The Radiologist Is in, but Was it Worth the Wait? Radiology Resident Note Quality in an Outpatient Interventional Radiology Clinic

Evolution of the Interventional Radiology (IR) Pathway-Various Changes and Interrelation to Diagnostic Radiology (DR)

Interventional radiology continues to evolve into a more robust and clinically dynamic specialty underpinned by significant advancements in training, education, and practice. This article, prepared by members of the 2020-2021 Association of University Radiologists' task force of the Radiology Research Alliance, will review these developments, highlighting the evolution of interventional radiology pathways with attention to growing educational differences, interrelation to diagnostic radiology training, post-training practice patterns, distribution of procedures and future trends, amongst other key features important to those pursuing a career in interventional radiology as well as those in practice.

Informed consent in interventional radiology - are we doing enough?

OBJECTIVES

Obtaining informed consent is a mandatory part of modern clinical practice. The aim of this study was to identify how often complications relating to Interventional Radiology (IR) procedures were discussed with the patient prior to the procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 100 patients who experienced a complication related to an IR procedure was performed. The patient's procedure consent form was examined to identify whether the complication they experienced had been discussed as a possible risk. Other parts of the consent form relating to need for blood transfusion and the need for further procedures were also examined.

RESULTS

39% of patients who experienced a complication did not have the complication documented as a potential risk on the consent form. 14% of patients required a blood transfusion but were not consented for this. 42% of patients required a further procedure or operation but were not warned of this.

CONCLUSION

The model of gaining informed consent on the day of procedure is no longer valid. Better education and the use of clinics, patient information sheets and other resources is essential.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The paper highlights the inadequacies of the current model in gaining consent for IR procedures. A more comprehensive consent process making use of all available resources is essential.

Interventional Radiology Outpatient Clinics (IROC): Clinical Impact and Patient Satisfaction

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyze our interventional radiology outpatient clinics (IROC) for referral patterns, impact on interventional practice, and patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consultations performed between 2011 and 2019 were extracted. The two consecutive years with the highest number of consultations (n₂₀₁₈ = 1426; n₂₀₁₉ = 1595) were compared for unattended consultations (i.e., scheduled consultations with patients not showing-up); initial/follow-up consultations; hospital clinician/general practitioner referrals; initial consultations with radiologists not recommending interventions; procedural conversion rate (PCR; i.e., No. initial consultations resulting in interventions over the total number of initial consultations performed for the same clinical indication). A survey was conducted in 159 patients to determine their satisfaction.

RESULTS

Consultations increased from 2011 to 2019 by 130%. In 2018-2019, the number of unattended consultations was stable (7.0% vs 6.6%; P = .68). The referrals were for back pain (42.2%), interventional oncology (40.5%), and arteriovenous malformations (9.0%). For back pain, in 2019, there were fewer consultations with radiologists not recommending interventions and increased PCR compared to 2018 (11.9% vs. 17.7%; 88.1% vs. 82.3%; respectively; P = .01). For interventional oncology, follow-up consultations and general practitioner referrals increased in 2019 compared to 2018 (43.0% vs 35.3%; P = .01; 24.4% vs. 12.7%; P < .01; respectively). No other changes were noted. Cumulative 2018-2019 PCR was ≥ 85.4%. 99.2% responders highly appreciated their IROC experience. Quality of secretarial and medical services were the main aspects evaluated to rate the experience with IROC.

CONCLUSION

IROC results in high PCR. Recent changes in referral/impact on IR practice were noted with patients referred for back pain and interventional oncology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Level 4, Case Series.

Impact of evaluation in interventional radiology clinic prior to uterine artery embolization: changes in management

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of pre-procedural evaluation of patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids and adenomyosis in interventional radiology (IR) clinic.

METHOD

In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, consecutive patients evaluated in the IR clinic in a tertiary academic hospital between 1/1/2015 and 9/30/2018 by a single board-certified interventional radiologist were included. Medical records were reviewed to obtain medical history, imaging and endometrial biopsies results. Impact of IR clinic assessment of clinical, imaging, and pathological findings on patient's clinical course was assessed. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

208 consecutive patients were evaluated in clinic for uterine fibroids 176/208 (85%), adenomyosis 8/208 (4%) or both 24/208 (11%) with age of 44.4 ± 5.8 years and BMI of 30.1 ± 8.6 kg/m². Leading presenting symptom was menorrhagia in 172/208 (80%) patients, pelvic pain in 91/208 (44%), and urinary symptoms in 88/208 (42%) patients. 159/208 (76%) patients underwent UAE, 12/208 (6%) patients underwent surgery, and 37/208 (18%) patients chose conservative management. 189/208 (91%) patients had pelvic MRI that altered management course in 7/189 (4%) patients due to intracavitary fibroids in two patients, endometrial polyps in two patients, non-enhancing fibroids in two patients, and adnexal mass in one patient. 166/208 (80%) underwent endometrial biopsy that altered management course in one patient (0.6%) due to endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial biopsy and pelvic MRI are helpful to detect cases of non-enhancing fibroids, intracavitary fibroids, and ovarian and endometrial malignancies and thus altered management of five percent of patients with symptomatic fibroids and adenomyosis.