Formal analysis of the optimal duration of tilt testing for the diagnosis of neurally mediated syncope

Syncope in the Young Adult and in the Athlete: Causes and Clinical Work-up to Exclude a Life-Threatening Cardiac Disease

Syncope is defined as a transient loss of consciousness due to cerebral hypoperfusion, characterized by a rapid onset, short duration, and spontaneous complete recovery. It is usually a benign event, but sometimes it may represent the initial presentation of several cardiac disorders associated with sudden cardiac death during physical activity. A careful evaluation is essential particularly in young adults and in competitive athletes in order to exclude the presence of an underlying life-threatening cardiovascular disease. The present review analyzes the main non-cardiac and cardiac causes of syncope and the contribution of the available tools for differential diagnosis. Clinical work-up of the athlete with syncope occurring in extreme environments and management in terms of sports eligibility and disqualification are also discussed.

Tilt-table test: its role in modern practice

Syncope is a major healthcare problem with significant morbidity, mortality and healthcare cost. It is a common symptom with a complex pathophysiology and, therefore, several aetiologies. Tilt-table testing (TTT) is an important, yet perhaps not widely-used, test that forms part of the management of syncope. We sought to assess the utilisation of this test in our institution for the investigation of patients with syncope, to study the referral patterns and the outcomes and usefulness of the TTT in a real-life setting. We undertook a retrospective study of all the TTT that were performed in our institution between January 2009 and October 2009. Of the 69 patients in which TTT was performed, 14 (20%) presented with presyncope, 24 (35%) with a single episode of syncope and 24 (44%) with multiple episodes. The average age was 57.2 years and 64% were female. Of the total patients, 35 (51%) had an abnormal TTT. Of the patients with normal TTT, four had internal loop recorders and six were referred to other medical specialities. The remaining patients (49%) had no formal diagnosis and were referred back to their general practitioner. TTT remains a common test modality and has great value when undertaken in the correct clinical context. This underlines the importance of a detailed clinical history. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines ensure a methodical and rational approach to syncopal patients and aide in choosing the right patient for the right test.

Orthostatic decrease in cardiac chaos during the head-up tilt test in patients with vasovagal syncope

BACKGROUND

Autonomic dysfunction contributes to orthostatic intolerance in vasovagal syncope (VVS), but as it has not been identified by spectral analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) in previous studies, the present hypothesis was that nonlinear analysis of HRV would identify the orthostatic intolerance in VVS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with VVS and 14 matched controls were subjected to 80-degree head-up tilt test (positive: 13 patients; negative: 13 patients and 14 controls). There were no differences in the orthostatic changes in the indices of spectral analyses of HRV among the 3 groups. The Lyapunov exponent (LE) was calculated from 200 consecutive RR-intervals to investigate chaotic behavior, and cardiac chaos was defined as the incidence of the presence of a positive finite LE. Orthostatic decreases in cardiac chaos were observed in the VVS patients (both the positive and negative groups), although there was no orthostatic decrease in the control group (ANOVA: p = 0.008). The receiver-operator characteristic curve indicated that cardiac chaos during the tilt identified VVS regardless of the results of the tilt (p < 0.001, sensitivity: 85.7%, specificity: 96.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in cardiac chaos during the tilt test was specific to patients with VVS, even if their response to the test was negative.

Role of autonomic evaluation in the diagnosis and management of syncope

There are many causes of syncope that include neurological (autonomic and non-autonomic), cardiac and psychiatric causes, amongst others. Disorders of the autonomic nervous system, either intermittent or fixed, are increasingly recognised as contributing to a large proportion of syncope. However, the majority of guidelines focus on cardiological and neurological evaluation in these disorders. In this overview we focus specifically on the role of autonomic evaluation. This has dual purposes; to aid the diagnosis and cause of syncope, and furthermore to provide information to understand the pathophysiological basis of syncope and thus improve management of such disorders.

Single-stage adenosine tilt testing in patients with unexplained syncope

INTRODUCTION

We previously have shown that a 3-minute single-stage adenosine tilt test has a diagnostic yield comparable to a two-stage protocol consisting of a 30-minute drug-free tilt followed by a 15-minute isoproterenol tilt. In this study, we sought to further define the clinical utility of adenosine tilt testing in patients with unexplained syncope by prospectively evaluating test specificity and determining predictors of a positive test response.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The specificity of single-stage adenosine tilt testing was determined using 30 control subjects. To determine the diagnostic yield of this protocol, adenosine tilts were performed in 129 patients with unexplained syncope. The adenosine tilt test protocol had high specificity (100%) but a low overall diagnostic yield (18%). However, the yield was affected significantly by age. In patients </=40 years of age, the tilt test was positive in 15 (41%) of 37 patients, which was significantly greater than the yield in patients between the ages of 41 and 64 years (6/41 patients [15%], P = 0.012) and those >/=65 years of age (2/41 patients [5%], P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

These data support single-stage adenosine tilt testing in patients </=40 years of age because the diagnostic yield of the test is maximal in this group and the test can be completed in </=3 minutes. Conversely, the diagnostic yield of adenosine tilt testing in patients >40 years of age is low, suggesting that the clinical utility of this protocol is limited in these patients.