1
|
George SP, Gaza R, Matthiä D, Laramore D, Lehti J, Campbell-Ricketts T, Kroupa M, Stoffle N, Marsalek K, Przybyla B, Abdelmelek M, Aeckerlein J, Bahadori AA, Barzilla J, Dieckmann M, Ecord M, Egeland R, Eronen T, Fry D, Jones BH, Hellweg CE, Houri J, Hirsh R, Hirvonen M, Hovland S, Hussein H, Johnson AS, Kasemann M, Lee K, Leitgab M, McLeod C, Milstein O, Pinsky L, Quinn P, Riihonen E, Rohde M, Rozhdestvenskyy S, Saari J, Schram A, Straube U, Turecek D, Virtanen P, Waterman G, Wheeler S, Whitman K, Wirtz M, Vandewalle M, Zeitlin C, Semones E, Berger T. Space radiation measurements during the Artemis I lunar mission. Nature 2024; 634:48-52. [PMID: 39294379 PMCID: PMC11446838 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07927-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024]
Abstract
Space radiation is a notable hazard for long-duration human spaceflight1. Associated risks include cancer, cataracts, degenerative diseases2 and tissue reactions from large, acute exposures3. Space radiation originates from diverse sources, including galactic cosmic rays4, trapped-particle (Van Allen) belts5 and solar-particle events6. Previous radiation data are from the International Space Station and the Space Shuttle in low-Earth orbit protected by heavy shielding and Earth's magnetic field7,8 and lightly shielded interplanetary robotic probes such as Mars Science Laboratory and Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter9,10. Limited data from the Apollo missions11-13 and ground measurements with substantial caveats are also available14. Here we report radiation measurements from the heavily shielded Orion spacecraft on the uncrewed Artemis I lunar mission. At differing shielding locations inside the vehicle, a fourfold difference in dose rates was observed during proton-belt passes that are similar to large, reference solar-particle events. Interplanetary cosmic-ray dose equivalent rates in Orion were as much as 60% lower than previous observations9. Furthermore, a change in orientation of the spacecraft during the proton-belt transit resulted in a reduction of radiation dose rates of around 50%. These measurements validate the Orion for future crewed exploration and inform future human spaceflight mission design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart P George
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Ramona Gaza
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel Matthiä
- Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany
| | - Diego Laramore
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jussi Lehti
- Aboa Space Research Oy (ASRO), Turku, Finland
| | - Thomas Campbell-Ricketts
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martin Kroupa
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Science and Applications (ISR-1), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
| | - Nicholas Stoffle
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
- Axiom Space, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karel Marsalek
- Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany
| | - Bartos Przybyla
- Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany
| | - Mena Abdelmelek
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- KBR, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joachim Aeckerlein
- Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany
| | - Amir A Bahadori
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Houston, TX, USA
- Alan Levin Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
| | - Janet Barzilla
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthias Dieckmann
- European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC), European Space Agency (ESA), Noordwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Ecord
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ricky Egeland
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timo Eronen
- Aboa Space Research Oy (ASRO), Turku, Finland
| | - Dan Fry
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Christine E Hellweg
- Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Robert Hirsh
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Scott Hovland
- European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC), European Space Agency (ESA), Noordwijk, The Netherlands
| | | | - A Steve Johnson
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Moritz Kasemann
- Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerry Lee
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Houston, TX, USA
- The Aerospace Corporation, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Martin Leitgab
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
- Abbott Laboratories, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Catherine McLeod
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Lawrence Pinsky
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Phillip Quinn
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Markus Rohde
- Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany
| | - Sergiy Rozhdestvenskyy
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jouni Saari
- Aboa Space Research Oy (ASRO), Turku, Finland
| | | | - Ulrich Straube
- European Astronaut Centre (EAC), European Space Agency (ESA), Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Turecek
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Gideon Waterman
- StemRad Ltd., Tel Aviv, Israel
- Advanced Medical Physics, Inc., Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott Wheeler
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn Whitman
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- KBR, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael Wirtz
- Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Cary Zeitlin
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Space Exploration and Mission Operations, Leidos, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Edward Semones
- Space Radiation Analysis Group, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Berger
- Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Urban M, Nentvich O, Marek L, Hudec R, Sieger L. Timepix3: Temperature Influence on Radiation Energy Measurement with Si Sensor. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:s23042201. [PMID: 36850799 PMCID: PMC9960407 DOI: 10.3390/s23042201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
The Timepix3 readout ASIC chip is a hybrid pixelated radiation detector, designed at CERN, which contains a 256 px × 256 px matrix. Each of the 65,536 radiation-sensitive pixels can record an incoming particle, its energy deposition or time of arrival and measure them simultaneously. Since the detector is suitable for a wide range of applications from particle physics, national security and medicine to space science, it can be used in a wide range of temperatures. Until now, it has to be calibrated every time to the operating point of the application. This paper studies the possibility of energy measurement with Timepix3 equipped with a 500 m thick silicon sensor and MiniPIX readout interface in the temperatures between 10 ∘C and 70 ∘C with only one calibration. The detector has been irradiated by X-ray fluorescence photons in the energy range from 8 keV to 57 keV, and 31 keV to 81 keV photons from the 133Ba radioactive source. A deviation of 5% in apparent energy value may occur for a 10 ∘C change in temperature from the reference point, but, with the next temperature change, it can reach up to -30%. Moreover, Barium photons with an energy of 81 keV appear as deposited energy of only 55 keV at a detector temperature of 70 ∘C. An original compensation method that reduces the relative measurement error from -30% to less than 1% is presented in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Urban
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technicka 2, 166 27 Prague 6, Czech Republic
- Correspondence:
| | - Ondrej Nentvich
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technicka 2, 166 27 Prague 6, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Marek
- Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, V Holesovickach 2, 180 00 Prague 8, Czech Republic
- Advacam, s.r.o., U Pergamenky 1145/12, 170 00 Prague 7 , Czech Republic
| | - Rene Hudec
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technicka 2, 166 27 Prague 6, Czech Republic
| | - Ladislav Sieger
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technicka 2, 166 27 Prague 6, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jannis D, Hofer C, Gao C, Xie X, Béché A, Pennycook TJ, Verbeeck J. Event driven 4D STEM acquisition with a Timepix3 detector: Microsecond dwell time and faster scans for high precision and low dose applications. Ultramicroscopy 2022; 233:113423. [PMID: 34837737 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Four dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy (4D STEM) records the scattering of electrons in a material in great detail. The benefits offered by 4D STEM are substantial, with the wealth of data it provides facilitating for instance high precision, high electron dose efficiency phase imaging via centre of mass or ptychography based analysis. However the requirement for a 2D image of the scattering to be recorded at each probe position has long placed a severe bottleneck on the speed at which 4D STEM can be performed. Recent advances in camera technology have greatly reduced this bottleneck, with the detection efficiency of direct electron detectors being especially well suited to the technique. However even the fastest frame driven pixelated detectors still significantly limit the scan speed which can be used in 4D STEM, making the resulting data susceptible to drift and hampering its use for low dose beam sensitive applications. Here we report the development of the use of an event driven Timepix3 direct electron camera that allows us to overcome this bottleneck and achieve 4D STEM dwell times down to 100 ns; orders of magnitude faster than what has been possible with frame based readout. We characterize the detector for different acceleration voltages and show that the method is especially well suited for low dose imaging and promises rich datasets without compromising dwell time when compared to conventional STEM imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Jannis
- EMAT, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium; NANOlab Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - C Hofer
- EMAT, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium; NANOlab Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - C Gao
- EMAT, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium; NANOlab Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - X Xie
- EMAT, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium; NANOlab Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - A Béché
- EMAT, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium; NANOlab Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - T J Pennycook
- EMAT, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium; NANOlab Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
| | - J Verbeeck
- EMAT, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium; NANOlab Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|