Subunit symmetry at the extracellular domain-transmembrane domain interface in acetylcholine receptor channel gating

A release of local subunit conformational heterogeneity underlies gating in a muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

Synaptic receptors respond to neurotransmitters by opening an ion channel across the post-synaptic membrane to elicit a cellular response. Here we use recent Torpedo acetylcholine receptor structures and functional measurements to delineate a key feature underlying allosteric communication between the agonist-binding extracellular and channel-gating transmembrane domains. Extensive mutagenesis at this inter-domain interface re-affirms a critical energetically coupled role for the principal α subunit β1-β2 and M2-M3 loops, with agonist binding re-positioning a key β1-β2 glutamate/valine to facilitate the outward motions of a conserved M2-M3 proline to open the channel gate. Notably, the analogous structures in non-α subunits adopt a locally active-like conformation in the apo state even though each L9' hydrophobic gate residue in each pore-lining M2 α-helix is closed. Agonist binding releases local conformational heterogeneity transitioning all five subunits into a conformationally symmetric open state. A release of conformational heterogeneity provides a framework for understanding allosteric communication in pentameric ligand-gated ion channels.

Mutational Analysis at Intersubunit Interfaces of an Anionic Glutamate Receptor Reveals a Key Interaction Important for Channel Gating by Ivermectin

The broad-spectrum anthelmintic drug ivermectin (IVM) activates and stabilizes an open-channel conformation of invertebrate chloride-selective glutamate receptors (GluClRs), thereby causing a continuous inflow of chloride ions and sustained membrane hyperpolarization. These effects suppress nervous impulses and vital physiological processes in parasitic nematodes. The GluClRs are pentamers. Homopentameric receptors assembled from the Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) GluClα (GLC-1) subunit can inherently respond to IVM but not to glutamate (the neurotransmitter). In contrast, heteromeric GluClα/β (GLC-1/GLC-2) assemblies respond to both ligands, independently of each other. Glutamate and IVM bind at the interface between adjacent subunits, far away from each other; glutamate in the extracellular ligand-binding domain, and IVM in the ion-channel pore periphery. To understand the importance of putative intersubunit contacts located outside the glutamate and IVM binding sites, we introduced mutations at intersubunit interfaces, between these two binding-site types. Then, we determined the effect of these mutations on the activation of the heteromeric mutant receptors by glutamate and IVM. Amongst these mutations, we characterized an α-subunit point mutation located close to the putative IVM-binding pocket, in the extracellular end of the first transmembrane helix (M1). This mutation (αF276A) moderately reduced the sensitivity of the heteromeric GluClαF276A/βWT receptor to glutamate, and slightly decreased the receptor subunits’ cooperativity in response to glutamate. In contrast, the αF276A mutation drastically reduced the sensitivity of the receptor to IVM and significantly increased the receptor subunits’ cooperativity in response to IVM. We suggest that this mutation reduces the efficacy of channel gating, and impairs the integrity of the IVM-binding pocket, likely by disrupting important interactions between the tip of M1 and the M2-M3 loop of an adjacent subunit. We hypothesize that this physical contact between M1 and the M2-M3 loop tunes the relative orientation of the ion-channel transmembrane helices M1, M2 and M3 to optimize pore opening. Interestingly, pre-exposure of the GluClαF276A/βWT mutant receptor to subthreshold IVM concentration recovered the receptor sensitivity to glutamate. We infer that IVM likely retained its positive modulation activity by constraining the transmembrane helices in a preopen orientation sensitive to glutamate, with no need for the aforementioned disrupted interactions between M1 and the M2-M3 loop.

Function of the M1 π-helix in endplate receptor activation and desensitization

KEY POINTS

A conserved proline in M1 causes a kink between α and π helical segments. The kink is under greater tension in the resting versus active conformation. The kink and the agonist do not interact directly. The π-helix separates the gating functions of the extracellular and transmembrane domains. Mutations of the conserved proline and propofol increase desensitization.

ABSTRACT

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) switch on/off to generate transient membrane currents (C↔O; closed-open 'gating') and enter/recover from long-lived, refractory states (O↔D; 'desensitization'). The M1 transmembrane helix of the muscle endplate AChR is linked to a β-strand of the extracellular domain that extends to a neurotransmitter binding site. We used electrophysiology to measure the effects of mutations of amino acids that are located at a proline kink in M1 that separates π and α helices, in both α (N217, V218 and P221) and non-α subunits. In related receptors, the kink is straighter and more stable in O vs. C structures (gating is 'spring-loaded'). None of the AChR kink mutations had a measureable effect on agonist affinity but many influenced the allosteric gating constant substantially. Side chains in the M1 α-helix experience extraordinarily large energy differences between C and O structures, probably because of a ∼2 Å displacement and tilt of M2 relative to M1. There is a discrete break in the character of the gating transition state between αN217 and αV218, indicating that the π-helix is a border between extracellular- and transmembrane-domain function. Mutations of the conserved M1 proline, and the anaesthetic propofol, increase a rate constant for desensitization. The results suggest that straightening of the M1 proline kink triggers AChR desensitization.

Energetic contributions to channel gating of residues in the muscle nicotinic receptor β1 subunit

In the pentameric ligand-gated ion channel family, transmitter binds in the extracellular domain and conformational changes result in channel opening in the transmembrane domain. In the muscle nicotinic receptor and other heteromeric members of the family one subunit does not contribute to the canonical agonist binding site for transmitter. A fundamental question is whether conformational changes occur in this subunit. We used records of single channel activity and rate-equilibrium free energy relationships to examine the β1 (non-ACh-binding) subunit of the muscle nicotinic receptor. Mutations to residues in the extracellular domain have minimal effects on the gating equilibrium constant. Positions in the channel lining (M2 transmembrane) domain contribute strongly and relatively late during gating. Positions thought to be important in other subunits in coupling the transmitter-binding to the channel domains have minimal effects on gating. We conclude that the conformational changes involved in channel gating propagate from the binding-site to the channel in the ACh-binding subunits and subsequently spread to the non-binding subunit.

Nicotinic receptor transduction zone: invariant arginine couples to multiple electron-rich residues

Gating of the muscle-type acetylcholine receptor (AChR) channel depends on communication between the ACh-binding site and the remote ion channel. A key region for this communication is located within the structural transition zone between the ligand-binding and pore domains. Here, stemming from β-strand 10 of the binding domain, the invariant αArg209 lodges within the hydrophobic interior of the subunit and is essential for rapid and efficient channel gating. Previous charge-reversal experiments showed that the contribution of αArg209 to channel gating depends strongly on αGlu45, also within this region. Here we determine whether the contribution of αArg209 to channel gating depends on additional anionic or electron-rich residues in this region. Also, to reconcile diverging findings in the literature, we compare the dependence of αArg209 on αGlu45 in AChRs from different species, and compare the full agonist ACh with the weak agonist choline. Our findings reveal that the contribution of αArg209 to channel gating depends on additional nearby electron-rich residues, consistent with both electrostatic and steric contributions. Furthermore, αArg209 and αGlu45 show a strong interdependence in both human and mouse AChRs, whereas the functional consequences of the mutation αE45R depend on the agonist. The emerging picture shows a multifaceted network of interdependent residues that are required for communication between the ligand-binding and pore domains.

The energy and work of a ligand-gated ion channel

Ligand-gated ion channels are allosteric membrane proteins that isomerize between C(losed) and O(pen) conformations. A difference in affinity for ligands in the two states influences the C↔O "gating" equilibrium constant. The energies associated with adult-type mouse neuromuscular nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) channel gating have been measured by using single-channel electrophysiology. Without ligands, the free energy, enthalpy and entropy of gating are ΔG0=+8.4, ΔH0=+10.9 and TΔS0=+2.5kcal/mol (-100mV, 23°C). Many mutations throughout the protein change ΔG0, including natural ones that cause disease. Agonists and most mutations change approximately independently the ground-state energy difference; thus, it is possible to forecast and engineer AChR responses simply by combining perturbations. The free energy of the low↔high affinity change for the neurotransmitter at each of two functionally equivalent binding sites is ΔGB(ACh)=-5.1kcal/mol. ΔGB(ACh) is set mainly by interactions of ACh with just three binding site aromatic groups. For a series of structurally related agonists, there is a correlation between the energies of low- and high-affinity binding, which implies that gating commences with the formation of the low-affinity complex. Brief, intermediate states in binding and gating have been detected. Several proposals for the nature of the gating transition-state energy landscape and the isomerization mechanism are discussed.

Structure and pharmacology of pentameric receptor channels: from bacteria to brain

Orthologs of the pentameric receptor channels that mediate fast synaptic transmission in the central and peripheral nervous systems have been found in several bacterial species and in a single archaea genus. Recent X-ray structures of bacterial and invertebrate pentameric receptors point to a striking conservation of the structural features within the whole family, even between distant prokaryotic and eukaryotic members. These structural data reveal general principles of molecular organization that allow allosteric membrane proteins to mediate chemoelectric transduction. Notably, several conformations have been solved, including open and closed channels with distinct global tertiary and quaternary structure. The data reveal features of the ion channel architecture and of diverse categories of binding sites, such as those that bind orthosteric ligands, including neurotransmitters, and those that bind allosteric modulators, such as general anesthetics, ivermectin, or lipids. In this review, we summarize the most recent data, discuss insights into the mechanism of action in these systems, and elaborate on newly opened avenues for drug design.

The energetic consequences of loop 9 gating motions in acetylcholine receptor-channels

Acetylcholine receptor-channels (AChRs) mediate fast synaptic transmission between nerve and muscle. In order to better-understand the mechanism by which this protein assembles and isomerizes between closed- and open-channel conformations we measured changes in the diliganded gating equilibrium constant (E(2)) consequent to mutations of residues at the C-terminus of loop 9 (L9) in the α and ε subunits of mouse neuromuscular AChRs. These amino acids are close to two interesting interfaces, between the extracellular and transmembrane domain within a subunit (E–T interface) and between primary and complementary subunits (P–C interface). Most α subunit mutations modestly decreased E(2) (mainly by slowing the channel-opening rate constant) and sometimes produced AChRs that had heterogeneous gating kinetic properties. Mutations in the ε subunit had a larger effect and could either increase or decrease E(2), but did not induce kinetic heterogeneity. There are broad-but-weak energetic interactions between αL9 residues and others at the αE–T interface, as well as between the εL9 residue and others at the P–C interface (in particular, the M2–M3 linker). These interactions serve, in part, to maintain the structural integrity of the AChR assembly at the E–T interface. Overall, the energy changes of L9 residues are significant but smaller than in other regions of the protein.

Mapping heat exchange in an allosteric protein

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) are synaptic ion channels that spontaneously isomerize (i.e., gate) between resting and active conformations. We used single-molecule electrophysiology to measure the temperature dependencies of mouse neuromuscular AChR gating rate and equilibrium constants. From these we estimated free energy, enthalpy, and entropy changes caused by mutations of amino acids located between the transmitter binding sites and the middle of the membrane domain. The range of equilibrium enthalpy change (13.4 kcal/mol) was larger than for free energy change (5.5 kcal/mol at 25°C). For two residues, the slope of the rate-equilibrium free energy relationship (Φ) was approximately constant with temperature. Mutant cycle analysis showed that both free energies and enthalpies are additive for energetically independent mutations. We hypothesize that changes in energy associated with changes in structure mainly occur close to the site of the mutation, and, hence, that it is possible to make a residue-by-residue map of heat exchange in the AChR gating isomerization. The structural correlates of enthalpy changes are discussed for 12 different mutations in the protein.