1
|
Yang S, Glass ST, Clements JL, Reznick LG, Faridi A. Outcomes of a Five-Year Formal Ophthalmology Residency Mentorship Program. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC OPHTHALMOLOGY 2022; 14:e178-e186. [PMID: 37064729 PMCID: PMC9927995 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective This article describes a formal ophthalmology residency mentorship program, identifies its strengths and weaknesses over 5 years of implementation, and proposes strategies to improve qualitative outcomes of the mentorship program.
Design Cross-sectional anonymous online survey.
Subjects All current and former mentees and mentors at the Casey Eye Institute (CEI) residency program from 2016 to 2021.
Methods All eligible participants were contacted via email to complete a survey to describe and analyze their experiences with the CEI's formal residency mentorship program.
Results Of the 65 surveyed participants, 82% preferred in-person meetings and met up from 2 to 3 times (44%) to 4 to 6 times (38.5%) annually at 15 minutes to 1 hour (48%) or 1 to 2 hours (42%) duration. Sixty-two percent of meetings were initiated by mentors, 8% by mentees, and 32% shared responsibilities equally. Participants also identified the three most important qualities for successful mentor-mentee relationship as personality (33.6%), communication styles (29.2%), and extracurricular interests/hobbies (16.8%). Mentees valued career advising, networking, and wellness support over academic and research mentorship. Subjective outcomes showed 25% of the mentee and 43% of the mentors agreed the mentorship program was a valuable experience. Comparably, 14% of the mentees and 38% of the mentors prioritized the relationship. There was a strong correlation between participants who prioritized the relationship and acknowledged it as a valuable experience (p < 0.01). Eighteen percent of the mentees and 43% of the mentors found the relationship effective and met their expectations. Twenty-one percent of the mentees and 38% of the mentors believed they had the tools and skills necessary to be effective in their respective roles.
Conclusion Our survey identified that weaknesses of the mentorship program include ineffective communications, inadequate preparation in their respective roles, and lack of priority focus on the relationship. We propose strategies to strengthen our program through creating workshops to clarify roles and responsibilities, emphasizing accountability with a contract statement, and implementing a new matching algorithm to customize participants' experience. Additional studies from other residencies with formal mentorship programs are warranted to identify, strategize, and foster high-quality mentorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sen Yang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sarah T Glass
- Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon
| | - John L Clements
- Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon
| | - Leah G Reznick
- Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon
| | - Ambar Faridi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adrien-Maxence H, Emilie B, Alois DLC, Michelle A, Kate A, Mylene A, David B, Marie DS, Jason F, Eric G, Séamus H, Kevin K, Alison L, Megan M, Hester M, Jaime RJ, Zhu X, Micaela Z, Federica M. Comparison of error rates between four pretrained DenseNet convolutional neural network models and 13 board-certified veterinary radiologists when evaluating 15 labels of canine thoracic radiographs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2022; 63:456-468. [PMID: 35137490 DOI: 10.1111/vru.13069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are commonly used as artificial intelligence (AI) tools for evaluating radiographs, but published studies testing their performance in veterinary patients are currently lacking. The purpose of this retrospective, secondary analysis, diagnostic accuracy study was to compare the error rates of four CNNs to the error rates of 13 veterinary radiologists for evaluating canine thoracic radiographs using an independent gold standard. Radiographs acquired at a referral institution were used to evaluate the four CNNs sharing a common architecture. Fifty radiographic studies were selected at random. The studies were evaluated independently by three board-certified veterinary radiologists for the presence or absence of 15 thoracic labels, thus creating the gold standard through the majority rule. The labels included "cardiovascular," "pulmonary," "pleural," "airway," and "other categories." The error rates for each of the CNNs and for 13 additional board-certified veterinary radiologists were calculated on those same studies. There was no statistical difference in the error rates among the four CNNs for the majority of the labels. However, the CNN's training method impacted the overall error rate for three of 15 labels. The veterinary radiologists had a statistically lower error rate than all four CNNs overall and for five labels (33%). There was only one label ("esophageal dilation") for which two CNNs were superior to the veterinary radiologists. Findings from the current study raise numerous questions that need to be addressed to further develop and standardize AI in the veterinary radiology environment and to optimize patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hespel Adrien-Maxence
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | - Acierno Michelle
- Michelle Acierno Veterinary Radiology Consulting, Kirkland, WA and Summit Veterinary Referral Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA
| | - Alexander Kate
- DMV Veterinary Center, Diagnostic Imaging, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Biller David
- Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Clinical Sciences, Manhattan, Kansas, USA
| | | | | | - Green Eric
- The Ohio State University, Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Hoey Séamus
- University College Dublin, Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Lee Alison
- Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Starkville, Mississippi, USA
| | - MacLellan Megan
- BluePearl, Veterinary Partners, Elden Prairie, Minnesota, USA
| | - McAllister Hester
- University College Dublin, Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Xiaojuan Zhu
- Office of Information Technology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Morandi Federica
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vieira A, Cabri MM, Spijkers S, Vieira AC, Maas M. Mentoring in radiology: An asset worth exploring! Eur J Radiol 2021; 155:110133. [PMID: 34991912 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Residents experience high pressure to be successful in both their career and in keeping up an optimal work-life balance. With a mentoring program, faculties can alleviate stress and provide help for their residents. It is now well established that mentor-mentee relationships during medical school, have influence in career decisions and professional identity formation. The same can be said for mentor-mentee relationships during radiology residency. In general, universal rules of mentoring are also useful and applicable in the field of radiology. These universal rules for establishing a successful mentoring relationship include creating a relationship of trust and confidentiality, clearly defining roles and responsibilities, establishing short- and long-term goals, using open and supportive communication, and collaboratively solving problems. The institutions and the radiology departments should be well prepared and aware of the responsibility to have trainees, providing time for mentors to dedicate to their academic duties. They have to implement strategies to effective mentor matching and orientation as well as the ability to provide evaluation with qualitative feedback. Periodic assessment should be warranted together with the incorporation of new technology as it plays a critical role in the training of millennial radiologists as they take the profession into a technology-laden future of medical imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Vieira
- FMUP: Universidade do Porto Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital CUF Porto, Portugal.
| | - Matthias M Cabri
- University of Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Suzanne Spijkers
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Mario Maas
- University of Amsterdam Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Meibergdreef 9, Room G1-211, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohtady HA, Könings KD, Al-Eraky MM, Muijtjens AMM, van Merriënboer JJG. High enthusiasm about long lasting mentoring relationships and older mentors. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2019; 19:364. [PMID: 31547807 PMCID: PMC6757421 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1791-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mentoring plays a pivotal role in workplace-based learning, especially in the medical realm. Organising a formal mentoring programme can be labor and time intensive and generally impractical in resource constrained medical schools with limited numbers of mentors. Hence, informal mentoring offers a valuable alternative, but will be more likely to be effective when mentors and protégés share similar views. It is therefore important to gain more insight into factors influencing perceptions of informal mentoring. This study aims to explore mentors and protégés' perceptions of informal mentoring and how these vary (or not) with gender, age and the duration of the relationship. METHOD We administered an Informal Mentor Role Instrument (IMRI) to medical practitioners and academics from Egypt, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was developed for the study from other validated instruments. It contained 39 items grouped into 7 domains: acceptance, counselling, friendship, parenting, psychological support, role modelling and sociability. RESULTS A total of 103 mentors and 91 protégés completed the IMRI. Mentors had a better appreciation for the interpersonal aspects of informal mentoring than protégés, especially regarding acceptance, counselling and friendship. Moreover, being older and engaged in a longer mentoring relationship contributed to more positive perceptions of interpersonal aspects of mentoring, regardless of one's role (mentor or protégé). CONCLUSION It can be concluded that the expectations of mentors and protégés differed regarding the content and aim of the interpersonal characteristics of their mentoring relationship. We recommend mentors and protégés to more explicitly exchange their expectations of the informal mentoring relationship, as typically practiced in formal mentoring. Additionally, in our study, seniority and lasting relationships seem crucial for good informal mentoring. It appears beneficial to foster lasting informal mentoring relationships and to give more guidance to younger mentors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba A. Mohtady
- Medical Education Department, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, P.O 2537, Jeddah, 21461 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Microbiology &Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lalwani N, Shanbhogue KP, Jambhekar K, Jha S, Ram R, Itri JN, Tappouni R. New Job, New Challenges: Life After Radiology Training. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 212:483-489. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Neeraj Lalwani
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University and Baptist Health, 1 Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157
| | | | - Kedar Jambhekar
- Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Saurabh Jha
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Roopa Ram
- Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Jason Neil Itri
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University and Baptist Health, 1 Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157
| | - Rafel Tappouni
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University and Baptist Health, 1 Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stephens EH, Goldstone AB, Fiedler AG, Vardas PN, Pattakos G, Lou X, Chen PC, Tchantchaleishvili V. Appraisal of mentorship in cardiothoracic surgery training. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156:2216-2223. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.06.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
7
|
Moores LK, Holley AB, Collen JF. Working With a Mentor: Effective Strategies During Fellowship and Early Career. Chest 2018; 153:799-804. [PMID: 29477494 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa K Moores
- Office for Student Affairs, F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD; Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.
| | - Aaron B Holley
- Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Service, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX
| | - Jacob F Collen
- Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|