Abortive cycling and the release of polymerase for elongation at the sigma 54-dependent glnAp2 promoter

The bacterial enhancer-dependent RNA polymerase

Transcription initiation is highly regulated in bacterial cells, allowing adaptive gene regulation in response to environment cues. One class of promoter specificity factor called sigma54 enables such adaptive gene expression through its ability to lock the RNA polymerase down into a state unable to melt out promoter DNA for transcription initiation. Promoter DNA opening then occurs through the action of specialized transcription control proteins called bacterial enhancer-binding proteins (bEBPs) that remodel the sigma54 factor within the closed promoter complexes. The remodelling of sigma54 occurs through an ATP-binding and hydrolysis reaction carried out by the bEBPs. The regulation of bEBP self-assembly into typically homomeric hexamers allows regulated gene expression since the self-assembly is required for bEBP ATPase activity and its direct engagement with the sigma54 factor during the remodelling reaction. Crystallographic studies have now established that in the closed promoter complex, the sigma54 factor occupies the bacterial RNA polymerase in ways that will physically impede promoter DNA opening and the loading of melted out promoter DNA into the DNA-binding clefts of the RNA polymerase. Large-scale structural re-organizations of sigma54 require contact of the bEBP with an amino-terminal glutamine and leucine-rich sequence of sigma54, and lead to domain movements within the core RNA polymerase necessary for making open promoter complexes and synthesizing the nascent RNA transcript.

A perspective on the enhancer dependent bacterial RNA polymerase

Here we review recent findings and offer a perspective on how the major variant RNA polymerase of bacteria, which contains the sigma54 factor, functions for regulated gene expression. We consider what gaps exist in our understanding of its genetic, biochemical and biophysical functioning and how they might be addressed.

Identification of multiple rate-limiting steps during the human mitochondrial transcription cycle in vitro

We have reconstituted human mitochondrial transcription in vitro on DNA oligonucleotide templates representing the light strand and heavy strand-1 promoters using protein components (RNA polymerase and transcription factors A and B2) isolated from Escherichia coli. We show that 1 eq of each transcription factor and polymerase relative to the promoter is required to assemble a functional initiation complex. The light strand promoter is at least 2-fold more efficient than the heavy strand-1 promoter, but this difference cannot be explained solely by the differences in the interaction of the transcription machinery with the different promoters. In both cases, the rate-limiting step for production of the first phosphodiester bond is open complex formation. Open complex formation requires both transcription factors; however, steps immediately thereafter only require transcription factor B2. The concentration of nucleotide required for production of the first dinucleotide product is substantially higher than that required for subsequent cycles of nucleotide addition. In vitro, promoter-specific differences in post-initiation control of transcription exist, as well as a second rate-limiting step that controls conversion of the transcription initiation complex into a transcription elongation complex. Rate-limiting steps of the biochemical pathways are often those that are targeted for regulation. Like the more complex multisubunit transcription systems, multiple steps may exist for control of transcription in human mitochondria. The tools and mechanistic framework presented here will facilitate not only the discovery of mechanisms regulating human mitochondrial transcription but also interrogation of the structure, function, and mechanism of the complexes that are regulated during human mitochondrial transcription.

Mechanism of instability in abortive cycling by T7 RNA polymerase

Abortive transcription, the premature release of short transcripts 2-8 bases in length, is a unique feature of transcription, accompanying the transition from initiation to elongation in all RNA polymerases. The current study focuses on major factors that relate to the stability of initially transcribing abortive complexes in T7 RNA polymerase. Building on previous studies, results reveal that collapse of the DNA from the downstream end of the bubble is a major contributor to the characteristic instability of abortive complexes. Furthermore, transcription from a novel DNA construct containing a nick between positions -14 and -13 of the nontemplate strand suggests that the more flexible promoter reduces somewhat the strain inherent in initially transcribing complexes, with a resulting decrease in abortive product release. Finally, as assessed by exonuclease III footprinting and transcription profiles, a DNA construct defective in bubble collapse specifically from the downstream end exhibits less abortive cycling and little perturbation of the final transition to elongation, including the process of promoter release.

Mediator Requirement for Both Recruitment and Postrecruitment Steps in Transcription Initiation

Mediator complexes are required for activators to stimulate Pol II preinitiation complex assembly on an associated promoter. We show here that for the mouse Egr1 gene, controlled largely by MAP kinase phosphorylation of the ELK1 transcription factor, the MED23 Mediator subunit that interacts with phospho-ELK1 is also required to stimulate Pol II initiation at a step subsequent to preinitiation complex assembly. In Med23-/- cells, histone acetylation, methylation, and chromatin remodeling complex association at the Egr1 promoter were equivalent to that of wild-type cells, yet Egr1 induction was greatly reduced. MAP kinase activation stimulated Pol II and GTF promoter binding. However, the difference in factor binding between wild-type and mutant cells was much less than the difference in transcription, and Pol II remained localized to the promoter in mutant cells. These results indicate that an interaction with MED23 stimulates initiation by promoter bound Pol II in addition to Pol II and GTF recruitment.

Weakening of the T7 promoter-polymerase interaction facilitates promoter release

During transcription initiation, RNA polymerases retain interactions with their promoters until the RNA is extended to 8-13 nucleotides, at which point the polymerase releases the promoter and moves downstream. It has been shown that release of the T7 promoter is inhibited when the T7 RNA polymerase-promoter interaction is strengthened. Here we asked whether release would be facilitated when the T7 promoter-polymerase interaction is weakened by the introduction of promoter mutations known to reduce promoter activity. Using chemical and enzymatic probes to monitor the position of the polymerase as a function of RNA length, we found that promoter mutations upstream of -4 facilitated release of the polymerase from the promoter, but more downstream mutations did not have such effects. We also found that released complexes turn over more slowly than promoter-bound complexes, indicating that retention of promoter interactions contributes to the dissociation of short RNAs during initial transcription.

Multiple roles for the T7 promoter nontemplate strand during transcription initiation and polymerase release

Transcription initiation begins with recruitment of an RNA polymerase to a promoter. Polymerase-promoter interactions are retained until the nascent RNA is extended to 8-12 nucleotides. It has been proposed that accumulation of "strain" in the transcription complex and RNA displacement of promoter-polymerase interactions contribute to releasing the polymerase from the promoter, and it has been further speculated that too strong a promoter interaction can inhibit the release step, whereas a weak interaction may facilitate release. We examined the effects of partial deletion of the nontemplate strand on release of T7 RNA polymerase from the T7 promoter. T7 polymerase will initiate from such partially single-stranded promoters but binds them with higher affinity than duplex promoters. We found that release on partially single-stranded promoters is strongly inhibited. The inhibition of release is not due to an indirect effect on transcription complex structure or loss of specific polymerase-nontemplate strand interactions, because release on partially single-stranded templates is recovered if the interaction with the promoter is weakened by a promoter base substitution. This same substitution also appears to allow the polymerase to escape more readily from a duplex promoter. Our results further suggest that template-nontemplate strand reannealing drives dissociation of abortive transcripts during initial transcription and that loss of interactions with either the nontemplate strand or duplex DNA downstream of the RNA lead to increased transcription complex slippage during initiation.

Mapping sigma 54-RNA polymerase interactions at the -24 consensus promoter element

The sigma 54 promoter specificity factor is distinct from sigma 70-type factors. The sigma 54-RNA polymerase binds to promoters with conserved sequence elements at -24 and -12 and utilizes specialized enhancer-binding activators to convert, through an ATP-dependent process, closed promoter complexes to open promoter complexes. The interface between sigma 54-RNA polymerase and promoter DNA is poorly characterized, contrasting with sigma 70. Here, sigma 54 was modified with strategically positioned cleavage reagents to provide physical evidence that the highly conserved RpoN box motif of sigma 54 is close to and may therefore interact with the consensus -24 promoter element. We show that the spatial relationship between the sigma 54-RNA polymerase and the -24 promoter element remains unchanged during closed to open complex conversion and transcription initiation but changes during the early elongation phase. In contrast, the spatial relationship between sigma 54-RNA polymerase and the consensus -12 promoter element changes upon conversion of the closed promoter complex to an open one. We provide evidence that some -12 promoter region-sigma 54 interactions are dependent upon either the core RNA polymerase or a fork junction DNA structure at the -12-position, indicating that DNA fork junctions can substitute for core RNAP. We also show the beta-subunit flap domain contributes to different sets of sigma-promoter DNA interactions at sigma 54- and sigma 70-dependent promoters.

T7 promoter release mediated by DNA scrunching

Transcription initiation includes a phase in which short transcripts dissociate from the transcription complex and the polymerase appears not to move away from the promoter. During this process DNA may scrunch within the complex or the polymerase may transiently break promoter contacts to transcribe downstream DNA. Promoter release allowing extended downstream movement of the polymerase may be caused by RNA-mediated disruption of promoter contacts, or by limits on the amount of DNA that can be scrunched. Using exonuclease and KMnO4 footprinting of T7RNAP transcription complexes we show that the DNA scrunches during progression through initial transcription. To determine whether promoter release is determined by RNA length or by the amount of DNA scrunched, we compared release at promoters where the polymerase is forced to initiate at +2 with those where it initiates at +1. For RNAs of identical length, release is greater when more DNA is scrunched. Release is inhibited when a nick introduced into the template relieves the strain of scrunching. DNA scrunching therefore makes an important contribution to T7 promoter release.

Structural basis of transcription: an RNA polymerase II elongation complex at 3.3 A resolution

The crystal structure of RNA polymerase II in the act of transcription was determined at 3.3 A resolution. Duplex DNA is seen entering the main cleft of the enzyme and unwinding before the active site. Nine base pairs of DNA-RNA hybrid extend from the active center at nearly right angles to the entering DNA, with the 3' end of the RNA in the nucleotide addition site. The 3' end is positioned above a pore, through which nucleotides may enter and through which RNA may be extruded during back-tracking. The 5'-most residue of the RNA is close to the point of entry to an exit groove. Changes in protein structure between the transcribing complex and free enzyme include closure of a clamp over the DNA and RNA and ordering of a series of "switches" at the base of the clamp to create a binding site complementary to the DNA-RNA hybrid. Protein-nucleic acid contacts help explain DNA and RNA strand separation, the specificity of RNA synthesis, "abortive cycling" during transcription initiation, and RNA and DNA translocation during transcription elongation.

Abortive initiation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase III

Promoter escape can be rate-limiting for transcription by bacterial RNA polymerases and RNA polymerase II of higher eukaryotes. Formation of a productive elongation complex requires disengagement of RNA polymerase from promoter-bound eukaryotic transcription factors or bacterial sigma factors. RNA polymerase III (pol III) stably associates with the TFIIIB-DNA complex even in the absence of localized DNA unwinding associated with the open promoter complex. To explore the role that release of pol III from the TFIIIB-DNA complex plays in limiting the overall rate of transcription, we have examined the early steps of RNA synthesis. We find that, on average, only three rounds of abortive initiation precede the formation of each elongation complex and that nearly all pol III molecules escape the abortive initiation phase of transcription without significant pausing or arrest. However, when elongation is limited to 5 nucleotides, the intrinsic exoribonuclease activity of pol III cleaves 5-mer RNA at a rate considerably faster than product release or reinitiation. This cleavage also occurs in the normal process of forming a productive elongation complex. The possible role of nucleolytic retraction in disengaging pol III from TFIIIB is discussed.

Abortive initiation of transcription at a hybrid promoter. An analysis of the sliding clamp activator of bacteriophage T4 late transcription, and a comparison of the sigma70 and T4 gp55 promoter recognition proteins

Bacteriophage T4 late promoters are transcribed by an RNA polymerase holoenzyme comprising the Escherichia coli core, E, the phage gene 55-encoded promoter recognition subunit, gp55, and the gene 33-encoded co-activator, gp33. Transcriptional initiation is activated by the T4 gene 45-encoded sliding clamp, which is loaded on to DNA at enhancer-like sites by its clamp-loader. Correct initiation of transcription at late promoters in basal mode requires only RNA polymerase core and gp55 (E.gp55). Dinucleotide-primed abortive initiation of basal and activated T4 late transcription has been compared. Only the trinucleotide non-productive transcript is made at a high rate; all other short transcripts are made at rates of less than one molecule per productive transcript. Gp45 increases abortive trinucleotide synthesis along with productive transcription, although the proportion of productive transcripts is also elevated. Nevertheless, this increase accounts for only a small part of the activation of T4 late transcription that is generated by its activator and co-activator. The pattern of production of short transcripts differs subtly between basal and enhanced transcription, indicating that linking the RNA polymerase with its sliding clamp activator only generates minor changes in the transition from abortive to productive RNA chain elongation. The T4 late promoter is converted to a strong sigma70 promoter by inserting an appropriate -35 promoter element. A direct comparison at such a hybrid promoter shows sigma70 and gp55 generating qualitatively and quantitative different patterns of abortive initiation at the same start site.

Active recruitment of sigma54-RNA polymerase to the Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida: role of IHF and alphaCTD

The sequence elements determining the binding of the sigma54-containing RNA polymerase (sigma54-RNAP) to the Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida have been examined. Contrary to previous results in related systems, we show that the integration host factor (IHF) binding stimulates the recruitment of the enzyme to the -12/-24 sequence motifs. Such a recruitment, which is fully independent of the activator of the system, XylR, requires the interaction of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNAP with specific DNA sequences upstream of the IHF site which are reminiscent of the UP elements in sigma70 promoters. Our data show that this interaction is mainly brought about by the distinct geometry of the promoter region caused by IHF binding and the ensuing DNA bending. These results support the view that binding of sigma54-RNAP to a promoter is a step that can be subjected to regulation by factors (e.g. IHF) other than the sole intrinsic affinity of sigma54-RNAP for the -12/-24 site.

Role of open complex instability in kinetic promoter selection by bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase

By measuring steady-state rates of dinucleotide synthesis on double-stranded (d.s.) and partially single-stranded (p.s.s.) promoters, and topological unwinding due to open complex formation on plasmids, we have obtained evidence that open complex formation in bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase:promoter binary complexes is thermodynamically disfavored and that the rate of collapse of the open complex is competitive with the rate of transcription initiation. It is suggested that open complex instability is a kinetic mechanism that allows T7 RNA polymerase (RNAP) to achieve promoter specificity while still allowing for efficient promoter release. Open complex instability could also provide a mechanism for modulating the KM for the initiating NTPs so as to allow different promoters to respond differently to physiological changes in NTP concentration.

The transcription initiation pathway of sigma 54 mutants that bypass the enhancer protein requirement. Implications for the mechanism of activation

In vitro transcription, DNase I footprinting, and abortive initiation assays were used to characterize transcription using mutant forms of sigma 54 shown previously to bypass certain enhancer requirements in vitro. The holoenzymes containing these sigma mutants produce low levels of open complexes at both the glnAp2 and glnHp2 promoters. The open complexes are unusual in that they are destroyed by heparin. Enhancer protein and ATP convert them into a stable heparin-resistant state. The enhancer response occurs over a similar range of NtrC concentration as occurs with the wild-type holoenzyme, indicating that the activation determinants have been largely preserved within these mutants. One-round transcription assays show that the mutant holoenzymes can be driven to transcribe both promoters without NtrC. The unstable opening induced by these mutations apparently serves as a conduit that can shuttle templates into transcriptionally competent complexes. The results lead to a model in which activation occurs in two steps. First, the enhancer complex overcomes an inhibitory effect of the sigma 54 leucine patch and unlocks the melting activity of the holoenzyme. Second, different sigma 54 determinants are used to drive stabilization of the open complexes, allowing the full transcription potential to be realized.

Converting Escherichia coli RNA polymerase into an enhancer-responsive enzyme: role of an NH2-terminal leucine patch in sigma 54

The protein sigma 54 associates with Escherichia coli core RNA polymerase to form a holoenzyme that binds promoters but is inactive in the absence of enhancer activation. Here, mutants of sigma 54 enabled polymerases to transcribe without enhancer protein and adenosine triphosphate. The mutations are in leucines within the NH2-terminal glutamine-rich domain of sigma 54. Multiple leucine substitutions mimicked the effect of enhancer protein, which suggests that the enhancer protein functions to disrupt a leucine patch. The results indicate that sigma 54 acts both as an inhibitor of polymerase activity and as a receptor that interacts with enhancer protein to overcome this inhibition, and that these two activities jointly confer enhancer responsiveness.

A novel bacterial transcription cycle involving sigma 54

sigma 54 is the promoter recognition subunit of the form of bacterial RNA polymerase that transcribes from promoters with enhancer elements. DNase footprinting experiments show that sigma 54 is attached selectively to the template strand, which must be single-stranded for transcription initiation. sigma 54 remains bound at the promoter after core polymerase begins elongation, in contrast to the well-established sigma 70-holoenzyme transcription cycle. Permanganate footprinting experiments show that the bound sigma 54 and the elongating core RNA polymerase downstream of it are each associated with a single-strand DNA region. Template commitment assays show that the promoter-bound sigma 54 must be reconfigured before reinitiation of transcription can occur. This unexpected pathway raises interesting possibilities for transcriptional regulation, especially with regard to control at the level of reinitiation.