APDR Healthcare Disparities Curriculum Pilot: Helping Trainees Meet More Than a Milestone

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

In order to help program directors satisfy the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education common program requirement for health care disparities (HCD) education, a comprehensive web-based curriculum on HCDs in Radiology was developed. The curriculum was designed to educate trainees about existing HCDs, stimulate discussion, and spur research about HCDs in radiology. The curriculum was piloted to assess its educational value and feasibility.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive curriculum comprised of four modules (1) Introduction to HCDs in Radiology, (2) Types of HCDs in Radiology, (3) Actions to Address HCDs in Radiology, and (4) Cultural Competency was created and housed on the Associate of Program Directors in Radiology website. Various educational media including recorded lectures or PowerPoint presentations, small group discussions, and journal clubs were employed. A pilot program was initiated to evaluate the benefits of this curriculum for resident education and consisted of a pre- and post-curriculum test for trainees, an experience survey for trainees, and a pre- and post-administration survey for facilitators.

RESULTS

Forty-seven radiology residency programs participated in the pilot of the HCD curriculum. Of those facilitating the curriculum, 83% indicated lack of standardized curriculum as a perceived barrier to implementing a HCD curriculum at their program on the pre-survey. Trainee knowledge scores increased from 65% (pre) to 67% (post) (p = 0.05). Following curriculum participation, residents indicated an increase in adequate understanding of HCDs in Radiology (81% post vs. 45% pre). Most program directors (75%) found the curriculum easy to implement.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrated that the APDR Health Care Disparities curriculum increased trainee awareness of HCDs. The curriculum also provided a forum for important discussions about HCDs.

Re-defining gender diversity through an equitable and inclusive lens

Gender diversity in radiology has centered on the societal construct of the gender binary, with significant work focused on increasing the number of women in radiology. Along with this critically important goal, it is imperative that we acknowledge gender is more expansive than a binary category because it represents a spectrum of gender identities. The discussion of this spectrum is lacking in our conversations around gender diversity and equity in radiology. Addressing equity for people of all gender identities is beneficial for us all. We define three key areas of focus: (1) improving fundamental knowledge about gender diversity and application of this knowledge in education, (2) recruiting and retaining gender-diverse physicians and (3) specific diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policy to support gender-affirming environments. Improved understanding and inclusion of the full spectrum of gender in these areas will improve diversity and equity, and, in turn, enhance creativity and innovation in radiology.

Strengthening the Clinical Learning Environment by Mandate-Implementing the ACGME Common Program Requirements

RATIONALE

Three years ago, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) introduced updated Common Program Requirements in recognition of the need to further promote resident and faculty member well-being and patient safety. The ACGME acknowledged residencies would need time to comply with new requirements. This grace period, however, concluded as of July 1, 2019, and programs now risk citations for failure to implement new requirements.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The authors, members of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology Common Program Requirements Ad Hoc committee, developed downloadable resources provided in the Appendix delineating the 2019 Common Program Requirements and offering sample resources as compliant solutions.

CONCLUSION

The resources offer a national standardized approach to educating trainees in these essential skills and should be especially helpful to programs with access to fewer resources. In addition to achieving compliance, incorporation of these resources into residency training will ensure the next generation of radiologists are equipped to add value while remaining physically and emotionally healthy.

A No-Math Primer on the Principles of Machine Learning for Radiologists

Machine learning is becoming increasingly important in both research and clinical applications in radiology due to recent technological developments, particularly in deep learning. As these technologies are translated toward clinical practice, there is a need for radiologists and radiology trainees to understand the basic principles behind them. This primer provides an accessible introduction to the vocabulary and concepts that are central to machine learning and relevant to the radiologist.

Sustainable low-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance in changing healthcare systems

Cardiovascular disease continues to be a major burden facing healthcare systems worldwide. In the developed world, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a well-established non-invasive imaging modality in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. However, there is significant global inequality in availability and access to CMR due to its high cost, technical demands as well as existing disparities in healthcare and technical infrastructures across high-income and low-income countries. Recent renewed interest in low-field CMR has been spurred by the clinical need to provide sustainable imaging technology capable of yielding diagnosticquality images whilst also being tailored to the local populations and healthcare ecosystems. This review aims to evaluate the technical, practical and cost considerations of low field CMR whilst also exploring the key barriers to implementing sustainable MRI in both the developing and developed world.

Education of Radiologists in Healthcare Disparities

Disparities exist in access to a multitude of screening and diagnostic imaging examinations and procedures. To address these disparities within radiology, emphasis so far has been placed upon diversifying the workforce and formally educating trainees on healthcare disparities. Currently, there is no organized and nationally accepted educational program or content for practicing radiologists specific to diversity and healthcare disparity. This void can be addressed by providing an educational curriculum framework for practicing radiologists based on three key factors: individual efforts, calling for institutional change, and national collaboration. Individual efforts should focus on acknowledging the existence of disparities, understanding the contribution of one's implicit bias in perpetuating disparities, understanding and highlighting issues related to insurance coverage of radiology examinations, and participating in radiology political action committees. These efforts can be facilitated by a consolidated web-based training program for practicing radiologists. To pave the way for meaningful systemic change, the implementation of institutional change like that initiated by the Culture of Safety movement in 2002 is needed. A national collaborative effort initiated by radiology organizations to empower radiologists and recognize positive changes would further provide support. SUMMARY: A three-pronged educational framework combining individual radiologist education, institutional change, and national collaboration will enable radiologists to play a role in addressing imaging-related disparities in healthcare.

A Systematic Review for Health Disparities and Inequities in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) is a novel procedure recommended by the American Urological Association for Prostate Cancer (PCa) diagnosis. In radiology, differences in utilization of expensive screening techniques are described but never reviewed for mpMRI. Thus, our article aims at summarizing disparities relating to the expensive yet revolutionary mpMRI in United States men with PCa while highlighting needed research areas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eligible articles were gathered via PubMed query, referred publications known to the authors or from the reference lists of the identified publications. We excluded studies that didn't specifically evaluate mpMRI technique, weren't conducted in the United States, or didn't directly assess the relationship between disparities and mpMRI. No date restrictions were applied, resulting articles were published through 2020.

RESULTS

Out of 80 publications, 17 were selected. Two unique themes were identified: 1) disparities in mpMRI utilization, and 2) performance. While demographic factors such as race, age and socioeconomic status played a significant role in utilization, mpMRI demonstrated equal and sometimes superior performance in AAs.

CONCLUSION

Our findings illustrate the importance of disparity awareness in PCa mpMRI and highlight the need to examine additional mpMRI disparities across other races and social determinants. A new area of inequity in PCa was theoretically illustrated, as lower utilization of mpMRI was detected in a group that could potentially benefit from it the most. Major limitation was the selected search terms. Our review is unique as disparities related to mpMRI were found to be multilayered, affecting utilization and performance. Continued research is needed to discover additional areas in efforts to reduce disparity gaps related to mpMRI and PCa.

Analysis of Literature Regarding Health Care Disparities in Radiology: Is Radiology Falling Behind?

PURPOSE

To quantify the gap between radiology and other specialties regarding the amount of literature on healthcare disparities (HCD).

METHODS

Four different searches were conducted to evaluate the amount of literature on HCD in radiology as compared to internal medicine and surgery. Initially, the Journal Citation Report was utilized to search for the five highest ranking journals in each field and a second search used impact factor. A combination of search terms "health" AND "disparities" was used. Two additional searches were performed with PubMed using the terms "health" AND "disparities AND "radiology" with the final term changed for each specialty. The second PubMed search added the term "medical education" for each specialty. Articles were limited to years 2017 to 2020.

RESULTS

The initial search found 1817 articles discussing "health" and "disparities". 14.6% of these were radiology, 65.7% internal medicine, and 19.7% surgery. The subsequent search controlling for impact factor found 2176 articles. 12.2% were for radiology, 66.1% were for internal medicine, and 21.7% for surgery. The initial PubMed search found 6543 articles. 9.9% were for radiology, 32.4% for internal medicine, and 57.7% were for surgery. The addition of "medical education" decreased the articles to 807. Radiology had 9.9%, internal medicine was 44.2%, and surgery was 45.9 %.

CONCLUSION

A gap in HCD literature exists for radiology as compared to surgery and internal medicine. However, radiology has demonstrated a recent significant push towards understanding HCD.  Radiology should continue to capitalize on its momentum and develop HCD curricula and research.

Addressing the ACGME Mandate for Healthcare Disparities Education in Residency Programs: A Needs Assessment

PURPOSE

To assess current opinions and efforts from radiology residency program leadership regarding healthcare disparities (HCD) education for residents.

METHODS

Radiology residency program directors across the United States were sent a 10-item survey and asked a series of qualitative questions regarding their opinions about HCD and current methods of implementation into their residency curriculum, in addition to demographic information such as program location and setting.

RESULTS

73 out of 334 program directors responded. 49.3% were located in the Northeast, 16.4% in the Southeast, 16.4% in the Midwest, 12.3% in the Southwest, and 5.5% in the Pacific. Community programs made up 16.4% of respondents, while academic programs made up 76.7%. 6.8% identified as "other". 98.6% agreed with the provided definition of HCD. 83.6% agreed or strongly agreed that HCD present an obstacle to providing imaging care. 74.0% agreed or strongly agreed that HCD education is an essential component of residency training. However, 74.0% agreed or strongly agreed that HCD education is difficult to implement due to competing educational requirements. Only 16.4% agreed or strongly agreed that they had sufficient material on HCD to train residents.

CONCLUSION

Although many radiology residency programs agree that HCD education is essential in residency training, the majority feel that a curriculum is difficult to implement and that they lack sufficient resources. This study confirms the need to address this gap with a standardized curriculum which has been developed and is discussed.

Educational Strategies to Achieve Equitable Breast Imaging Care

As the population of the United States becomes increasingly diverse, radiologists must learn to both understand and mitigate the impact of health disparities. Significant health disparities persist in radiologic care, including breast imaging. Racial and ethnic minorities, women from lower socioeconomic status, those living in rural areas, and the uninsured bear a disproportionate burden of breast cancer morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is no centralized radiology curriculum focusing on breast health disparities available to residents, breast imaging fellows, or practicing breast radiologists. While patient-, provider-, and system-level initiatives are necessary to overcome disparities, our purpose is to describe educational strategies targeted to breast imaging radiologists at all levels to provide equitable care to a diverse population. These strategies may include, but are not limited to, diversifying the breast imaging workforce, understanding the needs of a diverse population, cultural sensitivity and bias training, and fostering awareness of the existing issues in screening mammography access, follow-up imaging, and clinical care.

Public Health Foundations for Radiology Resident Education: Healthcare Disparities in Radiology

Increasing recognition within the medical literature and by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has been attributed to the need for enhanced resident education on concepts related to public health and health equity. Despite increasing documentation of pervasive inequalities within the scope of radiology, dedicated curricula designed to improve cultural competency and understanding of healthcare disparities among radiology trainees remains sparse. With relatively fewer patient interactions, radiology trainees are particularly susceptible to insufficient contextual awareness of how socioeconomic factors influence patient health and behaviors, physician recommendations, and ultimately clinical outcomes. The purpose of this article is to provide a high-yield background of foundational health equity and disparity concepts for radiology trainees, from which additional educational curricula may be derived. Specifically, this article will discuss the fundamental socioeconomic factors known to contribute to discrepant access and use of imaging services, followed by areas in radiology with well-documented disparities of which trainees should be aware. Lastly, previous and current strategies for addressing disparities in radiology will be discussed with the ultimate goal of stimulating trainee participation and the development of novel approaches.

Not all biases are bad: equitable and inequitable biases in machine learning and radiology

The application of machine learning (ML) technologies in medicine generally but also in radiology more specifically is hoped to improve clinical processes and the provision of healthcare. A central motivation in this regard is to advance patient treatment by reducing human error and increasing the accuracy of prognosis, diagnosis and therapy decisions. There is, however, also increasing awareness about bias in ML technologies and its potentially harmful consequences. Biases refer to systematic distortions of datasets, algorithms, or human decision making. These systematic distortions are understood to have negative effects on the quality of an outcome in terms of accuracy, fairness, or transparency. But biases are not only a technical problem that requires a technical solution. Because they often also have a social dimension, the 'distorted' outcomes they yield often have implications for equity. This paper assesses different types of biases that can emerge within applications of ML in radiology, and discusses in what cases such biases are problematic. Drawing upon theories of equity in healthcare, we argue that while some biases are harmful and should be acted upon, others might be unproblematic and even desirable-exactly because they can contribute to overcome inequities.