RNA polymerase sliding on DNA can couple the transcription of nearby bacterial operons

Single-mode termination of phage transcriptions, disclosing bacterial adaptation for facilitated reinitiations

Bacterial and bacteriophage RNA polymerases (RNAPs) have divergently evolved and share the RNA hairpin-dependent intrinsic termination of transcription. Here, we examined phage T7, T3 and SP6 RNAP terminations utilizing the single-molecule fluorescence assays we had developed for bacterial terminations. We discovered the phage termination mode or outcome is virtually single with decomposing termination. Therein, RNAP is displaced forward along DNA and departs both RNA and DNA for one-step decomposition, three-dimensional diffusion and reinitiation at any promoter. This phage displacement-mediated decomposing termination is much slower than readthrough and appears homologous with the bacterial one. However, the phage sole mode of termination contrasts with the bacterial dual mode, where both decomposing and recycling terminations occur compatibly at any single hairpin- or Rho-dependent terminator. In the bacterial recycling termination, RNA is sheared from RNA·DNA hybrid, and RNAP remains bound to DNA for one-dimensional diffusion, which enables facilitated recycling for reinitiation at the nearest promoter located downstream or upstream in the sense or antisense orientation. Aligning with proximity of most terminators to adjacent promoters in bacterial genomes, the shearing-mediated recycling termination could be bacterial adaptation for the facilitated reinitiations repeated at a promoter for accelerated expression and coupled at adjoining promoters for coordinated regulation.

Compatibility of termination mechanisms in bacterial transcription with inference on eukaryotic models

Transcription termination has evolved to proceed through diverse mechanisms. For several classes of terminators, multiple models have been debatably proposed. Recent single-molecule studies on bacterial terminators have resolved several long-standing controversies. First, termination mode or outcome is twofold rather than single. RNA is released alone before DNA or together with DNA from RNA polymerase (RNAP), i.e. with RNA release for termination, RNAP retains on or dissociates off DNA, respectively. The concomitant release, described in textbooks, results in one-step decomposition of transcription complexes, and this 'decomposing termination' prevails at ρ factor-dependent terminators. Contrastingly, the sequential release was recently discovered abundantly from RNA hairpin-dependent intrinsic terminations. RNA-only release allows RNAP to diffuse on DNA in both directions and recycle for reinitiation. This 'recycling termination' enables one-dimensional reinitiation, which would be more expeditious than three-dimensional reinitiation by RNAP dissociated at decomposing termination. Second, while both recycling and decomposing terminations occur at a hairpin-dependent terminator, four termination mechanisms compatibly operate at a ρ-dependent terminator with ρ in alternative modes and even intrinsically without ρ. RNA-bound catch-up ρ mediates recycling termination first and decomposing termination later, while RNAP-prebound stand-by ρ invokes only decomposing termination slowly. Without ρ, decomposing termination occurs slightly and sluggishly. These four mechanisms operate on distinct timescales, providing orderly fail-safes. The stand-by mechanism is benefited by terminational pause prolongation and modulated by accompanying riboswitches more greatly than the catch-up mechanisms. Conclusively, any mechanism alone is insufficient to perfect termination, and multiple mechanisms operate compatibly to achieve maximum possible efficiency under separate controls.

RNA polymerase collisions and their role in transcription

RNA polymerases are the central enzymes of gene expression and function frequently in either a head-on or co-directional manner on the busy DNA track. Whether and how these collisions between RNA polymerases contribute to transcriptional regulation is mysterious. Increasing evidence from biochemical and single-molecule studies suggests that RNA polymerase collisions function as an important regulator to fine-tune transcription, rather than creating deleterious "traffic jams". This review summarizes the recent progress on elucidating the consequences of RNA polymerase collisions during transcription and highlights the significance of cooperation and coordination between RNA polymerases.

RNA polymerase sliding on DNA can couple the transcription of nearby bacterial operons

DNA transcription initiates after an RNA polymerase (RNAP) molecule binds to the promoter of a gene. In bacteria, the canonical picture is that RNAP comes from the cytoplasmic pool of freely diffusing RNAP molecules. Recent experiments suggest the possible existence of a separate pool of polymerases, competent for initiation, which freely slide on the DNA after having terminated one round of transcription. Promoter-dependent transcription reinitiation from this pool of posttermination RNAP may lead to coupled initiation at nearby operons, but it is unclear whether this can occur over the distance and timescales needed for it to function widely on a bacterial genome in vivo. Here, we mathematically model the hypothesized reinitiation mechanism as a diffusion-to-capture process and compute the distances over which significant interoperon coupling can occur and the time required. These quantities depend on molecular association and dissociation rate constants between DNA, RNAP, and the transcription initiation factor σ70; we measure these rate constants using single-molecule experiments in vitro. Our combined theory/experimental results demonstrate that efficient coupling can occur at physiologically relevant σ70 concentrations and on timescales appropriate for transcript synthesis. Coupling is efficient over terminator-promoter distances up to ∼1,000 bp, which includes the majority of terminator-promoter nearest neighbor pairs in the Escherichia coli genome. The results suggest a generalized mechanism that couples the transcription of nearby operons and breaks the paradigm that each binding of RNAP to DNA can produce at most one messenger RNA.

Recycling of bacterial RNA polymerase by the Swi2/Snf2 ATPase RapA

Free-living bacteria have regulatory systems that can quickly reprogram gene transcription in response to changes in the cellular environment. The RapA ATPase, a prokaryotic homolog of the eukaryotic Swi2/Snf2 chromatin remodeling complex, may facilitate such reprogramming, but the mechanisms by which it does so are unclear. We used multiwavelength single-molecule fluorescence microscopy in vitro to examine RapA function in the Escherichia coli transcription cycle. In our experiments, RapA at <5 nM concentration did not appear to alter transcription initiation, elongation, or intrinsic termination. Instead, we directly observed a single RapA molecule bind specifically to the kinetically stable post termination complex (PTC)-consisting of core RNA polymerase (RNAP)-bound sequence nonspecifically to double-stranded DNA-and efficiently remove RNAP from DNA within seconds in an ATP-hydrolysis-dependent reaction. Kinetic analysis elucidates the process through which RapA locates the PTC and the key mechanistic intermediates that bind and hydrolyze ATP. This study defines how RapA participates in the transcription cycle between termination and initiation and suggests that RapA helps set the balance between global RNAP recycling and local transcription reinitiation in proteobacterial genomes.