Molecular Mechanism of Mot1, a TATA-binding Protein (TBP)-DNA Dissociating Enzyme

Generating a Peptide Library Using the Repeats of Amino Acid Scaffolds Created by Sliding the Framework of a 7-mer Human Chemerin Segment and Discovery of Potent Antibacterial and Antimycobacterial Peptides

The quest for new approaches for generating novel bioactive designer proteins/peptides has continued with their success in various biomedical applications. Previously, we designed a 14-mer α-helical peptide with antimicrobial and antimycobacterial activities by employing a tandem repeat of the 7-mer, "KVLGRLV" human chemerin segment. Herein, we devised a new method of "sliding framework" with this segment to create amino acid scaffolds of varying sizes and sequences and explored the design of a peptide library with antibacterial and antimycobacterial activities. By utilizing 2 to 7 repeats of these 2 to 6-residue scaffolds, we designed and synthesized 30 peptides of 10-16 residue lengths. Thus, we identified novel AMPs with α-helical, β-sheet, and random coil structures, membrane-destabilizing, and intracellular modes of action, and 9 of them showed therapeutic indices between 100 and 750. Three and two of these nine peptides showed in vivo antibacterial and antitubercular efficacies against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Mycobacterium bovis BCG infections, respectively, in a mouse model.

Structural basis for TBP displacement from TATA box DNA by the Swi2/Snf2 ATPase Mot1

The Swi2/Snf2 family transcription regulator Modifier of Transcription 1 (Mot1) uses adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to dissociate and reallocate the TATA box-binding protein (TBP) from and between promoters. To reveal how Mot1 removes TBP from TATA box DNA, we determined cryogenic electron microscopy structures that capture different states of the remodeling reaction. The resulting molecular video reveals how Mot1 dissociates TBP in a process that, intriguingly, does not require DNA groove tracking. Instead, the motor grips DNA in the presence of ATP and swings back after ATP hydrolysis, moving TBP to a thermodynamically less stable position on DNA. Dislodged TBP is trapped by a chaperone element that blocks TBP's DNA binding site. Our results show how Swi2/Snf2 proteins can remodel protein-DNA complexes through DNA bending without processive DNA tracking and reveal mechanistic similarities to RNA gripping DEAD box helicases and RIG-I-like immune sensors.

On the Role of TATA Boxes and TATA-Binding Protein in Arabidopsis thaliana

For transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II), all eukaryotes require assembly of basal transcription machinery on the core promoter, a region located approximately in the locus spanning a transcription start site (-50; +50 bp). Although Pol II is a complex multi-subunit enzyme conserved among all eukaryotes, it cannot initiate transcription without the participation of many other proteins. Transcription initiation on TATA-containing promoters requires the assembly of the preinitiation complex; this process is triggered by an interaction of TATA-binding protein (TBP, a component of the general transcription factor TFIID (transcription factor II D)) with a TATA box. The interaction of TBP with various TATA boxes in plants, in particular Arabidopsis thaliana, has hardly been investigated, except for a few early studies that addressed the role of a TATA box and substitutions in it in plant transcription systems. This is despite the fact that the interaction of TBP with TATA boxes and their variants can be used to regulate transcription. In this review, we examine the roles of some general transcription factors in the assembly of the basal transcription complex, as well as functions of TATA boxes of the model plant A. thaliana. We review examples showing not only the involvement of TATA boxes in the initiation of transcription machinery assembly but also their indirect participation in plant adaptation to environmental conditions in responses to light and other phenomena. Examples of an influence of the expression levels of A. thaliana TBP1 and TBP2 on morphological traits of the plants are also examined. We summarize available functional data on these two early players that trigger the assembly of transcription machinery. This information will deepen the understanding of the mechanisms underlying transcription by Pol II in plants and will help to utilize the functions of the interaction of TBP with TATA boxes in practice.

Role of the TATA-box binding protein (TBP) and associated family members in transcription regulation

The assembly of transcription complexes on eukaryotic promoters involves a series of steps, including chromatin remodeling, recruitment of TATA-binding protein (TBP)-containing complexes, the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, and additional basal transcription factors. This review describes the transcriptional regulation by TBP and its corresponding homologs that constitute the TBP family and their interactions with promoter DNA. The C-terminal core domain of TBP is highly conserved and contains two structural repeats that fold into a saddle-like structure, essential for the interaction with the TATA-box on DNA. Based on the TBP C-terminal core domain similarity, three TBP-related factors (TRFs) or TBP-like factors (TBPLs) have been discovered in metazoans, TRF1, TBPL1, and TBPL2. TBP is autoregulated, and once bound to DNA, repressors such as Mot1 induce TBP to dissociate, while other factors such as NC2 and the NOT complex convert the active TBP/DNA complex into inactive, negatively regulating TBP. TFIIA antagonizes the TBP repressors but may be effective only in conjunction with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme recruitment to the promoter by promoter-bound activators. TRF1 has been discovered inDrosophila melanogasterandAnophelesbut found absent in vertebrates and yeast. TBPL1 cannot bind to the TATA-box; instead, TBPL1 prefers binding to TATA-less promoters. However, TBPL1 shows a stronger association with TFIIA than TBP. The TCT core promoter element is present in most ribosomal protein genes inDrosophilaand humans, and TBPL1 is required for the transcription of these genes. TBP directly participates in the DNA repair mechanism, and TBPL1 mediates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. TBPL2 is closely related to its TBP paralog, showing 95% sequence similarity with the TBP core domain. Like TBP, TBPL2 also binds to the TATA-box and shows interactions with TFIIA, TFIIB, and other basal transcription factors. Despite these advances, much remains to be explored in this family of transcription factors.

Tandem Repeat of a Short Human Chemerin-Derived Peptide and Its Nontoxic d-Lysine-Containing Enantiomer Display Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial and Antitubercular Activities

To design novel antimicrobial peptides by utilizing the sequence of the human host defense protein, chemerin, a seven-residue amphipathic stretch located in the amino acid region, 109-115, was identified, which possesses the highest density of hydrophobic and positively charged residues. Although this 7-mer peptide was inactive toward microorganisms, its 14-mer tandem repeat (Chem-KVL) was highly active against different bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, a multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain, and slow- and fast-growing mycobacterial species. The selective enantiomeric substitutions of its two l-lysine residues were attempted to confer cell selectivity and proteolytic stability to Chem-KVL. Chem-8dK with a d-lysine replacement in its middle (eighth position) showed the lowest hemolytic activity against human red blood cells among Chem-KVL analogues and maintained high antimicrobial properties. Chem-8dK showed in vivo efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in BALB/c mice and inhibited the development of resistance in this microorganism up to 30 serial passages and growth of intracellular mycobacteria in THP-1 cells.

Conformational changes and catalytic inefficiency associated with Mot1-mediated TBP-DNA dissociation

The TATA-box Binding Protein (TBP) plays a central role in regulating gene expression and is the first step in the process of pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation on promoter DNA. The lifetime of TBP at the promoter site is controlled by several cofactors including the Modifier of transcription 1 (Mot1), an essential TBP-associated ATPase. Based on ensemble measurements, Mot1 can use adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis to displace TBP from DNA and various models for how this activity is coupled to transcriptional regulation have been proposed. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of Mot1 action is not well understood. In this work, the interaction of Mot1 with the DNA/TBP complex was investigated by single-pair Förster resonance energy transfer (spFRET). Upon Mot1 binding to the DNA/TBP complex, a transition in the DNA/TBP conformation was observed. Hydrolysis of ATP by Mot1 led to a conformational change but was not sufficient to efficiently disrupt the complex. SpFRET measurements of dual-labeled DNA suggest that Mot1's ATPase activity primes incorrectly oriented TBP for dissociation from DNA and additional Mot1 in solution is necessary for TBP unbinding. These findings provide a framework for understanding how the efficiency of Mot1's catalytic activity is tuned to establish a dynamic pool of TBP without interfering with stable and functional TBP-containing complexes.

Molecular mechanisms that distinguish TFIID housekeeping from regulatable SAGA promoters

An important distinction is frequently made between constitutively expressed housekeeping genes versus regulated genes. Although generally characterized by different DNA elements, chromatin architecture and cofactors, it is not known to what degree promoter classes strictly follow regulatability rules and which molecular mechanisms dictate such differences. We show that SAGA‐dominated/TATA‐box promoters are more responsive to changes in the amount of activator, even compared to TFIID/TATA‐like promoters that depend on the same activator Hsf1. Regulatability is therefore an inherent property of promoter class. Further analyses show that SAGA/TATA‐box promoters are more dynamic because TATA‐binding protein recruitment through SAGA is susceptible to removal by Mot1. In addition, the nucleosome configuration upon activator depletion shifts on SAGA/TATA‐box promoters and seems less amenable to preinitiation complex formation. The results explain the fundamental difference between housekeeping and regulatable genes, revealing an additional facet of combinatorial control: an activator can elicit a different response dependent on core promoter class.