1
|
Morales-Inostroza L, Folz J, Kühnemuth R, Felekyan S, Wieser FF, Seidel CAM, Götzinger S, Sandoghdar V. An optofluidic antenna for enhancing the sensitivity of single-emitter measurements. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2545. [PMID: 38514627 PMCID: PMC10957926 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46730-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Many single-molecule investigations are performed in fluidic environments, for example, to avoid unwanted consequences of contact with surfaces. Diffusion of molecules in this arrangement limits the observation time and the number of collected photons, thus, compromising studies of processes with fast or slow dynamics. Here, we introduce a planar optofluidic antenna (OFA), which enhances the fluorescence signal from molecules by about 5 times per passage, leads to about 7-fold more frequent returns to the observation volume, and significantly lengthens the diffusion time within one passage. We use single-molecule multi-parameter fluorescence detection (sm-MFD), fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurements to characterize our OFAs. The antenna advantages are showcased by examining both the slow (ms) and fast (50 μs) dynamics of DNA four-way (Holliday) junctions with real-time resolution. The FRET trajectories provide evidence for the absence of an intermediate conformational state and introduce an upper bound for its lifetime. The ease of implementation and compatibility with various microscopy modalities make OFAs broadly applicable to a diverse range of studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Morales-Inostroza
- Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
- Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julian Folz
- Chair for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ralf Kühnemuth
- Chair for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Suren Felekyan
- Chair for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Franz-Ferdinand Wieser
- Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
- Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Claus A M Seidel
- Chair for Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Stephan Götzinger
- Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
- Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91052, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Vahid Sandoghdar
- Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
- Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pasarkar AP, Bencomo GM, Olsson S, Dieng AB. Vendi sampling for molecular simulations: Diversity as a force for faster convergence and better exploration. J Chem Phys 2023; 159:144108. [PMID: 37823459 DOI: 10.1063/5.0166172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) is the method of choice for understanding the structure, function, and interactions of molecules. However, MD simulations are limited by the strong metastability of many molecules, which traps them in a single conformation basin for an extended amount of time. Enhanced sampling techniques, such as metadynamics and replica exchange, have been developed to overcome this limitation and accelerate the exploration of complex free energy landscapes. In this paper, we propose Vendi Sampling, a replica-based algorithm for increasing the efficiency and efficacy of the exploration of molecular conformation spaces. In Vendi sampling, replicas are simulated in parallel and coupled via a global statistical measure, the Vendi Score, to enhance diversity. Vendi sampling allows for the recovery of unbiased sampling statistics and dramatically improves sampling efficiency. We demonstrate the effectiveness of Vendi sampling in improving molecular dynamics simulations by showing significant improvements in coverage and mixing between metastable states and convergence of free energy estimates for four common benchmarks, including Alanine Dipeptide and Chignolin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amey P Pasarkar
- Vertaix, Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, 35 Olden Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - Gianluca M Bencomo
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, 35 Olden Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - Simon Olsson
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Rännvägen 6, 41258 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Adji Bousso Dieng
- Vertaix, Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, 35 Olden Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krishnamohan A, Hamilton GL, Goutam R, Sanabria H, Morcos F. Coevolution and smFRET Enhances Conformation Sampling and FRET Experimental Design in Tandem PDZ1-2 Proteins. J Phys Chem B 2023; 127:884-898. [PMID: 36693159 PMCID: PMC9900596 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c06720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The structural flexibility of proteins is crucial for their functions. Many experimental and computational approaches can probe protein dynamics across a range of time and length-scales. Integrative approaches synthesize the complementary outputs of these techniques and provide a comprehensive view of the dynamic conformational space of proteins, including the functionally relevant limiting conformational states and transition pathways between them. Here, we introduce an integrative paradigm to model the conformational states of multidomain proteins. As a model system, we use the first two tandem PDZ domains of postsynaptic density protein 95. First, we utilize available sequence information collected from genomic databases to identify potential amino acid interactions in the PDZ1-2 tandem that underlie modeling of the functionally relevant conformations maintained through evolution. This was accomplished through combination of coarse-grained structural modeling with outputs from direct coupling analysis measuring amino acid coevolution, a hybrid approach called SBM+DCA. We recapitulated five distinct, experimentally derived PDZ1-2 tandem conformations. In addition, SBM+DCA unveiled an unidentified, twisted conformation of the PDZ1-2 tandem. Finally, we implemented an integrative framework for the design of single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) experiments incorporating the outputs of SBM+DCA with simulated FRET observables. This resulting FRET network is designed to mutually resolve the predicted limiting state conformations through global analysis. Using simulated FRET observables, we demonstrate that structural modeling with the newly designed FRET network is expected to outperform a previously used empirical FRET network at resolving all states simultaneously. Integrative approaches to experimental design have the potential to provide a new level of detail in characterizing the evolutionarily conserved conformational landscapes of proteins, and thus new insights into functional relevance of protein dynamics in biological function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aishwarya Krishnamohan
- Departments of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas75080, United States
| | - George L Hamilton
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina29634, United States
| | - Rajen Goutam
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina29634, United States
| | - Hugo Sanabria
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina29634, United States
| | - Faruck Morcos
- Departments of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas75080, United States.,Center for Systems Biology, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas75080, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Götz M, Barth A, Bohr SSR, Börner R, Chen J, Cordes T, Erie DA, Gebhardt C, Hadzic MCAS, Hamilton GL, Hatzakis NS, Hugel T, Kisley L, Lamb DC, de Lannoy C, Mahn C, Dunukara D, de Ridder D, Sanabria H, Schimpf J, Seidel CAM, Sigel RKO, Sletfjerding MB, Thomsen J, Vollmar L, Wanninger S, Weninger KR, Xu P, Schmid S. A blind benchmark of analysis tools to infer kinetic rate constants from single-molecule FRET trajectories. Nat Commun 2022. [PMID: 36104339 DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.23.469671v2.article-info] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) is a versatile technique to study the dynamics and function of biomolecules since it makes nanoscale movements detectable as fluorescence signals. The powerful ability to infer quantitative kinetic information from smFRET data is, however, complicated by experimental limitations. Diverse analysis tools have been developed to overcome these hurdles but a systematic comparison is lacking. Here, we report the results of a blind benchmark study assessing eleven analysis tools used to infer kinetic rate constants from smFRET trajectories. We test them against simulated and experimental data containing the most prominent difficulties encountered in analyzing smFRET experiments: different noise levels, varied model complexity, non-equilibrium dynamics, and kinetic heterogeneity. Our results highlight the current strengths and limitations in inferring kinetic information from smFRET trajectories. In addition, we formulate concrete recommendations and identify key targets for future developments, aimed to advance our understanding of biomolecular dynamics through quantitative experiment-derived models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Götz
- Centre de Biologie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048, INSERM U1054, Univ Montpellier, 60 rue de Navacelles, 34090, Montpellier, France.
- PicoQuant GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 29, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Anders Barth
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629, HZ Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Søren S-R Bohr
- Department of Chemistry & Nano-science Center, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard Börner
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland
- Laserinstitut Hochschule Mittweida, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, 09648, Mittweida, Germany
| | - Jixin Chen
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Thorben Cordes
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Großhadernerstr. 2-4, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Dorothy A Erie
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Christian Gebhardt
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Großhadernerstr. 2-4, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | | | - George L Hamilton
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Nikos S Hatzakis
- Department of Chemistry & Nano-science Center, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thorsten Hugel
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Signalling Research Centers BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lydia Kisley
- Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Don C Lamb
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Nano Science (CeNS), Ludwig Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstraße 5-13, 81377, München, Germany
| | - Carlos de Lannoy
- Bioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Chelsea Mahn
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA
| | - Dushani Dunukara
- Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dick de Ridder
- Bioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo Sanabria
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA
| | - Julia Schimpf
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Claus A M Seidel
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Roland K O Sigel
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Magnus Berg Sletfjerding
- Department of Chemistry & Nano-science Center, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Johannes Thomsen
- Department of Chemistry & Nano-science Center, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Leonie Vollmar
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Wanninger
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Nano Science (CeNS), Ludwig Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstraße 5-13, 81377, München, Germany
| | - Keith R Weninger
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA
| | - Pengning Xu
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA
| | - Sonja Schmid
- NanoDynamicsLab, Laboratory of Biophysics, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Götz M, Barth A, Bohr SSR, Börner R, Chen J, Cordes T, Erie DA, Gebhardt C, Hadzic MCAS, Hamilton GL, Hatzakis NS, Hugel T, Kisley L, Lamb DC, de Lannoy C, Mahn C, Dunukara D, de Ridder D, Sanabria H, Schimpf J, Seidel CAM, Sigel RKO, Sletfjerding MB, Thomsen J, Vollmar L, Wanninger S, Weninger KR, Xu P, Schmid S. A blind benchmark of analysis tools to infer kinetic rate constants from single-molecule FRET trajectories. Nat Commun 2022; 13:5402. [PMID: 36104339 PMCID: PMC9474500 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33023-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) is a versatile technique to study the dynamics and function of biomolecules since it makes nanoscale movements detectable as fluorescence signals. The powerful ability to infer quantitative kinetic information from smFRET data is, however, complicated by experimental limitations. Diverse analysis tools have been developed to overcome these hurdles but a systematic comparison is lacking. Here, we report the results of a blind benchmark study assessing eleven analysis tools used to infer kinetic rate constants from smFRET trajectories. We test them against simulated and experimental data containing the most prominent difficulties encountered in analyzing smFRET experiments: different noise levels, varied model complexity, non-equilibrium dynamics, and kinetic heterogeneity. Our results highlight the current strengths and limitations in inferring kinetic information from smFRET trajectories. In addition, we formulate concrete recommendations and identify key targets for future developments, aimed to advance our understanding of biomolecular dynamics through quantitative experiment-derived models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Götz
- Centre de Biologie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048, INSERM U1054, Univ Montpellier, 60 rue de Navacelles, 34090, Montpellier, France.
- PicoQuant GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 29, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Anders Barth
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Department of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience Delft, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629, HZ Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Søren S-R Bohr
- Department of Chemistry & Nano-science Center, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard Börner
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland
- Laserinstitut Hochschule Mittweida, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, 09648, Mittweida, Germany
| | - Jixin Chen
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA
| | - Thorben Cordes
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Großhadernerstr. 2-4, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | - Dorothy A Erie
- Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Christian Gebhardt
- Physical and Synthetic Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Großhadernerstr. 2-4, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| | | | - George L Hamilton
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Nikos S Hatzakis
- Department of Chemistry & Nano-science Center, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thorsten Hugel
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Signalling Research Centers BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lydia Kisley
- Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Don C Lamb
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Nano Science (CeNS), Ludwig Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstraße 5-13, 81377, München, Germany
| | - Carlos de Lannoy
- Bioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Chelsea Mahn
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA
| | - Dushani Dunukara
- Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Dick de Ridder
- Bioinformatics Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo Sanabria
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA
| | - Julia Schimpf
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Claus A M Seidel
- Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Lehrstuhl für Molekulare Physikalische Chemie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Roland K O Sigel
- Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Magnus Berg Sletfjerding
- Department of Chemistry & Nano-science Center, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Johannes Thomsen
- Department of Chemistry & Nano-science Center, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Leonie Vollmar
- Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Wanninger
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Nano Science (CeNS), Ludwig Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstraße 5-13, 81377, München, Germany
| | - Keith R Weninger
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA
| | - Pengning Xu
- Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA
| | - Sonja Schmid
- NanoDynamicsLab, Laboratory of Biophysics, Wageningen University, Stippeneng 4, 6708WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hamilton GL, Saikia N, Basak S, Welcome FS, Wu F, Kubiak J, Zhang C, Hao Y, Seidel CAM, Ding F, Sanabria H, Bowen ME. Fuzzy supertertiary interactions within PSD-95 enable ligand binding. eLife 2022; 11:e77242. [PMID: 36069777 PMCID: PMC9581536 DOI: 10.7554/elife.77242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The scaffold protein PSD-95 links postsynaptic receptors to sites of presynaptic neurotransmitter release. Flexible linkers between folded domains in PSD-95 enable a dynamic supertertiary structure. Interdomain interactions within the PSG supramodule, formed by PDZ3, SH3, and Guanylate Kinase domains, regulate PSD-95 activity. Here we combined discrete molecular dynamics and single molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to characterize the PSG supramodule, with time resolution spanning picoseconds to seconds. We used a FRET network to measure distances in full-length PSD-95 and model the conformational ensemble. We found that PDZ3 samples two conformational basins, which we confirmed with disulfide mapping. To understand effects on activity, we measured binding of the synaptic adhesion protein neuroligin. We found that PSD-95 bound neuroligin well at physiological pH while truncated PDZ3 bound poorly. Our hybrid structural models reveal how the supertertiary context of PDZ3 enables recognition of this critical synaptic ligand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George L Hamilton
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson UniversityClemsonUnited States
| | - Nabanita Saikia
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson UniversityClemsonUnited States
| | - Sujit Basak
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUnited States
| | - Franceine S Welcome
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUnited States
| | - Fang Wu
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUnited States
| | - Jakub Kubiak
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Changcheng Zhang
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUnited States
| | - Yan Hao
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUnited States
| | - Claus AM Seidel
- Molecular Physical Chemistry, Heinrich Heine UniversityDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Feng Ding
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson UniversityClemsonUnited States
| | - Hugo Sanabria
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Clemson UniversityClemsonUnited States
| | - Mark E Bowen
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUnited States
| |
Collapse
|