Mandibular range of motion after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis or rigid fixation

TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors

Objective

In order to understand the conflicting information on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathophysiologic responses after mandibular advancement surgery, an overview of the literature was proposed with a focus on certain risk factors.

Methods

A literature search was carried out in the Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases in the period from January 1980 through March 2013. Various combinations of keywords related to TMJ changes [disc displacement, arthralgia, condylar resorption (CR)] and aspects of surgical intervention (fixation technique, amount of advancement) were used. A hand search of these papers was also carried out to identify additional articles.

Results

A total of 148 articles were considered for this overview and, although methodological troubles were common, this review identified relevant findings which the practitioner can take into consideration during treatment planning: 1- Surgery was unable to influence TMJ with preexisting displaced disc and crepitus; 2- Clicking and arthralgia were not predictable after surgery, although there was greater likelihood of improvement rather than deterioration; 3- The amount of mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation, and the rigidity of the fixation technique seemed to influence TMJ position and health; 4- The risk of CR increased, especially in identified high-risk cases.

Conclusions

Young adult females with mandibular retrognathism and increased mandibular plane angle are susceptible to painful TMJ, and are subject to less improvement after surgery and prone to CR. Furthermore, thorough evidenced-based studies are required to understand the response of the TMJ after mandibular advancement surgery.

Histologic and tomographic analyses of the temporomandibular joint after mandibular advancement surgery: study in minipigs

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to elucidate the changes occurring in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) after surgical mandibular advancement with different fixation materials: bicortical screws and miniplates.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighteen minipigs were randomly divided into 3 groups: group I (control), nonoperated animals; group II, animals submitted to surgical advancement surgery and osteosynthesis by bicortical screws; and group III, animals submitted to surgical advancement surgery and osteosynthesis by miniplates. Four months after the surgeries, TMJs were collected and histologically prepared after computerized tomography (CT) scanning for the blind detection of erosion, flattening, and osteophyte.

RESULTS

The CT analysis revealed significant alterations in the shape of the condyles (erosion: P = .0010; flattening: P < .0001) for group II compared with groups I and III. Descriptive histologic analysis was compatible with the CT findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that bicortical screw fixation resulted in more pronounced condylar alterations in the shape of the condyles than miniplate osteosynthesis. However, further clinical studies are necessary to confirm these data.