaluation of the program established that the proportion of patients with OUD receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) had increased, with use of the program resulting in treatment of 109 unique patients during 625 visits. Key program implementation facilitators included the facility leadership establishing increased use of MOUD as a priority area, identification of a physician champion, and a history of successful expansion of clinical pharmacy specialist practice within the VA system. Implementation barriers included factors related to provider engagement, patient identification, and program support. The CPCM model of provision of MOUD expanded the pharmacist role in buprenorphine management.
Conclusion
The need to increase the number of patients receiving MOUD led to the implementation of a CPCM model. The program was effectively implemented into practice and expanded the availability of MOUD, which allowed patients to access treatment in multiple care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth M DeRonne
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kara R Wong
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Erica Schultz
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Elzie Jones
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Erin E Krebs
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
COVID-19 could cause infection in persons with opioid use disorder, increase opioid overdose rates, reverse system-level gains in expanding access to medication for opioid use disorder, halt critical research, and prevent exacting legal reparations against opioid manufacturers. The authors call for urgent action to counteract these risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Becker
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut, and Yale Program in Addiction Medicine and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (W.C.B.)
| | - David A Fiellin
- Yale Program in Addiction Medicine and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (D.A.F.)
| |
Collapse
|