1
|
Goetz C, Behar E, Beth A, Bodewits D, Bromley S, Burch J, Deca J, Divin A, Eriksson AI, Feldman PD, Galand M, Gunell H, Henri P, Heritier K, Jones GH, Mandt KE, Nilsson H, Noonan JW, Odelstad E, Parker JW, Rubin M, Simon Wedlund C, Stephenson P, Taylor MGGT, Vigren E, Vines SK, Volwerk M. The Plasma Environment of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS 2022; 218:65. [PMID: 36397966 PMCID: PMC9649581 DOI: 10.1007/s11214-022-00931-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The environment of a comet is a fascinating and unique laboratory to study plasma processes and the formation of structures such as shocks and discontinuities from electron scales to ion scales and above. The European Space Agency's Rosetta mission collected data for more than two years, from the rendezvous with comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in August 2014 until the final touch-down of the spacecraft end of September 2016. This escort phase spanned a large arc of the comet's orbit around the Sun, including its perihelion and corresponding to heliocentric distances between 3.8 AU and 1.24 AU. The length of the active mission together with this span in heliocentric and cometocentric distances make the Rosetta data set unique and much richer than sets obtained with previous cometary probes. Here, we review the results from the Rosetta mission that pertain to the plasma environment. We detail all known sources and losses of the plasma and typical processes within it. The findings from in-situ plasma measurements are complemented by remote observations of emissions from the plasma. Overviews of the methods and instruments used in the study are given as well as a short review of the Rosetta mission. The long duration of the Rosetta mission provides the opportunity to better understand how the importance of these processes changes depending on parameters like the outgassing rate and the solar wind conditions. We discuss how the shape and existence of large scale structures depend on these parameters and how the plasma within different regions of the plasma environment can be characterised. We end with a non-exhaustive list of still open questions, as well as suggestions on how to answer them in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Goetz
- ESTEC, European Space Agency, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The Netherlands
- Department of Mathematics, Physics and Electrical Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Etienne Behar
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 812, 981 28 Kiruna, Sweden
- Lagrange, OCA, UCA, CNRS, Nice, France
| | - Arnaud Beth
- Department of Physics, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Dennis Bodewits
- Physics Department, Leach Science Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36832 USA
| | - Steve Bromley
- Physics Department, Leach Science Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36832 USA
| | - Jim Burch
- Southwest Research Institute, P.O. Drawer 28510, San Antonio, TX 78228-0510 USA
| | - Jan Deca
- Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado Boulder, 3665 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
| | - Andrey Divin
- Earth Physics Department, St. Petersburg State University, Ulianovskaya, 1, St Petersburg, 198504 Russia
| | | | - Paul D. Feldman
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
| | - Marina Galand
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | - Herbert Gunell
- Department of Physics, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | - Pierre Henri
- Lagrange, OCA, UCA, CNRS, Nice, France
- LPC2E, CNRS, Orléans, France
| | - Kevin Heritier
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | - Geraint H. Jones
- UCL Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, RH5 6NT UK
- The Centre for Planetary Sciences at UCL/Birkbeck, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | | | - Hans Nilsson
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 812, 981 28 Kiruna, Sweden
| | - John W. Noonan
- Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
| | - Elias Odelstad
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 537, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Martin Rubin
- Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cyril Simon Wedlund
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstr. 6, 8042 Graz, Austria
| | - Peter Stephenson
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | | | - Erik Vigren
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 537, SE-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sarah K. Vines
- Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723 USA
| | - Martin Volwerk
- Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstr. 6, 8042 Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mandt KE, Eriksson A, Beth A, Galand M, Vigren E. Influence of collisions on ion dynamics in the inner comae of four comets. ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS 2019; 630:A48. [PMID: 31631896 PMCID: PMC6800695 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Collisions between cometary neutrals in the inner coma of a comet and cometary ions that have been picked up into the solar wind flow and return to the coma lead to the formation of a broad inner boundary known as a collisionopause. This boundary is produced by a combination of charge transfer and chemical reactions, both of which are important at the location of the collisionopause boundary. Four spacecraft measured ion densities and velocities in the inner region of comets, exploring the part of the coma where an ion-neutral collisionopause boundary is expected to form. AIMS The aims are to determine the dominant physics behind the formation of the ion-neutral collisionopause and to evaluate where this boundary has been observed by spacecraft. METHODS We evaluated observations from three spacecraft at four different comets to determine if a collisionopause boundary was observed based on the reported ion velocities. We compared the measured location of the ion-neutral collisionopause with measurements of the collision cross sections to evaluate whether chemistry or charge exchange are more important at the location where the collisionopause is observed. RESULTS Based on measurements of the cross sections for charge transfer and for chemical reactions, the boundary observed by Rosetta appears to be the location where chemistry becomes the more probable result of a collision between H2O and H2O+ than charge exchange. Comparisons with ion observations made by Deep Space 1 at 19P/Borrelly and Giotto at 1P/Halley and 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup show that similar boundaries were observed at 19P/Borrelly and 1P/Halley. The ion composition measurements made by Giotto at Halley confirm that chemistry becomes more important inside of this boundary and that electron-ion dissociative recombination is a driver for the reported ion pileup boundary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K E Mandt
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd., Laurel, MD 20723
| | - A Eriksson
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, POB 537, SE-751 21, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - A Beth
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - M Galand
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - E Vigren
- Swedish Institute of Space Physics, POB 537, SE-751 21, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|