The non-histone chromatin protein HMG1 protects linker DNA on the side opposite to that protected by linker histones

Interactions of HMGB Proteins with the Genome and the Impact on Disease

High Mobility Group Box (HMGB) proteins are small architectural DNA binding proteins that regulate multiple genomic processes such as DNA damage repair, nucleosome sliding, telomere homeostasis, and transcription. In doing so they control both normal cellular functions and impact a myriad of disease states, including cancers and autoimmune diseases. HMGB proteins bind to DNA and nucleosomes to modulate the local chromatin environment, which facilitates the binding of regulatory protein factors to the genome and modulates higher order chromosomal organization. Numerous studies over the years have characterized the structure and function of interactions between HMGB proteins and DNA, both biochemically and inside cells, providing valuable mechanistic insight as well as evidence these interactions influence pathological processes. This review highlights recent studies supporting the roles of HMGB1 and HMGB2 in global organization of the genome, as well as roles in transcriptional regulation and telomere maintenance via interactions with G-quadruplex structures. Moreover, emerging models for how HMGB proteins function as RNA binding proteins are presented. Nuclear HMGB proteins have broad regulatory potential to impact numerous aspects of cellular metabolism in normal and disease states.

Protein intrinsic disorder on a dynamic nucleosomal landscape

The complex nucleoprotein landscape of the eukaryotic cell nucleus is rich in dynamic proteins that lack a stable three-dimensional structure. Many of these intrinsically disordered proteins operate directly on the first fundamental level of genome compaction: the nucleosome. Here we give an overview of how disordered interactions with and within nucleosomes shape the dynamics, architecture, and epigenetic regulation of the genetic material, controlling cellular transcription patterns. We highlight experimental and computational challenges in the study of protein disorder and illustrate how integrative approaches are increasingly unveiling the fine details of nuclear interaction networks. We finally dissect sequence properties encoded in disordered regions and assess common features of disordered nucleosome-binding proteins. As drivers of many critical biological processes, disordered proteins are integral to a comprehensive molecular view of the dynamic nuclear milieu.

Yeast HMO1: Linker Histone Reinvented

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged in chromatin. The higher-order organization of nucleosome core particles is controlled by the association of the intervening linker DNA with either the linker histone H1 or high mobility group box (HMGB) proteins. While H1 is thought to stabilize the nucleosome by preventing DNA unwrapping, the DNA bending imposed by HMGB may propagate to the nucleosome to destabilize chromatin. For metazoan H1, chromatin compaction requires its lysine-rich C-terminal domain, a domain that is buried between globular domains in the previously characterized yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae linker histone Hho1p. Here, we discuss the functions of S. cerevisiae HMO1, an HMGB family protein unique in containing a terminal lysine-rich domain and in stabilizing genomic DNA. On ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and genes encoding ribosomal proteins, HMO1 appears to exert its role primarily by stabilizing nucleosome-free regions or "fragile" nucleosomes. During replication, HMO1 likewise appears to ensure low nucleosome density at DNA junctions associated with the DNA damage response or the need for topoisomerases to resolve catenanes. Notably, HMO1 shares with the mammalian linker histone H1 the ability to stabilize chromatin, as evidenced by the absence of HMO1 creating a more dynamic chromatin environment that is more sensitive to nuclease digestion and in which chromatin-remodeling events associated with DNA double-strand break repair occur faster; such chromatin stabilization requires the lysine-rich extension of HMO1. Thus, HMO1 appears to have evolved a unique linker histone-like function involving the ability to stabilize both conventional nucleosome arrays as well as DNA regions characterized by low nucleosome density or the presence of noncanonical nucleosomes.

Deciphering the role of the AT-rich interaction domain and the HMG-box domain of ARID-HMG proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana

ARID-HMG DNA-binding proteins represent a novel group of HMG-box containing protein family where the AT-rich interaction domain (ARID) is fused with the HMG-box domain in a single polypeptide chain. ARID-HMG proteins are highly plant specific with homologs found both in flowering plants as well as in moss such as Physcomitrella. The expression of these proteins is ubiquitous in plant tissues and primarily localises in the cell nucleus. HMGB proteins are involved in several nuclear processes, but the role of ARID-HMG proteins in plants remains poorly explored. Here, we performed DNA-protein interaction studies with Arabidopsis ARID-HMG protein HMGB11 (At1g55650) to understand the functionality of this protein and its individual domains. DNA binding assays revealed that AtHMGB11 can bind double-stranded DNA with a weaker affinity (Kd = 475 ± 17.9 nM) compared to Arabidopsis HMGB1 protein (Kd = 39.8 ± 2.68 nM). AtHMGB11 also prefers AT-rich DNA as a substrate and shows structural bias for supercoiled DNA. Molecular docking of the DNA-AtHMGB11 complex indicated that the protein interacts with the DNA major groove, mainly through its ARID domain and the junction region connecting the ARID and the HMG-box domain. Also, predicted by the docking model, mutation of Lys(85) from the ARID domain and Arg(199) & Lys(202) from the junction region affects the DNA binding affinity of AtHMGB11. In addition, AtHMGB11 and its truncated form containing the HMG-box domain can not only promote DNA mini-circle formation but are also capable of inducing negative supercoils into relaxed plasmid DNA suggesting the involvement of this protein in several nuclear events. Overall, the study signifies that both the ARID and the HMG-box domain contribute to the optimal functioning of ARID-HMG protein in vivo.

Functional interplay between histone H1 and HMG proteins in chromatin

The dynamic interaction of nucleosome binding proteins with their chromatin targets is an important element in regulating the structure and function of chromatin. Histone H1 variants and High Mobility Group (HMG) proteins are ubiquitously expressed in all vertebrate cells, bind dynamically to chromatin, and are known to affect chromatin condensation and the ability of regulatory factors to access their genomic binding sites. Here, we review the studies that focus on the interactions between H1 and HMGs and highlight the functional consequences of the interplay between these architectural chromatin binding proteins. H1 and HMG proteins are mobile molecules that bind to nucleosomes as members of a dynamic protein network. All HMGs compete with H1 for chromatin binding sites, in a dose dependent fashion, but each HMG family has specific effects on the interaction of H1 with chromatin. The interplay between H1 and HMGs affects chromatin organization and plays a role in epigenetic regulation.

HMGB1 in health and disease

Complex genetic and physiological variations as well as environmental factors that drive emergence of chromosomal instability, development of unscheduled cell death, skewed differentiation, and altered metabolism are central to the pathogenesis of human diseases and disorders. Understanding the molecular bases for these processes is important for the development of new diagnostic biomarkers, and for identifying new therapeutic targets. In 1973, a group of non-histone nuclear proteins with high electrophoretic mobility was discovered and termed high-mobility group (HMG) proteins. The HMG proteins include three superfamilies termed HMGB, HMGN, and HMGA. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), the most abundant and well-studied HMG protein, senses and coordinates the cellular stress response and plays a critical role not only inside of the cell as a DNA chaperone, chromosome guardian, autophagy sustainer, and protector from apoptotic cell death, but also outside the cell as the prototypic damage associated molecular pattern molecule (DAMP). This DAMP, in conjunction with other factors, thus has cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor activity, orchestrating the inflammatory and immune response. All of these characteristics make HMGB1 a critical molecular target in multiple human diseases including infectious diseases, ischemia, immune disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders, and cancer. Indeed, a number of emergent strategies have been used to inhibit HMGB1 expression, release, and activity in vitro and in vivo. These include antibodies, peptide inhibitors, RNAi, anti-coagulants, endogenous hormones, various chemical compounds, HMGB1-receptor and signaling pathway inhibition, artificial DNAs, physical strategies including vagus nerve stimulation and other surgical approaches. Future work further investigating the details of HMGB1 localization, structure, post-translational modification, and identification of additional partners will undoubtedly uncover additional secrets regarding HMGB1's multiple functions.

The chromatin architectural proteins HMGD1 and H1 bind reciprocally and have opposite effects on chromatin structure and gene regulation

BACKGROUND

Chromatin architectural proteins interact with nucleosomes to modulate chromatin accessibility and higher-order chromatin structure. While these proteins are almost certainly important for gene regulation they have been studied far less than the core histone proteins.

RESULTS

Here we describe the genomic distributions and functional roles of two chromatin architectural proteins: histone H1 and the high mobility group protein HMGD1 in Drosophila S2 cells. Using ChIP-seq, biochemical and gene specific approaches, we find that HMGD1 binds to highly accessible regulatory chromatin and active promoters. In contrast, H1 is primarily associated with heterochromatic regions marked with repressive histone marks. We find that the ratio of HMGD1 to H1 binding is a better predictor of gene activity than either protein by itself, which suggests that reciprocal binding between these proteins is important for gene regulation. Using knockdown experiments, we show that HMGD1 and H1 affect the occupancy of the other protein, change nucleosome repeat length and modulate gene expression.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, our data suggest that dynamic and mutually exclusive binding of H1 and HMGD1 to nucleosomes and their linker sequences may control the fluid chromatin structure that is required for transcriptional regulation. This study provides a framework to further study the interplay between chromatin architectural proteins and epigenetics in gene regulation.

Characterization of the interaction between HMGB1 and H3-a possible means of positioning HMGB1 in chromatin

High mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) binds to the internucleosomal linker DNA in chromatin and abuts the nucleosome. Bending and untwisting of the linker DNA results in transmission of strain to the nucleosome core, disrupting histone/DNA contacts. An interaction between H3 and HMGB1 has been reported. Here we confirm and characterize the interaction of HMGB1 with H3, which lies close to the DNA entry/exit points around the nucleosome dyad, and may be responsible for positioning of HMGB1 on the linker DNA. We show that the interaction is between the N-terminal unstructured tail of H3 and the C-terminal unstructured acidic tail of HMGB1, which are presumably displaced from DNA and the HMG boxes, respectively, in the HMGB1-nucleosome complex. We have characterized the interaction by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and show that it is extensive for both peptides, and appears not to result in the acquisition of significant secondary structure by either partner.

H1 and HMGB1: modulators of chromatin structure

Histone H1 and HMGB1 (high-mobility group protein B1) are the most abundant chromosomal proteins apart from the core histones (on average, one copy per nucleosome and per ten nucleosomes respectively). They are both highly mobile in the cell nucleus, with high on/off rates for binding. In vivo and in vitro evidence shows that both are able to organize chromatin structure, with H1 binding resulting in a more stable structure and HMGB1 binding in a less stable structure. The binding sites for H1 and HMGB1 in chromatin are partially overlapping, and replacement of H1 by HMGB1 through the highly dynamic nature of their binding, possibly facilitated by interaction between them, could result in switching of chromatin states. Binding of HMGB1 to DNA or chromatin is regulated by its long and highly acidic tail, which is also involved in H1 binding. The present article focuses mainly on HMGB1 and its interaction with chromatin and H1, as well as its chaperone role in the binding of certain transcription factors (e.g. p53) to their cognate DNA.

The activity of the histone chaperone yeast Asf1 in the assembly and disassembly of histone H3/H4-DNA complexes

The deposition of the histones H3/H4 onto DNA to give the tetrasome intermediate and the displacement of H3/H4 from DNA are thought to be the first and the last steps in nucleosome assembly and disassembly, respectively. Anti-silencing function 1 (Asf1) is a chaperone of the H3/H4 dimer that functions in both of these processes. However, little is known about the thermodynamics of chaperone–histone interactions or the direct role of Asf1 in the formation or disassembly of histone–DNA complexes. Here, we show that Saccharomyces cerevisiae Asf1 shields H3/H4 from unfavorable DNA interactions and aids the formation of favorable histone–DNA interactions through the formation of disomes. However, Asf1 was unable to disengage histones from DNA for tetrasomes formed with H3/H4 and strong nucleosome positioning DNA sequences or tetrasomes weakened by mutant (H3K56Q/H4) histones or non-positioning DNA sequences. Furthermore, Asf1 did not associate with preformed tetrasomes. These results are consistent with the measured affinity of Asf1 for H3/H4 dimers of 2.5 nM, which is weaker than the association of H3/H4 for DNA. These studies support a mechanism by which Asf1 aids H3/H4 deposition onto DNA but suggest that additional factors or post-translational modifications are required for Asf1 to remove H3/H4 from tetrasome intermediates in chromatin.

Nucleosome binding properties and Co-remodeling activities of native and in vivo acetylated HMGB-1 and HMGB-2 proteins

The participation of HMGB-1 and -2 proteins in chromatin remodeling is investigated. Here, the ability of these proteins and their posttranslationally acetylated forms to affect SWI/SNF and RSC-dependent nucleosome mobilization was studied. Both proteins assisted nucleosome sliding induced by the two remodelers. Following acetylation, these proteins acquire the ability to bind to core particles, a property that has not yet been documented with parental proteins. We further report that compared to the nonmodified proteins, acetylated HMGB-1 and -2 exhibited both stronger binding to linker DNA-containing nucleosomes and a higher co-remodeling activity. Acetylation of HMGB-1 and -2 proteins enhanced binding of SWI/SNF to the nucleosome but did not affect its ATPase activity.

The interaction of HMGB1 and linker histones occurs through their acidic and basic tails

H1 and HMGB1 bind to linker DNA in chromatin, in the vicinity of the nucleosome dyad. They appear to have opposing effects on the nucleosome, H1 stabilising it by "sealing" two turns of DNA around the octamer, and HMGB1 destabilising it, probably by bending the adjacent DNA. Their presence in chromatin might be mutually exclusive. Displacement/replacement of one by the other as a result of their highly dynamic binding in vivo might, in principle, involve interactions between them. Chemical cross-linking and gel-filtration show that a 1:1 linker histone/HMGB1 complex is formed, which persists at physiological ionic strength, and that complex formation requires the acidic tail of HMGB1. NMR spectroscopy shows that the linker histone binds, predominantly through its basic C-terminal domain, to the acidic tail of HMGB1, thereby disrupting the interaction of the tail with the DNA-binding faces of the HMG boxes. A potential consequence of this interaction is enhanced DNA binding by HMGB1, and concomitantly lowered affinity of H1 for DNA. In a chromatin context, this might facilitate displacement of H1 by HMGB1.

The linker-protein network: control of nucleosomal DNA accessibility

Numerous studies have recently addressed the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA to protein factors. Two popular concepts - the histone code and chromatin remodeling - consider the nucleosome as a passive entity that 'waits' to be marked by histone modifications and is 'mobilized' by ATP-dependent remodelers. Here, we propose a holistic view of the nucleosome as an active, dynamic entity, the accessibility of which is controlled by binding of different linker proteins to the DNA entry/exit site. The linker proteins might directly compete for this binding site; alternatively, protein chaperones and/or chromatin remodelers might exchange one linker protein for another. Finally, according to our proposed model, the exchange factors are themselves controlled by post-translational modifications or binding of protein partners, to respond to the ever-changing intra- and extra-cellular environment.

A high mobility group protein binds to long CAG repeat tracts and establishes their chromatin organization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Long CAG repeat tracts cause human hereditary neurodegenerative diseases and have a propensity to expand during parental passage. Unusual physical properties of CAG repeat tracts are thought to contribute to their instability. We investigated whether their unusual properties alter the organization of CAG repeat tract chromatin. We report that CAG repeat tracts, embedded in yeast chromosomes, have a noncanonical chromatin organization. Digestion of chromatin with the restriction enzyme Fnu4HI reveals hypersensitive sites occurring approximately 125 bp apart in the repeat tract. To determine whether a non-histone protein establishes this pattern, we performed a yeast one-hybrid screen using CAG repeat tracts embedded in front of two reporter genes. The screen identified the high mobility group box protein Hmo1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged Hmo1 selectively precipitates CAG repeat tracts DNAs that range from 26 to 126 repeat units. Moreover, deletion of HMO1 drastically alters the Fnu4HI digestion pattern of CAG repeat chromatin. These results show that Hmo1 binds to CAG repeat tracts in vivo and establish the basis of their novel chromatin organization.

High mobility group proteins HMGD and HMGZ interact genetically with the Brahma chromatin remodeling complex in Drosophila

Many pleiotropic roles have been ascribed to small abundant HMG-Box (HMGB) proteins in higher eukaryotes but their precise function has remained enigmatic. To investigate their function genetically we have generated a defined deficiency uncovering the functionally redundant genes encoding HMGD and HMGZ, the Drosophila counterparts of HMGB1-3 in mammals. The resulting mutant is a strong hypomorphic allele of HmgD/Z. Surprisingly this allele is viable and exhibits only minor morphological defects even when homozygous. However, this allele interacts strongly with mutants of the Brahma chromatin remodeling complex, while no interaction was observed with mutant alleles of other remodeling complexes. We also observe genetic interactions between the HmgD/Z deficiency and some, but not all, known Brahma targets. These include the homeotic genes Sex combs reduced and Antennapedia, as well as the gene encoding the cell-signaling protein Rhomboid. In contrast to more general structural roles previously suggested for these proteins, we infer that a major function of the abundant HMGB proteins in Drosophila is to participate in Brahma-dependent chromatin remodeling at a specific subset of Brahma-dependent promoters.

A 'one-pot' assay for the accessibility of DNA in a nucleosome core particle

The accessibility of nucleosomal DNA to transcription factors and other sequence-specific DNA binding proteins is of importance in the consideration of mechanisms of transcriptional control. Here, we report a simple novel assay which determines this accessibility at eight different rotationally equivalent sites on nucleosomal DNA and shows that linker histones and the chromosomal HMGB proteins, HMG-D and HMG-Z, have opposite effects on the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. We compare this assay to previously described methods.

The DNA chaperone HMGB1 facilitates ACF/CHRAC-dependent nucleosome sliding

Nucleosome remodelling complexes CHRAC and ACF contribute to chromatin dynamics by converting chemical energy into sliding of histone octamers on DNA. Their shared ATPase subunit ISWI binds DNA at the sites of entry into the nucleosome. A prevalent model assumes that DNA distortions catalysed by ISWI are converted into relocation of DNA relative to a histone octamer. HMGB1, one of the most abundant nuclear non-histone proteins, binds with preference to distorted DNA. We have now found that transient interaction of HMGB1 with nucleosomal linker DNA overlapping ISWI-binding sites enhances the ability of ACF to bind nucleosomal DNA and accelerates the sliding activity of limiting concentrations of remodelling factor. By contrast, an HMGB1 mutant with increased binding affinity was inhibitory. These observations are consistent with a role for HMGB1 as a DNA chaperone facilitating the rate-limiting DNA distortion during nucleosome remodelling.

HMG-D and histone H1 alter the local accessibility of nucleosomal DNA

There is evidence that HMGB proteins facilitate, while linker histones inhibit chromatin remodelling, respectively. We have examined the effects of HMG-D and histone H1/H5 on accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. Using the 601.2 nucleosome positioning sequence designed by Widom and colleagues we assembled nucleosomes in vitro and probed DNA accessibility with restriction enzymes in the presence or absence of HMG-D and histone H1/H5. For HMG-D our results show increased digestion at two spatially adjacent sites, the dyad and one terminus of nucleosomal DNA. Elsewhere varying degrees of protection from digestion were observed. The C-terminal acidic tail of HMG-D is essential for this pattern of accessibility. Neither the HMG domain by itself nor in combination with the adjacent basic region is sufficient. Histone H1/H5 binding produces two sites of increased digestion on opposite faces of the nucleosome and decreased digestion at all other sites. Our results provide the first evidence of local changes in the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA upon separate interaction with two linker binding proteins.

Interaction of maize chromatin-associated HMG proteins with mononucleosomes: role of core and linker histones

Two groups of plant chromatin-associated high mobility group (HMG) proteins, namely the HMGA family, typically containing four A/T-hook DNA-binding motifs, and the HMGB family, containing a single HMG-box DNA-binding domain, have been identified. We have examined the interaction of recombinant maize HMGA and five different HMGB proteins with mononucleosomes (containing approx. 165 bp of DNA) purified from micrococcal nuclease-digested maize chromatin. The HMGB proteins interacted with the nucleosomes independent of the presence of the linker histone H1, while the binding of HMGA in the presence of H1 differed from that observed in the absence of H1. HMGA and the HMGB proteins bound H1-containing nucleosome particles with similar affinity. The plant HMG proteins could also bind nucleosomes that were briefly treated with trypsin (removing the N-terminal domains of the core histones), suggesting that the histone N-termini are dispensable for HMG protein binding. In the presence of untreated nucleosomes and trypsinised nucleosomes, HMGB1 could be chemically crosslinked with a core histone, which indicates that the trypsin-resistant part of the histones within the nucleosome is the main interaction partner of HMGB1 rather than the histone N-termini. In conclusion, these results indicate that specific nucleosome binding of the plant HMGB proteins requires simultaneous DNA and histone contacts.

Priming the nucleosome: a role for HMGB proteins?

The high-mobility-group B (HMGB) chromosomal proteins are characterized by the HMG box, a DNA-binding domain that both introduces a tight bend into DNA and binds preferentially to a variety of distorted DNA structures. The HMGB proteins seem to act primarily as architectural facilitators in the manipulation of nucleoprotein complexes; for example, in the assembly of complexes involved in recombination and transcription. Recent genetic and biochemical evidence suggests that these proteins can facilitate nucleosome remodelling. One mechanism by which HMGB proteins could prime the nucleosome for migration is to loosen the wrapped DNA and so enhance accessibility to chromatin-remodelling complexes and possibly also to transcription factors. By constraining a tight loop of untwisted DNA at the edge of a nucleosome, an HMGB protein could induce movements in the contacts between certain core histones that would result in an overall change in nucleosome structure.

The DNA chaperone HMGB1 facilitates ACF/CHRAC-dependent nucleosome sliding

Nucleosome remodelling complexes CHRAC and ACF contribute to chromatin dynamics by converting chemical energy into sliding of histone octamers on DNA. Their shared ATPase subunit ISWI binds DNA at the sites of entry into the nucleosome. A prevalent model assumes that DNA distortions catalysed by ISWI are converted into relocation of DNA relative to a histone octamer. HMGB1, one of the most abundant nuclear non-histone proteins, binds with preference to distorted DNA. We have now found that transient interaction of HMGB1 with nucleosomal linker DNA overlapping ISWI-binding sites enhances the ability of ACF to bind nucleosomal DNA and accelerates the sliding activity of limiting concentrations of remodelling factor. By contrast, an HMGB1 mutant with increased binding affinity was inhibitory. These observations are consistent with a role for HMGB1 as a DNA chaperone facilitating the rate-limiting DNA distortion during nucleosome remodelling.