Crystal structure of Aquifex aeolicus σN bound to promoter DNA and the structure of σN-holoenzyme

Expanding the σ54-dependent transcription process with orthogonal designs

The significance of orthogonal gene expression lies in its ability to ensure consistent and predictable operation of genetic pathways in synthetic biology. In bacteria, σ factors are responsible for promoter recognition, where the recognition pattern of σ54 is distinct from that of σ70. Moreover, σ54-dependent promoters require bacterial enhancer-binding proteins (bEBPs) for transcription initiation, which are stringently regulated and strongly activated. Thus, σ54 appears to be a promising candidate for orthogonal designs. In this study, through knowledge-based screening and rewiring of the RpoN box in σ54, together with its partnered promoter, we identified three sets of orthogonal expression systems based on σ54-R456H, R456Y, and R456L, with different promoter preferences and ideal mutual orthogonality toward each other and the native σ54. The orthogonality is transferable, as specific transcription via σ54-R456H was demonstrated in three non-model bacteria. When combined with different bEBPs, the system can be employed to control orthogonal downstream output in response to environmental or chemical signals. The orthogonal σ54 factors proved to be capable of orthogonalizing complex biological pathways and genetic circuits. Therefore, the orthogonal transcription system will contribute to the expansion of synthetic biology toolkits, thereby providing reliable and diversified gene expression in a wide range of hosts.

Structures and mechanisms of AAA+ protein complexes in DNA processing

AAA+ proteins are a large family of ATPases involved in a myriad of cellular activities. Recent advances in AAA+ proteins, especially cryoEM structures of these proteins in complex with their substrates, have provided key insights into how they function. Here we review recent progress in structural studies and mechanistic understanding of AAA+ proteins involved in DNA processing, including gene transcription, DNA replication, repair/recombination and transposition. Using a few selected examples, we show how AAA+ proteins act on both DNA and protein peptides, which are often enclosed in the pores of AAA+ hexamers. We propose that using AAA+ proteins to translocate a peptide to partially unfold a substrate is an effective strategy in disassembling an assembled complex. Further, several studies show that although they often act as asymmetric hexamers in their active form, AAA+ proteins adopt a range of oligomers for their functions.

Real-time capture of σN transcription initiation intermediates reveals mechanism of ATPase-driven activation by limited unfolding

Bacterial σ factors bind RNA polymerase (E) to form holoenzyme (Eσ), conferring promoter specificity to E and playing a key role in transcription bubble formation. σN is unique among σ factors in its structure and functional mechanism, requiring activation by specialized AAA+ ATPases. EσN forms an inactive promoter complex where the N-terminal σN region I (σN-RI) threads through a small DNA bubble. On the opposite side of the DNA, the ATPase engages σN-RI within the pore of its hexameric ring. Here, we perform kinetics-guided structural analysis of de novo formed EσN initiation complexes and engineer a biochemical assay to measure ATPase-mediated σN-RI translocation during promoter melting. We show that the ATPase exerts mechanical action to translocate about 30 residues of σN-RI through the DNA bubble, disrupting inhibitory structures of σN to allow full transcription bubble formation. A local charge switch of σN-RI from positive to negative may help facilitate disengagement of the otherwise processive ATPase, allowing subsequent σN disentanglement from the DNA bubble.

Structural basis of promoter recognition by Staphylococcus aureus RNA polymerase

Bacterial RNAP needs to form holoenzyme with σ factors to initiate transcription. While Staphylococcus aureus σA controls housekeeping functions, S. aureus σB regulates virulence, biofilm formation, persistence, cell internalization, membrane transport, and antimicrobial resistance. Besides the sequence difference, the spacers between the -35 element and -10 element of σB regulated promoters are shorter than those of σA regulated promoters. Therefore, how σB recognizes and initiates transcription from target promoters can not be inferred from that of the well studied σ. Here, we report the cryo-EM structures of S. aureus RNAP-promoter open complexes comprising σA and σB, respectively. Structural analyses, in combination with biochemical experiments, reveal the structural basis for the promoter specificity of S. aureus transcription. Although the -10 element of σA regulated promoters is recognized by domain σA2 as single-stranded DNA, the -10 element of σB regulated promoters is co-recognized by domains σB2 and σB3 as double-stranded DNA, accounting for the short spacers of σB regulated promoters. S. aureus RNAP is a validated target of antibiotics, and our structures pave the way for rational drug design targeting S. aureus RNAP.

Structure of the transcription open complex of distinct σI factors

Bacterial σI factors of the σ70-family are widespread in Bacilli and Clostridia and are involved in the heat shock response, iron metabolism, virulence, and carbohydrate sensing. A multiplicity of σI paralogues in some cellulolytic bacteria have been shown to be responsible for the regulation of the cellulosome, a multienzyme complex that mediates efficient cellulose degradation. Here, we report two structures at 3.0 Å and 3.3 Å of two transcription open complexes formed by two σI factors, SigI1 and SigI6, respectively, from the thermophilic, cellulolytic bacterium, Clostridium thermocellum. These structures reveal a unique, hitherto-unknown recognition mode of bacterial transcriptional promoters, both with respect to domain organization and binding to promoter DNA. The key characteristics that determine the specificities of the σI paralogues were further revealed by comparison of the two structures. Consequently, the σI factors represent a distinct set of the σ70-family σ factors, thus highlighting the diversity of bacterial transcription.

A general mechanism for transcription bubble nucleation in bacteria

Bacterial transcription initiation requires σ factors for nucleation of the transcription bubble. The canonical housekeeping σ factor, σ70, nucleates DNA melting via recognition of conserved bases of the promoter -10 motif, which are unstacked and captured in pockets of σ70. By contrast, the mechanism of transcription bubble nucleation and formation during the unrelated σN-mediated transcription initiation is poorly understood. Herein, we combine structural and biochemical approaches to establish that σN, like σ70, captures a flipped, unstacked base in a pocket formed between its N-terminal region I (RI) and extra-long helix features. Strikingly, RI inserts into the nascent bubble to stabilize the nucleated bubble prior to engagement of the obligate ATPase activator. Our data suggest a general paradigm of transcription initiation that requires σ factors to nucleate an early melted intermediate prior to productive RNA synthesis.

Mechanisms of DNA opening revealed in AAA+ transcription complex structures

Gene transcription is carried out by RNA polymerase (RNAP) and requires the conversion of the initial closed promoter complex, where DNA is double stranded, to a transcription-competent open promoter complex, where DNA is opened up. In bacteria, RNAP relies on σ factors for its promoter specificities. Using a special form of sigma factor (σ54), which forms a stable closed complex and requires its activator that belongs to the AAA+ ATPases (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities), we obtained cryo-electron microscopy structures of transcription initiation complexes that reveal a previously unidentified process of DNA melting opening. The σ54 amino terminus threads through the locally opened up DNA and then becomes enclosed by the AAA+ hexameric ring in the activator-bound intermediate complex. Our structures suggest how ATP hydrolysis by the AAA+ activator could remove the σ54 inhibition while helping to open up DNA, using σ54 amino-terminal peptide as a pry bar.

Reconstructing the transcription regulatory network to optimize resource allocation for robust biosynthesis

An ideal microbial cell factory (MCF) should deliver maximal resources to production, which conflicts with the microbe's native growth-oriented resource allocation strategy and can therefore lead to early termination of the high-yield period. Reallocating resources from growth to production has become a critical factor in constructing robust MCFs. Instead of strengthening specific biosynthetic pathways, emerging endeavors are focused on rearranging the gene regulatory network to fundamentally reprogram the resource allocation pattern. Combining this idea with transcriptional regulation within the hierarchical regulatory network, this review discusses recent engineering strategies targeting the transcription machinery, module networks, regulatory edges, and bottom network layer. This global view will help to construct a production-oriented phenotype that fully harnesses the potential of MCFs.

The Regulatory Functions of σ54 Factor in Phytopathogenic Bacteria

σ⁵⁴ factor (RpoN), a type of transcriptional regulatory factor, is widely found in pathogenic bacteria. It binds to core RNA polymerase (RNAP) and regulates the transcription of many functional genes in an enhancer-binding protein (EBP)-dependent manner. σ⁵⁴ has two conserved functional domains: the activator-interacting domain located at the N-terminal and the DNA-binding domain located at the C-terminal. RpoN directly binds to the highly conserved sequence, GGN₁₀GC, at the −24/−12 position relative to the transcription start site of target genes. In general, bacteria contain one or two RpoNs but multiple EBPs. A single RpoN can bind to different EBPs in order to regulate various biological functions. Thus, the overlapping and unique regulatory pathways of two RpoNs and multiple EBP-dependent regulatory pathways form a complex regulatory network in bacteria. However, the regulatory role of RpoN and EBPs is still poorly understood in phytopathogenic bacteria, which cause economically important crop diseases and pose a serious threat to world food security. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the regulatory function of RpoN, including swimming motility, flagella synthesis, bacterial growth, type IV pilus (T4Ps), twitching motility, type III secretion system (T3SS), and virulence-associated phenotypes in phytopathogenic bacteria. These findings and knowledge prove the key regulatory role of RpoN in bacterial growth and pathogenesis, as well as lay the groundwork for further elucidation of the complex regulatory network of RpoN in bacteria.

Regulatory small RNA, Qrr2 is expressed independently of sigma factor-54 and can function as the sole Qrr sRNA to control quorum sensing in Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Bacterial cells alter gene expression in response to changes in population density in a process called quorum sensing (QS). In Vibrio harveyi, LuxO, a low cell density activator of sigma factor-54 (RpoN), is required for transcription of five non-coding regulatory sRNAs, Qrr1-Qrr5, which each repress translation of the master QS regulator LuxR. Vibrio parahaemolyticus, the leading cause of bacterial seafood-borne gastroenteritis, also contains five Qrr sRNAs that control OpaR (the LuxR homolog), controlling capsule polysaccharide (CPS), motility, and metabolism. We show that in a ΔluxO deletion mutant, opaR was de-repressed and CPS and biofilm were produced. However, in a ΔrpoN mutant, opaR was repressed, no CPS was produced, and less biofilm production was observed compared to wild type. To determine why opaR was repressed, expression analysis in ΔluxO showed all five qrr genes were repressed, while in ΔrpoN the qrr2 gene was significantly de-repressed. Reporter assays and mutant analysis showed Qrr2 sRNA can act alone to control OpaR. Bioinformatics analysis identified a sigma-70 (RpoD) -35 -10 promoter overlapping the canonical sigma-54 (RpoN) -24 -12 promoter in the qrr2 regulatory region. The qrr2 sigma-70 promoter element was also present in additional Vibrio species indicating it is widespread. Mutagenesis of the sigma-70 -10 promoter site in the ΔrpoN mutant background, resulted in repression of qrr2. Analysis of qrr quadruple deletion mutants, in which only a single qrr gene is present, showed that only Qrr2 sRNA can act independently to regulate opaR. Mutant and expression data also demonstrated that RpoN and the global regulator, Fis, act additively to repress qrr2. Our data has uncovered a new mechanism of qrr expression and shows that Qrr2 sRNA is sufficient for OpaR regulation. Importance The quorum sensing non-coding sRNAs are present in all Vibrio species but vary in number and regulatory roles among species. In the Harveyi clade, all species contain five qrr genes, and in V. harveyi these are transcribed by sigma-54 and are additive in function. In the Cholerae clade, four qrr genes are present, and in V. cholerae the qrr genes are redundant in function. In V. parahaemolyticus, qrr2 is controlled by two overlapping promoters. In an rpoN mutant, qrr2 is transcribed from a sigma-70 promoter that is present in all V. parahaemolyticus strains and in other species of the Harveyi clade suggesting a conserved mechanism of regulation. Qrr2 sRNA can function as the sole Qrr sRNA to control OpaR.

Promoter Architecture Differences among Alphaproteobacteria and Other Bacterial Taxa

Much of our knowledge of bacterial transcription initiation has been derived from studying the promoters of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Given the expansive diversity across the bacterial phylogeny, it is unclear how much of this knowledge can be applied to other organisms. Here, we report on bioinformatic analyses of promoter sequences of the primary σ factor (σ70) by leveraging publicly available transcription start site (TSS) sequencing data sets for nine bacterial species spanning five phyla. This analysis identifies previously unreported differences in the -35 and -10 elements of σ70-dependent promoters in several groups of bacteria. We found that Actinobacteria and Betaproteobacteria σ70-dependent promoters lack the TTG triad in their -35 element, which is predicted to be conserved across the bacterial phyla. In addition, the majority of the Alphaproteobacteria σ70-dependent promoters analyzed lacked the thymine at position -7 that is highly conserved in other phyla. Bioinformatic examination of the Alphaproteobacteria σ70-dependent promoters identifies a significant overrepresentation of essential genes and ones encoding proteins with common cellular functions downstream of promoters containing an A, C, or G at position -7. We propose that transcription of many σ70-dependent promoters in Alphaproteobacteria depends on the transcription factor CarD, which is an essential protein in several members of this phylum. Our analysis expands the knowledge of promoter architecture across the bacterial phylogeny and provides new information that can be used to engineer bacteria for use in medical, environmental, agricultural, and biotechnological processes. IMPORTANCE Transcription of DNA to RNA by RNA polymerase is essential for cells to grow, develop, and respond to stress. Understanding the process and control of transcription is important for health, disease, the environment, and biotechnology. Decades of research on a few bacteria have identified promoter DNA sequences that are recognized by the σ subunit of RNA polymerase. We used bioinformatic analyses to reveal previously unreported differences in promoter DNA sequences across the bacterial phylogeny. We found that many Actinobacteria and Betaproteobacteria promoters lack a sequence in their -35 DNA recognition element that was previously assumed to be conserved and that Alphaproteobacteria lack a thymine residue at position -7, also previously assumed to be conserved. Our work reports important new information about bacterial transcription, illustrates the benefits of studying bacteria across the phylogenetic tree, and proposes new lines of future investigation.

Understanding transcription across scales: From base pairs to chromosomes

The influence of genome organization on transcription is central to our understanding of cell type specification. Higher-order genome organization is established through short- and long-range DNA interactions. Coordination of these interactions, from single atoms to entire chromosomes, plays a fundamental role in transcriptional control of gene expression. Loss of this coupling can result in disease. Analysis of transcriptional regulation typically involves disparate experimental approaches, from structural studies that define angstrom-level interactions to cell-biological and genomic approaches that assess mesoscale relationships. Thus, to fully understand the mechanisms that regulate gene expression, it is critical to integrate the findings gained across these distinct size scales. In this review, I illustrate fundamental ways in which cells regulate transcription in the context of genome organization.

Bacterial Enhancer Binding Proteins-AAA+ Proteins in Transcription Activation

Bacterial enhancer-binding proteins (bEBPs) are specialised transcriptional activators. bEBPs are hexameric AAA⁺ ATPases and use ATPase activities to remodel RNA polymerase (RNAP) complexes that contain the major variant sigma factor, σ⁵⁴ to convert the initial closed complex to the transcription competent open complex. Earlier crystal structures of AAA⁺ domains alone have led to proposals of how nucleotide-bound states are sensed and propagated to substrate interactions. Recently, the structure of the AAA⁺ domain of a bEBP bound to RNAP-σ⁵⁴-promoter DNA was revealed. Together with structures of the closed complex, an intermediate state where DNA is partially loaded into the RNAP cleft and the open promoter complex, a mechanistic understanding of how bEBPs use ATP to activate transcription can now be proposed. This review summarises current structural models and the emerging understanding of how this special class of AAA⁺ proteins utilises ATPase activities to allow σ⁵⁴-dependent transcription initiation.

Structures and mechanism of transcription initiation by bacterial ECF factors

Bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) forms distinct holoenzymes with extra-cytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors to initiate specific gene expression programs. In this study, we report a cryo-EM structure at 4.0 Å of Escherichia coli transcription initiation complex comprising σE-the most-studied bacterial ECF σ factor (Ec σE-RPo), and a crystal structure at 3.1 Å of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transcription initiation complex with a chimeric σH/E (Mtb σH/E-RPo). The structure of Ec σE-RPo reveals key interactions essential for assembly of E. coli σE-RNAP holoenzyme and for promoter recognition and unwinding by E. coli σE. Moreover, both structures show that the non-conserved linkers (σ2/σ4 linker) of the two ECF σ factors are inserted into the active-center cleft and exit through the RNA-exit channel. We performed secondary-structure prediction of 27,670 ECF σ factors and find that their non-conserved linkers probably reach into and exit from RNAP active-center cleft in a similar manner. Further biochemical results suggest that such σ2/σ4 linker plays an important role in RPo formation, abortive production and promoter escape during ECF σ factors-mediated transcription initiation.

Transcription activation in bacteria: ancient and modern

Regulatory interactions at the lac promoter.Activation of the transcription of genes is central to many processes of adaptation and differentiation in bacteria. Here, I review the molecular mechanisms by which transcription factors can activate the initiation of specific transcripts at bacterial promoters. The story is presented in the context of Marjory Stephenson's pioneering work on enzymatic adaptation in bacteria, and sets the different mechanisms in the greater context of how transcription regulatory mechanisms evolved.

Structure of RNA polymerase bound to ribosomal 30S subunit

In bacteria, mRNA transcription and translation are coupled to coordinate optimal gene expression and maintain genome stability. Coupling is thought to involve direct interactions between RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the translational machinery. We present cryo-EM structures of E. coli RNAP core bound to the small ribosomal 30S subunit. The complex is stable under cell-like ionic conditions, consistent with functional interaction between RNAP and the 30S subunit. The RNA exit tunnel of RNAP aligns with the Shine-Dalgarno-binding site of the 30S subunit. Ribosomal protein S1 forms a wall of the tunnel between RNAP and the 30S subunit, consistent with its role in directing mRNAs onto the ribosome. The nucleic-acid-binding cleft of RNAP samples distinct conformations, suggesting different functional states during transcription-translation coupling. The architecture of the 30S•RNAP complex provides a structural basis for co-localization of the transcriptional and translational machineries, and inform future mechanistic studies of coupled transcription and translation.

Structures of RNA Polymerase Closed and Intermediate Complexes Reveal Mechanisms of DNA Opening and Transcription Initiation

Gene transcription is carried out by RNA polymerases (RNAPs). For transcription to occur, the closed promoter complex (RPc), where DNA is double stranded, must isomerize into an open promoter complex (RPo), where the DNA is melted out into a transcription bubble and the single-stranded template DNA is delivered to the RNAP active site. Using a bacterial RNAP containing the alternative σ⁵⁴ factor and cryoelectron microscopy, we determined structures of RPc and the activator-bound intermediate complex en route to RPo at 3.8 and 5.8 Å. Our structures show how RNAP-σ⁵⁴ interacts with promoter DNA to initiate the DNA distortions required for transcription bubble formation, and how the activator interacts with RPc, leading to significant conformational changes in RNAP and σ⁵⁴ that promote RPo formation. We propose that DNA melting is an active process initiated in RPc and that the RNAP conformations of intermediates are significantly different from that of RPc and RPo.

•

RNA polymerase closed complex (RPc) structure reveals DNA distortions by σ

•

Intermediate complex (RPi) structure reveals the roles of AAA activator

•

DNA distortion and opening are initiated in RPc and RPi before entering the RNAP

•

RNAP conformation in RPi is significantly different from closed or open complex