Kinetic mechanism for the binding of eIF4F and tobacco Etch virus internal ribosome entry site rna: effects of eIF4B and poly(A)-binding protein

Poly(A)-binding protein promotes VPg-dependent translation of potyvirus through enhanced binding of phosphorylated eIFiso4F and eIFiso4F∙eIF4B

The phosphorylation of eukaryotic translational initiation factors has been shown to play a significant role in controlling the synthesis of protein. Viral infection, environmental stress, and growth circumstances cause phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of plant initiation factors. Our findings indicate that casein kinase 2 can phosphorylate recombinant wheat eIFiso4E and eIFiso4G generated from E. coli in vitro. For wheat eIFiso4E, Ser-207 was found to be the in vitro phosphorylation site. eIFiso4E lacks an amino acid that can be phosphorylated at the position corresponding to Ser-209, the phosphorylation site in mammalian eIF4E, yet phosphorylation of eIFiso4E has effects on VPg binding affinity that are similar to those of phosphorylation of mammalian eIF4E. The addition of VPg and phosphorylated eIFiso4F to depleted wheat germ extract (WGE) leads to enhancement of translation of both uncapped and capped viral mRNA. The addition of PABP together with eIFiso4Fp and eIF4B to depleted WGE increases both uncapped and capped mRNA translation. However, it exhibits a translational advantage specifically for uncapped mRNA, implying that the phosphorylation of eIFiso4F hinders cap binding while promoting VPg binding, thereby facilitating uncapped translation. These findings indicate TEV virus mediates VPg-dependent translation by engaging a mechanism entailing phosphorylated eIFiso4Fp and PABP. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying these observed effects, we studied the impact of PABP and/or eIF4B on the binding of VPg with eIFiso4Fp. The inclusion of PABP and eIF4B with eIFiso4Fp resulted in about 2-fold increase in affinity for VPg (Kd = 24 ± 1.7 nM), as compared to the affinity of eIFiso4Fp alone (Kd = 41.0 ± 3.1 nM). The interactions between VPg and eIFiso4Fp were determined to be both enthalpically and entropically favorable, with the enthalpic contribution accounting for 76-97% of the ΔG at 25°C, indicating a substantial role of hydrogen bonding in enhancing the stability of the complex. The binding of PABP to eIFiso4Fp·4B resulted in a conformational alteration, leading to a significant enhancement in the binding affinity to VPg. These observations suggest PABP enhances the affinity between eIFiso4Fp and VPg, leading to an overall conformational change that provides a stable platform for efficient viral translation.

Translation machinery: the basis of translational control

Messenger RNA (mRNA) translation consists of initiation, elongation, termination, and ribosome recycling, carried out by the translation machinery, primarily including tRNAs, ribosomes, and translation factors (TrFs). Translational regulators transduce signals of growth and development, as well as biotic and abiotic stresses, to the translation machinery, where global or selective translational control occurs to modulate mRNA translation efficiency (TrE). As the basis of translational control, the translation machinery directly determines the quality and quantity of newly synthesized peptides and, ultimately, the cellular adaption. Thus, regulating the availability of diverse machinery components is reviewed as the central strategy of translational control. We provide classical signaling pathways (e.g., integrated stress responses) and cellular behaviors (e.g., liquid-liquid phase separation) to exemplify this strategy within different physiological contexts, particularly during host-microbe interactions. With new technologies developed, further understanding this strategy will speed up translational medicine and translational agriculture.

mRNA- and factor-driven dynamic variability controls eIF4F-cap recognition for translation initiation

mRNA 5′ cap recognition by eIF4F is a key element of eukaryotic translational control. Kinetic differences in eIF4F–mRNA interactions have long been proposed to mediate translation-efficiency differences between mRNAs, and recent transcriptome-wide studies have revealed significant heterogeneity in eIF4F engagement with differentially-translated mRNAs. However, detailed kinetic information exists only for eIF4F interactions with short model RNAs. We developed and applied single-molecule fluorescence approaches to directly observe real-time Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4F subunit interactions with full-length polyadenylated mRNAs. We found that eIF4E–mRNA association rates linearly anticorrelate with mRNA length. eIF4G–mRNA interaction accelerates eIF4E–mRNA association in proportion to mRNA length, as does an eIF4F-independent activity of eIF4A, though cap-proximal secondary structure still plays an important role in defining the final association rates. eIF4F–mRNA interactions remained dominated by effects of eIF4G, but were modulated to different extents for different mRNAs by the presence of eIF4A and ATP. We also found that eIF4A-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis ejects eIF4E, and likely eIF4E•eIF4G from the mRNA after initial eIF4F•mRNA complex formation, suggesting a mechanism to prepare the mRNA 5′ end for ribosome recruitment. Our results support a role for mRNA-specific, factor-driven eIF4F association rates in kinetically controlling translation.

Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated In Vitro Transcribed mRNA Delivery for Treatment of HER2+ Breast Cancer Xenografts in Mice by Prodrug CB1954 without General Toxicity

Prodrugs are harmless until activated by a bacterial or viral gene product; they constitute the basis of gene-delivered prodrug therapies called GDEPT, which can kill tumors without major side effects. Previously, we utilized the prodrug CNOB (C16H7CIN2O4; not clinically tested) and enzyme HChrR6 in GDEPT to generate the drug MCHB (C16H9CIN2O2) in tumors. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) were used for directed gene delivery and HChrR6 mRNA as gene. Here, the clinical transfer of this approach is enhanced by: (i) use of CB1954 (tretazicar) for which safe human dose is established; HChrR6 can activate this prodrug. (ii) EVs delivered in vitro transcribed (IVT) HChrR6 mRNA, eliminating the potentially harmful plasmid transfection of EV producer cells we utilized previously; this has not been done before. IVT mRNA loading of EVs required several steps. Naked mRNA being unstable, we ensured its prodrug activating functionality at each step. This was not possible using tretazicar itself; we relied instead on HChrR6's ability to convert CNOB into MCHB, whose fluorescence is easily visualizable. HChrR6 mRNA-translated product's ability to generate fluorescence from CNOB vicariously indicated its competence for tretazicar activation. (iii) Systemic IVT mRNA-loaded EVs displaying an anti-HER2 single-chain variable fragment ("IVT EXO-DEPTs") and tretazicar caused growth arrest of human HER2+ breast cancer xenografts in athymic mice. As this occurred without injury to other tissues, absence of off-target mRNA delivery is strongly indicated. Many cancer sites are not amenable for direct gene injection, but current GDEPTs require this. In circumventing this need, a major advance in GDEPT applicability has been accomplished.

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Analyses of Iron Response Element (IRE)-mRNA Binding to Iron Regulatory Protein, IRP1

Comparison of kinetic and thermodynamic properties of IRP1 (iron regulatory protein1) binding to FRT (ferritin) and ACO2 (aconitase2) IRE-RNAs, with or without Mn²⁺, revealed differences specific to each IRE-RNA. Conserved among animal mRNAs, IRE-RNA structures are noncoding and bind Fe²⁺ to regulate biosynthesis rates of the encoded, iron homeostatic proteins. IRP1 protein binds IRE-RNA, inhibiting mRNA activity; Fe²⁺ decreases IRE-mRNA/IRP1 binding, increasing encoded protein synthesis. Here, we observed heat, 5 °C to 30 °C, increased IRP1 binding to IRE-RNA 4-fold (FRT IRE-RNA) or 3-fold (ACO2 IRE-RNA), which was enthalpy driven and entropy favorable. Mn²⁺ (50 µM, 25 °C) increased IRE-RNA/IRP1 binding (K_d) 12-fold (FRT IRE-RNA) or 6-fold (ACO2 IRE-RNA); enthalpic contributions decreased ~61% (FRT) or ~32% (ACO2), and entropic contributions increased ~39% (FRT) or ~68% (ACO2). IRE-RNA/IRP1 binding changed activation energies: FRT IRE-RNA 47.0 ± 2.5 kJ/mol, ACO2 IRE-RNA 35.0 ± 2.0 kJ/mol. Mn²⁺ (50 µM) decreased the activation energy of RNA-IRP1 binding for both IRE-RNAs. The observations suggest decreased RNA hydrogen bonding and changed RNA conformation upon IRP1 binding and illustrate how small, conserved, sequence differences among IRE-mRNAs selectively influence thermodynamic and kinetic selectivity of the protein/RNA interactions.

Kinetic analyses of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated eIFiso4E binding to mRNA cap analogues

Phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factors was previously shown to interact with m⁷G cap and play an important role in the regulation of translation initiation of protein synthesis. To gain further insight into the phosphorylation process of plant protein synthesis, the kinetics of phosphorylated wheat eIFiso4E binding to m⁷G cap analogues were examined. Phosphorylation of wheat eIFiso4E showed similar kinetic effects to human eIF4E binding to m⁷-G cap. Phosphorylation of eIFiso4E decreased the kinetic rate (2-fold) and increased the dissociation rate (2-fold) as compared to non-phosphorylated eIFiso4E binding to both mono- and di-nucleotide analogues at 22°C. Phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated eIFiso4E-m⁷G cap binding rates were found to be independent of concentration, suggesting conformational changes were rate limiting. Rate constant for phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated eIFiso4E binding to m⁷-G cap increased with temperature. Phosphorylation of eIFiso4E decreased (2-fold) the activation energy for both m⁷-G cap analogues binding as compared to non-phosphorylated eIFiso4E. The reduced energy barrier for the formation of eIFiso4E-m⁷-G cap complex suggests a more stable platform for further initiation complex formation and possible means of adapting variety of environmental conditions. Furthermore, the formation of phosphorylated eIFiso4E-cap complex may contribute to modulation of the initiation of protein synthesis in plants.

Non-canonical Translation in Plant RNA Viruses

Viral protein synthesis is completely dependent upon the host cell's translational machinery. Canonical translation of host mRNAs depends on structural elements such as the 5' cap structure and/or the 3' poly(A) tail of the mRNAs. Although many viral mRNAs are devoid of one or both of these structures, they can still translate efficiently using non-canonical mechanisms. Here, we review the tools utilized by positive-sense single-stranded (+ss) RNA plant viruses to initiate non-canonical translation, focusing on cis-acting sequences present in viral mRNAs. We highlight how these elements may interact with host translation factors and speculate on their contribution for achieving translational control. We also describe other translation strategies used by plant viruses to optimize the usage of the coding capacity of their very compact genomes, including leaky scanning initiation, ribosomal frameshifting and stop-codon readthrough. Finally, future research perspectives on the unusual translational strategies of +ssRNA viruses are discussed, including parallelisms between viral and host mRNAs mechanisms of translation, particularly for host mRNAs which are translated under stress conditions.

Mechanism of cytoplasmic mRNA translation

Protein synthesis is a fundamental process in gene expression that depends upon the abundance and accessibility of the mRNA transcript as well as the activity of many protein and RNA-protein complexes. Here we focus on the intricate mechanics of mRNA translation in the cytoplasm of higher plants. This chapter includes an inventory of the plant translational apparatus and a detailed review of the translational processes of initiation, elongation, and termination. The majority of mechanistic studies of cytoplasmic translation have been carried out in yeast and mammalian systems. The factors and mechanisms of translation are for the most part conserved across eukaryotes; however, some distinctions are known to exist in plants. A comprehensive understanding of the complex translational apparatus and its regulation in plants is warranted, as the modulation of protein production is critical to development, environmental plasticity and biomass yield in diverse ecosystems and agricultural settings.

Cis-acting RNA elements in positive-strand RNA plant virus genomes

Positive-strand RNA viruses are the most common type of plant virus. Many aspects of the reproductive cycle of this group of viruses have been studied over the years and this has led to the accumulation of a significant amount of insightful information. In particular, the identification and characterization of cis-acting RNA elements within these viral genomes have revealed important roles in many fundamental viral processes such as virus disassembly, translation, genome replication, subgenomic mRNA transcription, and packaging. These functional cis-acting RNA elements include primary sequences, secondary and tertiary structures, as well as long-range RNA-RNA interactions, and they typically function by interacting with viral or host proteins. This review provides a general overview and update on some of the many roles played by cis-acting RNA elements in positive-strand RNA plant viruses.

Molecular biology of potyviruses

Potyvirus is the largest genus of plant viruses causing significant losses in a wide range of crops. Potyviruses are aphid transmitted in a nonpersistent manner and some of them are also seed transmitted. As important pathogens, potyviruses are much more studied than other plant viruses belonging to other genera and their study covers many aspects of plant virology, such as functional characterization of viral proteins, molecular interaction with hosts and vectors, structure, taxonomy, evolution, epidemiology, and diagnosis. Biotechnological applications of potyviruses are also being explored. During this last decade, substantial advances have been made in the understanding of the molecular biology of these viruses and the functions of their various proteins. After a general presentation on the family Potyviridae and the potyviral proteins, we present an update of the knowledge on potyvirus multiplication, movement, and transmission and on potyvirus/plant compatible interactions including pathogenicity and symptom determinants. We end the review providing information on biotechnological applications of potyviruses.

Tobacco etch virus protein P1 traffics to the nucleolus and associates with the host 60S ribosomal subunits during infection

The genus Potyvirus comprises a large group of positive-strand RNA plant viruses whose genome encodes a large polyprotein processed by three viral proteinases. P1 protein, the most amino-terminal product of the polyprotein, is an accessory factor stimulating viral genome amplification whose role during infection is not well understood. We infected plants with Tobacco etch virus (TEV; genus Potyvirus) clones in which P1 was tagged with a fluorescent protein to track its expression and subcellular localization or with an affinity tag to identify host proteins involved in complexes in which P1 also takes part during infection. Our results showed that TEV P1 exclusively accumulates in infected cells at an early stage of infection and that the protein displays a dynamic subcellular localization, trafficking in and out of the nucleus and nucleolus during infection. Inside the nucleolus, P1 particularly targets the dense granular component. Consistently, we found functional nucleolar localization and nuclear export signals in TEV P1 sequence. Our results also indicated that TEV P1 physically interacts with the host 80S cytoplasmic ribosomes and specifically binds to the 60S ribosomal subunits during infection. In vitro translation assays of reporter proteins suggested that TEV P1 stimulates protein translation, particularly when driven from the TEV internal ribosome entry site. These in vitro assays also suggested that TEV helper-component proteinase (HC-Pro) inhibits protein translation. Based on these findings, we propose that TEV P1 stimulates translation of viral proteins in infected cells.

IMPORTANCE

In this work, we researched the role during infection of tobacco etch virus P1 protease. P1 is the most mysterious protein of potyviruses, a relevant group of RNA viruses infecting plants. Our experiments showed that the viral P1 protein exclusively accumulates in infected cells at an early stage of infection and moves in and out of the nucleus of infected cells, particularly targeting the nucleolus. Our experiments also showed that P1 protein binds host ribosomes during infection. Based on these findings and other in vitro experiments we propose that P1 protein stimulates translation of viral proteins during infection.

Rapid kinetics of iron responsive element (IRE) RNA/iron regulatory protein 1 and IRE-RNA/eIF4F complexes respond differently to metal ions

Metal ion binding was previously shown to destabilize IRE-RNA/IRP1 equilibria and enhanced IRE-RNA/eIF4F equilibria. In order to understand the relative importance of kinetics and stability, we now report rapid rates of protein/RNA complex assembly and dissociation for two IRE-RNAs with IRP1, and quantitatively different metal ion response kinetics that coincide with the different iron responses in vivo. k_on, for FRT IRE-RNA binding to IRP1 was eight times faster than ACO2 IRE-RNA. Mn²⁺ decreased k_on and increased k_off for IRP1 binding to both FRT and ACO2 IRE-RNA, with a larger effect for FRT IRE-RNA. In order to further understand IRE-mRNA regulation in terms of kinetics and stability, eIF4F kinetics with FRT IRE-RNA were determined. k_on for eIF4F binding to FRT IRE-RNA in the absence of metal ions was 5-times slower than the IRP1 binding to FRT IRE-RNA. Mn²⁺ increased the association rate for eIF4F binding to FRT IRE-RNA, so that at 50 µM Mn²⁺ eIF4F bound more than 3-times faster than IRP1. IRP1/IRE-RNA complex has a much shorter life-time than the eIF4F/IRE-RNA complex, which suggests that both rate of assembly and stability of the complexes are important, and that allows this regulatory system to respond rapidly to change in cellular iron.

Translational Regulation of Cytoplasmic mRNAs

Translation of the coding potential of a messenger RNA into a protein molecule is a fundamental process in all living cells and consumes a large fraction of metabolites and energy resources in growing cells. Moreover, translation has emerged as an important control point in the regulation of gene expression. At the level of gene regulation, translational control is utilized to support the specific life histories of plants, in particular their responses to the abiotic environment and to metabolites. This review summarizes the diversity of translational control mechanisms in the plant cytoplasm, focusing on specific cases where mechanisms of translational control have evolved to complement or eclipse other levels of gene regulation. We begin by introducing essential features of the translation apparatus. We summarize early evidence for translational control from the pre-Arabidopsis era. Next, we review evidence for translation control in response to stress, to metabolites, and in development. The following section emphasizes RNA sequence elements and biochemical processes that regulate translation. We close with a chapter on the role of signaling pathways that impinge on translation.

Poly(A) binding proteins: are they all created equal?

The PABP family of proteins were originally thought of as a simple shield for the mRNA poly(A) tail. Years of research have shown that PABPs interact not only with the poly(A) tail, but also with specific sequences in the mRNA, having a general and specific role on the metabolism of different mRNAs. The complexity of PABPs function is increased by the interactions of PABPs with factors involved in different cellular functions. PABPs participate in all the metabolic pathways of the mRNA: polyadenylation/deadenylation, mRNA export, mRNA surveillance, translation, mRNA degradation, microRNA-associated regulation, and regulation of expression during development. In this review, we update information on the roles of PABPs and emerging data on the specific interactions of PABP homologs. Specific functions of individual members of PABPC family in development and viral infection are beginning to be elucidated. However, the interactions are complex and recent evidence for exchange of nuclear and cytoplasmic forms of the proteins, as well as post-translational modifications, emphasize the possibilities for fine-tuning the PABP metabolic network.

Poly(A)-binding protein increases the binding affinity and kinetic rates of interaction of viral protein linked to genome with translation initiation factors eIFiso4F and eIFiso4F·4B complex

VPg of turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) was previously shown to interact with translation initiation factor eIFiso4F and play an important role in mRNA translation [Khan, M. A., et al. (2008) J. Biol. Chem.283, 1340-1349]. VPg competed with cap analogue for eIFiso4F binding and competitively inhibited cap-dependent translation and enhanced cap-independent translation to give viral RNA a significant competitive advantage. To gain further insight into the cap-independent process of initiation of protein synthesis, we examined the effect of PABP and/or eIF4B on the equilibrium and kinetics of binding of VPg to eIFiso4F. Equilibrium data showed the addition of PABP and/or eIF4B to eIFiso4F increased the binding affinity for VPg (K(d) = 24.3 ± 1.6 nM) as compared to that with eIFiso4F alone (K(d) = 81.3 ± 0.2.4 nM). Thermodynamic parameters showed that binding of VPg to eIFiso4F was enthalpy-driven and entropy-favorable with the addition of PABP and/or eIF4B. PABP and eIF4B decreased the entropic contribution by 67% for binding of VPg to eIFiso4F. The decrease in entropy involved in the formation of the eIFiso4F·4B·PABP-VPg complex suggested weakened hydrophobic interactions for complex formation and an overall conformational change. The kinetic studies of eIFiso4F with VPg in the presence of PABP and eIF4B show 3-fold faster association (k(2) = 182 ± 9.0 s(-1)) compared to that with eIFiso4F alone (k(2) = 69.0 ± 1.5 s(-1)) . The dissociation rate was 3-fold slower (k(-2) = 6.5 ± 0.43 s(-1)) for eIFiso4F with VPg in the presence of PABP and eIF4B (k(-2) = 19.0 ± 0.9 s(-1)). The addition of PABP and eIF4B decreased the activation energy of eIFiso4F with VPg from 81.0 ± 3.0 to 44.0 ± 2.4 kJ/mol. This suggests that the presence of both proteins leads to a rapid, stable complex, which serves to sequester initiation factors.

Iron responsive mRNAs: a family of Fe2+ sensitive riboregulators

Messenger RNAs (mRNAs) are emerging as prime targets for small-molecule drugs. They afford an opportunity to assert control over an enormous range of biological processes: mRNAs regulate protein synthesis rates, have specific 3-D regulatory structures, and, in nucleated cells, are separated from DNA in space and time. All of the many steps between DNA copying (transcription) and ribosome binding (translation) represent potential control points. Messenger RNAs can fold into complex, 3-D shapes, such as tRNAs and rRNAs, providing an added dimension to the 2-D RNA structure (base pairing) targeted in many mRNA interference approaches. In this Account, we describe the structural and functional properties of the IRE (iron-responsive element) family, one of the few 3-D mRNA regulatory elements with known 3-D structure. This family of related base sequences regulates the mRNAs that encode proteins for iron metabolism. We begin by considering the IRE-RNA structure, which consists of a short (~30-nucleotide) RNA helix. Nature tuned the structure by combining a conserved AGU pseudotriloop, a closing C-G base pair, and a bulge C with various RNA helix base pairs. The result is a set of IRE-mRNAs with individual iron responses. The physiological iron signal is hexahydrated ferrous ion; in vivo iron responses vary over 10-fold depending on the individual IRE-RNA structure. We then discuss the interaction between the IRE-RNA structure and the proteins associated with it. IRE-RNA structures, which are usually noncoding, tightly bind specific proteins called IRPs. These repressor proteins are bound to IRE-RNA through C-bulge and AGU contacts that flip out a loop AG and a bulge C, bending the RNA helix. After binding, the exposed RNA surface then invites further interactions, such as with iron and other proteins. Binding of the IRE-RNA and the IRP also changes the IRP conformation. IRP binding stabilities vary 10-fold within the IRE family, reflecting individual IRE-RNA paired and unpaired bases. This variation contributes to the graded (hierarchical) iron responses in vivo. We also consider the mechanisms of IRE-mRNA control. The binding of Fe(2+) to IRE-RNA facilitates IRP release and the binding of eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs), which are proteins that assemble mRNA, ribosomes, and tRNA for translation. IRE-RNAs are riboregulators for the inorganic metabolic signal, Fe(2+); they control protein synthesis rates by changing the distribution of the iron metabolic mRNAs between complexes with enhancing eIFs and inhibitory IRPs. The regulation of mRNA in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells is a burgeoning frontier in biomedicine. The evolutionarily refined IRE-RNAs, although absent in plants and bacteria, constitute a model system for 3-D mRNAs in all organisms. IRE-mRNAs have yielded "proof of principle" data for small-molecule targeting of mRNA structures, demonstrating tremendous potential for chemical manipulation of mRNA and protein synthesis in living systems.

Structure-based mutational analysis of eIF4E in relation to sbm1 resistance to pea seed-borne mosaic virus in pea

BACKGROUND

Pea encodes eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E (eIF4E(S)), which supports the multiplication of Pea seed-borne mosaic virus (PSbMV). In common with hosts for other potyviruses, some pea lines contain a recessive allele (sbm1) encoding a mutant eIF4E (eIF4E(R)) that fails to interact functionally with the PSbMV avirulence protein, VPg, giving genetic resistance to infection.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

To study structure-function relationships between pea eIF4E and PSbMV VPg, we obtained an X-ray structure for eIF4E(S) bound to m(7)GTP. The crystallographic asymmetric unit contained eight independent copies of the protein, providing insights into the structurally conserved and flexible regions of eIF4E. To assess indirectly the importance of key residues in binding to VPg and/or m(7)GTP, an extensive range of point mutants in eIF4E was tested for their ability to complement PSbMV multiplication in resistant pea tissues and for complementation of protein translation, and hence growth, in an eIF4E-defective yeast strain conditionally dependent upon ectopic expression of eIF4E. The mutants also dissected individual contributions from polymorphisms present in eIF4E(R) and compared the impact of individual residues altered in orthologous resistance alleles from other crop species. The data showed that essential resistance determinants in eIF4E differed for different viruses although the critical region involved (possibly in VPg-binding) was conserved and partially overlapped with the m(7)GTP-binding region. This overlap resulted in coupled inhibition of virus multiplication and translation in the majority of cases, although the existence of a few mutants that uncoupled the two processes supported the view that the specific role of eIF4E in potyvirus infection may not be restricted to translation.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

The work describes the most extensive structural analysis of eIF4E in relation to potyvirus resistance. In addition to defining functional domains within the eIF4E structure, we identified eIF4E alleles with the potential to convey novel virus resistance phenotypes.