Chronic critical illness: a review for surgeons

The long-term ICU patient: Which definition?

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To offer a review of the differing terminologies used by clinicians and researchers to describe the long-term intensive care unit (ICU) patient and the underlying propositions that align with this terminology.

BACKGROUND

Ongoing medical and technological advances in emergency and intensive care have resulted in improved survival of critically ill patients in recent decades. In addition, these advancements have also resulted in improved survival of complex critically ill patients who progress to a trajectory of prolonged critical illness, having protracted stays in the ICU. There is great variability in terminology used to define the long-term ICU patient. This lack of a common definition for long-term ICU patients is problematic, increasing their vulnerability and risk of care not being centred about their unique needs.

DESIGN

In this discursive article, we explore the terminology used to define the long-term ICU patient. An initial broad search of the literature across four electronic databases was conducted to identify common terminology used to define the long-term ICU patient. From here, seven definitions were identified and chosen for inclusion in the review as they meet inclusion criteria and clearly described a group of patients who have an extended ICU stay. The seven selected terms are as follows: prolonged mechanical ventilation; failure to wean; insertion of tracheostomy; chronically critically ill; persistent critical illness; persistent inflammatory-immunosuppressive and catabolic syndrome; and frailty. Following this a focused review of the literature with the selected terms was conducted to explore in greater detail the terminology.

DISCUSSION

The lack of clear definition for this patient group can potentiate their care needs being unmet. Acknowledgement of the need to clearly define this patient group is the first step to improve outcomes. Nursing is well positioned to recognise the different terminologies use to describe this group of patients and implement care to suit their unique clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Recognition and standardisation of these terms are an important priority to pave the way to improve care pathways and outcomes for this group of patients and their family.

Mortality After Elective Surgery: The Potential Role for Preoperative Palliative Care

BACKGROUND

Preoperative optimization is increasingly emphasized for high-risk surgical patients. One critical component of this includes preoperative advanced care planning to promote goal-concordant care. We aimed to define a subset of patients that might benefit from preoperative palliative care consult for advanced care planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined adult patients admitted from January 2016 to December 2018 to a university health system for elective surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with death within 1 y, and presence of palliative care consults preoperatively. Chi-square analysis evaluated the impact of a palliative care consult on advanced care planning variables.

RESULTS

Of the 29,132 inpatient elective procedures performed, there was a 2.0% mortality rate at 6 mo and 3.5% at 1 y. Those who died were more likely to be older, male, underweight (BMI <18), or have undergone an otolaryngology, neurosurgery or thoracic procedure type (all P-values < 0.05). At the time of admission, 29% had an advance directive, 90% had a documented code status, and 0.3% had a preoperative palliative care consult. Patients were more likely to have an advanced directive, a power of attorney, a documented code status, and have a do not resuscitate order if they had a palliative care consult (all P-values <0.05). The mortality rates and preoperative palliative care rates per procedure type did not follow similar trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative palliative care consultation before elective admissions for surgery had a significant impact on advanced care planning.

Spiritual care in the intensive care unit: An integrative literature research

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to review the literature for three major domains in relation to spiritual care in the ICU, namely Quality of Life (QoL), Quality of Care (QoC), and Education (E).

METHOD

An integrative literature research.

RESULTS

The 113 selected articles reveal that spirituality is an essential component of QoL and that complementary and effective spiritual care (SC) relieves distress of patients and their relatives. Furthermore, the contribution of SC to quality of care is: 1) diagnosing and addressing spiritual and emotional needs among patients and their relatives; 2) offering spiritual comfort to the patient in distress; 3) increased spiritual well-being of both patients and their relatives; 4) increased family satisfaction in general and by shared decision-making. Finally, the literature reveals the necessity to improve SC knowledge and skills of ICU healthcare professionals (IC HCPs) through relevant training courses.

CONCLUSION

SC contributes to QoL and QoC. The literature indicates that IC HCPs acknowledge the need to improve their SC knowledge and skills to enhance complementary, effective SC. Further research on SC as an integrated part of daily ICU care is necessary to improve QoL and QoC of patients and their relatives.

Goals of Care and End of Life in the ICU

Despite advances in surgical critical care, critical illness remains traumatic and has long-term adverse sequelae. Unrealistic expectations and erroneous assumptions about outcomes acceptable to patients have been identified as drivers of goal-discordant treatment. Goal setting in the ICU begins with compassionately delivered, accurate, and honest prognostic information. Through skilled communication and shared decision making, clinicians forge a mutual understanding of patient values and priorities and the role of therapeutic options in achieving patient goals. Ensuring that treatment is goal-concordant and meets physical, psychosocial, existential, and spiritual needs is crucial for attaining optimal patient and caregiver outcomes, independent of survival.

A risk prediction model for mortality in the moribund general surgical patient

INTRODUCTION

Surgeons struggle to counsel families on the role of surgery and likelihood of survival in the moribund patient. We sought to develop a risk prediction model for postoperative inpatient death for the moribund surgical candidate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using 2007-2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, we identified American Society of Anesthesiologists class 5 (moribund) patients. The sample was randomly divided into development and validation cohorts. In the development cohort, preoperative patient characteristics were evaluated. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Factors significant in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable model; points were assigned based on β coefficients. A scoring system was generated to predict inpatient mortality. Models were developed separately for operations performed within and after 24 hours of admission, and tested on the validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 3120 patients were included. In-hospital mortality was 50.6%. In multivariable analysis, patient characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality were age, functional status, recent dialysis, recent myocardial infarction, ventilator dependence, body mass index, and procedure type. The scoring system generated from this model accurately predicted in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing surgery within and after 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

A simple risk prediction model using readily available preoperative patient characteristics accurately predicts postoperative mortality in the moribund surgical patient. This scoring system can assist in decision making.