Growth, body composition and body wrinkle are favourably correlated with reproductive performance in 2-8-year-old Merino sheep

Context Despite the increased economic importance of reproductive rate in Australian Merinos, there have been low genetic improvements in reproductive performance over the past several decades. Genetically improving reproductive traits through direct selection is restricted by low heritability, low selection intensity directly on reproductive traits, high recording costs and lack of accurate maternal pedigrees in the majority of industry breeding programs. However, indirect selection via correlated traits may be useful as a supplement to direct selection or even on its own where reproduction records are not collected. Aims The aims of the present study were to determine whether various production and quality traits have the potential to be used as indirect selection criteria for genetically improving lifetime reproductive rate, but also whether their selection could be detrimental to reproduction via unfavourable correlations. Methods Reproductive traits studied included pregnancy rate (ewes scanned pregnant per ewe joined), fetal number (number of fetuses scanned per ewe joined), number of lambs born (per ewe joined), number of lambs weaned (per ewe joined) and ewe rearing ability (number of lambs weaned per fetuses scanned). Using data from the SA Selection Demonstration Flocks project (1997–2005), reproductive traits were modelled against various visual and production traits to estimate correlations. Key results Favourable genetic correlations with reproductive traits were estimated with adult ewe bodyweight (0.37–0.50), hogget eye muscle depth (HEMD, 0.40–0.57), fat depth (HFAT, 0.27–0.48) and hogget body (HBWS) and neck wrinkle scores (–0.13 to –0.50). However, the estimates for genetic correlations with hogget eye muscle depth and fat depth were lower when bodyweight was fitted as a covariate, being 0.11–0.35 and 0.17–0.32 respectively. Genetic correlations with ewe rearing ability were generally unfavourable (except those with hogget body and neck wrinkle scores, which were –0.24 and –0.15 respectively), but were either negligible (adult ewe bodyweight, hogget eye muscle depth, fibre diameter and fleece weight) or low in magnitude(fat depth). Unfavourable genetic correlations were observed between fibre diameter and reproductive traits (0.13–0.33). Fleece weight had negligible genetic correlations with all reproductive traits studied (–0.08 to 0.10). Predictions of response to index selection using indirect criteria of one or more of yearling weight, HBWS, HEMD and HFAT measurements projected substantial genetic gains in the number of lambs weaned per ewe joined (NLW). Without reproduction records on the dams of candidates for selection, indirect selection using all four indirect criteria (yearling weight, HBWS, HEMD and HFAT) was predicted to achieve 112–168% of the genetic gains of direct selection for NLW. When all indirect and direct criteria for NLW are combined as part of index selection, even larger gains for NLW are predicted (from 164–215% of direct NLW genetic gains). Conclusions Findings from the present study suggest that bodyweight, HEMD and HFAT and HBWS could be potentially beneficial as indirect selection criteria for lifetime reproductive rate. Selection for reduced fibre diameter is potentially detrimental to reproductive performance; however, selection for improved fleece weight is unlikely to have any effect on genetic gain for reproductive traits. Implications Use of indirect selection for lifetime reproductive could allow for genetic gain when either used with or without the direct selection criteria of reproduction records.

Repeatability and heritability of fertility in hill sheep

Lambing records of 3,500 Scottish Blackface ewes and 2,000 Welsh Mountain ewes were used for a study of repeatability of ewe fertility and litter size. The repeatability of litter size at birth (calculated as an intra-ewe correlation) was higher in both flocks (0.19 and 0.24 for Blackface and Welsh ewes respectively) than that for barrenness (0.09 and 0.08) or for number of lambs born per mating (0.07 and 0.10). Repeatability of the corresponding traits at weaning were generally about half these values.

About two-thirds of the ewes had sires recorded and were used for a heritability analysis. The heritability of litter size at birth in both flocks was higher (0.14 and 0.16 for Blackface and Welsh respectively) than either the heritability of barrenness (−0.03 and 0.03) or of numbers of lambs born per mating (−0.01 and 0.07).

It was concluded that the greatest improvement in numbers of lambs weaned would be obtained by selection on litter size at birth. There would be correlated changes in live-weight (genetic correlations of 0.44 and 0.78 for Blackface and Welsh respectively) but not in fleece weight (genetic correlations of 0.09 and −0.13).

Analysis of production records from a lowland sheep flock 3. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for reproductive performance

Phenotypic and genetic parameters for reproductive performance in a flock of Clun Forest ewes have been estimated. Average litter size (ALS) appeared to be more repeatable than the number of lambs born per ewe mated and present at lambing (NLBEM), and the estimates obtained by regression (0·15 and 0·14) were slightly higher than those from the analyses of variance (0·12 and 0·09). The repeatability of barrenness was very low (0·05). It was concluded that little scope existed for the improvement of reproductive performance from a regular policy of culling.

Estimates of heritability by analysis of variance and a method for all-or-none traits were 0·12 and 0·11 for ALS, and 0·15 and 0·10 for NLBEM, whereas barrenness was less heritable (0·07). An estimate of 016 was found for the heritability of ALS performance over two years. The phenotypic correlation between body weight and reproductive performance were positive yet small (ALS:+0·16; NLBEM:+0·10), while at the genetic level ALS was more strongly related to body weight (+0·21) than NLBEM (-0·04). The genetic regressions indicated that an increase of 5 lambs per 100 ewes lambing would accompany genetic gain of 5 kg in ewe body weight, while an increase of 1 lamb per ewe lambing would lead to a correlated response in body weight of 5 kg.

Selection for ALS on the basis of dams' performance, within the flock studied, would be expected to yield a rate of progress of 2% per annum.

Phenotypic and genetic parameters of productivity in Galway ewes

Records from a selection flock of Galway ewes collected over a 6-yr period (1966 to 1971) were used to obtain estimates of the phenotypic and genetic parameters of ewe productivity. The number of lambs born (NLB) and weaned (NLW), the weight of lamb weaned (WLW), ewe body weight (EBW) and greasy fleece weight (GFL) were used as measures of productivity, mean values being 1·25, 0·88, 25·6 kg, 52·8 kg and 2·8 kg, respectively. Each ewe's annual performance was adjusted to a 4-yr-old ewe equivalent and expressed as a deviation from the appropriate flock × year subgroup mean; these deviations were combined into a single index value for each ewe for NLB, NLW and WLW. Records for 975 individual ewes representing 84 sires which had three or more progeny were used in a half sib analysis of variance.

Estimates of heritability were 0·18, 0·24 and 0·25 for NLB, NLW and WLW based on index record and 0·07, 0·16 and 0·30 respectively for 2-yr-old ewes. Heritability estimates of EBW and GFL were 0·73 and 0·52 respectively. The genetic correlations between EBW and NLB2, NLW2, WLW2 and GFL were 0·85, 0·42, 0·62 and 0·53 respectively; those between EBW and index records were slightly negative. Phenotypic correlations were generally lower than the corresponding genetic ones.

Ewes born as multiples were more productive than singles. They were 1·8 kg lighter (P < 0·01) at 18 mo and weaned 2·5 kg more lamb (P < 0·05) at 2 yr of age. The repeatability of NLB ranged from 0 to 0·2.

Composite trait selection to improve reproduction and ewe productivity: a review

Reproduction and ewe productivity are complex composite traits that are influenced by several component traits. Genetic improvement by selection for an individual component trait may not always be advantageous because adverse or neutral genetic relationships can exist among the component traits. Selection for an overall composite trait of ewe productivity, defined as litter weight weaned per ewe joined, can result in a balanced biological composite trait with favourable responses in component traits including fertility, number of lambs born, lamb survival, lactation and lamb growth. Selection for litter weight weaned may also overcome adverse genetic relationships among reproductive component traits. This review examines the genetic responses of selecting directly for litter weight weaned, compared with selection responses for one or more of its component traits. It is concluded that selection to improve reproductive efficiency and ewe productivity, under most production and environmental systems, would benefit from selection for a composite trait such as litter weight weaned, rather than for a single component trait.

Resource-allocation rules and the heritability of traits

I hypothesize that the heritability of a trait, and thus its evolutionary responsiveness to natural selection, should be positively related to the priority with which resources are allocated to that trait. Low-priority traits are more sensitive to environmental effects, thus reducing the relative effect of genetic differences on phenotypic variation of these traits. This allocation-priority hypothesis explains why life-history traits, such as those involving growth and reproduction, generally have lower heritabilities than higher-priority morphological and physiological traits related to body maintenance. This hypothesis also shows how an organism-centered approach, as used in physiological ecology, can contribute to the development of evolutionary theory.

Litter size, ovulation rate and prenatal survival in relation to ewe body weight: genetics review

Lamb's birth weight and litter weight were found to be related to ewe weight. Deviations from generally applicable formulae indicated an interaction between the genotype of the lamb and the maternal environment, as suggested in egg transfer experiments. Land's (1977) hypothesis on the spare conceptus capacity, when comparing large and small breeds within a species, with respect to prolificacy, was more applicable to genetically homogeneous groups within a breed than between breeds and lines within a breed. A hypothesis suggests that variation in the within breed genetic correlation between ewe weight and prolificacy may largely depend on the relative uniformity of selection criteria applied. It can further be argued whether selection based on body weight or growth rate, compared to selection on reproductive performance, could be important sources of within breed as well as among breed variations in the genetic correlation estimates between ewe weight and prolificacy. The dynamics of the genetic correlation between ewe weight and prolificacy has an effect of long-term selection for body weight, growth rate and reproduction traits. This leads to the problem of the relative incompatibility of selection of an association between body proportions with reproductive traits, especially in meat type breeds. There is a parallellism or antagonism in the genetic correlations between ewe weight and prolificacy as compared to those between ewe weight and other reproduction traits. The within breed relationship between ewe weight and ovulation rate was found to be positive in some breeds. The effects of body condition at mating were contradictory. Genotypexenvironment interactions were observed in certain cases. Among most breeds, differences in ewe weight were unrelated to differences in ovulation rate. There were no relationships between ewe weight and prenatal survival within breeds or in lines within a breed. However, there exists a differential relationship between ovulation rates and prenatal survival rates in relation to ewe weight, depending on the selection criteria applied. A clearcut relationship between litter weight components and ewe weight cannot be generalized but may vary among differentially selected breeds and lines within them. This is a final, unifying and unresolved question.