Decoding toxicity: deducing the sequence requirements of IbsC, a type I toxin in Escherichia coli

Mechanism of action of sprG1-encoded type I toxins in Staphylococcus aureus: from membrane alterations to mesosome-like structures formation and bacterial lysis

sprG1/SprF1 is a type I toxin-antitoxin system located on Staphylococcus aureus prophage. It has previously been shown that the two toxins, SprG131 and SprG144, encoded by the sprG1 gene, are two membrane-associated peptides structured in a single α-helix. Overexpression of these two peptides leads to growth inhibition and even S. aureus death. In this study, we investigated the involvement of each peptide in this toxicity, the sequence requirements necessary for SprG131 toxicity, and the mechanism of action of these two peptides. Our findings show that both peptides, when expressed individually, are able to stop growth, with higher toxicity observed for SprG131. The combination of a hydrophobic domain and a charged domain located only at the C-terminus is necessary for this toxicity, likely to retain the orientation of the transmembrane domain. A net cationic charge for SprG131 is not essential to induce a growth defect in S. aureus. Furthermore, we established a chronology of toxic events following overexpression to gain insights into the mode of action of SprG144 and SprG131. We demonstrated that mesosome-like structures are already formed when membrane is depolarized, about 20 min after peptides induction. This membrane depolarization occurs concomitantly with a depletion of intracellular ATP, leading to S. aureus growth arrest. Moreover, we hypothesized that SprG144 and SprG131 do not form large pores in the S. aureus membrane, as ATP is not excreted into the extracellular medium, and membrane permeabilization is delayed relative to membrane depolarization. The next challenge is to identify the conditions under which SprG144 and SprG131 are naturally expressed, and to uncover their potential roles during staphylococcal growth, colonization, and infection.

Charged Amino Acids Contribute to ZorO Toxicity

Chromosomally encoded toxin-antitoxin systems have been increasingly identified and characterized across bacterial species over the past two decades. Overproduction of the toxin gene results in cell growth stasis or death for the producing cell, but co-expression of its antitoxin can repress the toxic effects. For the subcategory of type I toxin-antitoxin systems, many of the described toxin genes encode a small, hydrophobic protein with several charged residues distributed across the sequence of the toxic protein. Though these charged residues are hypothesized to be critical for the toxic effects of the protein, they have not been studied broadly across different type I toxins. Herein, we mutated codons encoding charged residues in the type I toxin zorO, from the zor-orz toxin-antitoxin system, to determine their impacts on growth inhibition, membrane depolarization, ATP depletion, and the localization of this small protein. The non-toxic variants of ZorO accumulated both in the membrane and cytoplasm, indicating that membrane localization alone is not sufficient for its toxicity. While mutation of a charged residue could result in altered toxicity, this was dependent not only on the position of the amino acid within the protein but also on the residue to which it was converted, suggesting a complex role of charged residues in ZorO-mediated toxicity. A previous study indicated that additional copies of the zor-orz system improved growth in aminoglycosides: within, we note that this improved growth is independent of ZorO toxicity. By increasing the copy number of the zorO gene fused with a FLAG-tag, we were able to detect the protein expressed from its native promoter elements: an important step for future studies of toxin expression and function.

Bacterial Type I Toxins: Folding and Membrane Interactions

Bacterial type I toxin-antitoxin systems are two-component genetic modules that encode a stable toxic protein whose ectopic overexpression can lead to growth arrest or cell death, and an unstable RNA antitoxin that inhibits toxin translation during growth. These systems are widely spread among bacterial species. Type I antitoxins are cis- or trans-encoded antisense small RNAs that interact with toxin-encoding mRNAs by pairing, thereby inhibiting toxin mRNA translation and/or inducing its degradation. Under environmental stress conditions, the up-regulation of the toxin and/or the antitoxin degradation by specific RNases promote toxin translation. Most type I toxins are small hydrophobic peptides with a predicted α-helical transmembrane domain that induces membrane depolarization and/or permeabilization followed by a decrease of intracellular ATP, leading to plasmid maintenance, growth adaptation to environmental stresses, or persister cell formation. In this review, we describe the current state of the art on the folding and the membrane interactions of these membrane-associated type I toxins from either Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria and establish a chronology of their toxic effects on the bacterial cell. This review also includes novel structural results obtained by NMR concerning the sprG1-encoded membrane peptides that belong to the sprG1/SprF1 type I TA system expressed in Staphylococcus aureus and discusses the putative membrane interactions allowing the lysis of competing bacteria and host cells.

Frame-shifted proteins of a given gene are unlikely to retain the same function

In a recently published paper, Huang and coworkers claim that proteins translated in different reading frames from the same mRNA can have similar functions. This conclusion is possibly incorrect due to the possibility that the wild-type protein could still be expressed.

Frame-shifted proteins of a given gene retain the same function

Frameshift mutations are generally considered to be lethal because it could result in radical changes of the protein sequence behind. However, the protein of frameshift mutants of a type I toxin (ibsc) was found to be still toxic to bacteria, retaining the similar function as wild-type protein to arrest the cellular growth by impairing the membrane's integrity. Additionally, we have verified that this observation is not an individual event as the same phenomenon had been found in other toxins subsequently. After analyzing the coding sequence of these genes, we proposed a hypothesis to search this kind of hidden gene, through which a dihydrofolate reductase-encoding gene (dfrB3) was found out. Like the wild-type reductase, both +1 and -1 frame-shifted proteins of dfrB3 gene were also proved to catalyze the reduction of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate by using NADPH.

An Effective Method for Quantifying RNA Expression of IbsC-SibC, a Type I Toxin-Antitoxin System in Escherichia coli

Toxin and antitoxin (TA) systems are small genetic modules consisting of a toxin protein and an RNA or protein antitoxin. It is difficult to study their functions in a large part due to the lack of effective methods to study toxin RNAs, which usually exist at exceptionally low levels. Herein, we describe a sensitive reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) method that is able to quantitate such RNA species. The method was directed at detection of the toxin mRNA of the ibsC-sibC TA pair, and its high specificity was validated by sequencing. The approach was used to determine relative expression of the IbsC and SibC RNAs at different cell-growth phases; this revealed an expression pattern that cannot be explained by the prevailing notion of growth stasis by the toxin and rescue by the antitoxin. The usefulness of the method was further showcased by the determination of average cellular copy numbers of the IbsC-SibC RNAs in wild-type E. coli cells and RNA abundance in E. coli cells engineered with extra copies of the ibsC-sibC genes. With a robust method to quantitate cellular small RNAs at very low concentrations, we are now equipped to study the expression of TA systems under different conditions to gain useful insights about their functions.

Proteolytic Queues at ClpXP Increase Antibiotic Tolerance

Antibiotic tolerance is a widespread phenomenon that renders antibiotic treatments less effective and facilitates antibiotic resistance. Here we explore the role of proteases in antibiotic tolerance, short-term population survival of antibiotics, using queueing theory (i.e., the study of waiting lines), computational models, and a synthetic biology approach. Proteases are key cellular components that degrade proteins and play an important role in a multidrug tolerant subpopulation of cells, called persisters. We found that queueing at the protease ClpXP increases antibiotic tolerance ∼80 and ∼60 fold in an E. coli population treated with ampicillin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. There does not appear to be an effect on antibiotic persistence, which we distinguish from tolerance based on population decay. These results demonstrate that proteolytic queueing is a practical method to probe proteolytic activity in bacterial tolerance and related genes, while limiting the unintended consequences frequently caused by gene knockout and overexpression.

Structural insights into the AapA1 toxin of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

We previously reported the identification of the aapA1/IsoA1 locus as part of a new family of toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems in the human pathogen Helicobacter pylori. AapA1 belongs to type I TA bacterial toxins, and both its mechanism of action towards the membrane and toxicity features are still unclear.

METHODS

The biochemical characterization of the AapA1 toxic peptide was carried out using plasmid-borne expression and mutational approaches to follow its toxicity and localization. Biophysical properties of the AapA1 interaction with lipid membranes were studied by solution and solid-state NMR spectroscopy, plasmon waveguide resonance (PWR) and molecular modeling.

RESULTS

We show that despite a low hydrophobic index, this toxin has a nanomolar affinity to the prokaryotic membrane. NMR spectroscopy reveals that the AapA1 toxin is structurally organized into three distinct domains: a positively charged disordered N-terminal domain (D), a single α-helix (H), and a basic C-terminal domain (R). The R domain interacts and destabilizes the membrane, while the H domain adopts a transmembrane conformation. These results were confirmed by alanine scanning of the minimal sequence required for toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our results have shown that specific amino acid residues along the H domain, as well as the R domain, are essential for the toxicity of the AapA1 toxin.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

Untangling and understanding the mechanism of action of small membrane-targeting toxins are difficult, but nevertheless contributes to a promising search and development of new antimicrobial drugs.

Type I Toxin-Antitoxin Systems: Regulating Toxin Expression via Shine-Dalgarno Sequence Sequestration and Small RNA Binding

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are small genetic loci composed of two adjacent genes: a toxin and an antitoxin that prevents toxin action. Despite their wide distribution in bacterial genomes, the reasons for TA systems being on chromosomes remain enigmatic. In this review, we focus on type I TA systems, composed of a small antisense RNA that plays the role of an antitoxin to control the expression of its toxin counterpart. It does so by direct base-pairing to the toxin-encoding mRNA, thereby inhibiting its translation and/or promoting its degradation. However, in many cases, antitoxin binding is not sufficient to avoid toxicity. Several cis-encoded mRNA elements are also required for repression, acting to uncouple transcription and translation via the sequestration of the ribosome binding site. Therefore, both antisense RNA binding and compact mRNA folding are necessary to tightly control toxin synthesis and allow the presence of these toxin-encoding systems on bacterial chromosomes.

FASTBAC-Seq: Functional Analysis of Toxin-Antitoxin Systems in Bacteria by Deep Sequencing

As the number of bacterial genomes and transcriptomes increases, so does the number of newly identified toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems. However, their functional characterization remains challenging, often requiring the use of overexpression vectors that can lead to misinterpretations of in vivo results. To fill this gap, we developed a systematic approach called FASTBAC-Seq (Functional AnalysiS of Toxin-Antitoxin Systems in BACteria by Deep Sequencing). Combining life/death phenotypic selection with next-generation sequencing, FASTBAC-Seq allows the rapid identification of loss-of-function (toxicity) mutations in toxin-encoding genes belonging to TA loci with nucleotide resolution. Here, we present the setup used on the first-time application of FASBACT-Seq to characterize a member of the aapA/IsoA family of type I TA systems hosted on the chromosome of the major human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. We propose FASBACT-Seq as a powerful tool for the functional characterization of TA systems that can in addition uncover key elements for the understanding of gene expression regulation in bacteria.

Molecular mechanism of mRNA repression in trans by a ProQ-dependent small RNA

Research into post-transcriptional control of mRNAs by small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) in the model bacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica has mainly focused on sRNAs that associate with the RNA chaperone Hfq. However, the recent discovery of the protein ProQ as a common binding partner that stabilizes a distinct large class of structured sRNAs suggests that additional RNA regulons exist in these organisms. The cellular functions and molecular mechanisms of these new ProQ-dependent sRNAs are largely unknown. Here, we report in Salmonella Typhimurium the mode-of-action of RaiZ, a ProQ-dependent sRNA that is made from the 3' end of the mRNA encoding ribosome-inactivating protein RaiA. We show that RaiZ is a base-pairing sRNA that represses in trans the mRNA of histone-like protein HU-α. RaiZ forms an RNA duplex with the ribosome-binding site of hupA mRNA, facilitated by ProQ, to prevent 30S ribosome loading and protein synthesis of HU-α. Similarities and differences between ProQ- and Hfq-mediated regulation will be discussed.

Structure, Biology, and Therapeutic Application of Toxin-Antitoxin Systems in Pathogenic Bacteria

Bacterial toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems have received increasing attention for their diverse identities, structures, and functional implications in cell cycle arrest and survival against environmental stresses such as nutrient deficiency, antibiotic treatments, and immune system attacks. In this review, we describe the biological functions and the auto-regulatory mechanisms of six different types of TA systems, among which the type II TA system has been most extensively studied. The functions of type II toxins include mRNA/tRNA cleavage, gyrase/ribosome poison, and protein phosphorylation, which can be neutralized by their cognate antitoxins. We mainly explore the similar but divergent structures of type II TA proteins from 12 important pathogenic bacteria, including various aspects of protein–protein interactions. Accumulating knowledge about the structure–function correlation of TA systems from pathogenic bacteria has facilitated a novel strategy to develop antibiotic drugs that target specific pathogens. These molecules could increase the intrinsic activity of the toxin by artificially interfering with the intermolecular network of the TA systems.

To be or not to be: regulation of restriction-modification systems and other toxin-antitoxin systems

One of the simplest classes of genes involved in programmed death is that containing the toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems of prokaryotes. These systems are composed of an intracellular toxin and an antitoxin that neutralizes its effect. These systems, now classified into five types, were initially discovered because some of them allow the stable maintenance of mobile genetic elements in a microbial population through postsegregational killing or the death of cells that have lost these systems. Here, we demonstrate parallels between some TA systems and restriction–modification systems (RM systems). RM systems are composed of a restriction enzyme (toxin) and a modification enzyme (antitoxin) and limit the genetic flux between lineages with different epigenetic identities, as defined by sequence-specific DNA methylation. The similarities between these systems include their postsegregational killing and their effects on global gene expression. Both require the finely regulated expression of a toxin and antitoxin. The antitoxin (modification enzyme) or linked protein may act as a transcriptional regulator. A regulatory antisense RNA recently identified in an RM system can be compared with those RNAs in TA systems. This review is intended to generalize the concept of TA systems in studies of stress responses, programmed death, genetic conflict and epigenetics.

New type I toxin-antitoxin families from "wild" and laboratory strains of E. coli: Ibs-Sib, ShoB-OhsC and Zor-Orz

Type I toxin-antitoxin loci consist of two genes: one encodes a small, toxic protein and the second encodes a small RNA antitoxin that represses toxin gene expression. These pairs were first described on plasmids where they regulate plasmid maintenance. However, recent discoveries have found novel type I loci, with no homology to plasmid sequences, in the chromosome of Escherichia coli and closely related species. The Ibs-Sib, ShoB-OhsC and Zor-Orz loci are examples of these new loci. For these toxic proteins, much more is known about how their expression is regulated than their biological function. Although all are found in E. coli and closely related bacteria, there is great variation among species as to which loci they possess. Herein, I discuss how these sRNA antitoxins prevent toxin production and how the distribution of these loci across species may be providing insights into their true function.