N1 esophageal carcinoma: the importance of staging and downstaging

Impact of bulky loco-regional lymphadenopathy in esophageal adenocarcinoma on survival: a retrospective single center analysis

The relationship between 'bulky' locoregional lymphadenopathy and survival has not been investigated in the setting of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). This study aimed to explore whether bulky regional lymphadenopathy at diagnosis affected survival outcomes in patients with EAC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and en bloc resection. A single-center retrospective review of a prospectively maintained upper GI cancer surgical database was performed between January 2012 and December 2019. Patients with locally advanced EAC (cT2-3, N+, M0) treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy and transthoracic en bloc esophagogastrectomy were identified. Computed tomography scans from before the initiation of treatment were reviewed, and patients were stratified according to whether bulky loco-regional lymph nodes were present. This was defined as lymphadenopathy >2 cm in any axis. Overall survival was compared, and a Cox multivariate regression model was calculated. Two hundred twenty-five of the eight hundred seventy patients identified met the inclusion criteria. Forty-eight (21%) had bulky lymphadenopathy, leaving 177 allocated to the control group. More patients with bulky lymphadenopathy had ypN3 disease (18/48, 38% vs. 39/177, 20%, P = 0.025). Among patients with bulky lymphadenopathy, overall survival was generally worse (32.6 vs. 59.1 months, P = 0.012). However, among the 9/48 (19%) patients with bulky lymphadenopathy who achieved ypN- status survival outcomes were similar to those with non-bulky lymphadenopathy who also achieved lymph node sterilization. Poor differentiation (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-2.9, P = 0.034), ypN+ (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.6, P = 0.032), and bulky lymphadenopathy were independently associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.7, 1.0-2.9, P = 0.048). Bulky regional lymphadenopathy is associated with a poor prognosis. Efforts to identify the ideal treatment regimen for these patients are urgently required.

Prognostic relevance of lymph node regression on survival in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic value of histomorphologic regression in primary esophageal cancer has been previously established, however the impact of lymph node (LN) response on survival still remains unclear. The aim of this review was to assess the prognostic significance of LN regression or downstaging following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed to identify articles evaluating LN regression or downstaging after neoadjuvant therapy. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the influence of regression in the LNs and nodal downstaging on overall survival. Histomorphologic tumor regression in LNs was defined by the absence of viable cells or degree of fibrosis on histopathologic examination. Downstaged LNs were defined as pN0 nodes by the tumor, node, and metastasis classification, which were positive prior to treatment neoadjuvant.

RESULTS

Eight articles were included, three of which assessed tumor regression (number of patients = 292) and five assessed downstaging (number of patients = 1368). Complete tumor regression (average rate of 29.1%) in the LNs was associated with improved survival, although not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26-1.06; P = 0.17). LNs downstaging (average rate of 32.2%) was associated with improved survival compared to node positivity after neoadjuvant treatment (HR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.22-0.77; P = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

The findings of this meta-analysis have shown a survival benefit in patients with LN downstaging and are suggestive for considering LN downstaging to ypN0 as an additional prognostic marker in staging and in the comparative evaluation of differing neoadjuvant regimens in clinical trials. No statistically significant effect of histopathologic regression in the LNs on long-term survival was seen.

Importance of Lymph Node Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Tumor response and lymph node involvement are the most important prognosticators in resected patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). We hypothesize that lymph node response (LNR) is also a valuable prognosticator in these patients, potentially revealing the added effect of nCRT.

METHODS

Hematoxylin and eosin slides of 193 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with clinical suspicion of lymph node involvement (cN+) and treated with nCRT between 2008 and 2015 were assessed. Lymph nodes containing viable tumor cells were considered ypN+, and those negative for viable tumor were ypN0. LNR was also described according to an earlier defined method. Three groups were obtained: ypN0/LNR-, ypN0/LNR+, and ypN+. They were compared with 188 cN+ patients being pN0 (n = 45) or pN+ (n = 143) after upfront esophageal resection.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were ypN0/LNR-, 55 were ypN0/LNR+, and 94 were ypN+. Median overall survival was 96.4, 31.2, and 20.6 months, respectively, and was significantly different between ypN0/LNR- and ypN0/LNR+ groups (P = .020). Survival was comparable between ypN0/LNR- and pN0 (104.2 months) groups (P = .519) and between ypN+ and pN+ (21.6 months) groups (P = .966). In ypN0 patients, risk of death in LNR+ patients was tripled compared with LNR- patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In cN+ esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with nCRT with postoperative final pathology being ypN0, median overall survival is tripled when no signs of LNR were found and comparable to cN+/pN0 upfront esophagectomy patients, suggesting that 23% of patients treated with nCRT were in fact true N0 and overtreated by nCRT. ypN+ patients have no survival benefit compared with pN+ patients.

Nodal Downstaging of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: Survival Analysis if ypN0 Is Achieved

BACKGROUND

It is known that ypN0 status after induction treatment can be divided into "natural" N0 (cN0/ypN0) and "downstaged" N0 (cN+/ypN0). Whether natural N0 patients and downstaged N0 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) have similar prognosis is unknown.

METHODS

An institutional database was reviewed to identify ESCC patients after nCRT, whose CT scans were retrieved and reviewed to reclassify nodal status. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on node status: natural N0, downstaged N0, and ypN+. Impact of nodal status on survival and associations with survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

We identified 110 patients, and 25 had natural N0 disease, 52 had downstaged N0 disease, and 33 had ypN+ disease. The 3-year OS was 76.7%, 79.5%, and 49% in natural N0, downstaged N0 and ypN+ group, respectively, and, correspondingly, the 3-year DFS was 77%, 73.9%, and 36.3%. In multivariable analysis, OS (P = 0.794) and DFS (P = 0.957) did not differ between natural N0 and downstaged N0 groups, but it was significantly shorter in ypN+ group (OS, P = 0.032; DFS, P = 0.021). In subgroups with "poor response" of primary tumor, the prognosis of natural N0 and downstaged N0 paitents was poor almost identical to ypN+ in both OS (P = 0.721; P = 0.252) and DFS (P = 0.694; P = 0.114).

CONCLUSIONS

The ypN0 status is an important hallmark demonstrating the effectiveness of nCRT for ESCC, regardless of cN status. Additionally, the survival of natural N0 and downstaged N0 patients with bad response at primary site may be poor, similar to ypN+ patients.

Induction therapy before surgery improves survival in patients with clinical T3N0 esophageal cancer: a nationwide study in Taiwan

The utility of induction therapy (IT) in patients with resectable esophageal cancer remains controversial, especially when clinical evidence of nodal metastases is lacking. We sought to compare the survival impact of IT versus upfront surgery (US) in patients with cT3N0 esophageal cancer. We searched the Taiwan Cancer Registry for patients with cT3N0 esophageal cancer who underwent US or IT between 2008 and 2013. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the potential benefits of IT in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Of the 11752 patients with esophageal cancer included in the nationwide database, 762 (6.5%) had cT3N0 disease. Most cases (720 [94.5%]) had a histological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. Of them, 135 received IT (the IT group) and 237 received surgery first (the US group). In the US group, pretreatment clinical staging was accurate in 47.9% of patients. Twenty-one (8.97%) were clinically overstaged (pT1-2N0), whereas 101 (43.17%) were clinically understaged (pT4N0 or pTanyN1-3). The presence of unexpected nodal metastases was identified in 92.1% of clinically understaged patients. In the IT group, 28 (20.74%) patients did not proceed to surgery after IT. The use of IT was associated with higher R0 resection rates and fewer pathological nodal metastases, despite unexpected M1 disease being more common (all P< 0.05). The 5-year OS rate was significantly higher (42%) in the IT group than in the US group (33%, P= 0.032). Similar findings were observed in terms of 5-year DFS (37% in the IT group versus 29% in the US group, P= 0.009). Multivariate analysis identified US (hazard ratio: 1.42, P= 0.03) and non-R0 resection (hazard ratio: 1.58, P= 0.03) as independent adverse prognostic factors. We found that 43.17% of patients with cT3N0 disease undergoing primary surgery had their disease understaged. The use of IT before esophagectomy significantly improves OS and DFS in patients with clinical T3N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE New to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual for epithelial cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction are separate, temporally related cancer classifications: 1) before treatment decision (clinical); 2) after esophagectomy alone (pathologic); and 3) after preresection therapy followed by esophagectomy (postneoadjuvant pathologic). The addition of clinical and postneoadjuvant pathologic stage groupings was driven by a lack of correspondence of survival, and thus prognosis, between both clinical and postneoadjuvant pathologic cancer categories (facts about the cancer) and pathologic categories. This was revealed by a machine-learning analysis of 6-continent data from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration, with consensus of the AJCC Upper GI Expert Panel. Survival is markedly affected by histopathologic cell type (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma) in clinically and pathologically staged patients, requiring separate stage grouping for each cell type. However, postneoadjuvant pathologic stage groups are identical. For the future, more refined and granular data are needed. This requires: 1) more accurate clinical staging; 2) innovative solutions to pathologic staging challenges in endoscopically resected cancers; 3) integration of genomics into staging; and 4) precision cancer care with targeted therapy. It is the responsibility of the oncology team to accurately determine and record registry data, which requires eliminating both common errors and those related to incompleteness and inconsistency. Despite the new complexity of eighth edition staging of cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction, these key concepts and new directions will facilitate precision cancer care. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:304-317. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Sterilization of tumor-positive lymph nodes of esophageal cancer by neo-adjuvant treatment is associated with worse survival compared to tumor-negative lymph nodes treated with surgery first

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Lymph node (LN) involvement by esophageal cancer is associated with compromised long-term prognosis. This study assessed whether LN downstaging by neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) might offer a survival benefit compared to patients with a priori negative LN.

METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer between 2005 and 2014 were screened for inclusion. Group 1 included cN0 patients confirmed as pN0 who were treated with surgery first, whereas group 2 included patients initially cN+ and down-staged to ypN0 after NAT. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included in our study, 24 in group 1 and 33 in group 2. Group 2 patients had more locally advanced lesions compared to a priori negative patients, and despite complete LN sterilization by NAT they still had worse long-term survival. Overall 3-year survival was 86.8% for a priori LN negative versus 63.3% for downstaged patients (P = 0.013), while disease-free survival was 79.6% and 57.9%, respectively (P = 0.021). Tumor recurrence was also earlier and more disseminated for the down-staged group.

CONCLUSIONS

Downstaged LN, despite the systemic effect of NAT, still inherit an increased risk for early tumor recurrence and worse long-term survival compared to a priori negative LN.

ypN0: Does It Matter How You Get There? Nodal Downstaging in Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

ypN0 following induction treatment for advanced esophageal cancer improves survival. Importance of how ypN0 is achieved is unknown. This study evaluates survival in "natural" N0 (cN0/ypN0) and "downstaged" N0 (cN+/ypN0) patients.

METHODS

Among patients treated with induction treatment and surgery, 83 CT scans were retrieved in digital format and re-evaluated by a radiologist, blinded to pathological nodal status: 28 natural N0, 37 downstaged N0, and 18 ypN+. Impact of N0 classification on survival and associations with survival were identified.

RESULTS

Survival varied with ypN: 3-year survival was 84 % for natural N0 patients, 59 % for downstaged N0, and 20 % for ypN+ (p < .001). Compared with natural N0 patients, risk of cancer mortality was 3.8 for downstaged N0 and 7.6 for ypN+ (p = .01). Survival was also stratified by ypT: compared with ypT0 natural N0, who had the best survival, intermediate survival was seen in ypT+ natural N0 [hazard ratio (HR), 1.3] and ypT0 downstaged N0 (HR, 1.8), and poor survival in ypT+ downstaged N0 (HR, 9.5) and ypN+ (HR, 12.0) (p = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

Natural N0 and downstaged N0 patients are different clinical entities: downstaging cN+ with induction treatment producing downstaged N0 improves survival only if there is concomitant primary cancer downstaging to ypT0. Intermediate survival is seen in downstaged N0 patients with complete tumor response. Natural N0 patients experience intermediate survival with incomplete response (ypT+). Complete response in natural N0 patients produces the best survival. Means of obtaining ypN0 status matters and requires a complete response for downstaged N0 patients to benefit from induction treatment.

Overexpression of IFITM3 predicts the high risk of lymphatic metastatic recurrence in pN0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy

Background. Recent studies have shown that the aberrant expression of IFITM3 is implicated in the lymph node metastasis of many malignancies. Our research aimed to investigate the expression of IFITM3 in pathological N0 (pN0) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and its relationship with lymph node metastatic recurrence. Methods. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to examine the expression profile of IFITM3 in 104 pairs of samples. Each pair consisted of ESCC tissue and its adjacent normal mucosa (ANM). This aberrant expression was verified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with 20 tumor specimens with strong immunostaining and their mucosal tissues. In addition, 20 samples of low expression tissues and their ANMs were evaluated. Moreover, the correlations between the IFITM3 expression level and the clinicopathological variables, recurrence risk and overall survival (OS) of patients were analyzed. Results. Both IHC and RT-PCR demonstrated that the IFITM3 expression level was significantly higher in tumor tissue than in ANM. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation of IFITM3 expression with the T status of esophageal cancer (p = 0.015). In addition, IFITM3 overexpression was demonstrated to be not only an important risk factor of lymphatic metastatic recurrence but a significant prognostic factor in pN0 ESCC (p < 0.005). Conclusions. Even pN0 ESCC patients will still experience lymphatic metastatic recurrence. The IFITM3 gene could be a predictor of lymphatic metastatic recurrence in pN0 ESCC after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Correlation Between Tumor Regression Grade and Clinicopathological Parameters in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

The aim of this study was 2-fold: first, to assess the prognostic significance on overall survival (OS) of the 3-point tumor regression grade (TRG) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT); second, to investigate the associations of TRG with the clinicopathological characteristics of the study patients.A total of 357 ESCC patients were retrospectively enrolled. The 3-point TRG was determined by assessing the percentage of viable residual tumor cells (VRTC) in the resected specimens as follows: TRG 1, 0% VRTC; TRG 2, 1% to 50% VRTC; and TRG 3, >50% VRTC.A TRG of 1, 2, and 3 was found in 32.2%, 38.9%, and 28.9% of the specimens, respectively. High TRG values were significantly associated with advanced pretreatment clinical stage, longer tumor length, and higher posttreatment tumor depth of invasion (yT), the presence of lymph node metastases (LNM), and lymphovascular invasion. We observed a stepwise decrease in 5-year OS rates with increasing TRG, as follows: 51% for patients with a TRG of 1, 28% for patients with a TRG of 2, and 22% for patients with a TRG of 3 (P < 0.001). TRG and LNM were independent predictors of OS in multivariate analysis. Notably, the prognostic impact of TRG on OS was greater in patients without LNM (P < 0.001) and ypT3 disease (P = 0.021).TRG is independently associated with OS in ESCC patients treated with nCRT. The interrelationships between TRG, LNM, and depth of tumor invasion may improve the prognostic stratification in esophageal cancer.

A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

The majority of esophagectomies in Western parts of the world are performed by a transthoracic approach reflecting the prevalence of adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been reported in a variety of formats, but there are no series that directly compare totally minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic 2 stage esophagectomy (MIE-2) with open Ivor Lewis (IVL). A prospective single-center cohort study of patients undergoing elective MIE-2 or IVL between January 2005 and November 2010 was performed. Short-term clinicopathologic outcomes were recorded using validated systems. One hundred and six patients (median age 66, range 36-85, 88 M : 18 F) underwent two-stage esophagectomy (53 MIE-2 and 53 IVL). Patient demographics (age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, tumor characteristics, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and TNM stage) were comparable between the two groups. Outcomes for MIE-2 and IVL were comparable for anastomotic leak rates (5 [9%] vs. 2 [4%], P= 0.241), resection margin clearance (R0) (43 [81%] vs. 38 [72%], P= 0.253), median lymph node yield (19 vs. 18, P= 0.584), and median length of stay (12 [range 7-91] vs. 12 [range 7-101] days), respectively. Blood loss was significantly less for MIE-2 compared with IVL (median 300 [range 0-1250] mL vs. 400 [range 0-3000] mL, respectively, P= 0.021). MIE-2 in this series of selected patients supports its efficacy, when performed by an experienced minimally invasive surgical team. A well-designed multicenter trial addressing clinical effectiveness is now required.

Cause of death during long-term follow-up for superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term prognosis and cause of death in patients with superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma (SEAC) after surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 85 patients without adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment underwent surgery for SEAC (pT1N0-1, M0) 1984-2011. Medical records and causes of death were reviewed, and 79 specimens (93 %) were reanalyzed for cancer penetration. Survival was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier and comparisons of survival with log-rank test. Multivariate survival was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients, 36 had transhiatal, 33 transthoracic en bloc, 6 minimally invasive en bloc, 5 vagal sparing esophageal resection and 5 endoscopic mucosal resections; 7 patients (8 %) had lymph node metastasis (LNM). Cancer penetration: 35 pT1a and 44 pT1b. Overall survival was 67 % at 5 years and 50 % at 10 years. Disease-specific survival was 82 % at 5 years and 78 % at 10 years. Recurrence-free survival was 80 % at 5 years. In a Cox multivariate model, poor overall survival was predicted only by LNM. Cumulative mortality during median follow-up of 5 years (0-25 years): 37 of 85 (44 %). Cause of death of these 37: SEAC recurrence for 15 (41 %), postoperative complications for 4 (11 %), another primary malignancy for 5 (14 %), non-cancer-related for 11 (30 %) and for 2 (5 %) cause unknown. Mortality after 5-year follow-up: 11 (30 %); 82 % of these deaths were unrelated to SEAC recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

With SEAC recurrence as the single most common cause of death, disease-specific 5-year survival was good. Overall and late (> 5-year) survival is affected by diseases related to aging.

Comparison of the prognostic value of the 6th and 7th editions of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM staging system in patients with lower esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery

Carcinoma of the esophagus is classified according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM staging system. The 7th edition of the UICC TNM staging system was published in 2009. This is the first study to compare the prognostic value of the TNM 6th and 7th editions in patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with chemotherapy followed by surgery. Two hundred forty-three patients with esophageal carcinoma were retrospectively selected from two referral centers. All patients received chemotherapy before surgery. Histopathologic data from the resection specimens were retrieved and restaged according to the TNM 7th edition. Disease-specific survival curves were plotted for depth of tumor invasion (ypT), lymph node status (ypN), and ypTNM stage and then compared. Median follow-up after surgery was 2.5 years (range 0.2-9 years). Survival analysis using the log-rank method revealed that there was a significant difference in survival between ypT4 disease and ypT3 disease (P= 0.003), but no difference between ypT0, ypT1, ypT2, and ypT3 categories irrespective of TNM edition used. Survival probability was significantly different between ypN0 and ypN1 (P= 0.001 for TNM 6th and 7th edition), as well as ypN2 and ypN3 (TNM 7th edition, P= 0.004), but not between ypN1 and ypN2 (TNM 7th edition, P= 0.89). Neither the TNM 6th nor 7th edition T staging provides accurate survival probability stratification. However, the advantage of the 7th edition is the introduction of a third tier in survival stratification for patients with nodal involvement.

Prognostic implications of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer after neo-adjuvant therapy: a single center experience

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study is to explore the prognostic implications of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer patients after neo-adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified esophageal cancer patients with locoregional disease who received neo-adjuvant therapy and surgery. Patients were grouped based on the number of nodes resected, pathological lymph node status, and percentage of positive nodes. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Log-rank test was used to compare survival between groups.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients formed the study group. Patients with ≥ 18 nodes resected had a significantly longer median OS than those with <18 nodes resected (68.6 vs. 29.6 months; p = 0.014). Lymph node-negative patients had significantly longer median OS (51.4 vs. 27.4 months; p = 0.025) and DFS (45.3 vs. 12.9 months; p = 0.03) when compared to lymph node-positive patients. Patients with a percentage of positive nodes <0.25 had a significantly longer median OS (31.1 vs. 17.8 months; p = 0.015) and DFS (21.7 vs. 8.9 months; p = 0.021) than patients with ≥ 0.25% positive.

CONCLUSION

Extent of lymphadenectomy, percentage of positive nodes, and pathological lymph node status are significant prognostic markers in patients who undergo esophagectomy after neo-adjuvant therapy.

The prognostic value of clinical and pathologic factors in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a mayo cohort of 796 patients with extended follow-up after surgical resection

OBJECTIVE

To identify and describe clinicopathologic prognostic factors in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection with curative intent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 796 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric cardia who underwent complete tumor resection at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 1997. We reviewed individual patient medical records and abstracted demographic, pathologic, perioperative, and cancer outcome data. Median follow-up for vital status and disease recurrence was 12.8 and 5.8 years, respectively.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed the following factors to be statistically associated with worse 5-year disease-specific survival: higher N and T status, higher tumor grade, age older than 76 years, and the presence of extracapsular lymph node extension and signet ring cells. The following factors remained significantly linked with worse 5-year disease-specific survival on multivariate analysis: higher N and T status, grade, and age and the absence of preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Anatomic location of tumor was not associated with differential prognosis. Lymph node metastases were found in 25 (27%) of 93 T1b tumors, 397 (85%) of 468 T3 tumors, and 22 (67%) of 33 T4a tumors. Disease-specific survival was better in T3-4N0 than in T1bN1-3 carcinomas (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.89, adjusted for grade and age; P=.02).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm the importance of T and N status and tumor grade and suggest that age may affect prognosis. In addition, we show that a significant proportion of superficial esophageal adenocarcinomas exhibit regional metastases and have worse prognosis than more invasive nonmetastatic tumors.

A phase II study of perioperative concurrent chemotherapy, gefitinib, and hyperfractionated radiation followed by maintenance gefitinib in locoregionally advanced esophagus and gastroesophageal junction cancer

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locoregionally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer produces high locoregional control rates but suboptimal distant metastatic control (DMC) and overall survival. This phase II study added gefitinib (G) to our previously tested CCRT regimen in an effort to improve these outcomes.

METHODS

Eligibility required T3, N1, or M1a esophageal or gastroesophageal junction squamous cell or adenocarcinoma staged by esophageal ultrasound and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Four-day continuous intravenous infusions of cisplatin (20 mg/m/d) and fluorouracil (1000 mg/m/d) began on day 1 of preoperative radiation (30 Gy and 1.5 Gy bid). Surgery followed in 4 to 6 weeks, and an identical course of CCRT 6 to 10 weeks postoperatively. G 250 mg/d was given with preoperative CCRT for 4 weeks and restarted with postoperative therapy for 2 years. Results were retrospectively compared with our historical series of 93 patients given CCRT without G.

RESULTS

Between April 2003 and July 2006, 80 patients were enrolled. Patient and tumor characteristics were similar to our historical series. G did not increase toxicity except for development of rash in 42 (53%) and diarrhea in 44 (55%) 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimates (G versus non-G treated patients) included: overall survival (42% versus 28%, p = 0.06), DMC (40% versus 32%, p = 0.33), and locoregional control (76% versus 77%, p = 0.74). Intolerance for G maintenance occurred in 48% of patients. Patients who experienced G related diarrhea appeared to have improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although G did not worsen CCRT toxicity, maintenance therapy proved difficult. This contemporary cohort of patients enjoyed superior survival, which does not solely reflect a decrease in DMC and merits further investigation.

[Neoadjuvant therapy of adenocarcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Status of radiotherapy]

Radiotherapy in combination with simultaneous chemotherapy can improve survival of advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. The extent of histopathological tumor regression achieved by the therapy is a relevant prognostic factor for this tumor entity. Response evaluation after radiochemotherapy of esophageal carcinoma will rely more and more on molecular factors and will allow individualization of the therapy. New combinations with taxanes and irinotecan as well as EGF receptor antagonists need to be evaluated in phase III trials. Postoperative chemoradiation and perioperative chemotherapy are evaluated in gastric adenocarcinomas and show a survival advantage. Surgery techniques used in theses trials are not recommended in current clinical guidelines.

Multimodality treatment with intensity modulated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer

The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility and report the outcome of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated with preoperative or definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Between 2003 and 2007, 30 patients with non-cervical esophageal cancer received concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT at Stanford University. Eighteen patients were planned for definitive CRT and 12 were planned for preoperative CRT. All patients had computed tomography-based treatment planning and received IMRT. The median dose delivered was 50.4 Gy. Patients planned for preoperative CRT underwent surgery 4-13 weeks (median 8.3 weeks) following completion of CRT. Median follow-up of surviving patients from start of RT was 24.2 months (range 8.2-38.3 months). The majority of tumors were adenocarcinomas (67%) and poorly differentiated (57%). Tumor location was 7% upper, 20% mid, 47% lower, and 27% gastroesophageal junction. Actuarial 2-year local-regional control (LRC) was 64%. High tumor grade was an adverse prognostic factor for LRC and overall survival (OS) (P= 0.015 and 0.012, respectively). The 2-year LRC was 83% vs. 51% for patients treated preoperatively vs. definitively (P= 0.32). The 2-year disease-free and OS were 38% and 56%, respectively. Twelve patients (40%) required feeding tube placement, and the average weight loss from baseline was 4.8%. Twelve (40%) patients experienced grade 3+ acute complications and one patient died of complications following feeding tube placement. Three patients (10%) required a treatment break. Eight patients (27%) experienced grade 3 late complications. No grade 4 complications were seen. IMRT was effective and well tolerated. Disease recurrence remains a challenge and further investigation with dose escalation to improve LRC and OS is warranted.

Metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) overexpression is closely associated with shorter disease-free interval after complete resection of histologically node-negative esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the expression of metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) and its relationship to the disease-free interval after resection of pathologic N0 (pN0) esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC).

METHODS

The subjects were 90 patients who successfully underwent complete resection of pN0 ESCC between May 2001 and May 2003. Immunohistochemical staining for MTA1 protein was performed using the avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method. Log-rank test was performed to compare the disease-free interval, and Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed to judge independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Metastasis-associated protein 1 overexpression was detected in 40 esophageal cancer tissues. Disease-free interval was significantly associated with MTA1 protein overexpression (p = 0.015). The overall 5-year survival rate was 45.6%, the 5-year survival rate of patients with MTA1 protein overexpression was significantly lower than that of those without overexpression (25.0 versus 62.0%; p < 0.001). The results of multivariate analysis confirmed that T status and MTA1 protein overexpression were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastasis-associated protein 1 overexpression was detected in pN0 ESCC and was significantly correlated with shorter disease-free interval. T status and MTA1 protein overexpression were both independent prognostic factors. These findings suggested MTA1 might be a predictor of relapsing phenotype and a prognostic factor in esophageal cancer.

Survival in lymph node negative adenocarcinoma of the esophagus after R0 resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy: evidence for downstaging of N status

BACKGROUND

After esophagectomy, many patients who received neoadjuvant therapy have no evidence of lymph node involvement (N0 disease). Whether lymph nodes were initially involved and eradicated by the neoadjuvant therapy (down-staged) or if the nodes were never involved is a subject of debate. To address this issue, we compared clinical outcomes in N0 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy with outcomes in patients treated with surgery alone.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed records of 100 consecutive patients who underwent R0 esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma with pathologic N0 status. Seventy-five patients were treated by operation alone and 25 received neoadjuvant therapy. Tumor characteristics including length, depth, lymphovascular invasion, and degree of differentiation were compared and longterm survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis at a median of 46 months (interquartile range 26 to 77 months).

RESULTS

Tumor characteristics were similar between groups. Recurrence was more common in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy compared with those treated with surgery alone (10 of 25 versus 10 of 75, p=0.0063). Patients with N0 disease after neoadjuvant therapy had a significantly worse survival than patients treated by surgery alone (49% versus 85%, p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Although neoadjuvant therapy may eradicate lymph node metastases, it does not result in the same outcomes as those achieved in patients with N0 disease treated with surgery alone. The poor clinical outcomes observed in N0 patients after neoadjuvant therapy suggest that they initially had node involvement and were downstaged by eradication of lymph node disease.

Multimodality Treatment for Esophageal Malignancy: The Roles of Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy

The best curative treatment for esophageal malignancy remains controversial. In 2003, we presented our institution's experience with 124 patients treated from 1990 to 2001. Here we update that experience with an additional 6 years’ data. A total of 221 patients underwent surgical resection from 1990 to 2007; 128 had up-front surgery, 88 underwent surgery after neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy (NARCS), and five underwent surgery after neoadjuvant, single-agent therapy Principle outcomes of interest were 30-day and in-hospital mortality as well 3- and 5-year survival rates. Overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 38 and 33 per cent. NARCS achieved complete pathologic result in 32 per cent of patients with corresponding 3- and 5-year survival rates of 58 and 53 per cent. The 3- and 5-year survival rates for all patients undergoing NARCS were 36 and 31 per cent versus 24 and 18 per cent for patients with up-front surgery for anything over Stage I disease ( P = 0.01). The 3- and 5-year survival rates for patients with up-front resection of Stage I disease were 78 and 70 per cent. Overall, 30-day and in-hospital mortalities were 1.8 and 2.3 per cent. Since January 1, 2000, hospital mortality has been less than 0.8 per cent. We prefer NARCS for malignancy of the esophagus, except in those patients with high-grade dysplasia (carcinoma in situ), suspected Stage I disease, poor performance status, or urgent/emergent circumstances.

Who profits from neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from locally advanced esophageal carcinoma are generally treated using multimodal therapies. This prospective, non-randomized trial was performed to evaluate the survival benefit of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy prior to surgery in comparison with surgery only.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Histopathological outcomes and survival were compared between 61 patients who underwent neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and 64 comparable control patients who had been under-staged. After neoadjuvant therapy, tumor regression was assessed using the method described by Mandard in 1994. Survival curves for the two groups were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Median and 3-year recurrence-free survival for the entire group were 26 months and 39.7%, respectively. The median and 3-year overall survival reached 34 months and 48.1%. Patients who showed complete response to neoadjuvant therapy had significantly improved survival (35 months) compared to patients with residual tumor cells (28 months), patients with tumors unresponsive to radiochemotherapy (22 months), or patients who received surgery only (control group, 29 months). Patients with nodal-negative carcinomas showed significantly longer survival after surgery only and after neoadjuvant therapy compared to patients with lymph node-positive cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete response after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is associated with significantly improved survival. Negative nodal status is a major determinant of outcomes following primary operation or neoadjuvant treatment.

Long-term results of a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal neoplasm

BACKGROUND

Effective systemic therapy is considered essential to improve the outcome for patients with surgically resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. We report the long-term results of our phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by esophagectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy for potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients were staged with computed tomography scan (n = 70), endoscopic ultrasonography (n = 63), and laparoscopy with or without thoracoscopy (n = 70). The pretreatment stages were T2N0 (n = 1), T2N1 (n = 15), T3N0 (n = 13), and T3N1 (n = 41). Chemotherapy consisted of 2 or 3 cycles of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and paclitaxel followed by esophagectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were monitored for recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were enrolled (66 adenocarcinoma, 4 squamous cell carcinoma; 64 men and 6 women; median age, 60 years). Esophagectomy was performed in 63 patients. Operative mortality was 0%. The median overall survival of the entire group was 27.4 months. Seventeen patients were alive at a median follow-up of 62.8 months (range, 39.1 to 142). Fourteen patients were alive without recurrence at a median follow-up of 79 months (range, 39 to 138). Nodal status was an important predictor of overall survival. Patients who were downstaged experienced a significantly improved median survival of 63.4 months versus 21.5 months and overall survival (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study for esophageal carcinoma demonstrates encouraging long-term results. In particular, downstaging of the tumor with preoperative chemotherapy is predictive of better long-term outcome. Our results support the role for perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer.

Lymphovascular invasion as a tool to further subclassify T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and/or lymph node metastases (LNM) adversely influence the overall survival (OS) of patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although endoscopic therapy may be adequate for patients with T1a cancer, patients with T1b cancer require esophagectomy/lymphadenectomy. The authors hypothesized that LVI status would subclassify T1b cancers and facilitate new therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

Ninety-nine consecutive patients with T1 adenocarcinoma were analyzed after they underwent esophagectomy/lymphadenectomy. LNM was assessed in all patients, and LVI was assessed in 89 patients. OS was correlated with pathologic cancer stage in association with LVI and LNM.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rate for patients with T1a tumors (88%) was superior to that for patients with T1b tumors (62%; P = .001). The 5-year OS rate for patients who had cancers without LVI (85%) was superior to the rate for patients who had cancers with LVI (36%; P = .0001). It is noteworthy that, for cancers without LVI, the 5-year OS rate for patients with T1b tumors (77%) was similar to the rate for patients with T1a tumors (90%; P = .08), but it was superior to the rate for patients with T1b tumors that had LVI (27%; P = .006). The presence of LVI and/or LNM resulted in worse 5-year OS (< or =37%) compared with the lack of LVI and/or LNM (88%; P < .001). The rate of LNM for patients who had T1b tumors without LVI still was 19%, and the relapse rate was 16%.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results demonstrated that LVI distinguishes the biologic behavior of early esophageal cancer, and patients who have T1b cancer without LVI have a clinical biology similar to that of patients with T1a cancer. If LNM before surgery can be diagnosed with high sensitivity by better endoscopic techniques and/or molecular biomarkers, then a new therapeutic paradigm for T1b cancers could emerge. Further research is needed on patients with T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Lymph node micrometastasis: a predictor of early tumor relapse after complete resection of histologically node-negative esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence of lymph node micrometastasis (LNMM) on the basis of the detection of MUC1 mRNA, and assess the impact of these micrometastases on disease-free interval after resection of pathologic N0 (pN0) esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC).

METHODS

The subjects were 93 patients who underwent complete resection of pN0 ESCC at our department between January 1999 and January 2001. All lymph nodes (426 stations) obtained from these patients were reevaluated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to detect MUC1 mRNA. The diagnosis of LNMM was based on the detection of MUC1 mRNA. A log-rank test was performed to compare the disease-free interval, and Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Micrometastasis was detected in 40 lymph node stations (9.4%) from 32 patients (34.4%). Disease-free interval was significantly associated with LNMM (P = 0.0138). The 5-year survival rate of patients with LNMM was significantly lower than that of those without LNMM (P = 0.004). The results of multivariate analysis confirmed that T status and LNMM were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of LNMM in patients with pN0 ESCC was 34.4% (32/93). Thus, LNMM was significantly associated with the disease-free interval. T status and LNMM were both independent prognostic factors.

Reduction rate of lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy

Tumor regression is used widely as a measure of tumor response following radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). In cases of esophageal cancer, a different pattern of tumor shrinkage is often observed between primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs). Regression of MLNs surrounded by normal tissue may be a more direct measure of the response to CRT than regression of a primary tumor as exfoliative mechanical clearance does not participate in shrinkage of MLNs. In this study we evaluated the significance of the reduction rate (RR) of MLNs as a prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT. Forty-two patients with marked MLNs were selected from 93 patients with esophageal carcinoma who had received neoadjuvant CRT. The RRs of the primary tumor and the MLNs were calculated from computed tomography scans. In 20 patients, surgical resection was carried out following CRT. Univariate analysis was used to determine which of the following variables were related to survival: size of the primary tumor and MLNs; RRs of both lesions; degree of lymph node (LN) metastasis; clinical stage; and surgical resection. Multivariate analysis was then performed to assess the prognostic relevance of each variable. The primary tumor was larger than the MLNs in 69% of patients before CRT and in 40% of patients after CRT. In 79% of the patients, the RR of the primary tumor was greater than the RR of the MLNs. The results of the univariate analyses showed that a high RR of the MLNs and surgical resection after CRT were associated with significantly improved survival. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the RR of MLNs had the strongest influence on survival. The RR of LN metastasis should be evaluated as an important prognostic predictor in patients with marked LN metastasis of esophageal cancer treated with CRT.

American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system does not accurately predict survival in patients receiving multimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

In patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, pathologic complete response (pCR), and estimated treatment response are various means used to stratify patients prognostically after surgery. However, none of these methods has been formally evaluated. The purpose of this study was to establish prognostic pathologic variables after CRT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who received CRT before esophagectomy. Data collected included demographics, CRT details, pathologic findings, and survival. Statistical methods included recursive partitioning and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-six patients were appropriate for this analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicates that the current AJCC system poorly distinguishes between stages 0 to IIA (P = .52), IIB to III (P = .87), and IVA to IVB (P = .30). The presence of a pCR conferred improved survival over residual disease (P = .01). Recursive partitioning analysis indicates that involved lymph nodes and metastatic disease are the best predictors of survival and that depth of invasion and degree of treatment response are less predictive.

CONCLUSION

The current AJCC staging system is not a good predictor of survival after CRT. Although patients with a pCR do have improved long-term survival relative to patients with residual disease, this method places too much emphasis on residual depth of invasion and fails to identify patients with residual disease who have good long-term survival. Recursive partitioning analysis more accurately identifies nodal disease and metastatic disease as the most important prognostic variables. Degree of treatment response is less prognostic than nodal involvement.

T2N0M0 esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to develop a treatment algorithm for cT2N0M0 esophageal cancer by determining (1) errors in clinical staging and (2) consequences of overtreatment and undertreatment of incorrectly clinically staged patients.

METHODS

Of 742 clinically staged patients, 61 (8.2%) had cT2N0M0 cancer; 45 underwent surgery alone; 8 underwent surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy; and 8 underwent induction therapy, then surgery. As reference, 31 of 666 patients (4.7%) who underwent surgery first had pT2N0M0 cancer and a 5-year survival of 61% +/- 9.3%. Referent values were calculated from 445 clinically staged patients who underwent surgery first. Unmatched and matched survival comparisons were made using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Only 7 of 53 cT2N0M0 cancers treated with surgery first were pT2N0M0 (13% positive predictive value). Of incorrectly staged cT2N0M0 cancers (46/53), 29 (63%) were overstaged and 17 (37%) were understaged. Most overstaged cancers were pT1 (11 [38%] T1a and 15 [52%] T1b), and most understaged cancers were pN1 (13 [76%]). Matched overstaged patients treated by surgery alone (25/28) had a 5-year survival similar to that of patients with pTNM (69% +/- 9.8% vs 63% +/- 13%, P =.8). Understaged patients did better at 5 years than patients with pTNM if they had postoperative adjuvant therapy, not surgery alone (43% +/- 22% vs 10% +/- 9.5%, P = .17). Induction therapy decreased 5-year survival compared with all other treatment strategies (13% +/- 12% vs 52% +/- 7.4%, P =.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cT2N0M0 cancers should undergo surgery first with lymphadenectomy. Clinically understaged patients should receive postoperative adjuvant therapy. In the unlikely event that patients with cT2N0M0 cancers are found to have an uncommon pT2N0M0 cancer, they will have acceptable survival with surgery alone.

Endoluminal therapy for Barrett's esophagus

This article reviews methods to minimize the complications associated with endoscopic therapy for patients with Barrett's esophagus. To place this discussion in context, the natural history of Barrett's esophagus and the risks associated with progression to dysplasia and invasive carcinoma are reviewed. Operative esophageal resection traditionally is recommended for patients with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia and early carcinoma, and these surgical risks also are reviewed. Finally, all currently approved and commercially available methods for endoscopic ablation and resection of Barrett's disease are categorized according to their application methods of ablation: focal ablation, field ablation, and mucosal resection. The clinical experience with these devices is reviewed with their associated adverse events and complications. Caveats, concerns, and recommendations are discussed to help minimize the complications associated with the use of these important technologies that hold the promise of removing or destroying Barrett's disease to prevent the development of invasive carcinoma.

Impact of preoperative radiochemotherapy on postoperative course and survival in patients with locally advanced squamous cell oesophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) on postoperative complications and survival after surgery for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Postoperative course and survival were compared in 144 patients who had neoadjuvant RCT and 80 control patients who had surgery alone for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (radiological stage T3, N0 or N1, M0).

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in terms of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, age, sex, weight loss, tumour location, presence of lymph node metastasis and surgical approach. Postoperative mortality rates were 6.3 and 9 per cent (P=0.481), with morbidity rates of 40.3 and 41 percent (P=0.887) in the RCT and control group respectively. Complete resection (R0) rates were 74.3 and 48 percent respectively (P<0.001). Significant downstaging was observed in the RCT group (P<0.001), with 16.0 percent of patients having a complete pathological response. Median survival was 29 versus 15 months, and the 5-year survival rate 37 versus 17 percent (P=0.002) in RCT and control groups respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant RCT significantly enhanced R0 resection and survival rates in patients with stage T3 oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, with no increase in postoperative mortality and morbidity rates.

Endoscopic ultrasound classification of esophageal cancer after chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy

Because of its ability to provide high resolution images of the esophageal wall and surrounding structures, Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) is thought to be well suited for prediction of T classification (depth of tumor invasion) and N classification (lymph node status) in patients with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer. EUS is also frequently used for interim classification after neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy). This editorial will focus on the potential goals of EUS in interim classification, its performance in this setting, and the relevance of interim staging.

Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients

BACKGROUND

Surgery, as the mainstay of treatment for localized esophageal cancer, is currently being challenged by the assumed high risk of esophagectomy and the poor longterm survival after resection. Epidemiologic and clinical changes over the past decade indicate that these assumptions should be reevaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the modern outcomes of esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

We studied 263 consecutive patients (215 men, 48 women), who had esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma from 1992 to 2002. Ninety-seven (37%) were stage I, 63 (24%) were stage II, 93 (35%) were stage III, and 10 (4%) were stage IV. Forty-five percent (119 of 263) had curative en bloc resection, 52% (138 of 263) had node involvement, and 18% (48) received neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Seventeen percent (44 of 263) of the patients were identified in a Barrett's surveillance program. The frequency of T1N0 adenocarcinoma increased over the study period (p=0.024). The overall 5-year survival was 46.5%, and for the last 5 years of the study was 50.4%. The overall 5-year survival for stage I was 81%; for stage II, 51%; for stage III, 14%; and for stage IV, 0%. Complications occurred in 61% and there were 12 perioperative deaths (4.5%). Cox proportional hazard analysis identified tumor stage and type of resection as independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of patients undergoing esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma survive >or=5 years. Improvements in survival are associated with increased detection of early stage disease, and a liberal use of en bloc resection. Nonsurgical treatments should be compared with these contemporary outcomes measures.

Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification

OBJECTIVE

We sought to quantitatively and objectively evaluate histomorphologic tumor regression and establish a relevant prognostic regression classification system for esophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-five consecutive patients with localized esophageal cancers (cT2-4, Nx, M0) received standardized neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, 36 Gy). Seventy-four (87%) patients were resected by transthoracic en bloc esophagectomy and 2-field lymphadenectomy. The entire tumor beds of the resected specimens were evaluated histomorphologically, and regression was categorized into grades I to IV based on the percentage of vital residual tumor cells (VRTCs). A major response was achieved when specimens contained either less than 10% VRTCs (grade III) or a pathologic complete remission (grade IV).

RESULTS

Complete resections (R0) were performed in 66 of 74 (89%) patients with 3-year survival rates of 54% +/- 7.05% for R0-resected cases and 0% for patients with incomplete resections or tumor progression during neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.01). Minor histopathologic response was present in 44 (59.5%) and major histopathologic response in 30 (40.5%) tumors. Significantly different 3-year survival rates (38.8% +/- 8.1% for minor versus 70.7 +/- 10.1% for major response) were observed. Univariate survival analysis identified histomorphologic tumor regression (P < 0.004) and lymph node category (P < 0.01) as significant prognostic factors. Pathologic T category (P < 0.08), histologic type (P = 0.15), or grading (P = 0.33) had no significant impact on survival. Cox regression analysis identified dichotomized regression grades (minor and major histomorphologic regression, P < 0.028) and lymph node status (ypN0 and ypN1, P < 0.036) as significant independent prognostic parameters. A 2-parameter regression classification system that includes histomorphologic regression (major versus minor) and nodal status (ypN0 versus ypN1) was established (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node status (ypN) were significant prognostic parameters for patients with complete resections (R0) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer. A regression classification based on 2 parameters could lead to improved objective evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment protocols, accuracy of staging and restaging modalities, and molecular response prediction.

The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with esophageal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are restaged with computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), and integrated positron emission computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), and the results affect treatment.

METHODS

This is a prospective trial on a consecutive series of patients who had initial chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT scan; EUS-FNA; and fluoro-2-deoxy- d -glucose (FDG)-integrated PET/CT; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; repeat staging tests; pathologic staging; and, if appropriate, resection with lymphadenectomy. The primary objective was to assess the accuracy of these 3 tests in restaging patients after neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

There were 48 patients (41 men), and 41 underwent Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. The accuracy of each test for distinguishing pathologic T4 from T1 to T3 disease is 76%, 80%, and 80% for CT scan, EUS-FNA and FDG-PET/CT, respectively. The accuracy for nodal disease was 78%, 78%, and 93% for CT scan, EUS-FNA and FDG-PET/CT, respectively ( P = .04). FDG-PET/CT correctly identified M1b disease in 4 patients, falsely suggested it in 4 patients, and missed it in 2 patients, whereas for CT, it was 3, 3, and 3 patients. Fifteen (31%) patients were complete responders, and FDG-PET/CT accurately predicted complete response in 89% compared with 67% for EUS-FNA ( P = .045) and 71% for CT ( P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET/CT is more accurate than EUS-FNA and CT scan for predicting nodal status and complete responders after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer. FDG-PET/CT and CT alone provide targets for biopsy, but results are often falsely positive.

A Retrospective Analysis of Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy Followed by Surgery or Surgery Alone

BACKGROUND

We conducted an institutional review of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who had complete pretreatment and surgical staging to identify variables predictive of outcome.

METHODS

From 1993 through 2002, 286 patients presented for surgical therapy of esophageal cancer. Of these, 176 patients met criteria for review including pretreatment endoscopic ultrasound stages IIA through IVA and a transthoracic surgical approach with "two-field" lymph node dissection. This cohort was primarily male (84.7%, n = 149) with adenocarcinoma (88.6%, n = 156), and 101 patients (57.3%) demonstrated endoscopic ultrasound stage III or IVA.

RESULTS

Eighty-five (48.3%) patients presented to surgery after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, and 91 (51.7%) underwent surgery alone. Both groups were well matched with respect to comorbidities and pretreatment stage. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward increased operative mortality and nonfatal morbidity. The overall median survival was 16.8 months, and there was no survival difference comparing patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery or surgery alone (p = 0.82). The subset of 25 patients (29.4%) demonstrating a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy however had superior survival (median survival = 57.6 months, p < 0.01) as compared with neoadjuvant chemoradiation patients demonstrating partial downstaging (n = 36, 42.3%), no downstaging (n = 24, 28.2%), and surgery alone patients. Multivariate analysis identified a complete pathologic response, endoscopic ultrasound stage, and number of pathologically positive lymph nodes as independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer as the subset of patients who demonstrate a complete pathologic response experienced significantly better survival.

Endoscopic ultrasound errors in esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Previous assessments of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) classification of esophageal cancer are dominated by symptomatic patients with advanced stage disease. Fewer data exist on EUS errors in a cohort balanced between early and advanced disease.

PURPOSE

Assess EUS errors in classification of esophageal cancer in a more balanced cohort, and identify clinical and tumor characteristics associated with EUS errors.

METHODS

A total of 266 patients underwent EUS and esophagectomy without preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Pathologic classification of disease extent: 108 (41%) tumors were confined to the esophageal wall (pTis-pT2, pN0, pM0); 158 (59%) were advanced beyond (pT3-pT4, pN1, or pM1). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify correlates of error in T classification and disease extent using 10 clinical and tumor characteristics (gender, age, dysphagia, weight loss, tumor length, location, traversability, morphology, histopathologic type, and histologic grade).

RESULTS

EUS erroneously predicted pathologic T (pT) in 119 patients (45%). When T classification was dichotomized into tumors whose depth of invasion was not beyond the muscularis propria (pTis-pT2) and those beyond (pT3-pT4), errors occurred in 42 patients (16%). EUS erroneously predicted N classification in 67 patients (25%), and was insensitive to the presence of distant metastases. EUS misclassified disease extent in 40 patients (15%). Logistic regression analysis indicated that weight loss and tumor length were the only clinical and tumor characteristics correlated with EUS errors; more weight loss was associated with decreased odds of misclassification, while the odds of misclassification were four to six times greater for intermediate length tumors than for shorter tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS errors, particularly in predicting pT, are more frequent than previously reported. Weight loss and tumor length are the only clinical and tumor characteristics correlated with EUS errors.

Neoadjuvant therapy for oesophagogastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis after surgery for oesophagogastric cancer remains poor.

METHODS

This review clarifies current indications for neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal and gastric cancer. A systematic literature research and evaluation of data from international cancer meetings were carried out.

RESULTS

Recently published results of large randomized phase III trials underscore the potential value of neoadjuvant treatment for oesophagogastric cancer. However, it remains uncertain which subgroups of patients should routinely undergo preoperative therapy. Metabolic response evaluation during neoadjuvant treatment is a promising tool for the selection of responding patients.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a valid option for locally advanced oesophageal and gastric cancer. In the future, more effective and better tolerated treatment strategies, tailored to the specific tumour characteristics of each individual, should be possible.