The Australian 75+ Health Assessment: could it detect early functional decline better?

Experienced general practitioners' and practice nurses' views on the older-person health assessment forms

Objective Health assessments (HAs) are available annually for community-dwelling older people: the 75+HA for non-Indigenous Australians aged ≥75 years and the 55+IHA for Indigenous Australians aged ≥55 years. Medicare requires general practitioners (GPs) to cover the items within the relevant HA form. This study explored the views of experienced GPs and practice nurses (PNs) towards the older-person HA forms. Methods Thirty-nine experienced GPs and PNs responded to an online questionnaire. Results In this study, experienced GPs and PNs suggested that current items within the 75+HA Medicare-provided guideline form need reviewing, such as those relating to psychological function, medication and exercise and falls. There were also recommendations to consider including items consistently across both the 55+IHA and 75+HA and to include new items, such as personal alarms, loneliness, support networks, spiritual health, musculoskeletal diseases, whether other screening is up to date and future planning. Many parts of the HA were deemed irrelevant or condescending to 'well' older Australians, so should be optional. Healthcare professionals also requested reintroducing conducting the HA at the community-dwelling patient's home. User-friendly integrated forms would improve healthcare professionals' time management and provide better communication with patients and carers, and create greater opportunities for multidisciplinary referral processes, as well as provide linkages to MyAgedCare and myHealthRecord. Conclusion Capturing the views of healthcare professionals towards older-person HA forms generated suggested improvements. The adoption of these suggestions would elicit more holistic health information for older Australians. What is known about the topic? Annual HAs are available for older Australians (75+HAs and 55+IHAs). Medicare requires GPs cover items within their prescribed HA form. The 75+HAs and 55+IHAs allow for the monitoring of health problems specific to community-dwelling older people, which may be difficult to address in the time frames of a standard GP consultation; however, there is very little research on the experiences of health professionals regarding the conditions required to be assessed within the HAs. What does this paper add? This study examined the views of experienced GPs and PNs to identify potential changes to the current procedures. Capturing the views of healthcare professionals towards older-person HA forms generated important suggested improvements, such as reviewing psychological function, medication, exercise and falls items. There were recommendations to include items across both the 55+IHA and 75+HA and new items, such as personal alarms, loneliness, support networks, spiritual health, musculoskeletal diseases assessments, future planning and whether the patient's screening is up to date. What are the implications for practitioners? The experienced GPs and PNs in this study suggested significant additions and revisions to the current HA forms. The incorporation of these suggestions should lead to permanent modifications of the current forms to make them more relevant and appropriate for older Australians, but the challenge for implementation is how these additional items would be funded.

What is learned from an Australian older person health assessment?

Objective To examine what new health information is identified at a patient's most recent 75+HA compared with their standard GP consultations in the prior 24 months. Methods Parameters measured included newly identified chronic conditions, new management for previously diagnosed chronic conditions, medication management, referrals, vaccinations, and positive test results for the monitoring of previously diagnosed chronic conditions. A retrospective patient record study collecting data from two GP clinics in metropolitan and regional Victoria was undertaken. A total of 195 75+HA recipients were included. Results No significant difference was found in the number of new chronic conditions recorded at patients' most recent 75+HA compared with standard GP consultations in the prior 24 months. However, significant differences in the types of conditions were noted, with 75+HAs significantly more likely to record elevated lipids (P<0.001), vitamin D deficiencies (P=0.004), eye/vision-related (P=0.011), diabetes (P=0.019), and hearing conditions (P=0.045) compared with standard GP consultations. Significantly more referrals (P<0.001) and new management for previously diagnosed conditions (P=0.009) occurred at 75+HA than at standard GP consultations. Patients who were receiving their first 75+HA were significantly more likely to receive vaccinations than those receiving a subsequent 75+HA (P=0.022). Conclusion 75+HAs fulfil a role in addressing chronic health problems otherwise overlooked during standard GP consultations. What is known about the topic? Since their introduction in 1999, uptake of 75+HAs has been low. Two studies from 2001 to 2002 have suggested benefits of conducting 75+HAs to identify new health problems. What does this paper add? When compared with standard GP consultations, 75+HAs identify different types of new health problems, including elevated lipids, vitamin D deficiencies, eye/vision-related conditions, diabetes, and hearing conditions. Furthermore, more referrals and new management of previously identified problems occur at 75+HA. What are the implications for practitioners? 75+HAs fulfil a role in identifying and addressing chronic health problems in older patients that may otherwise have been overlooked at standard GP consultations. Suggestions of additions to the 75+HA template are made based on common chronic conditions detected in standard consultations but not included currently within the 75+HA.

Is the Australian 75+ Health Assessment person-centred? A qualitative descriptive study of older people's perceptions

Objective The aim of the present study was to explore the perspectives of older people following their recent participation in a 75+ Health Assessment (75+HA) and interrogate these perspectives using a person-centred lens. Methods A qualitative descriptive study design was used within a larger study funded by the Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute. Nineteen participants from four different general practices in one Australian state described their perceptions of the 75+HA in a face-to-face interview. Data were then analysed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Results The purpose of the 75+HA was not well understood by participants. Participant responses reveal that where, when, who and how a primary health professional conducted the 75+HA affected what older people talked about, the guidance they sought to deal with issues and, in turn, the actioning of issues that were discussed during the 75+HA. Conclusion To enable older people to make informed decisions about and successfully manage their own health and well being, and to choose when to invite others to act on their behalf, primary health professionals need to ask questions in the 75+HA within a person-centred mindset. The 75+HA is an opportunity to ensure older people know why they need support, which ones, and agree to, supports and services they require. What is known about the topic? The Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule includes the 75+HA, developed as a proactive primary care opportunity for general practitioners and practice nurses to identify issues affecting community-dwelling older people's health and well being. The aim of the 75+HA is to consider a broad range of factors that could affect physical, psychological and social functioning, which, in turn, affects overall health, and the capacity of older people to live independently in the community. Underlying the 75+HA is the importance of detecting early functional decline to enable healthy aging. What does this paper add? There is scant, if any, attention in the literature to the views of consumers who have completed a 75+HA, especially with regard to whether this opportunity is conducted with a person-centred mindset. This paper addresses this gap. Even after participating in the 75+HA, most participants were unclear as to the purpose of the assessment, what information had been recorded and what would happen from any concerns identified in the assessment. Comments about the 75+HA included that it did not ask people about their goals and what comprised their functionality to ensure their independent living. What are the implications for practitioners? A person-centred approach requires active collaboration between primary health professionals and older people who are living the process of, and planning for, aging-in-place. Assessments like the 75+HA can assist in identifying whether older people may be experiencing early signs of functional decline, even if older people self-report living without problems in their home. Practitioners need to ask questions of older people and respond to what they say with a person-centred mindset.

General health, wellbeing and oral health of patients older than 75 years attending health assessments

Annual health assessments by general practices for community-dwelling people aged 75 years and over are important for the early intervention and monitoring of chronic health conditions, including oral disease. Uptake of the health assessment to date has been poor, and little is known of the general and oral health profile of patients. Older patients attending health assessments at general practices in South Australia were sampled for this study. Data on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, and patients’ general and oral health, were collected by mailed questionnaire from 459 respondents. By comparison with national estimates, patients attending health assessments fared worse in many of the measures, such as self-rated general health, quality of life and the prevalence of most chronic conditions, as well as their socioeconomic circumstances. Also identified were a high degree of nutritional risk and clear need for oral health treatment, with poor self-rated oral health being three-fold higher than the national age-eligible population. Patients attending health assessments would likely benefit from nutritional screening (by a validated tool) and specific assessment of their oral health and dentition, supported by appropriate referral or intervention.