Offering maternal composite ewes higher levels of nutrition from mid-pregnancy to lambing results in predictable increases in birthweight, survival and weaning weight of their lambs

Management of nutrition during pregnancy for maternal composite ewes has the potential to improve lamb production and survival in prime lamb production systems but existing condition score (CS) guidelines developed for Merinos may not be appropriate for the optimum production of maternal ewes. To address this, three replicated experiments were conducted at two research sites in Victoria and one in Western Australia. Ewes (781–800 per site) were allocated to four CS treatments following pregnancy scanning (~Day 50) and differentially fed to reach approximate targets of CS 2.4, 2.8, 3.2 and 3.6 by lambing. Single and multiple bearing ewes grazed together, and nutritional treatments were applied until the end of lambing after which ewes and lambs were aggregated into management groups containing all treatments. At lambing, maternal ewe liveweight had a range between treatments of 13.7–19.1 kg (average 16.4 kg) and CS varied by 1.1–1.5 of a CS (average 1.24). Across site analysis indicated that lamb birthweight and weaning weight increased with application of higher CS treatments (P < 0.001). There was also an improvement in survival of multiple born lambs with increasing CS at lambing (P < 0.001). Birthweight was significantly related to survival (P < 0.001) at all sites with no significant effect of birth type on lamb survival. Changes in birthweight and weaning weight could be predicted from ewe joining liveweight, ewe liveweight change to Day 90 and ewe liveweight change Day 90 to lambing. The coefficients derived for each of these effects were similar to those found in previous experiments examining Merino and crossbred Border Leicester Merino ewes. The optimum CS targets for multiple bearing maternal composite ewes may be higher than the industry recommended target for Merino ewes based on advantages in lamb survival and weaning weight.

Intensive sheep and beef production from pasture--a New Zealand perspective of concerns, opportunities and challenges

This paper details current production trends for sheep and beef cattle production in New Zealand and gives some insight into the opportunities for improvement based on New Zealand research at Massey University. Further it outlines some of the challenges the industries face in the near future. The New Zealand climate favours pasture growth and this is the key to sheep and beef cattle production with over 95% of the diet being grazed pasture or crop. Exports are the focus of the industry with 95% of sheep meat and wool, and 80% of beef exported. There have been considerable gains in production over the last 20 years but there still remains a huge opportunity for further intensification through breeding sheep at an earlier age, increasing the weight of lambs weaned per ewe per year and improving beef production systems. These improvements need to occur within a framework of minimal environmental footprint and produce products that are in demand in the high end international markets.

Effects of twin-bearing ewe nutritional treatments on ewe and lamb performance to weaning

Nutrition of the ewe at various stages of pregnancy is known to affect ewe and offspring performance. However, little is known regarding the potential interactions among differing maternal nutrition regimens in early and mid–late pregnancy. The objective of the present study was to examine the effects and potential interactions of three pastoral nutritional treatments from Day 21 of pregnancy (P21) to P50 (Sub-maintenanceP21–50 (total liveweight change achieved, SMP21-50, –0.15 ± 0.02 kg/day) v. MaintenanceP21–50 (MP21-50,–0.02 ± 0.02 kg/day) v. Ad libitumP21–50 (AdP21-50,0.15 ± 0.02 kg/day) and two pastoral nutritional treatments from P50 to P139 [MaintenanceP50–139 (designed to match change in conceptus mass, total liveweight change achieved, 0.19 ± 0.01 kg/day) v. Ad libitumP50–139 (0.26 ± 0.01 kg/day)] on 382 twin-bearing ewes and their offspring until 91 days after the mid-point of lambing (L91). Ewe liveweight and condition scores in pregnancy and lactation, and lamb liveweights, indices of colostrum uptake and survival were recorded. There were no interactions between nutritional periods for lamb liveweight, apparent colostrum intake and survival, and ewe liveweight, condition score and total weight of lamb per ewe at the end of the study. At L91, ewe nutritional treatment during P21–50 or P50–139 had no effect on either ewe liveweight or body condition score. Ewe nutritional treatment during P21–50 had no effect on lamb birthweight. Lambs born to AdP50–139 ewes were lighter (P < 0.05) than those born to MP50–139 ewes (5.32 ± 0.04 v. 5.48 ± 0.04 kg, respectively). Ewe nutritional treatment during P21–50 or P50–139 had no (P > 0.05) effect on indices of colostrum uptake in lambs at 24–36 h of age. At L91, ewe nutritional treatment during P21–50 or P50–139 had no effect on lamb liveweight, survival or total weight of lamb per ewe. In conclusion, although considerable differences in ewe liveweight were observed during pregnancy, the nutritional treatments had no effect on the production parameters measured at the end of the study. These results indicate, first, that farmers can use early pregnancy as a period to control ewe nutrition when ewes are offered at least pregnancy maintenance levels of nutrition in the mid–late pregnancy period and, second, that there is no advantage from offering twin-bearing ewes a level of nutrition above their pregnancy maintenance requirements in mid–late pregnancy.

Effect of offering concentrate supplement in late pregnancy, under conditions of unrestricted herbage, on the performance of multiple-bearing ewes and their lambs to weaning

The aim of the present study was to determine if offering ewes a commercial concentrate supplement under conditions of unrestricted perennial ryegrass–white clover herbage availability would increase newborn lamb heat production, colostrum intake and subsequent liveweight. Forty seven twin- and 43 triplet-bearing Romney composite ewes (1/2 Romney, 1/4 Finn, 1/4 Texel) were randomly allocated to either non-concentrate or concentrate treatment groups (twin non-concentrate, n = 24; twin concentrate, n = 23; triplet non-concentrate, n = 22; triplet concentrate, n = 21) from Day 79 of pregnancy. Concentrate-fed ewes were offered an increasing amount of concentrate sheep pellets from Day 79 until Day 90 of pregnancy, at which stage ewes were offered 400 g/day per ewe until they lambed. Pre- and post-grazing herbage masses did not differ (P > 0.05) between non-concentrate (2162 ± 54 and 1704 ± 47 kg DM/ha) and concentrate (2135 ± 49 and 1771 ± 42 kg DM/ha) ewes. Ewe nutritional treatment had no effect (P > 0.05) on ewe liveweight, body condition score, β-hydroxybutyate or non-esterified fatty acid concentrations in late pregnancy. Offering concentrates increased (P < 0.05) the birthweight of triplet-born lambs (4.4 ± 0.1 v. 3.9 ± 0.1 kg for those born to concentrate and non-concentrate ewes, respectively) but had the opposite effect on twins (4.8 ± 0.1 v. 5.2 ± 0.1 kg, respectively). There was no difference (P > 0.05) in maximal heat production, total heat production, rate to reach maximal heat production, and IgG concentrations at 24–36 h of age or liveweight and survival of lambs born to ewes offered concentrates or not. Twin-born lambs had greater (P < 0.05) liveweight and total heat production and had higher (P < 0.05) survival rates than triplet-born lambs. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that there are only minor beneficial effects from offering concentrate supplements to ewes in late pregnancy under conditions of unrestricted herbage availability and it is not a viable option for farmers to utilise.