Single amino acids changes in the signal receptor domain of XylR resulted in mutants that stimulate transcription in the absence of effectors

An updated structural model of the A domain of the Pseudomonas putida XylR regulator poses an atypical interplay with aromatic effectors

A revised model of the aromatic binding A domain of the σ⁵⁴ -dependent regulator XylR of Pseudomonas putida mt-2 was produced based on the known 3D structures of homologous regulators PoxR, MopR and DmpR. The resulting frame was instrumental for mapping a number of mutations known to alter effector specificity, which were then reinterpreted under a dependable spatial reference. Some of these changes involved the predicted aromatic binding pocket but others occurred in distant locations, including dimerization interfaces and putative zinc binding site. The effector pocket was buried within the protein structure and accessible from the outside only through a narrow tunnel. Yet, several loop regions of the A domain could provide the flexibility required for widening such a tunnel for passage of aromatic ligands. The model was experimentally validated by treating the cells in vivo and the purified protein in vitro with benzyl bromide, which reacts with accessible nucleophilic residues on the protein surface. Structural and proteomic analyses confirmed the predicted in/out distribution of residues but also supported two additional possible scenarios of interaction of the A domain with aromatic effectors: a dynamic interaction of the fully structured yet flexible protein with the aromatic partner and/or inducer-assisted folding of the A domain.

Engineering transcription factor BmoR for screening butanol overproducers

The wild-type transcription factors are sensitive to their corresponding signal molecules. Using wild-type transcription factors as biosensors to screen industrial overproducers are generally impractical because of their narrow detection ranges. This study took transcription factor BmoR as an example and aimed to expand the detection range of BmoR for screening alcohols overproducers. Firstly, a BmoR mutation library was established, and the mutations distributed randomly in all predicted functional domains of BmoR. Structure of BmoR-isobutanol complex were modelled, and isobutanol binding sites were confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis. Subsequently, the effects of the mutations on the detection range or output were confirmed in the BmoR mutants. Four combinatorial mutants containing one increased-detection-range mutation and one enhanced-output mutation were constructed. Compared with wild-type BmoR, F276A/E627N BmoR and D333N/E627N BmoR have wider detection ranges (0-100 mM) and relatively high outputs to the isobutanol added quantitatively or produced intracellularly, demonstrating they have potential for screening isobutanol overproduction strains. This work presented an example of engineering the wild-type transcription factors with physiological significance for industrial utilization.

Structural Basis of Selective Aromatic Pollutant Sensing by the Effector Binding Domain of MopR, an NtrC Family Transcriptional Regulator

Phenol and its derivatives are common pollutants that are present in industrial discharge and are major xenobiotics that lead to water pollution. To monitor as well as improve water quality, attempts have been made in the past to engineer bacterial in vivo biosensors. However, due to the paucity of structural information, there is insufficiency in gauging the factors that lead to high sensitivity and selectivity, thereby impeding development. Here, we present the crystal structure of the sensor domain of MopR (MopR(AB)) from Acinetobacter calcoaceticus in complex with phenol and its derivatives to a maximum resolution of 2.5 Å. The structure reveals that the N-terminal residues 21-47 possess a unique fold, which are involved in stabilization of the biological dimer, and the central ligand binding domain belongs to the "nitric oxide signaling and golgi transport" fold, commonly present in eukaryotic proteins that bind long-chain fatty acids. In addition, MopR(AB) nests a zinc atom within a novel zinc binding motif, crucial for maintaining structural integrity. We propose that this motif is crucial for orchestrated motions associated with the formation of the effector binding pocket. Our studies reveal that residues W134 and H106 play an important role in ligand binding and are the key selectivity determinants. Furthermore, comparative analysis of MopR with XylR and DmpR sensor domains enabled the design of a MopR binding pocket that is competent in binding DmpR-specific ligands. Collectively, these findings pave way towards development of specific/broad based biosensors, which can act as useful tools for detection of this class of pollutants.

Bacterial strategies for growth on aromatic compounds

Although the biodegradation of aromatic compounds has been studied for over 40 years, there is still much to learn about the strategies bacteria employ for growth on novel substrates. Elucidation of these strategies is crucial for predicting the environmental fate of aromatic pollutants and will provide a framework for the development of engineered bacteria and degradation pathways. In this chapter, we provide an overview of studies that have advanced our knowledge of bacterial adaptation to aromatic compounds. We have divided these strategies into three broad categories: (1) recruitment of catabolic genes, (2) expression of "repair" or detoxification proteins, and (3) direct alteration of enzymatic properties. Specific examples from the literature are discussed, with an eye toward the molecular mechanisms that underlie each strategy.

The predicted σ(54)-dependent regulator EtpR is essential for expression of genes for anaerobic p-ethylphenol and p-hydroxyacetophenone degradation in "Aromatoleum aromaticum" EbN1

Background

The denitrifying betaproteobacterium "Aromatoleum aromaticum" EbN1 anaerobically utilizes a multitude of aromatic compounds via specific peripheral degradation routes. Compound-specific formation of these catabolic modules is assumed to be mediated by specific transcriptional activators. In case of the recently elucidated p-ethylphenol/p-hydroxyacetophenone pathway, the highly substrate-specific regulation was implicated to involve the predicted σ⁵⁴-dependent, NtrC-type regulator EbA324. The latter was suggested to control the expression of the two neighboring gene clusters encoding the catabolic enzymes as well as a corresponding putative solvent efflux system. In the present study, a molecular genetic approach was used to study the predicted function of EbA324.

Results

An unmarked in frame ΔebA324 (here renamed as ΔetpR; p-ethylphenol regulator) deletion mutation was generated. The ΔetpR mutant was unable to grow anaerobically with either p-ethylphenol or p-hydroxyacetophenone. Growth similar to the wild type was restored in the ΔetpR mutant background by in trans expression of plasmid-born etpR. Furthermore, expression of the "p-ethylphenol" gene clusters as well as corresponding protein formation was shown to depend on the presence of both, EtpR and either p-ethylphenol or p-hydroxyacetophenone. In the wild type, the etpR gene appears to be constitutively expressed and its expression level not to be modulated upon effector presence. Comparison with the regulatory domains of known phenol- and alkylbenzene-responsive NtrC-type regulators of Pseudomonas spp. and Thauera aromatica allowed identifying >60 amino acid residues in the regulatory domain (in particular positions 149 to 192 of EtpR) that may contribute to the effector specificity viz. presumptively restricted effector spectrum of EtpR.

Conclusions

This study provides experimental evidence for the genome predicted σ⁵⁴-dependent regulator EtpR (formerly EbA324) of "A. aromaticum" EbN1 to be responsive to p-ethylphenol, as well as its degradation intermediate p-hydroxyacetophenone, and to control the expression of genes involved in the anaerobic degradation of these two aromatic growth substrates. Overall, the presented results advance our understanding on the regulation of anaerobic aromatic compound catabolism, foremost based on the sensory discrimination of structurally similar substrates.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0571-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Towards habitat-oriented systems biology of "Aromatoleum aromaticum" EbN1: chemical sensing, catabolic network modulation and growth control in anaerobic aromatic compound degradation

The denitrifying betaproteobacterium "Aromatoleum aromaticum" EbN1 is a well-studied model organism for anaerobic degradation of aromatic compounds. Following publication of its genome in 2005, comprehensive physiological-proteomic studies were conducted to deduce functional understanding from the genomic blueprint. A catabolic network (85 predicted, 65 identified proteins) for anaerobic degradation of 24 aromatic growth substrates (including 11 newly recognized) was established. Newly elucidated pathways include those for 4-ethylphenol and plant-derived 3-phenylpropanoids, involving functional assignment of several paralogous genes. The substrate-specific regulation of individual peripheral degradation pathways is probably initiated by highly specific chemical sensing via dedicated sensory/regulatory proteins, e.g. three different σ⁵⁴-dependent one-component sensory/regulatory proteins are predicted to discriminate between three phenolic substrates (phenol, p-cresol and 4-ethylphenol) and two different two-component systems are assumed to differentiate between two alkylbenzenes (toluene, ethylbenzene). Investigations under in situ relevant growth conditions revealed (a) preferred utilization of benzoate from a mixture with succinate results from repressed synthesis of a C₄-dicarboxylate TRAP transporter; (b) response to alkylbenzene-induced solvent stress comprises metabolic re-routing of acetyl-CoA and reducing equivalents to poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) synthesis, alteration of cellular membrane composition and formation of putative solvent efflux systems; and (c) multifaceted adaptation to slow growth includes adjustment of energy demand for maintenance and preparedness for future nutritional opportunities, i.e. provision of uptake systems and catabolic enzymes for multiple aromatic substrates despite their absence. This broad knowledge base taken together with the recent development of a genetic system will facilitate future functional, biotechnological (stereospecific dehydrogenases) and habitat re-enacting ("eco-"systems biology) studies with "A. aromaticum" EbN1.

The role of bacterial enhancer binding proteins as specialized activators of σ54-dependent transcription

Bacterial enhancer binding proteins (bEBPs) are transcriptional activators that assemble as hexameric rings in their active forms and utilize ATP hydrolysis to remodel the conformation of RNA polymerase containing the alternative sigma factor σ(54). We present a comprehensive and detailed summary of recent advances in our understanding of how these specialized molecular machines function. The review is structured by introducing each of the three domains in turn: the central catalytic domain, the N-terminal regulatory domain, and the C-terminal DNA binding domain. The role of the central catalytic domain is presented with particular reference to (i) oligomerization, (ii) ATP hydrolysis, and (iii) the key GAFTGA motif that contacts σ(54) for remodeling. Each of these functions forms a potential target of the signal-sensing N-terminal regulatory domain, which can act either positively or negatively to control the activation of σ(54)-dependent transcription. Finally, we focus on the DNA binding function of the C-terminal domain and the enhancer sites to which it binds. Particular attention is paid to the importance of σ(54) to the bacterial cell and its unique role in regulating transcription.

Diversity of the transcriptional regulation of the pch gene cluster in two indigenous p-cresol-degradative strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens

p-Cresol methylhydroxylase (PCMH), a key enzyme responsible for the catabolism of p-cresol via the protocatechuate ortho pathway, was used as a tool to characterize catabolic differences between phenol- and p-cresol-degrading Pseudomonas fluore-scens strains PC18 and PC24. Although both strains catabolize p-cresol using PCMH, different whole-cell kinetic parameters for this compound were revealed. Affinity for the substrate and the specific growth rate were higher in PC18, whereas maximum p-cresol tolerance was higher in PC24. In addition, PCMH of strain PC18 was induced during growth on phenol. In both strains, the pchACXF operon, which encodes p-hydroxybenzaldehyde dehydrogenase and PCMH, was sequenced. Transcriptional regulation of these operons by PchR, a putative sigma(54)-dependent regulator, was shown. Although the promoters of these operons resembled sigma(54)-controlled promoters, they differed from the consensus sequence by having T instead of C at position -12. Complementation assays confirmed that the amino acid sequence differences of the PchR regulators between the two strains studied led to different effector-binding capabilities of these proteins: (1) phenol was a more efficient effector for PchR of PC18 than p-cresol, (2) phenol did not activate the regulator of PC24, and (3) both regulators responded similarly to p-cresol.

The TodS-TodT two-component regulatory system recognizes a wide range of effectors and works with DNA-bending proteins

The TodS and TodT proteins form a previously unrecognized and highly specific two-component regulatory system in which the TodS sensor protein contains two input domains, each of which are coupled to a histidine kinase domain. This system regulates the expression of the genes involved in the degradation of toluene, benzene, and ethylbenzene through the toluene dioxygenase pathway. In contrast to the narrow substrate range of this catabolic pathway, the TodS effector profile is broad. TodS has basal autophosphorylation activity in vitro, which is enhanced by the presence of effectors. Toluene binds to TodS with high affinity (Kd = 684 +/- 13 nM) and 1:1 stoichiometry. The analysis of the truncated variants of TodS reveals that toluene binds to the N-terminal input domain (Kd = 2.3 +/- 0.1 microM) but not to the C-terminal half. TodS transphosphorylates TodT, which binds to two highly similar DNA binding sites at base pairs -107 and -85 of the promoter. Integration host factor (IHF) plays a crucial role in the activation process and binds between the upstream TodT boxes and the -10 hexamer region. In an IHF-deficient background, expression from the tod promoter drops 8-fold. In vitro transcription assays confirmed the role determined in vivo for TodS, TodT, and IHF. A functional model is presented in which IHF favors the contact between the TodT activator, bound further upstream, and the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase bound to the downstream promoter element. Once these contacts are established, the tod operon is efficiently transcribed.

Transcriptional regulators à la carte: engineering new effector specificities in bacterial regulatory proteins

For many regulators of bacterial biodegradation pathways, small molecule/effector binding is the signal for triggering transcriptional activation. Thus, regulation results from a cross-talk between chemicals sensed by transcriptional factors and operon expression status. These features can be utilised in the construction of biosensors for a wide range of target compounds as, in principle, any regulatory protein whose activity is modulated by binding to a small molecule can have its effector/inducer profile artificially altered. The cognate specificities of a number of regulatory proteins have been modified as an astute approach to developing, among others, bacterial biosensors for environmentally relevant compounds.

Deciphering environmental signal integration in sigma54-dependent promoters with a simple mathematical model

A mathematical model was developed to describe the physiological co-regulation of two Pseudomonas sigma54-dependent promoter/regulator systems, Pu/XylR and Po/DmpR of Pseudomonas strains mt2 and CF600, respectively. Five ordinary differential equations and six algebraic equations were developed to describe the following processes of transcription initiation: binding of the activator protein to the upstream activating sequence, union of the sigma factor with the core polymerase, formation of the open complex, and escape of the transcription machinery from the promoter region. In addition, growth-phase control of the integration host factor (IHF), sigma-70 regulation during stationary phase, and the contribution of (p)ppGpp to both sigma factor selectivity and promoter escape were hypothesized. By including any three of these four effects, the model predicted that expression from both promoters is repressed during exponential growth and sharply increases as the cells enter stationary phase. The difference in behavior of the two systems during overexpression of either sigma54 or (p)ppGpp could be explained by different values of two model parameters. To accurately represent the behavior of both promoters in (p)ppGpp null strains, an additional parameter must be varied. Although numerical data available for this system is scarce, the model has proved useful for helping to interpret the experimental observations and to evaluate four hypotheses that have been proposed to explain the phenomenon of exponential silencing.

Deciphering the action of aromatic effectors on the prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein XylR: a structural model of its N-terminal domain

The prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein XylR is the central regulator of the toluene degradation pathway in Pseudomonas species. Copious genetic and biochemical data indicate that the N-terminal domain of the protein (domain A) interacts directly with m-xylene, which renders the protein competent as a transcriptional activator. Single-site and shuffling mutants of XylR or homologues have been reported to change or expand their effector profiles. Here, we follow a fold recognition approach to generate three-dimensional models of the domain A of XylR and DmpR with the purpose of deciphering the molecular activity of this protein family. The model is based on the crystallographic data of the rat catechol O-methyltransferase, a typical alpha/beta fold, consisting of eight alpha-helices and seven beta-strands. The fold identification is supported by physico-chemical properties of conserved amino acids, distribution of residues characteristic of the sequence families and confrontation with experimental data. The model not only provides a rationale for understanding published experimental data, but also suggests the molecular mechanism of the activation step and is a potentially useful conceptual tool for designing regulators with predefined inducer specificities.

A la carte transcriptional regulators: unlocking responses of the prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein XylR to non-natural effectors

To investigate the activation mechanism of the enhancer-binding protein XylR encoded by the TOL plasmid of Pseudomonas putida mt-2, a combinatorial library was generated composed of shuffled N-terminal A domains of the homologous regulators DmpR, XylR and TbuT, reassembled within the XylR structure. When the library was screened in vivo for responsiveness to non-effectors bulkier than one aromatic ring (such as biphenyl) or bearing an entirely different distribution of electronegative groups (e.g. nitrotoluenes), protein variants were found that displayed an expanded inducer range including the new effectors. Although the phenotypes endowed with the corresponding changes were largely similar, the modifications involved different sites within the A domain. The positions of the mutations within a structural model of the A domain suggest that expansion of the inducer profile can be brought about not only by changes in the effector pocket of the protein but also by unlocking steps of the signal transmission mechanism that follows effector binding. These results provide a rationale for evolving in vitro regulators à la carte that are responsive to predetermined, natural or xenobiotic chemical species.

Analysis of the domain structure and the DNA binding site of the transcriptional activator FhlA

FhlA is the transcriptional activator of the genes coding for the formate hydrogen lyase system in Escherichia coli. It is activated by the binding of formate and induces transcription by sigma54 RNA polymerase after binding to specific upstream activating sequences (UAS). Sequence comparison had shown that FhlA exhibits a structure composed of three domains, which is typical for sigma54-dependent regulators. By analyzing the N-terminal domain of FhlA of E. coli (amino acids 1-378; FhlA-N) and the rest of the protein (amino acids 379-693; FhlA-C) as separate proteins in vivo and in vitro the functions of the different domains of FhlA were elucidated. The FhlA-C domain is active in ATP hydrolysis and activation of transcription and its activity is neither influenced by the presence of formate nor of the antiactivator HycA. However, it is stimulated in the presence of the FhlA-specific UAS, indicating that this region of FhlA is responsible for DNA binding. FhlA-N is not active itself but able to reduce the activity of full-length FhlA in trans, probably by formation of nonfunctional heterooligomers. The DNA binding site of FhlA was analyzed by hydroxyradical footprinting. Each UAS consists of two binding sites of 16 bp separated by a spacer region. A consensus sequence could be deduced and a model is presented and supported by in vivo data in which a FhlA tetramer binds to the UAS on one side of the DNA helix. Performing an extensive screening we could show that the FhlA regulatory system is conserved in different species of the family Enterobacteriaceae. The analysis of orthologs of FhlA revealed that they are able to functionally replace the E. coli enzyme.

HbpR, a new member of the XylR/DmpR subclass within the NtrC family of bacterial transcriptional activators, regulates expression of 2-hydroxybiphenyl metabolism in Pseudomonas azelaica HBP1

The regulation of 2-hydroxybiphenyl and 2,2'-dihydroxybiphenyl degradation in Pseudomonas azelaica is mediated by the regulatory gene, hbpR. The hbpR gene encodes a 63-kDa protein belonging to the NtrC family of prokaryotic transcriptional activators and having the highest homology to members of the XylR/DmpR subclass. Disruption of the hbpR gene in P. azelaica and complementation in trans showed that the HbpR protein was the key regulator for 2-hydroxybiphenyl metabolism. Induction experiments with P. azelaica and Escherichia coli containing luxAB-based transcriptional fusions revealed that HbpR activates transcription from a promoter (P(hbpC)) in front of the first gene for 2-hydroxybiphenyl degradation, hbpC, and that 2-hydroxybiphenyl itself is the direct effector for HbpR-mediated activation. Of several compounds tested, only the pathway substrates 2-hydroxybiphenyl and 2,2'-dihydroxybiphenyl and structural analogs like 2-aminobiphenyl and 2-hydroxybiphenylmethane were effectors for HbpR activation. HbpR is therefore, to our knowledge, the first regulator of the XylR/DmpR class that recognizes biaromatic but not monoaromatic structures. Analysis of a spontaneously occurring mutant, P. azelaica HBP1 Prp, which can grow with the non-wild-type effector 2-propylphenol, revealed a single mutation in the hbpR gene (T613C) leading to a Trp-->Arg substitution at amino acid residue 205. P. azelaica HBP1 derivative strains without a functional hbpR gene constitutively expressed the genes for 2-hydroxybiphenyl degradation when complemented in trans with the hbpR-T613C gene. This suggests the importance of this residue, which is conserved among all members of the XylR/DmpR subclass, for interdomain repression.

Aromatic ligand binding and intramolecular signalling of the phenol-responsive sigma54-dependent regulator DmpR

The Pseudomonas-derived sigma54-dependent regulator DmpR has an amino-terminal A-domain controlling the specificity of activation by aromatic effectors, a central C-domain mediating an ATPase activity essential for transcriptional activation and a carboxy-terminal D-domain involved in DNA binding. In the presence of aromatic effectors, the DmpR protein promotes transcription from the -24, -12 Po promoter controlling the expression of specialized (methyl)phenol catabolic enzymes. Previous analysis of DmpR has led to a model in which the A-domain acts as an interdomain repressor of DmpR's ATPase and transcriptional promoting property until specific aromatic effectors are bound. Here, the autonomous nature of the A-domain in exerting its biological functions has been dissected by expressing portions of DmpR as independent polypeptides. The A-domain of DmpR is shown to be both necessary and sufficient to bind phenol. Analysis of phenol binding suggests one binding site per monomer of DmpR, with a dissociation constant of 16 microM. The A-domain is also shown to have specific affinity for the C-domain and to repress the C-domain mediated ATPase activity in vitro autonomously. However, physical uncoupling of the A-domain from the remainder of the regulator results in a system that does not respond to aromatics by its normal derepression mechanism. The mechanistic implications of aromatic non-responsiveness of autonomously expressed A-domain, despite its demonstrated ability to bind phenol, are discussed.

Modulation of the function of the signal receptor domain of XylR, a member of a family of prokaryotic enhancer-like positive regulators

The XylR protein controls expression from the Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid upper pathway operon promoter (Pu) in response to aromatic effectors. XylR-dependent stimulation of transcription from a Pu::lacZ fusion shows different induction kinetics with different effectors. With toluene, activation followed a hyperbolic curve with an apparent K of 0.95 mM and a maximum beta-galactosidase activity of 2,550 Miller units. With o-nitrotoluene, in contrast, activation followed a sigmoidal curve with an apparent K of 0.55 mM and a Hill coefficient of 2.65. m-Nitrotoluene kept the XylR regulator in an inactive transcriptional form. Therefore, upon binding of an effector, the substituent on the aromatic ring leads to productive or unproductive XylR forms. The different transcriptional states of the XylR regulator are substantiated by XylR mutants. XylRE172K is a mutant regulator that is able to stimulate transcription from the Pu promoter in the presence of m-nitrotoluene; however, its response to m-aminotoluene was negligible, in contrast with the wild-type regulator. These results illustrate the importance of the electrostatic interactions in effector recognition and in the stabilization of productive and unproductive forms by the regulator upon aromatic binding. XylRD135N and XylRD135Q are mutant regulators that are able to stimulate transcription from Pu in the absence of effectors, whereas substitution of Glu for Asp135 in XylRD135E resulted in a mutant whose ability to recognize effectors was severely impaired. Therefore, the conformation of mutant XylRD135Q as well as XylRD135N seemed to mimic that of the wild-type regulator when effector binding occurred, whereas mutant XylRD135E seemed to be blocked in a conformation similar to that of wild-type XylR and XylRE172K upon binding to an inhibitor molecule such as m-nitrotoluene or m-aminotoluene.

Transcriptional control of the Pseudomonas TOL plasmid catabolic operons is achieved through an interplay of host factors and plasmid-encoded regulators

The xyl genes of Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid that specify catabolism of toluene and xylenes are organized in four transcriptional units: the upper-operon xylUWCAMBN for conversion of toluene/xylenes into benzoate/alkylbenzoates; the meta-operon xylXYZLTEGFJQKIH, which encodes the enzymes for further conversion of these compounds into Krebs cycle intermediates; and xylS and xylR, which are involved in transcriptional control. The XylS and XylR proteins are members of the XylS/AraC and NtrC families, respectively, of transcriptional regulators. The xylS gene is constitutively expressed at a low level from the Ps2 promoter. The XylS protein is activated by interaction with alkylbenzoates, and this active form stimulates transcription from Pm by sigma70- or sigmaS-containing RNA polymerase (the meta loop). The xylR gene is also expressed constitutively. The XylR protein, which in the absence of effectors binds in a nonactive form to target DNA sequences, is activated by aromatic hydrocarbons and ATP; it subsequently undergoes multimerization and structural changes that result in stimulation of transcription from Pu of the upper operon. This latter process is assisted by the IHF protein and mediated by sigma54-containing RNA polymerase. Once activated, the XylR protein also stimulates transcription from the Ps1 promoter of xylS without interfering with expression from Ps2. This process is assisted by the HU protein and is mediated by sigma54-containing RNA polymerase. As a consequence of hyperexpression of the xylS gene, the XylS protein is hyperproduced and stimulates transcription from Pm even in the absence of effectors (the cascade loop). The two sigma54-dependent promoters are additionally subject to global (catabolite repression) control.

Identification of the repressor subdomain within the signal reception module of the prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein XylR of Pseudomonas putida

In the presence of m-xylene, the protein XylR encoded by the TOL plasmid of Pseudomonas putida, activates the final sigma54-dependent promoter Pu. Early activation stages involve the release of the intramolecular repression caused by the signal reception N-terminal (A domain) of XylR on the central module of the protein. A genetic approach has been followed to locate the specific segment within A domain of XylR that is directly responsible for its down-regulation in the absence of inducer, as compared to that involved in effector (m-xylene) binding. For this, a reporter Escherichia coli strain carrying a monocopy transcriptional fusion of Pu to lacZ was transformed with a collection of plasmids encoding equivalent truncated varieties of XylR, consisting of nested and internal deletions throughout the entire A domain. Examination of the resulting phenotypes allowed the assignment of the A domain region near the central activation domain, as the portion of the protein responsible for the specific repression of XylR activity in the absence of m-xylene.

The nucleotide concentration determines the specificity of in vitro transcription activation by the sigma 54-dependent activator FhlA

An in vitro transcription system has been set up for formate- and FhlA-dependent transcription activation at the -12/-24 promoter of the fdhF gene from Escherichia coli by sigma 54-RNA polymerase. It requires the presence of the upstream activation sequence on supercoiled DNA. Transcription is independent from the effector formate at nucleoside triphosphate concentrations of 400 microM and above and completely dependent on the presence of the effector when the concentration is lowered to 300 microM. Inclusion of nucleoside diphosphates in the system raises the nucleoside triphosphate level at which specific induction by formate can take place. The threshold level of FhlA relative to that of template DNA required for transcription activation in the absence of formate was lowered at a high nucleoside triphosphate concentration. On the other hand, transcription activation at the fdhF promoter lacking the upstream activation sequence requires an increased ratio of FhlA to promoter plus the presence of formate; high ATP concentrations cannot bypass the effect of formate. These results are interpreted in terms of a model which implies that FhlA must undergo a change in its oligomeric state for transcription activation and that this oligomerization is favored by high nucleoside triphosphate concentrations, by the effector formate, and by the target DNA. In the absence of the target DNA, FhlA can line up at unspecific DNA and activate transcription; in this case, however, presence of formate and a higher FhlA concentration are required to stabilize and increase the amount of active oligomer.

The amino-terminal domain of the prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein XylR is a specific intramolecular repressor

The mechanism under which the signal-reception amino-terminal portion (A domain) of the prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein XylR controls the activity of the regulator has been investigated through complementation tests in vivo, in which the various protein segments were produced as independent polypeptides. Separate expression of the A domain repressed the otherwise constitutive activity of a truncated derivative of XylR deleted of its A domain (XylR delta A). Such inhibition was not released by m-xylene, the natural inducer of the system. Repression caused by the A domain was specific for XylR because it did not affect activation of the sigma 54 promoter PnifH by a derivative of its cognate regulator, NifA, deleted of its own A domain. The A domain was also unable to repress the activity of a NifA-XylR hybrid protein resulting from fusing two-thirds of the central domain of NifA to the carboxyl-terminal third of XylR, which includes its DNA-binding domain. The inhibitory effect caused by the A domain of XylR on XylR delta A seems, therefore, to result from specific interactions in trans between the two truncated proteins and not from mere hindering of an activating surface.