Double-catheter method to prevent dislodgement during percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy

Endoscopic diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: Advances and current limitations

The accurate diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma is difficult, even now. When ultrasonography (US) shows dilatation of the bile duct, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography followed by endoscopic US (EUS) is the next step. When US or EUS shows localized bile duct wall thickening, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should be conducted with intraductal US (IDUS) and forceps biopsy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization increases the sensitivity of brush cytology with similar specificity. In patients with papillary type bile duct carcinoma, three biopsies are sufficient. In patients with nodular or infiltrating-type bile duct carcinoma, multiple biopsies are warranted, and IDUS can compensate for the limitations of biopsies. In preoperative staging, the combination of dynamic multi-detector low computed tomography (MDCT) and IDUS is useful for evaluating vascular invasion and cancer depth infiltration. However, assessment of lymph nodes metastases is difficult. In resectable cases, assessment of longitudinal cancer spread is important. The combination of IDUS and MDCT is useful for revealing submucosal cancer extension, which is common in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. To estimate the mucosal extension, which is common in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, the combination of IDUS and cholangioscopy is required. The utility of current peroral cholangioscopy is limited by the maneuverability of the “baby scope”. A new baby scope (10 Fr), called “SpyGlass” has potential, if the image quality can be improved. Since extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma is common in the Far East, many researchers in Japan and Korea contributed these studies, especially, in the evaluation of longitudinal cancer extension.

Multiple bile duct biopsies using a sheath with a side port: usefulness of intraductal sonography

OBJECTIVE

We clarified the number of biopsies required to determine malignancy of the biliary tract on the basis of the type of bile duct tumor.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients with a biliary tract malignancy (n = 33) and a benign biliary stenosis (n = 3) underwent biopsy via the percutaneous transhepatic route. We performed intraductal sonography using a 20-MHz probe with a 2.0-mm diameter. The sonographic findings were prospectively classified as polypoid, circular, or semicircular. The tip of a long 9-French sheath with a side port was wedged into the stenosis, and six specimens were obtained with a 1.8-mm-diameter forceps with serrated cups.

RESULTS

When cholangiography or intraductal sonography showed a polypoid lesion, the sensitivity of two biopsies was 100% (6/6). When cholangiography showed a stenotic lesion, the sensitivity of nine biopsies (96%, 26/27) was superior to that of two biopsies (74%, 20/27; p < 0.05). When intraductal sonography showed a circular lesion, the sensitivity of three biopsies (100%, 14/14) was superior to that of a single biopsy (64%, 9/14; p < 0.05). When it showed a semicircular lesion, the sensitivity of nine biopsies (92%, 12/13) was superior to that of two biopsies (54%, 7/13; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Bile duct biopsy using a sheath with a side port has a high sensitivity. However, the number of biopsies required depends on the cholangioscopic and intraductal sonographic appearance of the tumor.