Simple method for estimating regurgitant volume with use of a single radius for measuring proximal isovelocity surface area: an in vitro study of simulated mitral regurgitation

Proximal Flow Convergence Region as Assessed by Real-time 3-Dimensional Echocardiography: Challenging the Hemispheric Assumption

OBJECTIVE

Traditionally, a hemispheric assumption for the proximal flow convergence region (PFCR) is used when calculating mitral regurgitant (MR) effective orifice area (EROA). However, 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography limits evaluation of the complete PFCR contour. Real-time 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography (RT3D) allows direct assessment of the true PFCR contour. We hypothesized that the PFCR contour is not necessarily hemispheric, but rather hemielliptic, and aimed to apply a hemielliptic calculation, based on the 3D contour of the PFCR for more accurate MR quantification.

METHODS

In all, 50 patients with MR underwent RT3D to characterize PFCR contour as hemispheric or hemielliptic. MR EROA by RT3D-derived PFCR was calculated using a hemielliptic formula using 3D data. The 2D EROA was computed using standard hemispheric assumption. EROAs calculated from 2D and RT3D data were compared with quantitative Doppler EROA (mitral inflow--aortic outflow/MR time-velocity integral), used as an independent comparison.

RESULTS

Only 1 of 50 patients (2%) had a hemispheric PFCR contour by RT3D. The remaining had hemielliptic PFCR contours. Compared with Doppler method, 2D echocardiography significantly underestimated EROA (0.34 +/- 0.14 vs 0.48 +/- 0.25 cm(2), P < .001). RT3D EROA was not significantly different from Doppler EROA (0.52 +/- 0.17 vs 0.48 +/- 0.25, P = not significant). Of 33 patients with Doppler EROA greater than 0.3 cm(2) (> or =moderate-severe MR), 45% (15 of 33) were underestimated as having mild to moderate MR by 2D EROA.

CONCLUSIONS

The true PFCR contour as shown by RT3D is generally not hemispheric but hemielliptic, tracking the orifice contour. Based on this 3D shape, a hemielliptic approach can be used for practical clinical application with improved MR quantification.

Estimación de la severidad de la insuficiencia mitral según un método simplificado basado en el flujo de convergencia proximal

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Calculation of the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) is regarded as the most accurate way of assessing the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR), but the technique's complexity limits its use. Our objective was to modify and validate a previously published semiquantitative method of assessment based on measurement of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) in order to adapt it to recent recommendations from American and European cardiology societies.

METHODS

In the PISA method, maximum regurgitant flow (MRF) is a function of the radius and aliasing velocity (AV). Using this relationship, it is possible to construct a nomogram formed by lines of different MRF value, which can be easily derived by looking for radius values on the graph and observing where they cross with AV values. The MR severity limits on the nomogram were set to reflect the different severity grades and limits recommended for use with ERO measurements by American and European cardiology societies.

RESULTS

We studied 76 patients with MR using Doppler echocardiography. There was an excellent correlation between MRF and ERO (r=0.98, P< .001). Estimates of MR severity made using the new nomogram were in good agreement with those derived from the ERO: for a scale with three severity grades, kappa was 0.951 and the standard error was 0.11; for four grades, kappa was 0.969 and the standard error, 0.11.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimates of MR severity derived semiquantitatively from MRF using the nomogram proposed here were in excellent agreement with quantitative estimates obtained using the ERO, and the method was faster and easier to use.