Systemic and renal effects of atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or in acute saline solution loading

Impaired natriuretic and renal endocrine response to acute volume expansion in pre-clinical systolic and diastolic dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized an impaired renal endocrine and natriuretic response to volume expansion (VE) in humans with pre-clinical systolic dysfunction (PSD) and pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction (PDD). We further hypothesized that exogenous B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) could rescue an impaired natriuretic response in PSD and PDD.

BACKGROUND

Recent reports suggest that in early systolic heart failure (HF), there is an impaired natriuretic response to acute VE.

METHODS

PSD was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction <40% without HF symptoms. PDD was defined as ejection fraction >50%, moderate to severe diastolic dysfunction by Doppler criteria, and no HF symptoms. A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study was employed to determine the renal response to VE (0.25 ml/kg/min of normal saline for 60 min) in the presence and absence of exogenous BNP. Twenty healthy control subjects, 20 PSD subjects, and 18 PDD subjects participated.

RESULTS

In healthy control subjects, urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and natriuresis increased after VE. In contrast, among PSD and PDD subjects, there was a paradoxical decrease in urinary cGMP and attenuated natriuresis. Pre-treatment with subcutaneous BNP resulted in similar increases in both urinary cGMP and natriuresis among healthy normal, PSD, and PDD subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

In PSD and PDD, there is impaired renal cGMP activation, which contributes to impaired natriuresis in response to VE. Impaired activation of urinary cGMP and reduced natriuresis may contribute to volume overload and the progression of HF among PSD and PDD subjects. Importantly, the impaired renal excretory response to VE is rescued by exogenous BNP in PSD and PDD.

ANP is cleared much faster than BNP in patients with congestive heart failure

OBJECTIVE

To obtain a better understanding of the pharmacokinetics of atrial and brain natriuretic peptides (ANP and BNP, respectively), two peptide mediators used in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). Although both peptides exert their effects by binding to a common receptor (natriuretic peptide receptor A) with about the same affinity, their respective loading and maintenance doses differ.

METHODS

Sixteen CHF patients were randomized to be infused for 2 h with alpha-human ANP (0.05 microg/kg per minute) or BNP (0.01 microg/kg per minute). Plasma concentrations of both peptides were measured 0, 2, 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min post-infusion. The pharmacokinetic parameters were then calculated using a 1-compartment model.

RESULTS

The plasma BNP concentrations in the ANP and BNP groups before infusion were 464.7 +/- 339.8 and 506.8 +/- 332.5 pg/ml, respectively. Following infusion, ANP disappeared from the circulation more rapidly than BNP: their plasma half-lives were 2.4 +/- 0.7 and 12.1 +/- 3.0 min, and their total body clearance volumes were 48.2 +/- 24.1 and 10.1 +/- 2.7 ml/min per kilogram, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ANP has a shorter half-life in the plasma of CHF patients than BNP, which suggests that it controls hemodynamics more readily than BNP.

Present and future pharmacotherapy for heart failure

The pharmacotherapy currently recommended by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association for heart failure (HF) is a diuretic, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist and (usually) digitalis. This current treatment of HF may be improved by optimising the dose of ACEI used, as increasing the dose of lisinopril increases its benefits in HF. Selective angiotensin receptor-1 (AT(1)) antagonists are effective alternatives for those who cannot tolerate ACEIs. AT(1) antagonists may also be used in combination with ACEIs, as some studies have shown cumulative benefits for the combination. In addition to being used in Stage IV HF patients, in whom it has a marked benefit, spironolactone should be studied in less severe HF and in the presence of beta-blockers. The use of carvedilol, extended-release metoprolol and bisoprolol should be extended to severe HF patients as these agents have been shown to decrease mortality in this group. The ancillary properties of carvedilol, particularly antagonism at prejunctional beta -adrenoceptors, may give it additional benefits to selective beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists. Celiprolol and bucindolol are not the beta-blockers of choice in HF, as they do not decrease mortality. Although digitalis does not reduce mortality, it remains the only option for a long-term positive inotropic effect, as the long-term use of the phosphodiesterase inhibitors is associated with increased mortality. The calcium sensitising drug levosimendan may be useful in the hospital treatment of decompensated HF to increase cardiac output and improve dyspnoea and fatigue. The antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone should probably be used in patients at high risk of arrhythmic or sudden death, although this treatment may soon be superseded by the more expensive implanted cardioverter defibrillators, which are probably more effective and have fewer side effects. The natriuretic peptide nesiritide has recently been introduced for the hospital treatment of decompensated HF. Novel drugs that may be beneficial in the treatment of HF include the vasopeptidase inhibitors and the selective endothelin-A receptor antagonists but these require much more investigation. However, disappointing results have been obtained in a large clinical trial of the tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonist etanercept, where no likelihood of a difference between placebo and etanercept was observed. Small clinical trials with recombinant growth hormone to thicken ventricles in dilated cardiomyopathy have given variable results.